Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Low-cost drones are increasingly being used to strike bases, energy facilities, and critical infrastructure in the U.S.–Israel–Iran conflict. Conventional air defense systems are too expensive to counter these threats at scale. Türkiye’s MKE has developed the TOLGA system based on an “effective, simple, and low-cost” approach, integrating jamming (soft-kill)...

43,867 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.

RussiaNews 🇷🇺

13,364 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨🇮🇳 Drone threat? Meet India’s layered kill chain India is building a layered, multi-domain counter-drone ecosystem—blending indigenous innovation, strategic acquisitions, and tri-service integration to stay ahead in the evolving drone era. From micro-drone neutralization to large-area airspace defense, a new generation of homegrown anti-drone systems is taking shape: 1️⃣ D4: Designed to detect and neutralize micro and small UAVs within a 1–1.25 km range, delivering 360° coverage in both static and vehicle-mounted configurations. Developed by Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), produced by Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL). 2️⃣ Bhargavastra: Low-cost, AI-enabled hard-kill system built to counter drone swarms, combining guided and unguided micro-missiles, radar detection up to 6 km, and a 2.5 km strike range, with the ability to launch up to 64 micro-missiles simultaneously. 3️⃣ C-UAS (Counter-Unmanned Aerial System): A multi-layer, multi-sensor platform developed by Zen Technologies, integrating radar, camera-based tracking, GPS jamming, and kinetic interception to detect, track, and neutralise enemy drones. 4️⃣ Indrajaal: AI-powered autonomous defense system provides wide-area protection of up to 4,000 sq. km, enabling real-time detection, identification, and neutralization of aerial threats across critical infrastructure, including mobile patrol units. 5️⃣ Dronaam: A compact, indigenous solution offers directional and omnidirectional coverage, deployable as a rifle-style system or portable backpack unit for rapid, tactical counter-drone response.

Sputnik India

15,784 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад