Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

20,637 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Michael Turk's profile picture
Michael Turk1 year ago

Before they scrap'em can I have one 😭 I don't mind a tracked vehicle that can fit a family of 4.

VOZ's profile picture
VOZ1 year ago

"The Democratic Party's actions had left many U.S. citizens feeling humiliated. Signs of a Trump victory were proclaimed well before Biden withdrew from the race. The voters had had enough." 📝 @KarinaLMariani

Austin 🇺🇸's profile picture
Austin 🇺🇸1 year ago

The booker was a late cold war era designed tank! not ready for the modern battlefield!

ksa_rsaf15 🇸🇦's profile picture
ksa_rsaf15 🇸🇦1 year ago

Rest in peace booker......

Lore keeper in Training's profile picture
Lore keeper in Training1 year ago

Great analysis! I was wondering why it was canceled.

ChaoticAtoms's profile picture
ChaoticAtoms1 year ago

Awesome, another 7.2B wasted.

Redneck Bill Buckley's profile picture
Redneck Bill Buckley1 year ago

Idk, even in the post 2022 world I still see a place for light tanks (as well as heavy tanks). The only missing puzzle piece is effective anti UAV systems, something a big armored vehicle does really well is carry defensive weapons systems without complaining about it.

Steveo110's profile picture
Steveo1101 year ago

Removing the vehicle designed to provide direct fire support to light infantry feels like an odd choice when they also plan to expand the number of light infantry BCTs.

Not A RINO's profile picture
Not A RINO1 year ago

I can kind of understand the 82nd and 11th Abn. using them. Kind of . Not the 101st. It’s not light enough for slingl load so it’s useless for air assault ops. What’s it gonna do, guard the airfield ? The 10th and 25th I D I can definitely see their use.

FLYWHEEL PRIME's profile picture
FLYWHEEL PRIME1 year ago

Good content here McBeth, please keep making stuff in this style and keep the political shenanigans to the side

Related Videos