正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Luther Burden Caleb Williams likely expected Burden to continue tempo-ing his break across this open zone. Burden settled. If correct, rookie mistake. It has been a luxury to bring Burden along slowly in an O that Odunze said would take a yr+ to fully learn. #DaBears

147,715 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

BREAKING: BILL ACKMAN WANTS TO TAKE 𝕏 PUBLIC | WOULD YOU INVEST? Billionaire investor Bill Ackman confirmed to the Wall Street Journal that he is “absolutely" interested in considering exploring a deal with Elon's ​​𝕏 to make it a public company again. When Elon purchased Twitter, he took the company private so retail investors could no longer invest. This allowed him to restructure the company and improve the financials. Today, 𝕏 is breaking user records and is months away from profitability, all while becoming a beacon of free speech. HOW THIS HELPS 𝕏? Since its privatization, 𝕏 has been under financial strain, grappling with a pre-existing debt burden. Elon’s focus on fighting agenda-driven censorship also led to a temporary loss of many advertisers, caused by pressure from the media and various organizations. Ackman's firm, Pershing Square, has secured regulatory approval for a novel investment vehicle that might bring a crucial capital boost to 𝕏. Ackman, who’s joined our spaces before and praised Elon’s Twitter, stated he has "enormous respect" for Elon and his vision of 𝕏 as a free-speech platform. If 𝕏 goes public, it opens the door for retail investors to back a platform that protects Free Speech in an increasingly censored world. This aligns with Ackman's appreciation for 𝕏 as a free-speech haven. For the first time ever, the public might finally get an opportunity to invest in a platform that champions free speech! This collaboration between Elon Musk and Bill Ackman could not only help 𝕏, but allow the public to put their money where their mouth is and support free speech. Would you invest in 𝕏 if it goes public?

Mario Nawfal

357,481 次观看 • 2 年前

EXCLUSIVE from Patrick Maguire on our podcast The State of It: * Sir Keir Starmer’s relationship with Ed Miliband has broken down to such an extent that the energy secretary has been accused of “ghosting” the prime minister in recent weeks * Senior government sources claimed that Miliband declined to take calls from the prime minister during a tense stand-off over defence spending * No 10 became increasingly concerned last week that Miliband could quit over the imposition of cuts on his department to fund defence spending * The State of It, the political podcast by The Times and The Sunday Times, has been told that Starmer attempted to contact Miliband repeatedly but did not receive a response. He was said to have been “ghosted” * This account was rejected by a source close to Miliband, who said that the pair did eventually speak and denied that Miliband declined to take the prime minister’s calls * Multiple sources said that Starmer and Miliband were barely on speaking terms and that the prime minister was “furious” at what he regarded as the energy secretary’s “betrayal” * Lara Spirit reveals that several cabinet ministers are weighing up whether to resign after the by-election in an attempt to force Starmer’s hand. Allies of Burnham suggested that Miliband was likely to be among them * The prime minister is said to have become increasingly “entrenched” as he prepares to fight any challenge from Burnham. Starmer sees himself as a “servant of the country rather than the party” and allies said he was determined to resist a “coronation” * An ally of Starmer said: ‘“It would be coup territory, it would profoundly undemocratic. We don’t really know what Burnham stands for or what he would do. Winning a by-election is very different to running the country. Win or lose, someone has to flush out his positions. Keir is becoming more entrenched’

Steven Swinford

56,610 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mamdani’s Pied-à-Terre Tax Hits Full-Time New Yorkers — And He’s Fine With That Mayor Zohran Mamdani is requiring longtime New York City residents who live in the city full-time to prove it — simply to avoid a new surcharge on their homes. Notices have been sent telling some owners they “may” face five-figure tax bills unless they submit documentation confirming their property is a primary residence. When pressed on the errors, the mayor largely dismissed the concerns, stating that the Department of Finance had “identified homes that may be subject to the surcharge” and that owners have time to appeal. “As required by the law, the Department of Finance sent informational resources to homeowners to ensure that they understood the tax… and also if they did not believe it to apply to them, that they had the time in order to be able to appeal,” Mamdani said. (Video: AI) At the same time, illegal immigrants continue to receive free housing and services costing New York City well over $1 billion this year. Full-time residents who own and live in valuable properties are being treated as if they must justify their presence. Why would anyone who has built equity and a life here choose to remain in a city that subjects them to this burden while others receive a free pass? Legal residents of means will answer by voting with their feet and relocating to cities and states that are more financially welcoming. This trend is already underway, and places like Florida and Texas are capitalizing on it.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

30,966 次观看 • 13 天前