Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Looking at last year’s campus protests, where is the line between antisemitic speech—and legitimate expressions of support for one side of a war? Greg Lukianoff: FIRE defended many pro-Palestinian students/speakers when their speech rights were violated. At the same time, much of their behavior following October 7—from mob censorship... show more

Conversations with Coleman

4,292 subscribers

43,023 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

After Charlie Kirk’s murder at Utah Valley University, FIRE’s Greg Lukianoff went to the shocked campus with a powerful message for the UVU community and America: In the face of political violence, free speech is the only way forward.

After Charlie Kirk’s murder at Utah Valley University, FIRE’s Greg Lukianoff went to the shocked campus with a powerful message for the UVU community and America: In the face of political violence, free speech is the only way forward.

FIRE

13,619 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Tom Joscelyn: "They want to quell speech, which is a direct assault on free speech and a direct assault on our constitutional rights. And at the same time, they want to deflect from their own bad behavior and their own rhetoric."

Tom Joscelyn: "They want to quell speech, which is a direct assault on free speech and a direct assault on our constitutional rights. And at the same time, they want to deflect from their own bad behavior and their own rhetoric."

Home of the Brave

17,477 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk: We're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money. “It is important to have a global free speech platform where people from a wide range of opinions can voice their views. And in some cases, there were advertisers who were insisting on censorship. And at the end of the day, if there is censorship, if we have to make a choice between censorship and money, censorship and money or free speech and losing money, we're going to pick the second, we're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money, which is, I think, right moral decision.” Cannes Lions, June 19, 2024

Elon Musk: We're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money. “It is important to have a global free speech platform where people from a wide range of opinions can voice their views. And in some cases, there were advertisers who were insisting on censorship. And at the end of the day, if there is censorship, if we have to make a choice between censorship and money, censorship and money or free speech and losing money, we're going to pick the second, we're going to support free speech rather than agree to be censored for money, which is, I think, right moral decision.” Cannes Lions, June 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

20,409 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The situation in Brazil is getting ugly, with X and Elon Musk fighting for the right of the people of Brazil to voice their free speech. The problem, though, is that the highest court in the land says that some of this free speech is not legal speech. Musk doesn't get enough credit for his free speech advocacy, but at the same time, he did say that X will obey the laws of the countries where people reside. So who should decide if speech is or is not in line with the laws of Brazil? Should it be Elon Musk and his lawyers or should it be the highest court in Brazil? Even if they are misinterpreting their own laws, who should decide that? What are your thoughts?

The situation in Brazil is getting ugly, with X and Elon Musk fighting for the right of the people of Brazil to voice their free speech. The problem, though, is that the highest court in the land says that some of this free speech is not legal speech. Musk doesn't get enough credit for his free speech advocacy, but at the same time, he did say that X will obey the laws of the countries where people reside. So who should decide if speech is or is not in line with the laws of Brazil? Should it be Elon Musk and his lawyers or should it be the highest court in Brazil? Even if they are misinterpreting their own laws, who should decide that? What are your thoughts?

Ed Krassenstein

277,690 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”

🚨 ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech (the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world) had very strong censorship on freedom of speech. That’s one of the signs that they are the bad guys. Restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist. Ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it clear that the left is the side that is against freedom; and freedom of speech is one of the many freedoms we should have as a civil society. Idea should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.”

Autism Capital 🧩

1,777,489 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed

Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed

X Freeze

13,607,602 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: The self-proclaimed champion of "free speech" just called for Rachel Maddow and Nicolle Wallace to be fired—for using their free speech about the Cancer survivor at his Speech. These aren't the words of a president. They're the words of a dictator. And let’s not forget—this is the same guy slashing funding for cancer research.

🚨 BREAKING: The self-proclaimed champion of "free speech" just called for Rachel Maddow and Nicolle Wallace to be fired—for using their free speech about the Cancer survivor at his Speech. These aren't the words of a president. They're the words of a dictator. And let’s not forget—this is the same guy slashing funding for cancer research.

Brian Krassenstein

1,521,833 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON: BY PUSHING FOR CENSORSHIP, THE LEFT SHOWS IT’S AGAINST FREEDOM “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, Mussolinis of the world. They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That's one of the signs that they are the bad guys. In fact, restrictions on speech and large government are fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom. And freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society. Because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments, they should not win because they suppress [other ideas].” Source: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 2025

ELON: BY PUSHING FOR CENSORSHIP, THE LEFT SHOWS IT’S AGAINST FREEDOM “You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, Mussolinis of the world. They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That's one of the signs that they are the bad guys. In fact, restrictions on speech and large government are fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom. And freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society. Because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments, they should not win because they suppress [other ideas].” Source: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 2025

Mario Nawfal

84,655 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

"The US constitution is under heavy attack from Tel Aviv as the Israel First lobby tries to restrict, limit, and redefine the rights of ordinary Americans. First, Israel went after the free speech rights of US citizens. When the Federal courts stood in the way, they went after the free speech rights of naturalised citizens. When they failed, they went after the free speech rights of students, and then the rights of visitors." ------- Full interview with Breaking Points can be found here:

"The US constitution is under heavy attack from Tel Aviv as the Israel First lobby tries to restrict, limit, and redefine the rights of ordinary Americans. First, Israel went after the free speech rights of US citizens. When the Federal courts stood in the way, they went after the free speech rights of naturalised citizens. When they failed, they went after the free speech rights of students, and then the rights of visitors." ------- Full interview with Breaking Points can be found here:

Sami Hamdi سامي الهاشمي الحامدي

17,500 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A rare victory for free speech on campus. The university of Maryland tried to shut down the students’ Gaza vigil. They sued. They won. $100,000. And the best part? They’re using the money to keep organizing for a free Palestine. A federal court ruled: “From the river to the sea” is protected speech. You cannot silence Palestine solidarity! Not now. Not ever.

A rare victory for free speech on campus. The university of Maryland tried to shut down the students’ Gaza vigil. They sued. They won. $100,000. And the best part? They’re using the money to keep organizing for a free Palestine. A federal court ruled: “From the river to the sea” is protected speech. You cannot silence Palestine solidarity! Not now. Not ever.

Medea Benjamin

29,403 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Parents & Students are upset about what took place between a student & representatives at Arkansas State University One student wrote I just got off the phone with the Chancellor’s office at Arkansas State University regarding what’s been happening on campus. It is extremely disappointing and unacceptable that representatives from Turning Point USA are reportedly on campus making derogatory and racist remarks toward Black individuals—using terms like “ghetto,” “dusty,” and “ashy.” That kind of language is harmful, disrespectful, and creates a hostile environment for students. Yes, A-State is a public university, and I understand that under the First Amendment, even offensive speech can be protected. Court rulings like Brandenburg v. Ohio make it clear that speech is protected unless it incites imminent violence or is a direct threat. But let’s be clear just because something is legally protected does NOT make it right. Universities still have a responsibility to ensure their students feel safe, respected, and supported. Speech that targets and degrades people based on race can contribute to a hostile and discriminatory environment, and that should never be ignored. This is bigger than “free speech.” This is about dignity. This is about respect. This is about protecting ALL students. I am calling on Arkansas State University to take this seriously, review the situation, enforce their policies, and stand firm in their commitment to an inclusive campus. We can uphold free speech AND hold people accountable for harmful behavior at the same time. NAACP NAACP highlight #lrhn

Parents & Students are upset about what took place between a student & representatives at Arkansas State University One student wrote I just got off the phone with the Chancellor’s office at Arkansas State University regarding what’s been happening on campus. It is extremely disappointing and unacceptable that representatives from Turning Point USA are reportedly on campus making derogatory and racist remarks toward Black individuals—using terms like “ghetto,” “dusty,” and “ashy.” That kind of language is harmful, disrespectful, and creates a hostile environment for students. Yes, A-State is a public university, and I understand that under the First Amendment, even offensive speech can be protected. Court rulings like Brandenburg v. Ohio make it clear that speech is protected unless it incites imminent violence or is a direct threat. But let’s be clear just because something is legally protected does NOT make it right. Universities still have a responsibility to ensure their students feel safe, respected, and supported. Speech that targets and degrades people based on race can contribute to a hostile and discriminatory environment, and that should never be ignored. This is bigger than “free speech.” This is about dignity. This is about respect. This is about protecting ALL students. I am calling on Arkansas State University to take this seriously, review the situation, enforce their policies, and stand firm in their commitment to an inclusive campus. We can uphold free speech AND hold people accountable for harmful behavior at the same time. NAACP NAACP highlight #lrhn

LRHN cash

11,793 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Days ago at a Sydney Invasion Day rally, one speaker asked for more hate speech laws to address anti-black racism. This is the problem with giving certain groups of people their own specific laws—every group then wants their own. The best thing is to allow free speech for all.

Days ago at a Sydney Invasion Day rally, one speaker asked for more hate speech laws to address anti-black racism. This is the problem with giving certain groups of people their own specific laws—every group then wants their own. The best thing is to allow free speech for all.

Kobie Thatcher

12,078 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

New episode: Pam Bondi says hate speech is not free speech — is she right? FIRE staff (Nico Perrino, Sarah McLaughlin, & Aaron Terr) also take your questions on Charlie Kirk's assassination, President Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times, cancel culture, and more. 00:00 Intro 01:42 Attorney General Pam Bondi's comments that "hate speech" is distinct from "free speech" 02:23 Is it OK for the Department of Justice to target people for "hate speech"? 05:42 How have “hate speech” laws played out overseas? 07:19 President Trump's response to Pam Bondi's “hate speech” remarks 08:50 Are “fighting words,” “incitement,” and “true threats” free speech? 11:22 What about doxxing? 15:15 Is it free speech to celebrate or condone the assassination of Charlie Kirk? 21:52 The termination of k-12 and university faculty in response to their commentary on Kirk's assassination 28:40 Is there a law that might implicate the Discord users who had reason to be aware of malicious intentions the shooter had towards Kirk ahead of the assassination? 30:05 The agency of speakers and those hearing their speech under the incitement standard 31:14 What are the differences between the free speech rights of citizens and non-citizens? 36:20 Does a court filing by President Trump as an individual in the New York Times lawsuit open him up to being deposed about a wide range of behaviors and actions? 37:40 What is the Trump's administration's legal strategy with the New York Times lawsuit? 39:24 What is FIRE doing about private employees being fired for their political commentary? 46:50 What is Charlie Kirk's legacy on free speech? 50:04 What is the difference between the academic protections enjoyed by tenured and non-tenured faculty members? 52:05 Does FIRE trust the Supreme Court to protect free speech? 56:12 How can we prevent capitulation from The New York Times? 59:20 How can ordinary people safely express their opinions on social media and promote civil discourse?

New episode: Pam Bondi says hate speech is not free speech — is she right? FIRE staff (Nico Perrino, Sarah McLaughlin, & Aaron Terr) also take your questions on Charlie Kirk's assassination, President Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times, cancel culture, and more. 00:00 Intro 01:42 Attorney General Pam Bondi's comments that "hate speech" is distinct from "free speech" 02:23 Is it OK for the Department of Justice to target people for "hate speech"? 05:42 How have “hate speech” laws played out overseas? 07:19 President Trump's response to Pam Bondi's “hate speech” remarks 08:50 Are “fighting words,” “incitement,” and “true threats” free speech? 11:22 What about doxxing? 15:15 Is it free speech to celebrate or condone the assassination of Charlie Kirk? 21:52 The termination of k-12 and university faculty in response to their commentary on Kirk's assassination 28:40 Is there a law that might implicate the Discord users who had reason to be aware of malicious intentions the shooter had towards Kirk ahead of the assassination? 30:05 The agency of speakers and those hearing their speech under the incitement standard 31:14 What are the differences between the free speech rights of citizens and non-citizens? 36:20 Does a court filing by President Trump as an individual in the New York Times lawsuit open him up to being deposed about a wide range of behaviors and actions? 37:40 What is the Trump's administration's legal strategy with the New York Times lawsuit? 39:24 What is FIRE doing about private employees being fired for their political commentary? 46:50 What is Charlie Kirk's legacy on free speech? 50:04 What is the difference between the academic protections enjoyed by tenured and non-tenured faculty members? 52:05 Does FIRE trust the Supreme Court to protect free speech? 56:12 How can we prevent capitulation from The New York Times? 59:20 How can ordinary people safely express their opinions on social media and promote civil discourse?

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

31,314 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Praffulgarg

11,269 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Laurence Fox: Defending Freedom of Speech Against Censorship At the Unite The Kingdom Freedom of Speech rally, Laurence Fox delivered a passionate speech on the state of free expression in Britain. He exposed the dangers of political censorship, cancel culture, and media manipulation, while calling on the people to reclaim their right to speak the truth without fear. This powerful address reminds us why freedom of speech is the foundation of every other liberty — and why it must be defended at all costs. Please sign up to the website to register your interest and keep up to date with UTK news and events organising.

Laurence Fox: Defending Freedom of Speech Against Censorship At the Unite The Kingdom Freedom of Speech rally, Laurence Fox delivered a passionate speech on the state of free expression in Britain. He exposed the dangers of political censorship, cancel culture, and media manipulation, while calling on the people to reclaim their right to speak the truth without fear. This powerful address reminds us why freedom of speech is the foundation of every other liberty — and why it must be defended at all costs. Please sign up to the website to register your interest and keep up to date with UTK news and events organising.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

83,851 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 CARNEY THREATENS U.S. FREE SPEECH 🚨 Canada’s new PM Mark Carney just declared war on American social media platforms for having “too much free speech.” 🛑 He wants U.S.-based platforms regulated from Ottawa. 🗣️ Censorship isn’t enough — he wants control. 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Canadian speech laws may soon be forced onto American platforms ⚠️ Carney’s globalist playbook mirrors the UK’s & Germany’s censorship schemes ⚠️ Free speech under direct international assault 🔥 Trump & JD Vance already pushed back hard against Europe’s censorship laws. 💥 Will they now take on Carney’s Canada? 🚨 FREE SPEECH IS THE RED LINE. AND CARNEY JUST CROSSED IT. 🚨

🚨 CARNEY THREATENS U.S. FREE SPEECH 🚨 Canada’s new PM Mark Carney just declared war on American social media platforms for having “too much free speech.” 🛑 He wants U.S.-based platforms regulated from Ottawa. 🗣️ Censorship isn’t enough — he wants control. 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Canadian speech laws may soon be forced onto American platforms ⚠️ Carney’s globalist playbook mirrors the UK’s & Germany’s censorship schemes ⚠️ Free speech under direct international assault 🔥 Trump & JD Vance already pushed back hard against Europe’s censorship laws. 💥 Will they now take on Carney’s Canada? 🚨 FREE SPEECH IS THE RED LINE. AND CARNEY JUST CROSSED IT. 🚨

Jim Ferguson

108,718 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side & which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech, had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That's one of the signs that they are the bad guys. It makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom. Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society. Because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments, they should not win because they are suppressed."

ELON MUSK: “You can tell which side is the good side & which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech, had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That's one of the signs that they are the bad guys. It makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom. Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society. Because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments, they should not win because they are suppressed."

DogeDesigner

1,868,403 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Donald Trump and Republicans are going after free speech and the First Amendment — one of the most fundamental rights we have as Americans. This is authoritarianism, and we must fight it at every turn. Free speech is not up for debate.

Donald Trump and Republicans are going after free speech and the First Amendment — one of the most fundamental rights we have as Americans. This is authoritarianism, and we must fight it at every turn. Free speech is not up for debate.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

25,995 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten