Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

London Council has released a video showing a white man sexually abusing a black woman on public transport. It’s the same pattern we’ve seen before—crimes that, statistically, white British men are far less likely to commit are being deliberately misrepresented. Netflix’s Adolescence did the same when it turned a...

1,242,564 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Clara🐈🐈‍⬛🦕
Clara🐈🐈‍⬛🦕1 год назад

They must be doing it to wind people up now.

Фото профиля Daughters of Persia
Daughters of Persia1 год назад

22 women in Iran’s Evin Prison are being subjected to sexual abuse during brutal body searches. Their open letter exposes the horrors: humiliation, assault, and dehumanization. They risk torture for speaking out. How much longer will the world ignore their screams? @IranIntl_En

Фото профиля Sir Alf
Sir Alf1 год назад

white women are just as bad

Фото профиля ΑΩ
ΑΩ1 год назад

This is why non-whites should leave the UK. Whites are horrible, vile people. Life would be much better in one of the many African utopias.

Фото профиля Shayna
Shayna1 год назад

@PatrickChristys here's one for you.

Фото профиля Blue Snake
Blue Snake1 год назад

They will never show a black or aisian playing this kind of role.....never!

Фото профиля Cthulhu Loves You
Cthulhu Loves You1 год назад

If they won't represent us fairly, then they don't get to represent anyone. Reject governance. They are our employees.

Фото профиля I no longer consent…
I no longer consent…1 год назад

Just look at the adverts on TV - it’s 24/7 programming and social engineering - pushing their ‘message’ - the political elite see us as cattle (some even might say vermin)

Фото профиля Sande Freundlieb
Sande Freundlieb1 год назад

@jarrod30_dog The left land of opposites

Фото профиля Lorraine@Manche.
Lorraine@Manche.1 год назад

Quick call the squad..

Фото профиля Sarah Says
Sarah Says1 год назад

I'm pretty sure this was the opening scene of a David Tennant Netflix show, surprise surprise, he is the woke-ist idiot around

Похожие видео

I asked the Safeguarding Minister, Jess Phillips, if she'd considered the impact that mass migration has on the safety of women and girls. She said that there's no reliable data on this issue. But that isn't entirely true. There is indicative data, and it is damning. It's true that people from any country, or culture, can be violence towards women and girls, including sexually. It's also true that, regardless of a person's background, we should come down hard on those who commit violent or sexual abuse. However, we should also recognise that not every culture has the same attitudes towards women and girls. In some cultures, for example, it's seen as indecent for a woman to walk around without her hair covered. In most cultures, it’s normal for men and women to be segregated for some things (like getting changed); in some cultures, men and women are segregated for many more things. In some cultures, physical and sexual violence towards women is commonplace. When men from those cultures come to this country, those are the cultural assumptions they bring with them. This makes intuitive sense. Why would we expect people to suddenly adopt British norms, habits, and behaviours, immediately upon arriving here? Particularly when so many people in the British state are unwilling to recognise that different cultures have different norms in the first place? That's not to say that everybody from these cultures poses a threat to women and girls. And of course, some of those people may have wanted to come here to get away from those very cultural expectations. But what we often see is that, 'per capita' (or per person), people from certain nationalities are more likely to commit certain types of crime when they come to the UK. That's particularly true in the case of illegal migrants, who are disproportionately likely to be young men - the group most likely to commit violent or sexual crime. Back in October, Labour MPs voted to block the release of detailed migrant crime data, which would have given us the full picture about how likely different migrant groups are to commit certain crimes. Some nationalities might be more likely to commit crime than British nationals. Others might be less likely. But at least we'd have the data, which would allow us to have an informed debate about this. However, thanks to the hard work of campaigners and journalists, we have some indicative data about the rates at which different nationalities commit crime, including crime which disproportionately targets women and girls. For example, data obtained from the Ministry of Justice last year showed that two nationalities, Afghans and Eritreans, were more than 20 times as likely to be convicted of a sexual offence than British nationals. This data showed that Afghans had a conviction rate for sexual offences of 59 per 10,000 people, while Eritreans had a conviction rate of 53.6 per 10,000 people. British nationals, on the other hand, had a conviction rate of 2.66 per 10,000. People have since disputed those figures. They say that, since the population figures used to work out this data are taken from the 2021 Census, we're likely to be undercounting the number of Afghans and Eritreans in the country. But even if that's true, the rate of conviction for sexual offences would still be much higher amongst Afghans and Eritreans than amongst British nationals. If this indicative data is wrong, then the Government should publish the full figures. Their failure to do so is a choice. We can collect a person's nationality when they're arrested, when they stand trial, and when they go to prison. People deserve to know what impact mass migration is having on the safety of women and girls. We need to be able to tell the truth about the fact that not every culture treats women in the same way, and that when people arrive here, they often bring that cultural baggage with them.

Katie Lam

174,806 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Matt Walsh says that Minnesota woman Shiloh Hendrix being found guilty for using the N-word was about Democrats sending a message that “blasphemy against their favored racial groups and against the Democrats' open borders agenda will not be tolerated” This is exactly what they’re doing in the UK too…. Arresting people for racial slurs. It’s a globalist agenda Matt Walsh also says that there are lots of racial slurs. The people who should be arrested are the groups that hear one word and become so enraged they can’t control themselves “There are a lot of slurs of various kinds. Why would that one particular word be so likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction? Why is that? Is it because the offended group is statistically more likely to be violent in general? If that's the case, and it is, then the answer is not to throw the book at somebody saying the word, but rather to throw it at anybody responding violently to it” Free speech is legal. Acting violently to hearing free speech is not legal not should we accept it Here’s how much more likely a black person is to commit Homicide compared to other races - Black vs. White: 6.7 times higher - Black vs. Asian: 15 times higher Here’s how much more likely a black person is to commit violent crimes like aggravated assault, robbery, rape and sexual assault compared to other races - Black per-capita is roughly 3.5x the White rate - Black rate is roughly 12 times the Asian rate

Wall Street Apes

58,098 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

1% of the population is responsible for more than 60% of violent crime. And a disproportionate share of that 1% happens to come from marginalized or dispossessed groups. And because of this the logic some people seem to think well, we just shouldn’t enforce laws anymore. But the problem is, criminals usually victimize people around them. And the people they’re victimizing also tend to be disproportionately poor, disproportionately marginalized, disproportionately from deprived backgrounds too. Compared to Americans who earn more than $75,000 a year, the lowest-income Americans are 7 times more likely to be victims of aggravated assault, 7 times more likely to be victims of robbery, and 20 times more likely to be victims of sexual assault and homicide. Virtually every crime you can think of — the poor are the most likely to be victimized by it. And what gets lost is that poor people are much more likely to be victimized by crime than to be perpetrators of crime. But we focus so much of the attention on the perpetrators — and how they come from marginalized and deprived backgrounds — and we just don’t think nearly as much about the victims. What happens to them. What their lives look like afterward. And I think that’s a shame. I mean, if there’s a criminal who commits an act, we should spend more time thinking about how to help the victim than the perpetrator. From my conversation with Garry Tan

Rob Henderson

36,879 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад