正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

M4 recoil comparison after patch - both M856A1 Modded: 40 recoil Stock: 82 recoil +4% recoil reduction from skills Slight pull-down on mouse Standing stance

DanExert

7,210 subscribers

129,022 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Fully kitted XM4 and Jackal PDW recoil comparison pre and post patch of today's huge weapon sway and visual recoil reduction overhaul. This is a very noticeable difference and at first glance feels much more comparable to warzone 1 levels of visual recoil. 1st pass is uncontrolled recoil, 2nd pass is controlling, 3rd is 25% speed and zoomed. Gotta give praise where its due, thank you Treyarch Raven Software - plenty of things to still work on, but this is a massive step in the right direction

Fully kitted XM4 and Jackal PDW recoil comparison pre and post patch of today's huge weapon sway and visual recoil reduction overhaul. This is a very noticeable difference and at first glance feels much more comparable to warzone 1 levels of visual recoil. 1st pass is uncontrolled recoil, 2nd pass is controlling, 3rd is 25% speed and zoomed. Gotta give praise where its due, thank you Treyarch Raven Software - plenty of things to still work on, but this is a massive step in the right direction

TCaptainX

328,217 次观看 • 1 年前

Operation Overhaul will feature revamped movement including: faster vaulting that places you on top of objects, recoil penalty when drop-shotting, prone turn radius limits, and a fix for player snapping or sliding from mouse wiggling.

Operation Overhaul will feature revamped movement including: faster vaulting that places you on top of objects, recoil penalty when drop-shotting, prone turn radius limits, and a fix for player snapping or sliding from mouse wiggling.

BattleBit Remastered

245,418 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨NEW: Analysis of Candace Owens’ rooftop footage appears to show Tyler Robinson’s rifle recoil at the exact moment Charlie Kirk is shot. The footage was zoomed, sharpened, and contrast-enhanced. Despite the low resolution from recording a screen showing a distant man, you can clearly see where Robinson’s head and upper body appear to recoil backward in a frame that syncs with the gunshot. Robinson then flees the roof carrying what appears to be the rifle wrapped in a towel before stashing it in nearby bushes, consistent with what he described himself in text confessions to his boyfriend. TriggerSmart also breaks down the flashes Candace suggested could be military signals, showing they appear to be reflections from cars passing in the background. He notes Robinson had already been on the roof for roughly seven minutes before this clip begins, giving him ample time to assemble the rifle. Prosecutors allege Robinson carried the rifle disassembled under his clothing, causing the limp visible in surveillance footage as he approached the roof through the tunnel and stairs. To the skeptics: What exactly would you expect recoil to look like in footage captured by a camera recording a screen showing a distant man firing a .30-06 from the prone position? Since prone helps control recoil, how much movement would realistically be visible, and which parts of his body would move? And why does the visible recoil line up exactly with the gunshot? Full 1.5 hour stream:

🚨NEW: Analysis of Candace Owens’ rooftop footage appears to show Tyler Robinson’s rifle recoil at the exact moment Charlie Kirk is shot. The footage was zoomed, sharpened, and contrast-enhanced. Despite the low resolution from recording a screen showing a distant man, you can clearly see where Robinson’s head and upper body appear to recoil backward in a frame that syncs with the gunshot. Robinson then flees the roof carrying what appears to be the rifle wrapped in a towel before stashing it in nearby bushes, consistent with what he described himself in text confessions to his boyfriend. TriggerSmart also breaks down the flashes Candace suggested could be military signals, showing they appear to be reflections from cars passing in the background. He notes Robinson had already been on the roof for roughly seven minutes before this clip begins, giving him ample time to assemble the rifle. Prosecutors allege Robinson carried the rifle disassembled under his clothing, causing the limp visible in surveillance footage as he approached the roof through the tunnel and stairs. To the skeptics: What exactly would you expect recoil to look like in footage captured by a camera recording a screen showing a distant man firing a .30-06 from the prone position? Since prone helps control recoil, how much movement would realistically be visible, and which parts of his body would move? And why does the visible recoil line up exactly with the gunshot? Full 1.5 hour stream:

KanekoaTheGreat

79,331 次观看 • 8 天前

Explaining why donk's aim & fighting skills are so good (also on YT) Timestamps: 0:00 Pros on donk's aim 0:15 Hook 0:27 Spray usage, direct lines, tension 1:10 Spray usage & recoil control 1:45 Transition from snappy flick to micro 2:10 donk's grip & tension 2:50 Off-meta dodge timing ft. minig0d 3:25 Predictive aiming mistake 3:40 Active movement reading & reactive aim 4:05 Exercise: how does donk control this fight? 4:22 Answer 4:37 CartoonFPS (aim coach) on donk's micros 5:27 Spray control training 5:40 Tension management training 5:55 Flick quality & direct lines training 7:10 Isolating flicking skills 7:30 Reactive aiming 8:08 Addressing old habits 8:45 Outro

Explaining why donk's aim & fighting skills are so good (also on YT) Timestamps: 0:00 Pros on donk's aim 0:15 Hook 0:27 Spray usage, direct lines, tension 1:10 Spray usage & recoil control 1:45 Transition from snappy flick to micro 2:10 donk's grip & tension 2:50 Off-meta dodge timing ft. minig0d 3:25 Predictive aiming mistake 3:40 Active movement reading & reactive aim 4:05 Exercise: how does donk control this fight? 4:22 Answer 4:37 CartoonFPS (aim coach) on donk's micros 5:27 Spray control training 5:40 Tension management training 5:55 Flick quality & direct lines training 7:10 Isolating flicking skills 7:30 Reactive aiming 8:08 Addressing old habits 8:45 Outro

Daniel Kapadia

127,183 次观看 • 1 年前

My message to Treyarch regarding Snipers in Black Ops 6. - Uncentered - Scope / Reticle wobble after firing - Disorienting effect without Muzzle Break attachment - Noscope Delay locking you in place - Vertical Recoil - Intense flinch without Heavy Stock attachment - Slow ADS Not requesting an overall buff for snipers, that will just lead to endless patches / nerfs and buffs. Just asking for snipers to be on a level playing field. TreyarchCM Matt Scronce Lawrence Metten

My message to Treyarch regarding Snipers in Black Ops 6. - Uncentered - Scope / Reticle wobble after firing - Disorienting effect without Muzzle Break attachment - Noscope Delay locking you in place - Vertical Recoil - Intense flinch without Heavy Stock attachment - Slow ADS Not requesting an overall buff for snipers, that will just lead to endless patches / nerfs and buffs. Just asking for snipers to be on a level playing field. TreyarchCM Matt Scronce Lawrence Metten

Scope

1,212,572 次观看 • 1 年前

Recoil Benchmarks for both Controller and MnK: 1. Ping moving dummy that has mythic shield. Use ping distance as benchmarks. 2. Start at 10 Meters. One-clip dummy 5x in a row. Then 10x. Then 20x. 3. If you can do it 20x in a row, move back 10 meters. 4. Practice on different sights. The google sheets looks unimpressive. Hopefully TheGr33nB3an will make it look better when he is awake. Check out underappreciated aimers like 4a463a77de8f1b55 bob peepo

Recoil Benchmarks for both Controller and MnK: 1. Ping moving dummy that has mythic shield. Use ping distance as benchmarks. 2. Start at 10 Meters. One-clip dummy 5x in a row. Then 10x. Then 20x. 3. If you can do it 20x in a row, move back 10 meters. 4. Practice on different sights. The google sheets looks unimpressive. Hopefully TheGr33nB3an will make it look better when he is awake. Check out underappreciated aimers like 4a463a77de8f1b55 bob peepo

Balvarine+

32,138 次观看 • 1 年前

Set up some rudimentary shooting functions, with both the main gun and the coaxial gun to fire where the barrel is pointing, not the camera The turret has been given smoother rotation so it's always at a constant rate rather than easing in and out The main gun even has recoil that pushes the whole thing backwards, since it's repulsors have no contact to the ground to hold it in place This particular barrel features a coaxial machinegun, but there will be other barrels with their own gimmicks available that all tanks will have access to Axis locking also not only allows it to strafe to protect it's weaker rear plating, it also depresses it slightly to reduce profile, and reduces recoil from the main gun They also tilt based on the angle of the ground above, and the barrel depression compensates accordingly to keep it always level

CSAURAGEUL

12,020 次观看 • 3 个月前

Another streamer cheating in battlefield playtest... it's just ridiculous. Twitch pls ban. 0:00 obvious aimlock 0:06 more aimlock (you can tell because he locks on as soon as he aims down sight) 0:18 looks at a random wall, where a player will be in a few seconds 0:20 checks the door for no reason (because he knows someone is there(walls)) 0:23 interesting... 0:37 looks at a random wall again. surely no one is standing there. 0:39 interesting... 0:42 recoil macros (undeniable)

Another streamer cheating in battlefield playtest... it's just ridiculous. Twitch pls ban. 0:00 obvious aimlock 0:06 more aimlock (you can tell because he locks on as soon as he aims down sight) 0:18 looks at a random wall, where a player will be in a few seconds 0:20 checks the door for no reason (because he knows someone is there(walls)) 0:23 interesting... 0:37 looks at a random wall again. surely no one is standing there. 0:39 interesting... 0:42 recoil macros (undeniable)

Dapper

1,713,978 次观看 • 1 年前

REIGN SUPREME. This isn’t a nod to the past; it’s a launch into the future. The AX800 Suprema is the most advanced waterfowl shotgun we’ve ever built, engineered for total control, comfort, and reliability in the toughest conditions. Engineered to shoot further, hit harder, and cycle faster, season after season. From the new B-LINK® Pro gas system (36% faster, 46% cleaner) to Steelium® Pro barrels and Kick-Off® Pro recoil reduction, every detail exists for one reason- to help serious hunters reign supreme in the toughest conditions. Available soon at U.S. retailers. #ReignSupreme #BerettaAX800 #WaterfowlHunt

REIGN SUPREME. This isn’t a nod to the past; it’s a launch into the future. The AX800 Suprema is the most advanced waterfowl shotgun we’ve ever built, engineered for total control, comfort, and reliability in the toughest conditions. Engineered to shoot further, hit harder, and cycle faster, season after season. From the new B-LINK® Pro gas system (36% faster, 46% cleaner) to Steelium® Pro barrels and Kick-Off® Pro recoil reduction, every detail exists for one reason- to help serious hunters reign supreme in the toughest conditions. Available soon at U.S. retailers. #ReignSupreme #BerettaAX800 #WaterfowlHunt

BERETTA USA

34,315 次观看 • 8 个月前

Bull Armory built a gun that feels like it stopped respecting recoil. This Tac Comp has V6 porting and a compensator machined into the barrel. Ports first. Comp second. Recoil basically gets jumped in an alley before the gun even has a chance to move. And that’s the wild part. The gun barely moves. The only real “problem” is the concussion. It barks. You feel the blast. But after shooting it for a while, I realized the only reason I noticed the concussion so much is because the gun gives you almost nothing else to feel. No real flip. No real rise. No real shove. Just flat. Stupid flat. Texas flat. And under $3,000, this thing is clearly walking into the Staccato XC conversation with a lot of confidence. So now I want to hear from y’all: Is Bull Armory becoming one of the best values in the 2011 world… Or are you still taking the Staccato XC? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who thinks ports and comps on the same gun is doing too much.

Bull Armory built a gun that feels like it stopped respecting recoil. This Tac Comp has V6 porting and a compensator machined into the barrel. Ports first. Comp second. Recoil basically gets jumped in an alley before the gun even has a chance to move. And that’s the wild part. The gun barely moves. The only real “problem” is the concussion. It barks. You feel the blast. But after shooting it for a while, I realized the only reason I noticed the concussion so much is because the gun gives you almost nothing else to feel. No real flip. No real rise. No real shove. Just flat. Stupid flat. Texas flat. And under $3,000, this thing is clearly walking into the Staccato XC conversation with a lot of confidence. So now I want to hear from y’all: Is Bull Armory becoming one of the best values in the 2011 world… Or are you still taking the Staccato XC? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who thinks ports and comps on the same gun is doing too much.

Colion Noir

64,713 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CANDACE OWENS JUST DESTROYED THE OFFICIAL CHARLIE KIRK STORY — AND IT GETS EVEN WORSE Candace Owens just broke down the rooftop footage from Charlie Kirk’s assassination… and the official narrative is falling apart fast. Side-by-side comparison shows what a real military-style lateral crawl looks like versus the person on the roof. The guy who recorded the footage said he saw no recoil. The person they say is Tyler, is seen sprinting full speed across the roof. How do you run like that with a long rifle strapped to your leg? He only pulls something out after lying down. He doesn’t assemble anything. After the shot, he doesn’t take anything apart either... he just gets up and runs. When he jumps off the roof, he’s only holding a small bag. So where is the rifle? It wasn’t in his pants. He didn’t have time to disassemble it. And we never see him hide it. The official story keeps getting more impossible. What do you think really happened on that roof?

🚨 CANDACE OWENS JUST DESTROYED THE OFFICIAL CHARLIE KIRK STORY — AND IT GETS EVEN WORSE Candace Owens just broke down the rooftop footage from Charlie Kirk’s assassination… and the official narrative is falling apart fast. Side-by-side comparison shows what a real military-style lateral crawl looks like versus the person on the roof. The guy who recorded the footage said he saw no recoil. The person they say is Tyler, is seen sprinting full speed across the roof. How do you run like that with a long rifle strapped to your leg? He only pulls something out after lying down. He doesn’t assemble anything. After the shot, he doesn’t take anything apart either... he just gets up and runs. When he jumps off the roof, he’s only holding a small bag. So where is the rifle? It wasn’t in his pants. He didn’t have time to disassemble it. And we never see him hide it. The official story keeps getting more impossible. What do you think really happened on that roof?

HustleBitch

24,132 次观看 • 9 天前

So, I have been watching the video for hours. I am pretty sure I see a gun, I see him doing something in the area of the screwdriver was found and I see a recoil, but first, let's break it down, this first video, I think it is clear he is running with a gun, this looks like the barrel to me. Excuse my poor editing, I was trying to give you an area to look at to see the barrel--inevitably, a cultist will take a still from this video where I prematurely circled the area so you know what area to look, and they will claim "NO GUN" you watch. Anyway, I do not care, first part is proving a gun was on that roof and I clearly see it, do you?

So, I have been watching the video for hours. I am pretty sure I see a gun, I see him doing something in the area of the screwdriver was found and I see a recoil, but first, let's break it down, this first video, I think it is clear he is running with a gun, this looks like the barrel to me. Excuse my poor editing, I was trying to give you an area to look at to see the barrel--inevitably, a cultist will take a still from this video where I prematurely circled the area so you know what area to look, and they will claim "NO GUN" you watch. Anyway, I do not care, first part is proving a gun was on that roof and I clearly see it, do you?

MR. Xclusive

24,959 次观看 • 11 天前

Folks, here's another little design exercise that I spent the last few hours on 👍 This is based on a thesis I had for basically a decade now: Aiming in FPS games with the right analog stick is quite bad. Your thumb has maybe 1cm of travel on a tiny stick, fighting a spring, trying to make precise micro-adjustments AND fast 180-degree turns with the same input. If we're being honest, that's a terrible interface for the task. Your wrist, on the other hand, has roughly 180 degrees of rotational range, uses your entire forearm's muscle groups, and can make both ultra-precise micro-corrections and fast sweeping motions naturally. It's why mouse aiming destroys stick aiming: You're using your wrist and arm, not your thumb. So the thesis is simple: what if we just used wrist rotation directly as the aiming input? No VR headset, no special hardware. Just hold an old Switch1 Joy-Con in your right hand and rotate your wrist. Small rotations for precision tracking, larger rotations for fast turns. Recoil kicks the camera up and you instinctively tilt your hand back to compensate, etc. To me, it just feels right. I built a little prototype to test this. It has 4 weapons with some recoil, cover you can lean around, jump/crouch, lock-on targeting, ammo management, blablabla. The whole point is to see if this input method feels as good in practice as it does in theory. The aiming algorithm handles all the shitty stuff: Dead zones against shaky hands, auto-clutching when you unwind your wrist, asymmetric sensitivity because human wrists rotate further inward than outward, response curves for precision at low speed without sacrificing fast flicks, etc. I made a quick video to show the prototype in action. And if you wanna try it yourself, I put a small zip file up here that contains the executable:

Folks, here's another little design exercise that I spent the last few hours on 👍 This is based on a thesis I had for basically a decade now: Aiming in FPS games with the right analog stick is quite bad. Your thumb has maybe 1cm of travel on a tiny stick, fighting a spring, trying to make precise micro-adjustments AND fast 180-degree turns with the same input. If we're being honest, that's a terrible interface for the task. Your wrist, on the other hand, has roughly 180 degrees of rotational range, uses your entire forearm's muscle groups, and can make both ultra-precise micro-corrections and fast sweeping motions naturally. It's why mouse aiming destroys stick aiming: You're using your wrist and arm, not your thumb. So the thesis is simple: what if we just used wrist rotation directly as the aiming input? No VR headset, no special hardware. Just hold an old Switch1 Joy-Con in your right hand and rotate your wrist. Small rotations for precision tracking, larger rotations for fast turns. Recoil kicks the camera up and you instinctively tilt your hand back to compensate, etc. To me, it just feels right. I built a little prototype to test this. It has 4 weapons with some recoil, cover you can lean around, jump/crouch, lock-on targeting, ammo management, blablabla. The whole point is to see if this input method feels as good in practice as it does in theory. The aiming algorithm handles all the shitty stuff: Dead zones against shaky hands, auto-clutching when you unwind your wrist, asymmetric sensitivity because human wrists rotate further inward than outward, response curves for precision at low speed without sacrificing fast flicks, etc. I made a quick video to show the prototype in action. And if you wanna try it yourself, I put a small zip file up here that contains the executable:

thomasmahler

11,678 次观看 • 4 个月前

10 months ago, President Trump and Benny Johnson were saying the surveillance footage from the Tyler Robinson manhunt was so poor that it was essentially useless. Trump described the figure on the roof as “the size of an ant.” Benny Johnson said you couldn’t even tell if it was a man or a woman. Fast forward to the preliminary hearing, and many of the very same voices—including Benny Johnson, Brandon Tatum, Graham Allen, Andrew Kolvet, and Blake Neff—were describing that same surveillance video as “high-definition,” “4K,” and so clear that it supposedly showed Tyler Robinson, the trigger pull, recoil, and even a muzzle flash. Which is it? Was the footage too blurry to identify whether the person was male or female, or was it crystal clear and capable of proving every detail of the shooting? The video didn’t change. The narrative did.

10 months ago, President Trump and Benny Johnson were saying the surveillance footage from the Tyler Robinson manhunt was so poor that it was essentially useless. Trump described the figure on the roof as “the size of an ant.” Benny Johnson said you couldn’t even tell if it was a man or a woman. Fast forward to the preliminary hearing, and many of the very same voices—including Benny Johnson, Brandon Tatum, Graham Allen, Andrew Kolvet, and Blake Neff—were describing that same surveillance video as “high-definition,” “4K,” and so clear that it supposedly showed Tyler Robinson, the trigger pull, recoil, and even a muzzle flash. Which is it? Was the footage too blurry to identify whether the person was male or female, or was it crystal clear and capable of proving every detail of the shooting? The video didn’t change. The narrative did.

The Black Line Brief

15,496 次观看 • 12 天前

I keep hearing the same story from Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, and Jack Posobiec about the "bombshell" video shown on the final day of the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. So I pulled the video apart frame by frame. My conclusion: the public narrative about what this video supposedly shows doesn't match what I see. ❌ It's not a magically enhanced 4K video. ❌ You cannot clearly see a rifle. ❌ You do not see a shot fired. ❌ You do not see a muzzle flash. ❌ You do not see recoil. ❌ There is no audio. What you do see is a zoomed-in version of an already low-quality surveillance video. The individual climbs the railing, runs, lies down for a period of time, and then runs away at approximately 12:23:30. That's it. Watch the video yourself and decide whether the claims being made about this footage are supported by what is actually on the screen. Receipts matter. Video attached.

I keep hearing the same story from Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, and Jack Posobiec about the "bombshell" video shown on the final day of the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. So I pulled the video apart frame by frame. My conclusion: the public narrative about what this video supposedly shows doesn't match what I see. ❌ It's not a magically enhanced 4K video. ❌ You cannot clearly see a rifle. ❌ You do not see a shot fired. ❌ You do not see a muzzle flash. ❌ You do not see recoil. ❌ There is no audio. What you do see is a zoomed-in version of an already low-quality surveillance video. The individual climbs the railing, runs, lies down for a period of time, and then runs away at approximately 12:23:30. That's it. Watch the video yourself and decide whether the claims being made about this footage are supported by what is actually on the screen. Receipts matter. Video attached.

The Black Line Brief

20,185 次观看 • 1 个月前

Yes, Ricky was surely the culprit. But only in pushing the button. HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PALM PISTOL IN HIS HAND ! > 1. Nothing is visible between the fingers, but the shadow on the frames 0, or +1 ; > 2. Cutler's hand is half way open, with all fingers positioned forward. Nothing can be held in the open hand position like that. Especially when the hand is in motion. If anything was in that hand, it would simply fall out ; > 3. Most certainly, no weapon can be aimed at the target in this kind of open hand position, even if something could have been in it. Any weapon has to be held with a firm grip, for it to be aimed properly. Any suggesting that a weapon can be aimed form such a completely open hand position is utterly laughable ; > 4. No squeezing action in the hand is visible at all. All fingers remain perfectly stationary ; > > > 5. NO RECOIL action on the hand whatsoever ! Anyone who knows anything about the basic laws of physics, would know that no weapon is ever fired without a recoil action. Even the knowledge of the laws of physics is not required for this understanding. Just the basic common sense should be sufficient. Any one of the points above mentioned makes this palm pistol option impossible. Let alone all of them at the same time. And this evidence is with regards to the hand only. If I were to make the whole list of evidence against the palm pistol, aside of the actual hand itself, it would probably be 30-40 items long. So, I will skip that pages long extended part. I hope that just the above stated is sufficient enough ? But the full length video, with all the frames, each frame by frame examination is coming right up.

Yes, Ricky was surely the culprit. But only in pushing the button. HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PALM PISTOL IN HIS HAND ! > 1. Nothing is visible between the fingers, but the shadow on the frames 0, or +1 ; > 2. Cutler's hand is half way open, with all fingers positioned forward. Nothing can be held in the open hand position like that. Especially when the hand is in motion. If anything was in that hand, it would simply fall out ; > 3. Most certainly, no weapon can be aimed at the target in this kind of open hand position, even if something could have been in it. Any weapon has to be held with a firm grip, for it to be aimed properly. Any suggesting that a weapon can be aimed form such a completely open hand position is utterly laughable ; > 4. No squeezing action in the hand is visible at all. All fingers remain perfectly stationary ; > > > 5. NO RECOIL action on the hand whatsoever ! Anyone who knows anything about the basic laws of physics, would know that no weapon is ever fired without a recoil action. Even the knowledge of the laws of physics is not required for this understanding. Just the basic common sense should be sufficient. Any one of the points above mentioned makes this palm pistol option impossible. Let alone all of them at the same time. And this evidence is with regards to the hand only. If I were to make the whole list of evidence against the palm pistol, aside of the actual hand itself, it would probably be 30-40 items long. So, I will skip that pages long extended part. I hope that just the above stated is sufficient enough ? But the full length video, with all the frames, each frame by frame examination is coming right up.

US_did_ 911

143,561 次观看 • 4 个月前

Looking at the handguards, wireframes are different & EFT's has holes for the screws whereas ABI's screws are part of the texture, however... Unless these handguards went through the exact same wear & tear during service something fishy is 100% going on 🤣

Looking at the handguards, wireframes are different & EFT's has holes for the screws whereas ABI's screws are part of the texture, however... Unless these handguards went through the exact same wear & tear during service something fishy is 100% going on 🤣

DanExert

381,173 次观看 • 2 年前

Video on attempts to develop an anti-drone Active Protection System (APS) in the Russian Armed Forces. The APS architecture with a stationary defeat system and the chosen off-the-shelf solutions, such as canister charges for "Tucha," in my opinion, will not ensure success in this endeavor. The idea of manually firing canister rounds is not even worth considering against FPV drones, no matter how many cameras are installed. Moreover, even if FPV drones could miraculously be shot down, this offers zero help against "Baba Yaga" drones.On the other hand, building an APS on a fast, stabilized rotating platform with a rational defeat system is not feasible due to the lack of commercially available solutions for such a platform, which must also withstand significant repeated recoil. Meanwhile, private entities or the military have access to existing software and hardware solutions for drone detection systems, which design bureaus will never use, as they prefer to start from scratch with 10-year R&D projects to maximize profits.

Video on attempts to develop an anti-drone Active Protection System (APS) in the Russian Armed Forces. The APS architecture with a stationary defeat system and the chosen off-the-shelf solutions, such as canister charges for "Tucha," in my opinion, will not ensure success in this endeavor. The idea of manually firing canister rounds is not even worth considering against FPV drones, no matter how many cameras are installed. Moreover, even if FPV drones could miraculously be shot down, this offers zero help against "Baba Yaga" drones.On the other hand, building an APS on a fast, stabilized rotating platform with a rational defeat system is not feasible due to the lack of commercially available solutions for such a platform, which must also withstand significant repeated recoil. Meanwhile, private entities or the military have access to existing software and hardware solutions for drone detection systems, which design bureaus will never use, as they prefer to start from scratch with 10-year R&D projects to maximize profits.

Andrei_bt

14,001 次观看 • 9 个月前