Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Lots of controversy after my post about explicit, systematic instruction! Discussions are good! But watch what happens when, yesterday, I decided to take an inquiry-based approach in a literacy lesson…. I asked students to guess the meaning of a new word (Château). Two incorrect answers were given and I...

MmeLockhartLDS's profile picture

Mme Lockhart

17,389 subscribers

99,723 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Yorum

Andrew Fenner profil fotoğrafı
Andrew Fenner2 yıl önce

Research suggests that the two who generated a hypothesis (even if it's a guess) and then got feedback are more likely to retain the information than if they were just told outright. This includes those who guessed in their head.

Vanessa Bianchi profil fotoğrafı
Vanessa Bianchi2 yıl önce

This is not an “inquiry-approach” which isn’t delivered as a one-time thing. Inquiry does have elements of direct, explicit instruction-children are not “guessing”-this is NOT inquiry

Hilary M profil fotoğrafı
Hilary M2 yıl önce

While I agree with you on the importance of explicit instruction, I don't think this is a good example of inquiry-based learning either. Inquiry-based learning isn't just asking kids what they think something is without any context.

Ruth Murran profil fotoğrafı
Ruth Murran2 yıl önce

You’re not teaching something that requires analysis and construction of arguments. Like anything in teaching different things work for different subjects and areas. The difficulty arises when people get ideologically attached to one particular thing and convinced they’re right.

Mark Barnes profil fotoğrafı
Mark Barnes2 yıl önce

When I come across a word I don’t know, I Google it. Ask me what it means 5 minutes later, I don’t remember. Talk about it in context, though, and it’s locked in.

Andrea profil fotoğrafı
Andrea2 yıl önce

This is not inquiry-based approach 🥴

Nils Headley profil fotoğrafı
Nils Headley2 yıl önce

This is hyperbolic and not representative.

John Rainer profil fotoğrafı
John Rainer2 yıl önce

Try applying your methods to a subject that is not centred on propositional knowledge - like drama.Are you going to tell children what it feels like to be a character in a fiction - or utilise sophisticated pedagogy to help them to experience it for themselves?

Benzer Videolar

"I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard." ~Rubio As expected... No Disclosure. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Nothing new, and Hannity started off with a "fun" question about The Age of Disclosure. 🙄 If you've followed my tweets the past few days, what Rubio said, or didn't say, should come as no surprise. He said they used "selective editing" in the doc and was interviewed 3-4 years ago. That's why I said we needed to hear the entire interview, uncut. Rubio: ""I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard. I don't have independent knowledge that what they're saying is true. We have people with very high jobs in the USG that are either, A) Liars, B) Crazy or C) Telling the truth. And two of those three options are not good. I don't know the answer. I don't want to call them liars, I just don't have any independent way to verify every things they said."
2:47

"I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard." ~Rubio As expected... No Disclosure. 🤷🏼‍♂️ Nothing new, and Hannity started off with a "fun" question about The Age of Disclosure. 🙄 If you've followed my tweets the past few days, what Rubio said, or didn't say, should come as no surprise. He said they used "selective editing" in the doc and was interviewed 3-4 years ago. That's why I said we needed to hear the entire interview, uncut. Rubio: ""I was describing what people had said to me, not things that I have firsthand knowledge of in that regard. I don't have independent knowledge that what they're saying is true. We have people with very high jobs in the USG that are either, A) Liars, B) Crazy or C) Telling the truth. And two of those three options are not good. I don't know the answer. I don't want to call them liars, I just don't have any independent way to verify every things they said."

Joe Murgia

37,878 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

"I'm in a privileged position to have some of the world's smartest people come to my house and tell me what they think about different subjects. I realized the thing that they had most in common was no matter how smart they were, when I asked them the questions, they said I don't know." Jeffrey Epstein
0:50

"I'm in a privileged position to have some of the world's smartest people come to my house and tell me what they think about different subjects. I realized the thing that they had most in common was no matter how smart they were, when I asked them the questions, they said I don't know." Jeffrey Epstein

Red Panda Koala

137,685 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

TRUMP DOES NOT Back Down from his comments about the Seditious Democrats: —— “What happens to them, I can’t tell you, but they broke the law.” 👀 “If you look at sedition, a very strong form of being a traitor, I thought it was some kind of a comedy skit — what they said in the old days if you said a thing like that, that was punishable by death. I’m not threatening them, but I think they’re in serious trouble. I would say they’re in serious trouble — In the old days it was death. That’s as seditious behavior… These people broke the law, now what happens to them, I can’t tell you, but they broke the law.” Clip Full Interview
2:53

TRUMP DOES NOT Back Down from his comments about the Seditious Democrats: —— “What happens to them, I can’t tell you, but they broke the law.” 👀 “If you look at sedition, a very strong form of being a traitor, I thought it was some kind of a comedy skit — what they said in the old days if you said a thing like that, that was punishable by death. I’m not threatening them, but I think they’re in serious trouble. I would say they’re in serious trouble — In the old days it was death. That’s as seditious behavior… These people broke the law, now what happens to them, I can’t tell you, but they broke the law.” Clip Full Interview

MJTruthUltra

1,384,261 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

.Douglas Murray to Piers Morgan: “The thing that struck me, Piers, about seeing the 7th of October footage, was that even the Nazis were actually ashamed of what they did. SS battalions who spent their days shooting Jews in the back of the head and pushing them into trenches, had to get very, very drunk in the evening to forget what they had done. The Nazi high command had to famously sort of get around the problem of soldier morale because the soldiers knew this wasn’t exactly what their lives were meant to look like either. “I tell you one very big difference. If you look at the raw footage—and I really hope people don’t on a wider scale have to view what I viewed the other day—if they see it, they will see something that is at least as barbaric as what the Nazis did. “But here’s the difference: They did it with glee. They were deeply proud. You see people taking the head off a young Israeli man with a shovel and then calling their parents back in Gaza and telling them, father, father, … I’ve killed ten Jews in my hands, get mother on the phone, I want to tell her how great a job their son has done. “I’m not exaggerating this. It’s very, very interesting. People need to realize you had this situation with the Nazis where they were also a genocidal anti-Semitic organization. But they tried to cover their crimes up. “Hamas [is] actually proud of them, and they’ve said they will do them until the whole world is clear of Jews. “So I suggest we take that seriously, and I think Israel is taking it seriously. I hope they continue to take it seriously. But I think the world should take it seriously.”
2:28

.Douglas Murray to Piers Morgan: “The thing that struck me, Piers, about seeing the 7th of October footage, was that even the Nazis were actually ashamed of what they did. SS battalions who spent their days shooting Jews in the back of the head and pushing them into trenches, had to get very, very drunk in the evening to forget what they had done. The Nazi high command had to famously sort of get around the problem of soldier morale because the soldiers knew this wasn’t exactly what their lives were meant to look like either. “I tell you one very big difference. If you look at the raw footage—and I really hope people don’t on a wider scale have to view what I viewed the other day—if they see it, they will see something that is at least as barbaric as what the Nazis did. “But here’s the difference: They did it with glee. They were deeply proud. You see people taking the head off a young Israeli man with a shovel and then calling their parents back in Gaza and telling them, father, father, … I’ve killed ten Jews in my hands, get mother on the phone, I want to tell her how great a job their son has done. “I’m not exaggerating this. It’s very, very interesting. People need to realize you had this situation with the Nazis where they were also a genocidal anti-Semitic organization. But they tried to cover their crimes up. “Hamas [is] actually proud of them, and they’ve said they will do them until the whole world is clear of Jews. “So I suggest we take that seriously, and I think Israel is taking it seriously. I hope they continue to take it seriously. But I think the world should take it seriously.”

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

1,653,251 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

I wasn't going to post any of the videos I had from that day, was asked to post these two. Just Phil Lyman , All of the TPUSA guys and Volunteers were nothing but caring for others in the aftermath. I didn't activate my camera for most of it, was a little preoccupied. I have a couple others, but they really aren't very interesting.
1:06

I wasn't going to post any of the videos I had from that day, was asked to post these two. Just Phil Lyman , All of the TPUSA guys and Volunteers were nothing but caring for others in the aftermath. I didn't activate my camera for most of it, was a little preoccupied. I have a couple others, but they really aren't very interesting.

Flat Ranger - UT

33,624 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Katt Williams claims Harvey Weinstein once offered him two actresses “like they were playing cards” Theo Von: “Were there things you didn’t take in your career?” Katt Williams: “They weren’t for me because I knew I wasn’t going to take them.” “But I did want to get offered.” “Most of this stuff I wouldn’t have believed until I got to a certain level and saw the proof.” “I was as shocked as anybody by how powerful Harvey Weinstein was.” “I thought none of that applied to me.” “They offered me two actresses like they were playing cards.” “I was like… ‘What?’” Theo Von: “Did you think about it?” Katt Williams: “In scary situations, I don’t leave it up to me.” “I’m going to do what the superhero would do in that part of the movie…” “…and deal with what happens afterward.”
2:30

Katt Williams claims Harvey Weinstein once offered him two actresses “like they were playing cards” Theo Von: “Were there things you didn’t take in your career?” Katt Williams: “They weren’t for me because I knew I wasn’t going to take them.” “But I did want to get offered.” “Most of this stuff I wouldn’t have believed until I got to a certain level and saw the proof.” “I was as shocked as anybody by how powerful Harvey Weinstein was.” “I thought none of that applied to me.” “They offered me two actresses like they were playing cards.” “I was like… ‘What?’” Theo Von: “Did you think about it?” Katt Williams: “In scary situations, I don’t leave it up to me.” “I’m going to do what the superhero would do in that part of the movie…” “…and deal with what happens afterward.”

agim𓍯

1,559,583 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

At what point does shame enter the room and say why are you lying to us over and over and again? There was a time when those in office had the good grace to resign when they were caught with their hand in the cookie jar. But not anymore. Today lies don’t mean a thing to the rich and powerful, they are no longer a source of shame, they have become tools of the trade. 🎥 TikTok -
2:51

At what point does shame enter the room and say why are you lying to us over and over and again? There was a time when those in office had the good grace to resign when they were caught with their hand in the cookie jar. But not anymore. Today lies don’t mean a thing to the rich and powerful, they are no longer a source of shame, they have become tools of the trade. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

12,021 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

q. it’s an obvious question but when you came back to be in the band, it’s an interesting thing because you’re the youngest and they’ll always think of you as the youngest but you’re also a solo hitmaker. how did that affect the way that you approach things for the new album and maybe the way the other members approach things with you? 🐰: i’m just a very carefree and open person and I don’t think too much during my day-to-day unless I really have to. so when it comes to work process or choosing songs, I’ll express myself, sure, I’ll speak up and share my opinion, but I don’t stress about it. rather… well I don’t know about the others, I guess some of the members were pretty stressed but I just thought it was fun! I enjoyed it. I did what I wanted to do
1:09

q. it’s an obvious question but when you came back to be in the band, it’s an interesting thing because you’re the youngest and they’ll always think of you as the youngest but you’re also a solo hitmaker. how did that affect the way that you approach things for the new album and maybe the way the other members approach things with you? 🐰: i’m just a very carefree and open person and I don’t think too much during my day-to-day unless I really have to. so when it comes to work process or choosing songs, I’ll express myself, sure, I’ll speak up and share my opinion, but I don’t stress about it. rather… well I don’t know about the others, I guess some of the members were pretty stressed but I just thought it was fun! I enjoyed it. I did what I wanted to do

ajk ⋆

109,985 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”
2:29

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

Arjun Khemani

10,523 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.
3:08

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,913 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Zelensky was moved to tears when answering a question about his children — When your children were little, what did you say to them most often? What did you repeat to them the most when they were children? — a journalist asked the President of Ukraine. — “I love you.” — And what do you say to them now, when they are grown up? — “I miss you…” Volodymyr and Olena Zelensky have two children — a daughter, Oleksandra, who is now 21, and a 13-year-old son, Kyrylo. For the past four years, they have hardly seen their father.
0:25

Zelensky was moved to tears when answering a question about his children — When your children were little, what did you say to them most often? What did you repeat to them the most when they were children? — a journalist asked the President of Ukraine. — “I love you.” — And what do you say to them now, when they are grown up? — “I miss you…” Volodymyr and Olena Zelensky have two children — a daughter, Oleksandra, who is now 21, and a 13-year-old son, Kyrylo. For the past four years, they have hardly seen their father.

NEXTA

211,378 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

I caught CBC red-handed. I found they were spending nearly $80,000 on coaching for CBC executives to show up to committee and NOT answer direct questions with direct answers. If you want a good example of the difference between Conservatives and Liberals, here it is. The Liberals never even thought about how this is a waste of money, and Conservatives can’t understand how the government could be so wasteful.
9:38

I caught CBC red-handed. I found they were spending nearly $80,000 on coaching for CBC executives to show up to committee and NOT answer direct questions with direct answers. If you want a good example of the difference between Conservatives and Liberals, here it is. The Liberals never even thought about how this is a waste of money, and Conservatives can’t understand how the government could be so wasteful.

Steven Bonk

31,221 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On the situation in Iran, US President Donald Trump says, "... I have a plan for everything, but we will see what happens. They should have made the deal. I had a great deal for them. We talked about it for 60 days, and in the end, they decided not to do it, and now they wish they had. It's late to meet, but they want to, and they want to come to the White House. I may do that... Anything could happen... I have a meeting in the war room in a while. We are in the midst of something terrible. I hate to see so much death and destruction... I have ideas as to what I could do, but they are not final. I like to finalise one second before it's due. Things change. Especially with war..." Source: US Network Pool via Reuters
2:29

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On the situation in Iran, US President Donald Trump says, "... I have a plan for everything, but we will see what happens. They should have made the deal. I had a great deal for them. We talked about it for 60 days, and in the end, they decided not to do it, and now they wish they had. It's late to meet, but they want to, and they want to come to the White House. I may do that... Anything could happen... I have a meeting in the war room in a while. We are in the midst of something terrible. I hate to see so much death and destruction... I have ideas as to what I could do, but they are not final. I like to finalise one second before it's due. Things change. Especially with war..." Source: US Network Pool via Reuters

ANI

89,499 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🔥🚨JUST IN: The HATERS are furious! RFK Jr. says hes is NOT telling people what to eat, just giving HEALTHY ADVICE! "You know, our approach is not to tell people what they can and cannot eat. To give them very good dietary advice." "Tell them what is good for their health, and then if you want to have a soda pop and a doughnut. That's up to you. We live in America." "You ought to be able to make those choices. But we are moving right now to move to the front of the label -- front of product labeling." "We are going to tell people exactly what's in their food and why, whether it's good for them or bad for them, and let them have healthy choices."
0:34

🔥🚨JUST IN: The HATERS are furious! RFK Jr. says hes is NOT telling people what to eat, just giving HEALTHY ADVICE! "You know, our approach is not to tell people what they can and cannot eat. To give them very good dietary advice." "Tell them what is good for their health, and then if you want to have a soda pop and a doughnut. That's up to you. We live in America." "You ought to be able to make those choices. But we are moving right now to move to the front of the label -- front of product labeling." "We are going to tell people exactly what's in their food and why, whether it's good for them or bad for them, and let them have healthy choices."

The Patriot Oasis™

108,066 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Tony Gwynn shares what it took to become one of the greatest hitters of all time and how to master the mental game. "It took me a while to figure it out, but after about 4 or 5 years, I started to realize that this thing was more mental than it was physical." He didn't figure it out alone. "Those first 5 years, I had great conversations with a lot of great players. Pete Rose, Willie Stargell, Henry Aaron, Mike Schmidt. I had a chance to sit down and talk to 'em - pick their brain, find out how they do what they do." The greats learn from the greats. They never stop learning. They never stop wanting to get better. "After about 4 years, I started to realize that this is more mental than physical. So what I need to do is get an approach that I think will work and then just trust the approach. Trust what you practice on. Trust it." That's the key. Create the plan then work the plan. And when it's not working, you still trust yourself. "During the winter, I can hit in a cage and be mechanically sound. But the first time I hit live in spring training, I'll be lucky if I get a ball out of the cage." "For younger guys, that's a sign of, 'Oh, I'm not getting out of the cage,' so they try to speed things up, do things quicker." Trust your approach and stay under control. Don't let frustration change who you are. The game is mental. The greats know that and they learn how to build a process that works for them. They adapt as needed, but they learn the art of focus. Focusing on how to master and trust the process. (🎥Special Collections )
2:15

Tony Gwynn shares what it took to become one of the greatest hitters of all time and how to master the mental game. "It took me a while to figure it out, but after about 4 or 5 years, I started to realize that this thing was more mental than it was physical." He didn't figure it out alone. "Those first 5 years, I had great conversations with a lot of great players. Pete Rose, Willie Stargell, Henry Aaron, Mike Schmidt. I had a chance to sit down and talk to 'em - pick their brain, find out how they do what they do." The greats learn from the greats. They never stop learning. They never stop wanting to get better. "After about 4 years, I started to realize that this is more mental than physical. So what I need to do is get an approach that I think will work and then just trust the approach. Trust what you practice on. Trust it." That's the key. Create the plan then work the plan. And when it's not working, you still trust yourself. "During the winter, I can hit in a cage and be mechanically sound. But the first time I hit live in spring training, I'll be lucky if I get a ball out of the cage." "For younger guys, that's a sign of, 'Oh, I'm not getting out of the cage,' so they try to speed things up, do things quicker." Trust your approach and stay under control. Don't let frustration change who you are. The game is mental. The greats know that and they learn how to build a process that works for them. They adapt as needed, but they learn the art of focus. Focusing on how to master and trust the process. (🎥Special Collections )

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

95,300 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Breaking 🔴 Nothing against #SalmanKhan ⛔ Now, actor Sonu Mishra who was supposed to play Salman Khan ’s character in #KalaHiran exit the movie ⚠️ He left the movie after he came to know the intention of the makers. While talking to the media, Mishra said, "I was so much excited because I was supposed to play the role of superstar Salman Khan. I had also started the shooting of the film. But when the intent is negative, being an actor, I don't want to be a part of such a film. No doubt that they have a point of view. But you are showing superstar Salman Khan in a negative way and showing a one-sided narrative." He added, "I left because I had not signed the agreement. We shot for two days, and I asked them for the agreement and script because they were making a one-sided narrative story against a superstar. So, they understood I was not going to fall into their trap. I asked for the agreement to know what all clauses are there in it. After a long time, they showed me things, and it was revealed that I had to speak negatively against the star in the media. So, all these things were against my ethics."
2:02

Breaking 🔴 Nothing against #SalmanKhan ⛔ Now, actor Sonu Mishra who was supposed to play Salman Khan ’s character in #KalaHiran exit the movie ⚠️ He left the movie after he came to know the intention of the makers. While talking to the media, Mishra said, "I was so much excited because I was supposed to play the role of superstar Salman Khan. I had also started the shooting of the film. But when the intent is negative, being an actor, I don't want to be a part of such a film. No doubt that they have a point of view. But you are showing superstar Salman Khan in a negative way and showing a one-sided narrative." He added, "I left because I had not signed the agreement. We shot for two days, and I asked them for the agreement and script because they were making a one-sided narrative story against a superstar. So, they understood I was not going to fall into their trap. I asked for the agreement to know what all clauses are there in it. After a long time, they showed me things, and it was revealed that I had to speak negatively against the star in the media. So, all these things were against my ethics."

Always Bollywood

81,058 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

JUST IN: The former neighbor of Renee Good says she and her wife moved to Canada after the 2024 election because she was "afraid of what was to come." CNN: "Why did they tell you they were leaving?" Neighbor: "They said they were getting away for a while before the inauguration. I think they were a little afraid of what was to come, and they had the ability to get out, so they did."
1:41

JUST IN: The former neighbor of Renee Good says she and her wife moved to Canada after the 2024 election because she was "afraid of what was to come." CNN: "Why did they tell you they were leaving?" Neighbor: "They said they were getting away for a while before the inauguration. I think they were a little afraid of what was to come, and they had the ability to get out, so they did."

Collin Rugg

831,849 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”
1:48

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce