正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Lutnick refuses to commit to merely responding to oversight letters that Van Hollen has sent to his office

Aaron Rupar

973,708 subscribers

35,347 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 条评论

Ryca 的头像

Ryca1 年前

Got to love the party who screams about transparency... refusing to be transparent.

Errol Meade 的头像

Errol Meade1 年前

Felon POTUS's entire cabinet is just unqualified arse-kissers.

Havercamp 的头像

Havercamp1 年前

Of course, these incompetent appointees will never address any questions seriously because they know there’s no repercussions for their uncooperativeness or lies.

Parity Account 的头像

Parity Account1 年前

@grok Analyze the video and then write a mock letter sent to Lutnick from Van Hollen in the style of the song Stan from Eminem

Djoker Cristi 的头像

Djoker Cristi1 年前

This is all strange for Nutlick who hasn't worked a day in his life. He is only there next to trump to do one thing and one thing only.

Jerry Mcgee 的头像

Jerry Mcgee1 年前

hi why I respond to a man who is more concerned over MS 13 gang members then he is his own constituents.

Bob Moriarty 🇺🇸🇺🇦 的头像

Bob Moriarty 🇺🇸🇺🇦1 年前

Smugness runs deep in this administration

@rsbg_422 的头像

@rsbg_4221 年前

Republicans will be happy when all the checks, balances, and oversight are removed from our government. Then, they'll be able to continue on with dismantling all the parts that cost anything or constrain the president and the oligarchs.

🌻𝓢𝓹𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓮𝓝𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓮🌻 的头像

🌻𝓢𝓹𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓮𝓝𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓮🌻1 年前

Nutlick is one seriously smug SOB.

相关视频

Democrat Senator Chris Van Hollen continues to support Obama’s failed Iran nuclear deal that sent $1.7 billion to terrorists. VAN HOLLEN: "We got that done when President Obama was in office."

Democrat Senator Chris Van Hollen continues to support Obama’s failed Iran nuclear deal that sent $1.7 billion to terrorists. VAN HOLLEN: "We got that done when President Obama was in office."

RNC Research

20,762 次观看 • 2 个月前

Van Hollen: You did say at the last hearing with respect to the Epstein affair that you had "Nothing to hide." I assume that is still your testimony today. Lutnick: That is right. Van Hollen: Then why have you not responded to the letter that Senator Merkley and I sent asking for documents?

Van Hollen: You did say at the last hearing with respect to the Epstein affair that you had "Nothing to hide." I assume that is still your testimony today. Lutnick: That is right. Van Hollen: Then why have you not responded to the letter that Senator Merkley and I sent asking for documents?

Acyn

284,630 次观看 • 3 个月前

BREAKING: U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen just eviscerated Howard Lutnick to his face for lying his interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.

BREAKING: U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen just eviscerated Howard Lutnick to his face for lying his interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.

Ed Krassenstein

78,353 次观看 • 5 个月前

VAN HOLLEN: I'm simply asking you to provide the committee with a reorganization plan, and your response is 'maybe yes, maybe no.' Am I getting that right? LUTNICK: We're going to follow the law VAN HOLLEN: The law requires to you to submit these major changes to the Senate

VAN HOLLEN: I'm simply asking you to provide the committee with a reorganization plan, and your response is 'maybe yes, maybe no.' Am I getting that right? LUTNICK: We're going to follow the law VAN HOLLEN: The law requires to you to submit these major changes to the Senate

Aaron Rupar

156,819 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨Van Hollen REFUSES to say Abrego-Garcia isn’t in MS13: Bash: Can you say with absolute certainty that [Abrego-Garcia] is not, nor has he ever been a member of MS13? Van Hollen: Accuses Trump of trying to "change the subject” — as he then changes the subject: “So I’m not going to get into the details…" Bash: Did you ask him? Van Hollen: No.

🚨Van Hollen REFUSES to say Abrego-Garcia isn’t in MS13: Bash: Can you say with absolute certainty that [Abrego-Garcia] is not, nor has he ever been a member of MS13? Van Hollen: Accuses Trump of trying to "change the subject” — as he then changes the subject: “So I’m not going to get into the details…" Bash: Did you ask him? Van Hollen: No.

Western Lensman

601,942 次观看 • 1 年前

This is bonkers. VAN HOLLEN: Mr. Director, do you know that it is a crime to lie to Congress? PATEL: I have not lied to Congress. VAN HOLLEN: I didn't ask you that. PATEL: The only one that lied to Congress is you. VAN HOLLEN: I'm not testifying here, sir, and I don't lie.

This is bonkers. VAN HOLLEN: Mr. Director, do you know that it is a crime to lie to Congress? PATEL: I have not lied to Congress. VAN HOLLEN: I didn't ask you that. PATEL: The only one that lied to Congress is you. VAN HOLLEN: I'm not testifying here, sir, and I don't lie.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

133,367 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sen. Senator Chris Van Hollen to Howard Lutnick: You totally misled the American people about certain aspects of your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Sen. Senator Chris Van Hollen to Howard Lutnick: You totally misled the American people about certain aspects of your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Headquarters

56,989 次观看 • 3 个月前

Lutnick was sweating, mumbling, and lying to Oversight about his connections to Epstein. He has no business representing America or American business around the world. The Last Word

Lutnick was sweating, mumbling, and lying to Oversight about his connections to Epstein. He has no business representing America or American business around the world. The Last Word

Ro Khanna

250,614 次观看 • 2 个月前

Mohammed’s uncle Zeyad — who led the fight on Capitol Hill — sent a video to Senator Chris Van Hollen and his staff to share the news. The only lawmaker who got one.

Mohammed’s uncle Zeyad — who led the fight on Capitol Hill — sent a video to Senator Chris Van Hollen and his staff to share the news. The only lawmaker who got one.

jasper nathaniel

81,243 次观看 • 7 个月前

VAN HOLLEN: Why do the Epstein files show you coordinating a meeting and planning a visit with Jeffrey Epstein on his private island in December 2012? LUTNICK: I barely had anything to do with that person, okay?

VAN HOLLEN: Why do the Epstein files show you coordinating a meeting and planning a visit with Jeffrey Epstein on his private island in December 2012? LUTNICK: I barely had anything to do with that person, okay?

Aaron Rupar

125,393 次观看 • 5 个月前

Vince describes in detail exactly what you have to do to violate the Logan Act, and Chris Van Hollen has crossed that threshold Who else wants Senator Chris Van Hollen arrested and or fined or both for violating the Logan Act FBI Director Kash Patel Patel Dan Bongino This has to happen

Vince describes in detail exactly what you have to do to violate the Logan Act, and Chris Van Hollen has crossed that threshold Who else wants Senator Chris Van Hollen arrested and or fined or both for violating the Logan Act FBI Director Kash Patel Patel Dan Bongino This has to happen

@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

51,397 次观看 • 1 年前

Van Hollen: "Do you know whether the nanny that you had on that trip [to Epstein's island] was the same nanny that Epstein expressed interest in meeting?" Lutnick: "No, I have no idea about that whole thing. I don't recall it having anything to do with me." Van Hollen: "This guy was a convicted sex offender. Obviously not a good place for kids and nannies."

Van Hollen: "Do you know whether the nanny that you had on that trip [to Epstein's island] was the same nanny that Epstein expressed interest in meeting?" Lutnick: "No, I have no idea about that whole thing. I don't recall it having anything to do with me." Van Hollen: "This guy was a convicted sex offender. Obviously not a good place for kids and nannies."

Home of the Brave

25,060 次观看 • 5 个月前

VAN HOLLEN: Do you share the view that Israel has a biblical right to the entire West Bank? STEFANIK: Yes

VAN HOLLEN: Do you share the view that Israel has a biblical right to the entire West Bank? STEFANIK: Yes

Aaron Rupar

283,140 次观看 • 1 年前

Saks burnt his office, today he has sent goons to do this on his behalf.

Saks burnt his office, today he has sent goons to do this on his behalf.

Rodgers Kipembe Mpuru

394,588 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨HOLY SHIT - Howard Lutnick DID NOT DENY he trafficked his nanny to Epstein. This is SICK! VAN HOLLEN: “Do you know whether the nanny that you had on that trip was the same nanny that Jeffrey Epstein expressed interest in meeting?” LUTNICK: “No, I, I have no idea about that whole thing. I mean, I, I don't recall it having anything to do with me” VAN HOLLEN: “It's just, you know, this, this guy was a convicted sex offender and obviously not a, a great place for kids and nannies.”

🚨HOLY SHIT - Howard Lutnick DID NOT DENY he trafficked his nanny to Epstein. This is SICK! VAN HOLLEN: “Do you know whether the nanny that you had on that trip was the same nanny that Jeffrey Epstein expressed interest in meeting?” LUTNICK: “No, I, I have no idea about that whole thing. I mean, I, I don't recall it having anything to do with me” VAN HOLLEN: “It's just, you know, this, this guy was a convicted sex offender and obviously not a, a great place for kids and nannies.”

CALL TO ACTIVISM

571,585 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dean: What other financial ties do you have to Epstein? Lutnick: *refuses to answer*

Dean: What other financial ties do you have to Epstein? Lutnick: refuses to answer

Acyn

191,049 次观看 • 3 个月前

VAN HOLLEN: An individual who was pardoned by Trump went on to molest two children, and he tried to buy their silence by saying he would give them funds from your slush fund. Can you commit to not making that person eligible for a payout? BLANCHE: You're obviously lying in your question VAN HOLLEN: I am reporting what he said

VAN HOLLEN: An individual who was pardoned by Trump went on to molest two children, and he tried to buy their silence by saying he would give them funds from your slush fund. Can you commit to not making that person eligible for a payout? BLANCHE: You're obviously lying in your question VAN HOLLEN: I am reporting what he said

Aaron Rupar

857,301 次观看 • 2 个月前