Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Long before narratives were manufactured… before labels were assigned… before resistance was even given a name... there were women in south Lebanon. Lebanese women, in the early 1970s, speaking with unshaken voices about the horrors they witnessed under Israeli occupation. No scripts. No filters. No fear. Just truth. You...

Marwa__Osman's profile picture

Marwa Osman || مروة عثمان

76,835 subscribers

20,904 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ArtsNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Epic of Resistance 🎼 This is not just a symphony. This is what resistance sounds like. Composed by Majid Entezami, the Epic of Khorramshahr is not played… it is remembered. It carries the echo of the Battle of Khorramshahr during the Iran–Iraq War... when a city was shattered and occupied… then reclaimed by a people who refused to disappear. They believed fire would silence it. They believed steel would break it. They believed time would erase it. But they misunderstood something fundamental: You can destroy buildings… but not belief. You can occupy land… but not dignity. Listen. The violins do not mourn defeat— they rise like voices from beneath the dust. The drums are not war— they are the pulse of a nation that never stopped beating. The crescendo is not sound— it is return. Like Jerusalem… Khorramshahr fell— and then Khorramshahr rose — and so too will Jerusalem. And in its rising, a message was written into history: That oppression is loud… but resistance is eternal. Today, the same rhythm echoes— in every people who refuse humiliation, in every nation that stands when it is told to kneel, in every voice that says: enough. The oppressed the world over, do not hear this music as the past— but as a covenant. A promise carried across generations: That injustice exhausts itself. That arrogance overreaches. That truth, though tested, does not break. This is why the melody does not end. It advances— from rubble to resistance, from resistance to resurgence, from resurgence to victory. History has a pattern: Empires arrive with certainty. They leave with silence. But those who endure— write the final verse. And so the symphony continues… not as memory alone— but as prophecy. Victory is not a moment. It is a direction. And those who refuse to surrender are already moving toward it… They see victory—and joy and smiles— in Tehran and Gaza, in Beirut and Sana’a, in Baghdad and Jerusalem… in every city with a resisting soul and a tight fist... as candle by candle is rekindled, and as light by light is ignited across the world… until the darkness fades, until racism ends, and until supremacism dismantled.
2:52

The Epic of Resistance 🎼 This is not just a symphony. This is what resistance sounds like. Composed by Majid Entezami, the Epic of Khorramshahr is not played… it is remembered. It carries the echo of the Battle of Khorramshahr during the Iran–Iraq War... when a city was shattered and occupied… then reclaimed by a people who refused to disappear. They believed fire would silence it. They believed steel would break it. They believed time would erase it. But they misunderstood something fundamental: You can destroy buildings… but not belief. You can occupy land… but not dignity. Listen. The violins do not mourn defeat— they rise like voices from beneath the dust. The drums are not war— they are the pulse of a nation that never stopped beating. The crescendo is not sound— it is return. Like Jerusalem… Khorramshahr fell— and then Khorramshahr rose — and so too will Jerusalem. And in its rising, a message was written into history: That oppression is loud… but resistance is eternal. Today, the same rhythm echoes— in every people who refuse humiliation, in every nation that stands when it is told to kneel, in every voice that says: enough. The oppressed the world over, do not hear this music as the past— but as a covenant. A promise carried across generations: That injustice exhausts itself. That arrogance overreaches. That truth, though tested, does not break. This is why the melody does not end. It advances— from rubble to resistance, from resistance to resurgence, from resurgence to victory. History has a pattern: Empires arrive with certainty. They leave with silence. But those who endure— write the final verse. And so the symphony continues… not as memory alone— but as prophecy. Victory is not a moment. It is a direction. And those who refuse to surrender are already moving toward it… They see victory—and joy and smiles— in Tehran and Gaza, in Beirut and Sana’a, in Baghdad and Jerusalem… in every city with a resisting soul and a tight fist... as candle by candle is rekindled, and as light by light is ignited across the world… until the darkness fades, until racism ends, and until supremacism dismantled.

Sami Al-Arian

102,672 views • 4 months ago

#WATCH | Saharanpur, UP | On the visit of Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi to Darul Uloom Deoband, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Maulana Arshad Madani says, "We did not talk about that (ban on education for women in Afghanistan)... There is no difference in our religious teachings anywhere in the world, and we all preach that... Wherever there is a madrassa in the world, the same things are taught... What is happening with women in Afghanistan is wrong. Even in the press conference yesterday, it was just a coincidence that there were no women journalists present. They did not ask women not to come. This is propaganda."
1:01

#WATCH | Saharanpur, UP | On the visit of Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi to Darul Uloom Deoband, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Maulana Arshad Madani says, "We did not talk about that (ban on education for women in Afghanistan)... There is no difference in our religious teachings anywhere in the world, and we all preach that... Wherever there is a madrassa in the world, the same things are taught... What is happening with women in Afghanistan is wrong. Even in the press conference yesterday, it was just a coincidence that there were no women journalists present. They did not ask women not to come. This is propaganda."

ANI

337,897 views • 9 months ago

There is something people still fail to understand about Palestine. Not every battle is fought first on the battlefield. Some are fought inside the human being. Some are fought against fear, humiliation, and the belief that submission is inevitable. That is why so many people connect Palestine to Karbala. Not because the events are identical, but because they see in Karbala the refusal to accept that truth is measured by power, numbers, or immediate outcomes. Imam Husayn (AS), in Shia tradition, became a symbol of refusing legitimacy to what one believes is oppression even when the cost is immense. The lesson many take from that story is not seeking death — it is refusing to let fear decide what is true. When figures in Palestinian resistance publicly speak positively about Iranian support, many supporters interpret that through that same lens: not as sect, ethnicity, or geography, but as standing with those who they believe chose support over abandonment at moments they felt isolated. To them, the real victory begins before territory. It begins when a people stop believing that defeat is their natural condition. The most dangerous thing any occupier can lose is not land. It is control over the imagination of the people. Because once people stop accepting humiliation as destiny, history changes. Karbala, for those who invoke it, was never simply about who remained standing at the end of the day. It was about what survives after sacrifice: conviction, memory, and the refusal to normalize what one sees as injustice. That is why some say: first the mind is liberated, then the land follows.
0:37

There is something people still fail to understand about Palestine. Not every battle is fought first on the battlefield. Some are fought inside the human being. Some are fought against fear, humiliation, and the belief that submission is inevitable. That is why so many people connect Palestine to Karbala. Not because the events are identical, but because they see in Karbala the refusal to accept that truth is measured by power, numbers, or immediate outcomes. Imam Husayn (AS), in Shia tradition, became a symbol of refusing legitimacy to what one believes is oppression even when the cost is immense. The lesson many take from that story is not seeking death — it is refusing to let fear decide what is true. When figures in Palestinian resistance publicly speak positively about Iranian support, many supporters interpret that through that same lens: not as sect, ethnicity, or geography, but as standing with those who they believe chose support over abandonment at moments they felt isolated. To them, the real victory begins before territory. It begins when a people stop believing that defeat is their natural condition. The most dangerous thing any occupier can lose is not land. It is control over the imagination of the people. Because once people stop accepting humiliation as destiny, history changes. Karbala, for those who invoke it, was never simply about who remained standing at the end of the day. It was about what survives after sacrifice: conviction, memory, and the refusal to normalize what one sees as injustice. That is why some say: first the mind is liberated, then the land follows.

Shia Of Palestine

20,072 views • 1 month ago

Candace Owens spoke with the family of Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson’s boyfriend In the days before the assassination, there were so many unknown cars out front of the assassins house the people who lived in the neighborhood couldn’t find parking “There was some unusual traffic. A lot of cars that were seen outside leading up to the shooting in the days before the shooting or the week before the shooting.” “Leading up to the shooting, that there were unusual, unusual traffic in the driveway where Tyler Robinson and Lance lived. Cars that were not recognized in the neighborhood. This was not a couple that hosted people. It wasn't like they were expecting them to have parties. And so other people are saying that that is something that struck them as odd. But there were apparently lots of different license plates and it therefore caused a little neighborhood, you know, kerfuffle, because other people were not able to park their cars because there were so many people that were at this house” “We're hearing, there's more people involved.”
2:57

Candace Owens spoke with the family of Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson’s boyfriend In the days before the assassination, there were so many unknown cars out front of the assassins house the people who lived in the neighborhood couldn’t find parking “There was some unusual traffic. A lot of cars that were seen outside leading up to the shooting in the days before the shooting or the week before the shooting.” “Leading up to the shooting, that there were unusual, unusual traffic in the driveway where Tyler Robinson and Lance lived. Cars that were not recognized in the neighborhood. This was not a couple that hosted people. It wasn't like they were expecting them to have parties. And so other people are saying that that is something that struck them as odd. But there were apparently lots of different license plates and it therefore caused a little neighborhood, you know, kerfuffle, because other people were not able to park their cars because there were so many people that were at this house” “We're hearing, there's more people involved.”

Wall Street Apes

456,879 views • 10 months ago

Antonio Lobato was discussing how Carlos and James believe it will be hard for them as a team as the start of the season, the car is not where they want it and it will take them a lot of time to reverse the mistakes that were made until them they look like a 7th team “The car is not where Carlos wants it.. all the problems we already told you especially the excess of weight, additionally aerodynamically speaking is not what they hoped for..” “Carlos was telling us that it is too optimistic to position the Williams team in the group following the four top teams” “James Vowles said that possible they could be the 5th during one race but in others possible the 7th team depending on whether they nail their updates and their timing”
0:40

Antonio Lobato was discussing how Carlos and James believe it will be hard for them as a team as the start of the season, the car is not where they want it and it will take them a lot of time to reverse the mistakes that were made until them they look like a 7th team “The car is not where Carlos wants it.. all the problems we already told you especially the excess of weight, additionally aerodynamically speaking is not what they hoped for..” “Carlos was telling us that it is too optimistic to position the Williams team in the group following the four top teams” “James Vowles said that possible they could be the 5th during one race but in others possible the 7th team depending on whether they nail their updates and their timing”

ari 🦄✨

38,295 views • 5 months ago

"Beijing sees it as an attack because Shen Yun is saying: No. Take a look at it, because that's what China was before communism." "[The CCP] understands that the major threat to their regime is not economic. It is for what they used to call the hearts and minds of people. They see that as the sort of center of gravity under which their regime could be in trouble," says investigative journalist and author Peter Schweizer Watch UNBROKEN: The Untold Story of Shen Yun
0:30

"Beijing sees it as an attack because Shen Yun is saying: No. Take a look at it, because that's what China was before communism." "[The CCP] understands that the major threat to their regime is not economic. It is for what they used to call the hearts and minds of people. They see that as the sort of center of gravity under which their regime could be in trouble," says investigative journalist and author Peter Schweizer Watch UNBROKEN: The Untold Story of Shen Yun

The Epoch Times

11,092 views • 3 months ago

Do not ask the house who lived there The door is to tell the people they may leave How silent when I came to ask it A silence that blames those who betrayed it and left O knocker at the door, be gentle when you knock Maybe he is no longer in the trading house They dispersed and scattered across the paths of the earth As if there were no people and loved ones Have mercy, as there is no one in the house Do not expect a response, for the friendly people are gone And have mercy on the house, do not awaken its pain The house has a soul...just as people have souls
1:16

Do not ask the house who lived there The door is to tell the people they may leave How silent when I came to ask it A silence that blames those who betrayed it and left O knocker at the door, be gentle when you knock Maybe he is no longer in the trading house They dispersed and scattered across the paths of the earth As if there were no people and loved ones Have mercy, as there is no one in the house Do not expect a response, for the friendly people are gone And have mercy on the house, do not awaken its pain The house has a soul...just as people have souls

PALESTINE ONLINE 🇵🇸

14,136 views • 2 years ago

MS NOW’s Katy Tur at 304pm Eastern: “Has there been tension with the National Guard? I mean, NPR spoke with a number of National Guard members from Ohio on the condition of anonymity, and they talked to them just the other day, November 10, and they talked about the deployment to various cities, including D.C. One said, this is not what I signed up for. Three of them declined voluntary deployments, and they were deeply uncomfortable with what they were doing. Has it been tense with the National Guard around?” Tom Manger: “So, it has not been tense as far as the public and the National Guard, but I think it's it really is no secret that many of the national Guard's folks, National Guard folks, don't understand what the purpose of their being there is. I know that I'll have quick interactions with them when I see them occasionally. And, you know, they'll – they'll roll their eyes. They'll – you know, one of them said that he thought it was a waste of time. And so, I – and I think they – they understood at first when they were deployed there with all the other federal resources. But then so many of the federal resources have been pulled back out of D.C. and yet, the National Guard has stayed there. And they're staying at – at first, it was the touristy spots. You saw them down near the museums and the monuments along the mall, and then it seemed like they that they were deployed to many of the downtown subway metro stations. And so, I know that – I don't – I don't feel like there's tension with the public and the National Guard or with their presence. But I do think that that that many of them wonder why they're there, why they're there, what their purpose is and how long they're going to be there. Tur: “Their presence is also under question whether it's legal. Last week, a federal judge ruled the trump administration's deployment of the National Guard in D.C. was unlawful, arguing it lacks authority and is violating the District of Columbia's sovereign powers, under the Home Rule Act. The Trump administration is appealing that order. They filed their appeal, Ken, last night.”
2:27

MS NOW’s Katy Tur at 304pm Eastern: “Has there been tension with the National Guard? I mean, NPR spoke with a number of National Guard members from Ohio on the condition of anonymity, and they talked to them just the other day, November 10, and they talked about the deployment to various cities, including D.C. One said, this is not what I signed up for. Three of them declined voluntary deployments, and they were deeply uncomfortable with what they were doing. Has it been tense with the National Guard around?” Tom Manger: “So, it has not been tense as far as the public and the National Guard, but I think it's it really is no secret that many of the national Guard's folks, National Guard folks, don't understand what the purpose of their being there is. I know that I'll have quick interactions with them when I see them occasionally. And, you know, they'll – they'll roll their eyes. They'll – you know, one of them said that he thought it was a waste of time. And so, I – and I think they – they understood at first when they were deployed there with all the other federal resources. But then so many of the federal resources have been pulled back out of D.C. and yet, the National Guard has stayed there. And they're staying at – at first, it was the touristy spots. You saw them down near the museums and the monuments along the mall, and then it seemed like they that they were deployed to many of the downtown subway metro stations. And so, I know that – I don't – I don't feel like there's tension with the public and the National Guard or with their presence. But I do think that that that many of them wonder why they're there, why they're there, what their purpose is and how long they're going to be there. Tur: “Their presence is also under question whether it's legal. Last week, a federal judge ruled the trump administration's deployment of the National Guard in D.C. was unlawful, arguing it lacks authority and is violating the District of Columbia's sovereign powers, under the Home Rule Act. The Trump administration is appealing that order. They filed their appeal, Ken, last night.”

Curtis Houck

58,988 views • 7 months ago

🔴This is a long one. As Lebanese authorities are holding a new round of negotiations with the Israelis in Rome to discuss Israel’s occupation of southern Lebanon, the Israeli army continues to terrorize the area with drone strikes and bombings. Right before we started filming, there was a drone strike in front of us that injured two men. The Israeli army is not going anywhere. This occupation of South Lebanon has been planned for decades. Don’t let the ‘negotiations’ fool you.
2:57

🔴This is a long one. As Lebanese authorities are holding a new round of negotiations with the Israelis in Rome to discuss Israel’s occupation of southern Lebanon, the Israeli army continues to terrorize the area with drone strikes and bombings. Right before we started filming, there was a drone strike in front of us that injured two men. The Israeli army is not going anywhere. This occupation of South Lebanon has been planned for decades. Don’t let the ‘negotiations’ fool you.

courtneybonneauimages

73,811 views • 10 days ago

Optically, they stole the 2020 Election. They were unsuccessful. If they had been successful, we would not be here right now. They were allowed to proceed with certain guardrails in place to keep us out of WW3 and to not let the country fall past the point of no return. The people were too divided. The people were too brainwashed. There would have been a civil war. The four year pause was the only way. Biden was the red pill needed. Was it a show? A lot of it was, yes. Did it come with real life consequences? Yes, which is why I refuse to say it was all a show. It’s time for the difficult truths to be revealed, and people can accept it or reject it, but the truth is still the truth. In my opinion, the first difficult truth to learn is that Trump won the 2020 election, and the world will soon know.
0:37

Optically, they stole the 2020 Election. They were unsuccessful. If they had been successful, we would not be here right now. They were allowed to proceed with certain guardrails in place to keep us out of WW3 and to not let the country fall past the point of no return. The people were too divided. The people were too brainwashed. There would have been a civil war. The four year pause was the only way. Biden was the red pill needed. Was it a show? A lot of it was, yes. Did it come with real life consequences? Yes, which is why I refuse to say it was all a show. It’s time for the difficult truths to be revealed, and people can accept it or reject it, but the truth is still the truth. In my opinion, the first difficult truth to learn is that Trump won the 2020 election, and the world will soon know.

RealAF Patriot

29,747 views • 9 months ago

When Perisian women were given more freedom, liberty and every opportunity in Iran/Persia to do as they pleased, this is what the oldest generations did with it We didn't create porn. We made music among other things The abandonment of Islam will not ruin us.
0:38

When Perisian women were given more freedom, liberty and every opportunity in Iran/Persia to do as they pleased, this is what the oldest generations did with it We didn't create porn. We made music among other things The abandonment of Islam will not ruin us.

𝑅𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑎 ☀️

27,668 views • 1 year ago

Rwanda ... Is Not Choosing Sides in Congo. It Is Preventing Another Genocide. When people talk about the crisis between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, they often start from the map. Borders. Sovereignty. Diplomacy. Rwanda starts somewhere else. It starts from memory. Rwanda has been very clear about one thing: its security cannot be understood as beginning at its borders. Not because Rwanda seeks influence. But because history taught it … brutally … what happens when threats are allowed to grow just beyond them. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. This is not abstract history for Rwanda. It is lived experience. Between 1994 and 1999, genocidal forces operating from Congolese territory launched an insurgency aimed at finishing what they had started. Civilians were killed. Genocide survivors were targeted. Schools were attacked. Children were separated by ethnicity and murdered. This was not theoretical insecurity. It was existential. Today, many observers argue that the FDLR is weak … that its numbers have declined. But numbers are not the point anymore. The threat has evolved. What we are witnessing now is not the FDLR as a fugitive militia hiding in forests. It is the FDLR as a state-embedded actor. Through the Wazalendo framework, genocidal forces have gained access to weapons, logistics, intelligence, and political protection. They have positioned themselves as the ideological and operational core of a much larger armed ecosystem. This is a system-level threat. And that distinction matters. When Rwanda’s Ambassador in Washington explained this security reality before the U.S. Congress, some rushed to claim it was proof that Rwanda supports AFC/M23. That conclusion is wrong. Explaining a threat is not the same as endorsing a political movement. Security analysis is not political sponsorship. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congolese politics. It is not seeking to determine governance outcomes in the DRC. And it does not endorse armed groups as substitutes for inclusive governance. Its concern is singular: preventing the re-emergence of a genocidal cross-border insurgency. Reducing this to accusations of “backing rebels” may be convenient … but it avoids the real question: Why are genocidal forces being tolerated, protected, and integrated into state-sanctioned security structures in the first place? We have seen this movie before. In Sudan, militias empowered by the state turned into the Rapid Support Forces — and the country collapsed into civil war. In Ethiopia, reliance on irregular armed groups produced fragmentation and prolonged violence. In Libya, revolutionary militias destroyed the state they were meant to protect. The DRC is now walking the same path. But with one crucial difference: here, the ideological core of this mobilization is genocidal. And Rwanda knows what that means. Because Rwanda rebuilt itself while carrying open wounds, in its own flesh. While reconstructing its social fabric. While choosing reconciliation over revenge. And it did so largely alone. No one came in 1994. No one dismantled the genocidal networks afterward. No one protected Rwanda for the last thirty years. So today, no one can credibly tell Rwanda that it must outsource its survival. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congo. It is preventing another genocide. And until genocidal forces are dismantled … not explained away, not rebranded, not absorbed … Rwanda will continue to act on the lesson history imposed upon it: “Never again” is not a slogan. It is a responsibility.
5:10

Rwanda ... Is Not Choosing Sides in Congo. It Is Preventing Another Genocide. When people talk about the crisis between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, they often start from the map. Borders. Sovereignty. Diplomacy. Rwanda starts somewhere else. It starts from memory. Rwanda has been very clear about one thing: its security cannot be understood as beginning at its borders. Not because Rwanda seeks influence. But because history taught it … brutally … what happens when threats are allowed to grow just beyond them. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. This is not abstract history for Rwanda. It is lived experience. Between 1994 and 1999, genocidal forces operating from Congolese territory launched an insurgency aimed at finishing what they had started. Civilians were killed. Genocide survivors were targeted. Schools were attacked. Children were separated by ethnicity and murdered. This was not theoretical insecurity. It was existential. Today, many observers argue that the FDLR is weak … that its numbers have declined. But numbers are not the point anymore. The threat has evolved. What we are witnessing now is not the FDLR as a fugitive militia hiding in forests. It is the FDLR as a state-embedded actor. Through the Wazalendo framework, genocidal forces have gained access to weapons, logistics, intelligence, and political protection. They have positioned themselves as the ideological and operational core of a much larger armed ecosystem. This is a system-level threat. And that distinction matters. When Rwanda’s Ambassador in Washington explained this security reality before the U.S. Congress, some rushed to claim it was proof that Rwanda supports AFC/M23. That conclusion is wrong. Explaining a threat is not the same as endorsing a political movement. Security analysis is not political sponsorship. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congolese politics. It is not seeking to determine governance outcomes in the DRC. And it does not endorse armed groups as substitutes for inclusive governance. Its concern is singular: preventing the re-emergence of a genocidal cross-border insurgency. Reducing this to accusations of “backing rebels” may be convenient … but it avoids the real question: Why are genocidal forces being tolerated, protected, and integrated into state-sanctioned security structures in the first place? We have seen this movie before. In Sudan, militias empowered by the state turned into the Rapid Support Forces — and the country collapsed into civil war. In Ethiopia, reliance on irregular armed groups produced fragmentation and prolonged violence. In Libya, revolutionary militias destroyed the state they were meant to protect. The DRC is now walking the same path. But with one crucial difference: here, the ideological core of this mobilization is genocidal. And Rwanda knows what that means. Because Rwanda rebuilt itself while carrying open wounds, in its own flesh. While reconstructing its social fabric. While choosing reconciliation over revenge. And it did so largely alone. No one came in 1994. No one dismantled the genocidal networks afterward. No one protected Rwanda for the last thirty years. So today, no one can credibly tell Rwanda that it must outsource its survival. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congo. It is preventing another genocide. And until genocidal forces are dismantled … not explained away, not rebranded, not absorbed … Rwanda will continue to act on the lesson history imposed upon it: “Never again” is not a slogan. It is a responsibility.

Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼

15,193 views • 5 months ago

There is no way that Melania and Donald did not know what was happening with Maxwell and Epstein; it makes sense as to why Trump is losing it. The truth will come out; the victims of this deserve all the abusers' names to be told. #DemsUnited #EpsteinTrumpFiles
2:03

There is no way that Melania and Donald did not know what was happening with Maxwell and Epstein; it makes sense as to why Trump is losing it. The truth will come out; the victims of this deserve all the abusers' names to be told. #DemsUnited #EpsteinTrumpFiles

Rod (Izzy) Ⓜ️Ⓜ️ 🇺🇸🦅

205,964 views • 11 months ago

History is full of forgotten voices. Here is something about the colonial history. Did you know that thousands of Indian women called as ayahs were taken by British families during the colonial era? Not as guests. Not as equals. But as servants, to raise their children on long sea voyages to England. They fed them. Sang to them. Became second mothers. But once the ships docked in London, many of these Indian women were abandoned by these colonial officials. No return ticket, no support, no rights.
0:53

History is full of forgotten voices. Here is something about the colonial history. Did you know that thousands of Indian women called as ayahs were taken by British families during the colonial era? Not as guests. Not as equals. But as servants, to raise their children on long sea voyages to England. They fed them. Sang to them. Became second mothers. But once the ships docked in London, many of these Indian women were abandoned by these colonial officials. No return ticket, no support, no rights.

JIX5A

13,302 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Adam Smith on the double-tap strike: "There were two survivors on an overturned boat, and Senator Cotton's description of it is simply not accurate. When they were finally taken out, they weren't trying to flip the boat over. The boat was clearly incapacitated — a tiny portion of it remained capsized, the bow of the boat. They had no communications device, certainly they were unarmed. Any claim that the drugs somehow survived that attack is hard to really square with what we saw. So it was really disturbing. It did not appear that these two survivors were in any position to continue the fight."
1:11

Rep. Adam Smith on the double-tap strike: "There were two survivors on an overturned boat, and Senator Cotton's description of it is simply not accurate. When they were finally taken out, they weren't trying to flip the boat over. The boat was clearly incapacitated — a tiny portion of it remained capsized, the bow of the boat. They had no communications device, certainly they were unarmed. Any claim that the drugs somehow survived that attack is hard to really square with what we saw. So it was really disturbing. It did not appear that these two survivors were in any position to continue the fight."

The Bulwark

54,706 views • 7 months ago

Dr. Phil GOES OFF on the CDC: “You Damn Well Knew What You Were Doing When You Did It” “They knew that those schools were a lifeline to those kids ... and they shut it down anyway.” “You had information that these children were not as susceptible to this disease as everyone else was. You knew they were in a mental health crisis. You knew this was their lifeline, and you yanked it out from under them, and you damn well knew what you were doing when you did it.” It gets worse. The CDC knew schools staying open was essential for protecting children from their abusers at home. “They shut all of that down. And when they did, those [child abuse] referrals dropped 40% to 50% in some major markets. And these kids were sent home behind closed doors, locked up with the very abusers.” “And so, you ask questions about it, and they say, well, we did the best we could with what we knew at the time. No, you DID NOT do the best you could with what you knew at the time.”
2:57

Dr. Phil GOES OFF on the CDC: “You Damn Well Knew What You Were Doing When You Did It” “They knew that those schools were a lifeline to those kids ... and they shut it down anyway.” “You had information that these children were not as susceptible to this disease as everyone else was. You knew they were in a mental health crisis. You knew this was their lifeline, and you yanked it out from under them, and you damn well knew what you were doing when you did it.” It gets worse. The CDC knew schools staying open was essential for protecting children from their abusers at home. “They shut all of that down. And when they did, those [child abuse] referrals dropped 40% to 50% in some major markets. And these kids were sent home behind closed doors, locked up with the very abusers.” “And so, you ask questions about it, and they say, well, we did the best we could with what we knew at the time. No, you DID NOT do the best you could with what you knew at the time.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

951,675 views • 2 years ago

⚡️BREAKING Khaled Meshaal, head of Hamas’s external political bureau: Criminalizing the weapons of resistance and those who carried out resistance is an attempt by some to confine everything to “October 7,” cornering those involved and forcing them to pay a price. This is something we must not accept. The root of the conflict is occupation and a people resisting occupation. That people has the right to self-determination and independence. In that context, the question of resistance and its weapons becomes natural. The philosophy of resistance is simple: as long as there is occupation, there will be resistance. Resistance is a right of peoples under occupation. It is part of international law and the divine laws. It is part of the collective memory of nations, something nations take pride in. When you read any nation’s history, it begins with its major battles. This is how Palestinian behavior should be understood. October 7 is not the beginning of the crisis or the conflict. The striking paradox is the audacious call to disarm the Palestinian people defending themselves, while legitimizing the weapons of proxy militias such as Abu Shabab and others, intended to create chaos. Those promoting this believe the Palestinian people and resistance forces will accept it, which they will not. Palestinian history must be viewed as a whole. No phase of Palestinian resistance should be isolated from its broader context. Otherwise, we would treat the early revolution of martyr Izz al-Din al-Qassam in the late 1920s, who was martyred in 1935, as an aberration or a conspiracy, which is false. The same applies to Abd al-Qader al-Husseini at al-Qastal in 1948, the contemporary Palestinian revolution in 1965, the First Intifada, the Second Intifada, and beyond. Even Israel’s wars on Gaza are waged because it does not want any place with an infrastructure of resistance and a free will. In the West Bank, it fights mere Palestinian existence, let alone resistance. There are constants and variables: the constant is that as long as there is occupation, resistance remains. The variable is the form of resistance: revolution, intifada, armed resistance. Even “martyrdom operations” come in the context of responding to massacres, such as the Ibrahimi Mosque massacre on 25 February 1994, after which operations occurred in Afula, Hadera, and Dizengoff. By understanding the essence of the conflict, the question of resistance and its weapons can be answered clearly.
3:43

⚡️BREAKING Khaled Meshaal, head of Hamas’s external political bureau: Criminalizing the weapons of resistance and those who carried out resistance is an attempt by some to confine everything to “October 7,” cornering those involved and forcing them to pay a price. This is something we must not accept. The root of the conflict is occupation and a people resisting occupation. That people has the right to self-determination and independence. In that context, the question of resistance and its weapons becomes natural. The philosophy of resistance is simple: as long as there is occupation, there will be resistance. Resistance is a right of peoples under occupation. It is part of international law and the divine laws. It is part of the collective memory of nations, something nations take pride in. When you read any nation’s history, it begins with its major battles. This is how Palestinian behavior should be understood. October 7 is not the beginning of the crisis or the conflict. The striking paradox is the audacious call to disarm the Palestinian people defending themselves, while legitimizing the weapons of proxy militias such as Abu Shabab and others, intended to create chaos. Those promoting this believe the Palestinian people and resistance forces will accept it, which they will not. Palestinian history must be viewed as a whole. No phase of Palestinian resistance should be isolated from its broader context. Otherwise, we would treat the early revolution of martyr Izz al-Din al-Qassam in the late 1920s, who was martyred in 1935, as an aberration or a conspiracy, which is false. The same applies to Abd al-Qader al-Husseini at al-Qastal in 1948, the contemporary Palestinian revolution in 1965, the First Intifada, the Second Intifada, and beyond. Even Israel’s wars on Gaza are waged because it does not want any place with an infrastructure of resistance and a free will. In the West Bank, it fights mere Palestinian existence, let alone resistance. There are constants and variables: the constant is that as long as there is occupation, resistance remains. The variable is the form of resistance: revolution, intifada, armed resistance. Even “martyrdom operations” come in the context of responding to massacres, such as the Ibrahimi Mosque massacre on 25 February 1994, after which operations occurred in Afula, Hadera, and Dizengoff. By understanding the essence of the conflict, the question of resistance and its weapons can be answered clearly.

Warfare Analysis

21,320 views • 5 months ago

Tax has been there on medical insurance even before GST was introduced. There was already a Service Tax on medical insurance, before the GST was introduced. This is not a new tax, it was already there in all the states. Those protesting here, did they discuss regarding the removal of this tax in their states? Did they write to the Finance Ministers of their respective states about it and asked them to raise it in the GST Council where states have 2/3rd part? No, but they are protesting here. This is their double standards, this is their drama. - Smt Nirmala Sitharaman during her reply on #FinanceBill in #LokSabha. (1/n)
7:32

Tax has been there on medical insurance even before GST was introduced. There was already a Service Tax on medical insurance, before the GST was introduced. This is not a new tax, it was already there in all the states. Those protesting here, did they discuss regarding the removal of this tax in their states? Did they write to the Finance Ministers of their respective states about it and asked them to raise it in the GST Council where states have 2/3rd part? No, but they are protesting here. This is their double standards, this is their drama. - Smt Nirmala Sitharaman during her reply on #FinanceBill in #LokSabha. (1/n)

Nirmala Sitharaman Office

155,120 views • 1 year ago