正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Losses in forex is inevitable Basically what happens is that when a trader loses money in the Forex market, the money does not go to any particular person or entity. Instead, the money is considered a loss and disappears from the trader's account. When a trader loses money, the...

25,437 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

JiGi Forex💙 的头像
JiGi Forex💙1 年前

The lion has spoken🥶💙

Elite Trader Funding 的头像
Elite Trader Funding1 年前

Introducing the premier futures prop firm trusted by over 30,000 traders worldwide Our goal is simple: to help you become a consistently profitable trader. With over $8 million paid out to traders since inception, there's no better place start trading futures.

Josephmhata 💙❤️ 的头像
Josephmhata 💙❤️1 年前

If you're a Nigerian and you're not from rich homes you working hard earning pennies then deposit I believe that alone should teach u the need to b conservative 👌 I'm in DD, sometimes it comes to my head to let it go buh if I remembered how I suffer gather d money Omo🙈

Dios 🖤 的头像
Dios 🖤1 年前

So many information inside one post 🤗🌹💜

Õsilàmà Pàul💹💵💼 的头像
Õsilàmà Pàul💹💵💼1 年前

GM GM FxLion.💪💪

Banks ♞ 的头像
Banks ♞1 年前

Congratulations my chief 💪🏾🦅

GT.FX 的头像
GT.FX1 年前

The car also ROOOOAAAAARRRRRRR!!

Big Kala 的头像
Big Kala1 年前

Motivation on motivation. Thank you Sir 🙏🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶

Currency-TM 的头像
Currency-TM1 年前

Gm king

Crypto wealth 的头像
Crypto wealth1 年前

Well said make I write ✍🏿 this one down

Osho harcthur 的头像
Osho harcthur1 年前

Thanks for this... you realy give me secret advice...

相关视频

Most people think you need big money to start trading. You don’t‼️ What you actually need is skill, discipline, and patience. Starting small in trading is not a disadvantage. It’s actually one of the best things that can happen to a trader. Because when the account is small, the focus shifts away from chasing money and moves toward learning the game properly. You learn risk management. You learn patience. You learn that one clean setup is better than ten emotional trades. A lot of traders blow accounts because they try to skip the process. They want the big payouts immediately. They want the fast life before building the foundation. But the market has a way of humbling anyone who moves too fast. The traders who win long term are the ones who focus on percentages, not account size. Because if you can grow $100 consistently, you can grow $10,000. If you can manage risk on 0.01 lots, you can manage risk on 10 lots. The skill doesn’t change. Only the scale does. This is why smart traders build their edge first. Once the consistency is there, capital becomes easier to access, - whether through prop firms, reinvestment, or scaling up accounts. Trading is not about one lucky trade. It’s about building a system that works over and over again. So if you’re starting small, don’t rush it. Master the process. Protect your capital. Stay disciplined. Because in trading, small beginnings with consistency will always beat big accounts with no discipline.

Techriz💯📈

83,326 次观看 • 5 个月前

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.

Tykoo

25,535 次观看 • 8 个月前