Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Low agency in a 2 minute video: Derren Brown creates a compliance test He places 3 actors into a room The actors stand up and sit down when the bell rings He then introduces real people into the room It's fascinating AND terrifying how many people blindly copy the...

53,894 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von George Mack
George Mackvor 1 Jahr

This was taken from my research into high agency The full thing will drop soon on --> Get a link as soon as it's out.

Profilbild von California Insider Show
California Insider Showvor 1 Jahr

Flash Shelton, an anti-squatting activist, reveals how squatters in California exploit tenant laws, blurring the lines between tenant rights and unlawful occupation. He shares strategies for dealing with squatters and the challenges homeowners face in reclaiming their properties.

Profilbild von Simon Ducharme
Simon Ducharmevor 1 Jahr

This is a low stake situation in which someone simply assumes that if everyone does an action he/she must be the one who missed the info. Here the action has no cost to the self, it reflect a simple prosocial behavior rather than some worrisome low sense of agency

Profilbild von Rick Wong
Rick Wongvor 1 Jahr

Replicating patterns is perfectly fine. Replicating patterns when it is counter to a goal is when issues arise. Breaking those patterns, when it is a goal you actually care about, is high agency. Lack of a meaningful goal, we call mimicking patterns culture.

Profilbild von Brian Dolan - Waste Automation
Brian Dolan - Waste Automationvor 1 Jahr

The 2020-2022 Panic Era in 2 minutes

Profilbild von Joe Otten 🗳 🇬🇧🇺🇦 🔶️🎗️🇮🇱🕊️🇵🇸
Joe Otten 🗳 🇬🇧🇺🇦 🔶️🎗️🇮🇱🕊️🇵🇸vor 1 Jahr

I'd probably assume there had been some instruction that I'd missed.

Profilbild von Michael Dorausch
Michael Dorauschvor 1 Jahr

Fascinating. Robert Cialdini had great studies like what's playing out here, easy to reproduce if you have enough participants.

Profilbild von Brian Dolan - Waste Automation
Brian Dolan - Waste Automationvor 1 Jahr

This facial expression is representing knowing submission to illogical ridiculousness.

Profilbild von gus mann
gus mannvor 1 Jahr

If one is a rare non-lemming, one can observe this behavior constantly. Laughter evoking fake laughter, applause, etc.

Profilbild von Alain Breillatt
Alain Breillattvor 1 Jahr

You don’t need a new word. Robert Cialdini wrote a whole book on Influence that examines the research and real world examples of influenced behavior. This is a combination of Social Proof and Unity.

Profilbild von I. Lausannopoulos
I. Lausannopoulosvor 1 Jahr

Isn't there a selection bias? What is the probability of a high-agency person learning about and even more so deciding to participate in these fake studies?

Ähnliche Videos

Tim Cook reveals a surprising truth about hiring at the world's biggest tech company: You don't need to know how to code to work at Apple. "We hire people from all walks of life and people that have college degrees, people that don't. People that code, people that don't." Tim is a vocal advocate for learning to code, but not because it's a prerequisite for getting hired. He sees it as something far broader: "I do recommend coding for everyone to learn because I think it's a form of expressing yourself and it's a global language and it's the only global language that we all share is coding." So if coding isn't the golden ticket, what is? Tim explains that the traits he values most have nothing to do with technical credentials. There are three that matter above all else. The first is collaboration. Not just the willingness to work with others, but a deep, genuine belief that teams produce better outcomes than individuals ever could: "Can they really collaborate? Do they deeply believe that one plus one equals three?" The second is curiosity. Tim Cook gravitates toward people who are relentless in their need to understand, people who never stop probing how the world works and why people think the way they do: "I think curiosity is a trait that I love about people, about people that ask questions that are so curious about how things work, how people think. All of the why and how questions." The third is creativity. This is where everything comes together. Apple's entire model depends on anticipating needs that consumers haven't even recognised yet: "We're looking for people that can see around the corner because ultimately we want to create products that people can't live without, but they didn't know they needed." Collaboration. Curiosity. Creativity. None of them show up on a résumé, and none of them require a degree. But according to Tim Cook, they're exactly what makes a great team player at Apple.

Big Brain Business

438,122 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Jordan Peterson breaks down how to shut off social anxiety the moment you walk in: "You go to a party, your heart's beating. Why? The party is a monster. Why? Because it's judging you. It's putting you low down the dominance hierarchy, because that's what a negative judgment is" "That interferes with your sexual success, and that means you're being harshly evaluated by nature itself. So you're confronting the dragon of chaos when you go into the social situation" "And what do you do? You hunch over, and that's low dominance. I'm no threat. Well, that's not going to get you very far. But it's a logical thing to do in the face of a tyrant. You look at the king and you're dead. I'm no threat, I'm hunched over" "And then what's happening internally? What are people thinking about me? Am I looking stupid? Am I looking foolish? I'm awkward. I hate being here. I'm sweating too much. It's all internalized, it's all self-focused" "You can't tell someone to stop thinking about something, because they get caught in the loop. It's like don't think of a white elephant. White elephant, white elephant, white elephant" "What you do with socially anxious people is you say, look at other people. Look at them. Because if you look at them, you can tell what they're thinking" "If you're ever speaking to a group of people, never speak to the group of people. That doesn't exist. You talk to individuals, and then they reflect for you the entire group, because they're all entrained. You look at one person and they broadcast you everyone's thinking" "As soon as you focus on the person, not you, you push your attention outward and you start watching. Well then all your automatic mechanisms kick in and you stop being awkward" "If we're talking and I'm looking over here, I don't know what you're going to do next, and I'm going to put disjunctions in, like bad chords in the melody of our conversation. And the reason is I'm not paying attention" "That's why the eye is the thing at the top of the pyramid. It's the thing that enables you to win the set of all possible dominance hierarchies"

Johan

247,498 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

On Friday, Bill Maher asked me if what happened with Biden at the disastrous debate with Trump was the same story as the Emperor's New Clothes. Me: The story of the Emperor's New Clothes is a story about common knowledge, because when the kid blurted it out, he actually wasn't telling anyone anything they didn't already know. They could see the Emperor was naked. But he still changed their knowledge, because by blurting it out with an earshot of the others, now everyone knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew. And what that allowed them to do is change their relationship with the Emperor, from obsequious deference to ridicule and scorn. And the thing about common knowledge in the social realm is that it's what props up our social relationships. And so when something is blurted out, then it can change everything. It changes the nature of your relationship with someone. Maher: And we do have sort of a modern version of the Emperor parable, which is Joe Biden. I mean, he was the Emperor who everyone wouldn't say had lost his marbles. I mean, is that not really the same story? Me: It is the same story, because opinion polls showed that after that disastrous debate with Trump, the number of people who thought that he was cognitively impaired didn't go up by that much. It went up by a few percentage points. But before, a majority of people thought that he was cognitively impaired. The difference is, when it's on TV, where you're watching it, you know that the rest of the country is watching it, you know the rest of the country knows the rest of the country, it's no longer private. It's common. And that's when he was challenged. That was the end. Bill Maher Real Time with Bill Maher

Steven Pinker

272,948 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten