Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Look at Jacob Rees-Mogg's face when Victoria Derbyshire asks, "How many failed former Conservative ministers are Reform UK going to accept?" "The number of asylum hotels peaked under Robert Jenrick as Immigration Minister" "Suella Braverman was sacked twice as home Secretary" "Nadine Dorries brought in the Online Safety Act...

515,774 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 REFORM UK’S MASK JUST SLIPPED Nigel Farage’s latest recruit is Nadhim Zahawi — the man who helped enforce one of the most coercive medical policies in modern British history. Let’s remember who Zahawi really is. As Vaccine Minister and later Chancellor, Zahawi was not a reluctant bystander. He was one of the architects of the Covid control regime. He didn’t just “roll out” vaccines. He pushed: • Vaccine passports • Exclusion from public life • Medical segregation • Coercion by restriction His own words in Parliament were chilling: “We reserve the right to mandate its use.” “As a condition of entry… people will need to show they are fully vaccinated.” That meant: No jab → no concerts No jab → no venues No jab → no participation in society That was not public health. That was state coercion. And now this same man is being welcomed into Reform UK — a party that claims to stand for freedom. Let’s be honest about what this means. Reform UK is not a clean break from the system. It is absorbing the very people who built the system. Zahawi enforced: • mRNA rollout • Vaccine passports • Mandated medical compliance David Bull praised mass vaccination. Richard Tice backed vaccine passports and travel restrictions. These are not rebels. These are the enforcers of the Covid regime. So when a journalist asked about mRNA, Zahawi and Farage didn’t answer — they attacked the question. Because the truth is politically radioactive. You cannot claim to fight medical authoritarianism while recruiting the men who imposed it. You cannot claim to be anti-establishment while filling your front bench with: • Failed Conservative ministers • Lockdown enforcers • Passport advocates • Corporate-state technocrats Reform UK is not a revolution. It is the same machine, painted a different colour. And if they would lie about this, what else will they lie about when they have power?

Jim Ferguson

77,317 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

COULD JENRICK’S LEAP TO REFORM UK REIGNITE LEASEHOLDER LIBERATION? 📢 Lots of talk at the Reform UK Robert Jenrick presser about an “inflexion point” for British politics. Wait for it … there’s a leasehold abolition angle. Before defecting yesterday, Robert Jenrick was one of a tiny handful of Conservative parliamentarians who publicly pressured the Rishi Sunak government to go further on freeing leaseholders. Writing in the Telegraph, he called leasehold a symbol of “rip-off Britain”, urged the abolition of forfeiture, a gangster-like device that forces leaseholders to comply with financial demands under threat of having their home seized without compensation over arrears as small as £350, and called for a sunset clause on leasehold. “Today, leasehold stands not as a curiously British anomaly, but as an affront to the distinctly British dream of owning a home and the peace of mind that comes with ownership, rather than the insecurity of renting … a symbol of rip-off Britain, where hidden bills lurk around every corner, and of the growth of crony capitalism, where rent-seekers milk consumers despite adding no value.” We also understand that when the general election was called, Jenrick was one of the very few Conservatives who pressed Number 10 to reverse course and rescue the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill in the wash-up after Sunak and his aides had dropped it. That became the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024, which now sits rusting under this The Labour Party government, despite a promise in the July 2024 King’s Speech to “act quickly” to bring its provisions into effect. Some leaseholders criticise his time in office, particularly for giving freeholders a financial windfall under the two-storey permitted development right. This move caused the cost of collective enfranchisement to soar for affected blocks. His handling of the post-Grenfell building safety crisis was also controversial, as it initially risked imposing loans on cladding victims. On the latter, Jenrick secured a £1 billion government fund for remediation in May 2020, agreed with the Treasury and Sunak, then chancellor, and later succeeded in increasing it to £5 billion in February 2021. As his former colleague Stephen Greenhalgh said in 2023, after leaving government: “We forget that Robert Jenrick actually got a lot of money out of the Treasury. He went back and, like Oliver Twist, got more.” Yesterday, Jenrick admitted he made mistakes in government and said, like much of the country, he has been on a journey, realising the uniparty has failed Britain. After leaving the Sunak administration for the backbenches, he recalled how, as Housing Secretary, he resisted pressure from the murky retirement property sector, which had tried to preserve the exemption from a ban on ground rents for new builds that his predecessor had allowed. He ultimately abolished the exemption. “Its lobbyists approached Members of Parliament and my Department and threatened judicial review of our proceedings,” he said. “I considered it an unfair practice, targeted at the most elderly and vulnerable in our society. Why not have a fairer and transparent system where an elderly person knows exactly what they are paying?” He was responsible for the ban on ground rents in new leases under the 2022 Act, which abolished the retirement property exemption and aimed to pave the way for reviving commonhold. In a January 2021 statement, Jenrick secured government commitments to abolish marriage value, advance enfranchisement reform, and revive commonhold, launching a Commonhold Council to prepare the market and consumers ahead of the second-generation tenure’s rollout. Beyond ending ground rents for new builds, in January 2021 Jenrick secured a commitment from Boris Johnson for a second legislative package to free leaseholders. But after he left the Housing Secretary role, the 2022 Queen’s Speech saw this second Bill shelved, reportedly under pressure from the Treasury, Johnson’s own aides, and lobbyists for Big Freehold. The plan was eventually delivered by the Sunak government with the 2024 Act, though it incorporated only a handful of the 2020 Law Commission recommendations that Jenrick had overseen. While Labour has been dragging its feet in power, the Conservative Party has failed to defend the 2024 Act or hold the government to account on a totemic pro-homeownership policy that will reduce the cost of living and expand the property-owning democracy. After the general election, Jenrick was probably the most vocal Conservative MP on leasehold, pressing on Lord Hermer’s strange ECHR legalism thwarting leaseholder liberation, even though he was not the housing spokesperson. Leaseholders have seen no leadership from Conservative Shadow Housing Secretary James Cleverly🇬🇧. On Monday, when Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook was under pressure, Cleverly’s colleague David Simmonds CBE, Conservative MP delivered a disastrous performance in Parliament, asking about local government reorganisation during the leasehold and commonhold debate. Pennycook couldn’t believe his luck. Jenrick is now joining Reform UK, a party that promised cheaper lease extensions and freehold purchase in its last election manifesto. Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧, Reform deputy leader and MP for Boston and Skegness, rightly attacked the Sunak administration for backing down on slashing money-for-nothing ground rents to peppercorn or zero financial value, as promised in the 2019 Conservative manifesto. Tice also personally pushed for this agenda to be included in the Reform manifesto after Nigel Farage MP succeeded him as leader. At a March 2021 press conference, when proposing a “polluter pays” approach to resolving the cladding scandal with a guarantee that financial liability would not fall on leaseholders, in contrast to the Tory policy at the time, Tice said: “With my three decades of experience, I know what some of those landlords are like, and very often they haven’t got the leaseholders’ interests at heart.” It will be interesting to see whether both men continue to push for leaseholder liberation. The 5.3 million households alienated by Labour’s foot-dragging and repeated excuses on ending leasehold are looking to the party at the top of the polls to challenge the government and provide support as we approach crucial local elections. The political economy around housing is changing fast. The New Right are becoming wary of the financialisation of a prime social need. As Donald J. Trump and JD Vance have observed: “People live in homes, not corporations.”

Free Leaseholders

12,317 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

BREAKING:🚨 REFORM’S VACCINE FRAUD IS NOW ON FULL DISPLAY What just happened with Nadhim Zahawi exposed something very ugly inside Reform UK. A journalist asked about the mRNA rollout — and instead of answering, Zahawi and Farage attacked the question itself. Why? Because the truth is politically radioactive. Let’s be clear about who these people are: Nadhim Zahawi He was the Conservative minister who ran the UK’s Covid vaccine deployment — one of the most aggressive mRNA campaigns in British history. Mandates. Coercion. Travel restrictions. Social pressure. All of it happened on his watch. Now he’s being welcomed into Reform as if nothing happened. Dr David Bull Reform’s chairman. He has repeatedly praised mass vaccination campaigns and defended the Covid programme. He aligned himself with establishment medicine, not critics of it. Now he is supposed to be the voice of “free speech” on health? Richard Tice Reform’s former leader. He openly supported the government’s vaccine programme. He supported vaccine passports. He backed the idea that people who refused the jab should lose freedoms like flying. That is not resistance. That is compliance. So when a journalist dares to ask whether Reform actually questions the mRNA rollout, Zahawi explodes and calls it “a stupid question”. Of course he does. Because Reform is trying to pretend it represents vaccine sceptics while filling its leadership with the very people who enforced the system. This isn’t unity. It’s deception. You cannot claim to oppose authoritarian health policy while recruiting the architects of it. And you cannot build a freedom movement by importing ex-Cabinet ministers who still defend the biggest medical experiment in modern British history. Reform UK is not a clean break from the system. It is the system, rebranded.

Jim Ferguson

314,365 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад