Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Looking at last year’s campus protests, where is the line between antisemitic speech—and legitimate expressions of support for one side of a war? Greg Lukianoff: FIRE defended many pro-Palestinian students/speakers when their speech rights were violated. At the same time, much of their behavior following October 7—from mob censorship...

ConvoswColeman's profile picture

Conversations with Coleman

4,292 subscribers

43,023 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

After Charlie Kirk’s murder at Utah Valley University, FIRE’s Greg Lukianoff went to the shocked campus with a powerful message for the UVU community and America: In the face of political violence, free speech is the only way forward.
23:21

After Charlie Kirk’s murder at Utah Valley University, FIRE’s Greg Lukianoff went to the shocked campus with a powerful message for the UVU community and America: In the face of political violence, free speech is the only way forward.

FIRE

13,619 views • 8 months ago

We cannot legitimize the weapons of censorship against freedom of speech. Whoever has power at the time will use them against their enemies. Different party, same playbook. 🎙️: Greg Lukianoff 📺: CBS
0:38

We cannot legitimize the weapons of censorship against freedom of speech. Whoever has power at the time will use them against their enemies. Different party, same playbook. 🎙️: Greg Lukianoff 📺: CBS

FIRE

22,933 views • 9 months ago

Tom Joscelyn: "They want to quell speech, which is a direct assault on free speech and a direct assault on our constitutional rights. And at the same time, they want to deflect from their own bad behavior and their own rhetoric."
1:16

Tom Joscelyn: "They want to quell speech, which is a direct assault on free speech and a direct assault on our constitutional rights. And at the same time, they want to deflect from their own bad behavior and their own rhetoric."

Home of the Brave

17,477 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk: We're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money. “It is important to have a global free speech platform where people from a wide range of opinions can voice their views. And in some cases, there were advertisers who were insisting on censorship. And at the end of the day, if there is censorship, if we have to make a choice between censorship and money, censorship and money or free speech and losing money, we're going to pick the second, we're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money, which is, I think, right moral decision.” Cannes Lions, June 19, 2024
0:40

Elon Musk: We're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money. “It is important to have a global free speech platform where people from a wide range of opinions can voice their views. And in some cases, there were advertisers who were insisting on censorship. And at the end of the day, if there is censorship, if we have to make a choice between censorship and money, censorship and money or free speech and losing money, we're going to pick the second, we're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money, which is, I think, right moral decision.” Cannes Lions, June 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

20,409 views • 10 months ago

The situation in Brazil is getting ugly, with X and Elon Musk fighting for the right of the people of Brazil to voice their free speech. The problem, though, is that the highest court in the land says that some of this free speech is not legal speech. Musk doesn't get enough credit for his free speech advocacy, but at the same time, he did say that X will obey the laws of the countries where people reside. So who should decide if speech is or is not in line with the laws of Brazil? Should it be Elon Musk and his lawyers or should it be the highest court in Brazil? Even if they are misinterpreting their own laws, who should decide that? What are your thoughts?
2:32

The situation in Brazil is getting ugly, with X and Elon Musk fighting for the right of the people of Brazil to voice their free speech. The problem, though, is that the highest court in the land says that some of this free speech is not legal speech. Musk doesn't get enough credit for his free speech advocacy, but at the same time, he did say that X will obey the laws of the countries where people reside. So who should decide if speech is or is not in line with the laws of Brazil? Should it be Elon Musk and his lawyers or should it be the highest court in Brazil? Even if they are misinterpreting their own laws, who should decide that? What are your thoughts?

Ed Krassenstein

277,685 views • 2 years ago

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”
1:14

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”

Autism Capital 🧩

1,777,466 views • 1 year ago

My speech at the UK's Free The Free Speech Union debate on Wednesday of last week: "The purpose of a system is what it does. The purpose of the UK's speech laws is to enforce woke political orthodoxy at gunpoint."
11:53

My speech at the UK's Free The Free Speech Union debate on Wednesday of last week: "The purpose of a system is what it does. The purpose of the UK's speech laws is to enforce woke political orthodoxy at gunpoint."

Preston Byrne

26,423 views • 1 year ago

TAKE ACTION: Free speech doesn’t take sides. Neither does FIRE. From pro-ICE speech under review at University of Illinois, to anti-ICE speech investigated at Penn State, students’ political expression is under threat. If it’s protected, we’ll defend it. Now, we need your help.
1:12

TAKE ACTION: Free speech doesn’t take sides. Neither does FIRE. From pro-ICE speech under review at University of Illinois, to anti-ICE speech investigated at Penn State, students’ political expression is under threat. If it’s protected, we’ll defend it. Now, we need your help.

FIRE

21,175 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed
1:03

Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed

X Freeze

13,604,462 views • 5 months ago

🧵 Speech inciting imminent violence is ILLEGAL in our country and NOT protected under the 1st Amd. This DOJ supports free speech, and will prosecute violence. Those who are losing their jobs due to their hateful rhetoric…may not have been suitable for their jobs, and their choices have consequences.
2:43

🧵 Speech inciting imminent violence is ILLEGAL in our country and NOT protected under the 1st Amd. This DOJ supports free speech, and will prosecute violence. Those who are losing their jobs due to their hateful rhetoric…may not have been suitable for their jobs, and their choices have consequences.

AAGHarmeetDhillon

112,613 views • 9 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The self-proclaimed champion of "free speech" just called for Rachel Maddow and Nicolle Wallace to be fired—for using their free speech about the Cancer survivor at his Speech. These aren't the words of a president. They're the words of a dictator. And let’s not forget—this is the same guy slashing funding for cancer research.
0:43

🚨 BREAKING: The self-proclaimed champion of "free speech" just called for Rachel Maddow and Nicolle Wallace to be fired—for using their free speech about the Cancer survivor at his Speech. These aren't the words of a president. They're the words of a dictator. And let’s not forget—this is the same guy slashing funding for cancer research.

Brian Krassenstein

1,521,720 views • 1 year ago

“Free speech belongs to everyone or it belongs to no one” - Greg Lukianoff Watch his full TED Talk on the importance of free speech — and how protecting it benefits everyone:
2:25

“Free speech belongs to everyone or it belongs to no one” - Greg Lukianoff Watch his full TED Talk on the importance of free speech — and how protecting it benefits everyone:

TED Talks

36,534 views • 11 months ago

ELON: BY PUSHING FOR CENSORSHIP, THE LEFT SHOWS IT’S AGAINST FREEDOM “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, Mussolinis of the world. They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That's one of the signs that they are the bad guys. In fact, restrictions on speech and large government are fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom. And freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society. Because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments, they should not win because they suppress [other ideas].” Source: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 2025
1:07

ELON: BY PUSHING FOR CENSORSHIP, THE LEFT SHOWS IT’S AGAINST FREEDOM “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, Mussolinis of the world. They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That's one of the signs that they are the bad guys. In fact, restrictions on speech and large government are fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom. And freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society. Because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments, they should not win because they suppress [other ideas].” Source: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 2025

Mario Nawfal

84,655 views • 9 months ago

"The US constitution is under heavy attack from Tel Aviv as the Israel First lobby tries to restrict, limit, and redefine the rights of ordinary Americans. First, Israel went after the free speech rights of US citizens. When the Federal courts stood in the way, they went after the free speech rights of naturalised citizens. When they failed, they went after the free speech rights of students, and then the rights of visitors." ------- Full interview with Breaking Points can be found here:
1:45

"The US constitution is under heavy attack from Tel Aviv as the Israel First lobby tries to restrict, limit, and redefine the rights of ordinary Americans. First, Israel went after the free speech rights of US citizens. When the Federal courts stood in the way, they went after the free speech rights of naturalised citizens. When they failed, they went after the free speech rights of students, and then the rights of visitors." ------- Full interview with Breaking Points can be found here:

Sami Hamdi سامي الهاشمي الحامدي

17,500 views • 7 months ago

The Trump administration is not only targeting students on visas who criticize Israel, it is eroding the free speech rights of American students and academics across the country. Glenn Greenwald on the escalating censorship crisis at U.S. universities:
6:32

The Trump administration is not only targeting students on visas who criticize Israel, it is eroding the free speech rights of American students and academics across the country. Glenn Greenwald on the escalating censorship crisis at U.S. universities:

System Update

38,723 views • 1 year ago

Free speech is not for the speech you like or for the people you like. Free speech is for the speech that you hate of the people you despise. If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution. Full Video:
1:16

Free speech is not for the speech you like or for the people you like. Free speech is for the speech that you hate of the people you despise. If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution. Full Video:

Jimmy Dore

69,678 views • 1 year ago

Bash: "Do you believe in free speech?" Sen. Markwayne Mullin: "Absolutely I believe in free speech...There's a thin line between free speech and when it crosses a line and causes violence. When you start calling someone 'fascist'...there is a problem."
0:44

Bash: "Do you believe in free speech?" Sen. Markwayne Mullin: "Absolutely I believe in free speech...There's a thin line between free speech and when it crosses a line and causes violence. When you start calling someone 'fascist'...there is a problem."

The Bulwark

1,006,462 views • 9 months ago

Valentina Gomez: ‘We Will Not Be Silenced’ | UTK Freedom of Speech Rally Valentina Gomez delivers a powerful message at the UTK Freedom of Speech Rally — calling out censorship, political hypocrisy, and the growing fear of speaking the truth in modern Britain. Her speech lit a fire under the free speech movement. Watch it in full now.
4:15

Valentina Gomez: ‘We Will Not Be Silenced’ | UTK Freedom of Speech Rally Valentina Gomez delivers a powerful message at the UTK Freedom of Speech Rally — calling out censorship, political hypocrisy, and the growing fear of speaking the truth in modern Britain. Her speech lit a fire under the free speech movement. Watch it in full now.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

103,797 views • 9 months ago

“What’s so bad about the UK?” “People get arrested for speech!” My interview with Greg Lukianoff from this week’s episode of Free Speech Nation…
8:14

“What’s so bad about the UK?” “People get arrested for speech!” My interview with Greg Lukianoff from this week’s episode of Free Speech Nation…

Andrew Doyle

13,220 views • 1 year ago