Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Lots of controversy after my post about explicit, systematic instruction! Discussions are good! But watch what happens when, yesterday, I decided to take an inquiry-based approach in a literacy lesson…. I asked students to guess the meaning of a new word (Château). Two incorrect answers were given and I...

99,723 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 8

Фото профиля Andrew Fenner
Andrew Fenner2 лет назад

Research suggests that the two who generated a hypothesis (even if it's a guess) and then got feedback are more likely to retain the information than if they were just told outright. This includes those who guessed in their head.

Фото профиля Vanessa Bianchi
Vanessa Bianchi2 лет назад

This is not an “inquiry-approach” which isn’t delivered as a one-time thing. Inquiry does have elements of direct, explicit instruction-children are not “guessing”-this is NOT inquiry

Фото профиля Hilary M
Hilary M2 лет назад

While I agree with you on the importance of explicit instruction, I don't think this is a good example of inquiry-based learning either. Inquiry-based learning isn't just asking kids what they think something is without any context.

Фото профиля Ruth Murran
Ruth Murran2 лет назад

You’re not teaching something that requires analysis and construction of arguments. Like anything in teaching different things work for different subjects and areas. The difficulty arises when people get ideologically attached to one particular thing and convinced they’re right.

Фото профиля Mark Barnes
Mark Barnes2 лет назад

When I come across a word I don’t know, I Google it. Ask me what it means 5 minutes later, I don’t remember. Talk about it in context, though, and it’s locked in.

Фото профиля Andrea
Andrea2 лет назад

This is not inquiry-based approach 🥴

Фото профиля Nils Headley
Nils Headley2 лет назад

This is hyperbolic and not representative.

Фото профиля John Rainer
John Rainer2 лет назад

Try applying your methods to a subject that is not centred on propositional knowledge - like drama.Are you going to tell children what it feels like to be a character in a fiction - or utilise sophisticated pedagogy to help them to experience it for themselves?

Похожие видео

An MTV LA journalist on her encounter with ENHYPEN: -I’ve had experience with many kpop bands and all of them have been wonderful. But what I experienced with ENHYPEN was something very different, I’ll tell you why. The people that are behind the kpop industry are people who follow procedures very rigorously. There’s a lot of control over the questions you can ask, of what you get to say, of how they need to answer. If you didn't know, its a very strict world in that regard. So, usually with this type of interview, there's not a lot of room for you to interact with the talents outside of the cameras. Normally they're sitting down, waiting for someone to tell them the camers are rolling and for questions to be asked. They almost never interact or ask you questions, which could be due to the language barrier. But in this case it wasn't like that. From the moment they came in, they were super friendly, they greeted us all. You could tell they had watched the Norway vs. England game, and we started talking to them about it. We told them “right now, we’re rooting for Norway because England eliminated us”. They laughed and said “Ok we support Noway!” They were very chatty, very nice. We ended the “payaso de rodeo” portion super hyped and happy. We sang “ENHYPEN, hermano ya eres Mexicano (ENHYPEN, brother, you’re already Mexican)” and they were like “Wow, what does that mean?” and when we told them, they asked us what to do if the fans yell that at them, and we told them to say “Viva Mexico!”. There were a lot of interactions that didn’t come out on camera and that almost never happens to me with kpop artists. It doesn’t usually happen, so it surprised me that it was like that. It shows that they, even though they're huge worldwide, are still very humble people, very down to Earth. I am going to my grave regretting that dance segment. I don’t know when my brain decided to go the other side (taught them a slightly incorrect dance) But, either way, we had an amazing time. They had a lot of fun. I couldn't stay until the end of the show, so I found out after that they tried to dance it on the stage. But that they didn't do it right. I’m sorry… it was probably my fault! Anyways, I want to tell you that if you are an ENGENE and you support ENHYPEN, honestly, girl (or boy or them), you get everything… They're really people who are super, super nice. I was terrified, because I was called out once before for not knowing how to pronounce a Korean name, so I spent an entire day listening to a video of how to pronounce them, so something like that doesn't happen again. But honestly, from the moment they walked in, they took my nerves away. They made me feel like they were having a good time- I was having a good time, the team was having a good time, everyone was having a good time! And hopefully when ENGENE gets to see this content, they will be having an incredible time. I dont know when the whole interview will come out, but it'll air on the MTV LA channel. You can watch them there. When it comes out, I'll let you know. Tell me what you think~

AboutEnhypen

102,617 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.Douglas Murray to Piers Morgan: “The thing that struck me, Piers, about seeing the 7th of October footage, was that even the Nazis were actually ashamed of what they did. SS battalions who spent their days shooting Jews in the back of the head and pushing them into trenches, had to get very, very drunk in the evening to forget what they had done. The Nazi high command had to famously sort of get around the problem of soldier morale because the soldiers knew this wasn’t exactly what their lives were meant to look like either. “I tell you one very big difference. If you look at the raw footage—and I really hope people don’t on a wider scale have to view what I viewed the other day—if they see it, they will see something that is at least as barbaric as what the Nazis did. “But here’s the difference: They did it with glee. They were deeply proud. You see people taking the head off a young Israeli man with a shovel and then calling their parents back in Gaza and telling them, father, father, … I’ve killed ten Jews in my hands, get mother on the phone, I want to tell her how great a job their son has done. “I’m not exaggerating this. It’s very, very interesting. People need to realize you had this situation with the Nazis where they were also a genocidal anti-Semitic organization. But they tried to cover their crimes up. “Hamas [is] actually proud of them, and they’ve said they will do them until the whole world is clear of Jews. “So I suggest we take that seriously, and I think Israel is taking it seriously. I hope they continue to take it seriously. But I think the world should take it seriously.”

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

1,653,286 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Tom Brady says his career turned around when a sports psychologist told him to stop complaining about what he wasn’t getting and start stewarding what he had the right way “Greg said to me, ‘Why don’t you quit bitching about all the things you’re not getting, and how about you do the best with whatever opportunities you get?’, ‘Stop worrying about what the other quarterback’s getting. Stop worrying about what the coach is saying to you.’” “‘Every time you get in there, you bring the juice. You bring the energy. You bring the enthusiasm. You treat practice like a game.’ Because if you just decide to go out there and you’re blaming everybody else, where does that get you? So I started to change my attitude.” “I didn’t have a lot of confidence in myself. And when you don’t have a lot of confidence in yourself, you blame other people. When you gain confidence in yourself, you start pointing the finger at yourself.” “I would encourage every athlete to look in the mirror after every day of practice or a game and say, ‘What can I do better to help the team? What can I do better?’” “Not, ‘What does the coach need to do better?’ Not, ‘What do my teammates need to do better?’, ‘What do I need to do better?’ If every player does that, you’re going to have an incredible team.” “You can’t have a false confidence. You don’t only gain your confidence because of your physical ability. You gain your confidence because you’re prepared, because you’re competitive. I couldn’t just show up and be better than everybody.” “I had to show up prepared. I had to show up with energy. I had to show up with my body feeling right. I had to show up like I was on a mission.”

Josh Chambers

4,037,581 просмотров • 15 дней назад

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,949 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Tony Gwynn shares what it took to become one of the greatest hitters of all time and how to master the mental game. "It took me a while to figure it out, but after about 4 or 5 years, I started to realize that this thing was more mental than it was physical." He didn't figure it out alone. "Those first 5 years, I had great conversations with a lot of great players. Pete Rose, Willie Stargell, Henry Aaron, Mike Schmidt. I had a chance to sit down and talk to 'em - pick their brain, find out how they do what they do." The greats learn from the greats. They never stop learning. They never stop wanting to get better. "After about 4 years, I started to realize that this is more mental than physical. So what I need to do is get an approach that I think will work and then just trust the approach. Trust what you practice on. Trust it." That's the key. Create the plan then work the plan. And when it's not working, you still trust yourself. "During the winter, I can hit in a cage and be mechanically sound. But the first time I hit live in spring training, I'll be lucky if I get a ball out of the cage." "For younger guys, that's a sign of, 'Oh, I'm not getting out of the cage,' so they try to speed things up, do things quicker." Trust your approach and stay under control. Don't let frustration change who you are. The game is mental. The greats know that and they learn how to build a process that works for them. They adapt as needed, but they learn the art of focus. Focusing on how to master and trust the process. (🎥Special Collections )

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

95,654 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад