Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Luttig: It doesn’t matter what the Supreme Court does from this point forward. For two years, the Supreme Court has authorized the absolute lawlessness and unconstitutional activity of this president.

Acyn

765,609 subscribers

465,116 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Luttig: The Supreme Court cut the heart and soul out of America with this abominable decision… The defining maxim of America has been that no one is above the law. That can never be said about America again after this decision from the Supreme Court. Without any question whatsoever, the Supreme Court held that the President of the United States, and in particular, the former President of the United States Donald Trump, is above the law.

Luttig: The Supreme Court cut the heart and soul out of America with this abominable decision… The defining maxim of America has been that no one is above the law. That can never be said about America again after this decision from the Supreme Court. Without any question whatsoever, the Supreme Court held that the President of the United States, and in particular, the former President of the United States Donald Trump, is above the law.

Acyn

679,683 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Overall, this was a very good term for the Supreme Court. President Trump's most consequential accomplishment of his first term was the transformation of the Supreme Court to the first constitutionalist majority in ninety years. As a result, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that states can regulate trans surgeries on minors. And this week, the Supreme Court also ruled 6-3 that these nationwide injunctions by activist judges are unconstitutional. We may never know what’s going on in the heads of the three justices that decided to dissent from these commonsense issues.

Overall, this was a very good term for the Supreme Court. President Trump's most consequential accomplishment of his first term was the transformation of the Supreme Court to the first constitutionalist majority in ninety years. As a result, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that states can regulate trans surgeries on minors. And this week, the Supreme Court also ruled 6-3 that these nationwide injunctions by activist judges are unconstitutional. We may never know what’s going on in the heads of the three justices that decided to dissent from these commonsense issues.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

20,070 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

O’Leary: It would have been better on a practical basis to have not done this I think… Hunt: The Supreme Court or the President? O’Leary: The Supreme Court! They caused a nightmare. What am I supposed to do next?

O’Leary: It would have been better on a practical basis to have not done this I think… Hunt: The Supreme Court or the President? O’Leary: The Supreme Court! They caused a nightmare. What am I supposed to do next?

Acyn

64,014 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

CNN: This is a loss for President Trump. The Supreme Court has blocked Trump from moving forward with deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act

CNN: This is a loss for President Trump. The Supreme Court has blocked Trump from moving forward with deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act

FactPost

47,019 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Trump: Was that decision appealed? “The Supreme Court found 9-0 against the college position” Trump: The Supreme Court is responsible for this?? “Nine nothing and Kavanaugh supported it” Trump: That’s a shame

Trump: Was that decision appealed? “The Supreme Court found 9-0 against the college position” Trump: The Supreme Court is responsible for this?? “Nine nothing and Kavanaugh supported it” Trump: That’s a shame

Acyn

1,083,593 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"Former President Trump's effort to run the clock has a partner in the Supreme Court at this point."

"Former President Trump's effort to run the clock has a partner in the Supreme Court at this point."

Matthew Gertz

269,366 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,385 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."

FactPost

14,546 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

CNN: We're told President Trump has just left the Supreme Court

CNN: We're told President Trump has just left the Supreme Court

Acyn

283,061 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Tariffs are "a matter of national security and this is one of President Donald J. Trump' signature policies — and it would be very unusual for the Supreme Court to overrule a President's signature policy. The Supreme Court gave President Obama a lot of room on Obamacare..."

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Tariffs are "a matter of national security and this is one of President Donald J. Trump' signature policies — and it would be very unusual for the Supreme Court to overrule a President's signature policy. The Supreme Court gave President Obama a lot of room on Obamacare..."

Rapid Response 47

121,213 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Standing ovation for this line from King Charles: The U.S. Supreme court historical society has calculated that Magna Carta is cited in at least 160 supreme court cases since 1789, not least as the foundation of the principle that executive power is subject to checks and balances.

Standing ovation for this line from King Charles: The U.S. Supreme court historical society has calculated that Magna Carta is cited in at least 160 supreme court cases since 1789, not least as the foundation of the principle that executive power is subject to checks and balances.

Acyn

1,467,122 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A crime has been committed by the president of the United States. This is what happens when a corrupt, right-wing Supreme Court rules that a president has absolute immunity. 😳👇

A crime has been committed by the president of the United States. This is what happens when a corrupt, right-wing Supreme Court rules that a president has absolute immunity. 😳👇

Bill Madden

20,969 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

McClain: President Biden just announced that by the stroke of his pen he's going to forgive $39 billion in student loans. This is in direct violation of the supreme court's decision. But I guess the president has no respect for the constitutional authority of the supreme court.

McClain: President Biden just announced that by the stroke of his pen he's going to forgive $39 billion in student loans. This is in direct violation of the supreme court's decision. But I guess the president has no respect for the constitutional authority of the supreme court.

Acyn

2,060,309 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

And there it is.. this is the Supreme Court, not the district Court..

And there it is.. this is the Supreme Court, not the district Court..

Santa Trump.. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

53,892 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear one of the most important Second Amendment cases in decades. The Court will decide whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right to own AR-15s. The Supreme Court has avoided this question for years. That changes now.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear one of the most important Second Amendment cases in decades. The Court will decide whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right to own AR-15s. The Supreme Court has avoided this question for years. That changes now.

Gun Owners of America

55,908 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt UNLEASHES on activist judge who banned President Trump from firing federal employees during the shutdown - says the judge DEFIED the Supreme Court "This same judge in May ILLEGALLY ruled that the president does not have the right to fire executive branch employees - the Supreme Court smacked this judge DOWN in July!" "They have NO legal rationale for this nationwide restraining order! She is now BLOCKING the administration from doing what the Supreme Court has already affirmed the president can do!" "She is WRONG...she is a FAR-LEFT HACK and she uses politics from the bench." 🔥

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt UNLEASHES on activist judge who banned President Trump from firing federal employees during the shutdown - says the judge DEFIED the Supreme Court "This same judge in May ILLEGALLY ruled that the president does not have the right to fire executive branch employees - the Supreme Court smacked this judge DOWN in July!" "They have NO legal rationale for this nationwide restraining order! She is now BLOCKING the administration from doing what the Supreme Court has already affirmed the president can do!" "She is WRONG...she is a FAR-LEFT HACK and she uses politics from the bench." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

411,172 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has declared a key section of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional. MeidasTouch

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has declared a key section of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional. MeidasTouch

Dina Sayegh Doll

17,780 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸BIDEN HAS BIG PLANS FOR THE SUPREME COURT… Proposed reforms: 1. No Immunity for Crimes a Former President Committed in Office 2. Term Limits for Supreme Court Justices 3. Binding Code of Conduct for the Supreme Court

🚨🇺🇸BIDEN HAS BIG PLANS FOR THE SUPREME COURT… Proposed reforms: 1. No Immunity for Crimes a Former President Committed in Office 2. Term Limits for Supreme Court Justices 3. Binding Code of Conduct for the Supreme Court

Mario Nawfal

2,434,726 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren