Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

๐Ÿ”ดMacG is right, even though Diddy may be guilty, the illuminatti would have squashed his whole saga had Diddy not pissed them off! Dali Mpofu Mpho Phalatse Gayton Hlophe KwaZulu-Natal Edwin Sodi #MakhadziOneWomanShow President Cyril Ramaphosa JMPD Dr Hlophe Hillbrow Riri

80,803 views โ€ข 2 years ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

10 Comments

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ's profile picture
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ2 years ago

Might be right.

Gazett's profile picture
Gazett2 years ago

Mac is telling the truth Diddy is going down for pissing off the top dawgs

SLACEHOODPHARMACIST's profile picture
SLACEHOODPHARMACIST2 years ago

Who are those people Illuminate we busy saying illuminate but we don't know those people

Adv. Nel (Maximum Liberty ) ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บโ™ ๏ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ's profile picture
Adv. Nel (Maximum Liberty ) ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บโ™ ๏ธ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ2 years ago

Jacob Zuma

Nongoloza ยฎ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ's profile picture
Nongoloza ยฎ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ2 years ago

Same thing happened to Bill Cosby, to Michael Jackson etc

uChris Brown's profile picture
uChris Brown2 years ago

Mina what scares me is why all these American "Greats" have this in common. - Michael Jackson was said to be a Rapist R.Kelly is prison as we speak same allegations Now Diddy... Why Kanti ama Americans e So fucked up???? These people could get as Noma nini noma kuphi

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ENOCKAY PICTURES's profile picture
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ENOCKAY PICTURES2 years ago

Look at it this way, most powerful people have scandals but some are protected and those who are protected are controlled and once u get out of line,u can easily be exposed

Tebogo Pharedi's profile picture
Tebogo Pharedi2 years ago

MacG nailed it...

HProdigy_ML's profile picture
HProdigy_ML2 years ago

He's just saying things he saw on Twitter, even the Jay-Z reference.

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ENOCKAY PICTURES's profile picture
๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ENOCKAY PICTURES2 years ago

@85_its_oh_kay Ok

Related Videos

Sadly, Leeโ€™s attacks against President Trump only get worse. See video below ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป As the conversation continued, Bryant pointed out to Jason Lee that the Epstein files โ€œmay be the Watergate of our timeโ€ that takes President Trump down. However, Lee responded that he didn't believe anything would happen to Trump because he claimed โ€œwhite American Christians have a history of supporting pedophilesโ€. Lee said, โ€œWell, first of all, okay, I'm going to say this and I know some people may not like it, but it's probably a lot of Catholics on that list, too. And the Catholic Church for years has been embedded in this scandal. And white folks have sat around and still did Ash Wednesday.โ€ Lee then seemingly called for violence, asking why Trump haters haven't burned America down yet: โ€œThe Cubans and the Latinos for Trump were cha cha chaing all the way to the voter booth and now he's putting them in cages and sending them to wherever he wants and it's still okay. We ain't burnt the country down yet. Barack Obama. We had to have that man go dig his birth certificate out of some hole to prove he was an American. The standard, the double standard has been right in front.โ€ Lee then ended his rant by comparing Trump to P-Diddy: โ€œNo. Diddy lost everything, including his freedom. His children lost their peace. And I'm not protecting Diddy. I don't even use baby oil. I don't got no dildos at my house. Okay.โ€ See video below ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป

Laura Loomer

41,264 views โ€ข 7 months ago

Will Diddy get pardoned by President Trump? It's a conversation that has been going on since before the embattled music mogul was even convicted. Now that the Bad Boy founder has been sentenced to 50 months in prison, there's been even more drama surrounding whether the POTUS will free Puff. On Monday (Oct. 20), TMZ reported that The Donald was "vacillating" on a commutation for Diddy, citing a "high-ranking White House official." However, on Tuesday (Oct. 21), NBC News countered the celebrity news site's reporting with a statement. "There is zero truth to the TMZ report, which we wouldโ€™ve gladly explained had they reached out before running their fake news," a White House official told NBC News in a statement. "The President, not anonymous sources, is the final decider on pardons and commutations." TMZ responded by saying they stand by their reporting. The same day, Deadline ran a story saying sources tell them President Trump has cooled on the idea of pardoning Diddy due to the possibility of MAGA backlash. Back in May, Trump left the door open for the possibility of giving Diddy a hall pass. "I'd look at what's happening," Trump told the assembled press during a meeting in the Oval Office. "And I haven't been watching it too closely. Though it is certainly getting a lot of coverage. I haven't spoken to him in years. He used to really like me a lot. I think when I ran for politics, that relationship busted up." "I would certainly look at the facts," Trump continued. "If I think somebody was mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact." In July, Diddy was found guilty of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. On Oct. 3, he was sentenced to 50 months in federal prison. XXL has reached out to President Trump's camp and Diddy's team for comment.

XXL Magazine

11,773 views โ€ข 11 months ago

I predicted it. Todayโ€™s verdict in the Diddy case is nothing less than a complete and total failure by the prosecution in what I previously described as the most expensive prostitution trial in American history. The jury didnโ€™t believe any of the victims. Cassie was discredited because of her emails and text messages saying she enjoyed the freak-offs. Mia didnโ€™t tell law enforcement or prosecutors that she was sexually assaulted, and she posted on social media that she loved Diddy. Jane accepted money and gifts from Diddy, and he continues to pay her rent, so the jurors concluded that she knew what she was getting herself into and that it was a transactional relationship. The sex trafficking charges were weak because of the overwhelming evidence of consent. The prosecutionโ€™s only real chance of a victory was racketeering and proving a non-sex-related predicate acts like kidnapping, arson, extortion, or bribery. The fact that the jury even rejected that argument shows the many flaws in the prosecutionโ€™s case. The government made a number of fatal self-induced errors. They included Gina in the indictment as victim 3 when they didnโ€™t have assurances that she would show up, and she went missing days before the trial. They failed to lean on and flip key members of Diddyโ€™s inner circle like KK and D-ROC. They didnโ€™t anticipate that the victimsโ€™ messages and social media posts would be used against them and failed to elicit the bad testimony during their direct examination to take the sting out of cross. The prosecution didnโ€™t call any of the sexual assault victims who filed civil lawsuits, who did not have a romantic or professional relationship with Diddy. Victims who were minors couldnโ€™t consent, so that avoids the defenseโ€™s best argument. And victims who donโ€™t have a relationship with Diddy wouldnโ€™t have messages expressing admiration for him. The big question in the case was why the victims stayed if they were abused? The prosecution failed to answer that question. Expert witness Dawn Hughes is now 0-2 in high profile trials, having failed to convince jurors in the Amber Heard case. By the way, the prosecution in the Harvey Weinstein retrial also failed to answer that question, and it was a setback for the #MeToo movement. Let me be clear. I believe the victims. But if you come for the king, you best not miss. And today was a huge miss by the DOJ. This case will have a chilling effect on other victims coming forward. Imagine telling jurors you were urinated on, forced to take drugs until you threw up, and to have sex on your period and UTI, and they donโ€™t believe you? They had to relive their trauma in a very public and embarrassing way, and you better believe other victims will hesitate to do the same if they wonโ€™t be believed. I was surprised Judge Subramanian denied Diddy bail today. Diddy should be a free man, and he is not a risk of flight or a danger to the community. I expect the defense to appeal the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rather than wait for the October 3 sentencing, and I wouldnโ€™t be surprised if an appellate panel reverses the detention order. Weโ€™re talking about prostitution here. It is not a serious crime and is rarely prosecuted by the Feds. I put more than a thousand people in federal prison, I never charged the Mann Act. And in theory, if Diddy is guilty of prostitution, so are Cassie and Jane. They communicated with the sex workers directly, set up the freak-offs and hotel nights, and paid them cash or through Zelle or CashApp. Iโ€™m not suggesting that Cassie or Jane be prosecuted, but to just show how absurd it is to hold Diddy in custody on prostitution convictions alone. Ex ante, no prosecutor would have charged Diddy with just prostitution, and even if they had, no judge would have denied bail for such a minor offense. Even though the Mann Act carries a potential 10 year maximum sentence on each count, Diddy should get time served or close to it. His sentencing guideline range on the prostitution charges alone is at worst 21-27 months. The government is trying to backdoor the uncharged and even acquitted conduct to get to a much higher range of 51-63 months because of our purported coercion and violence. 4-5 years in federal prison is unjust, and is sour grapes by prosecutors who are unwilling to accept the jury verdict. This is why people think Diddy is being railroaded and treated unfairly. Being a prosecutor is not about wins and losses; itโ€™s about pursuing justice. The jury has spoken, and prosecutors in the prestigious Southern District of New York should take this very embarrassing loss and move on.

Neama Rahmani

34,699 views โ€ข 1 year ago

Deflection or Analysis? In Rushing to Defend Mkhwanazi, Mpofu-Walsh Ignores Key Questionsโ€ผ๏ธโ€ผ๏ธโ€ผ๏ธ Dr Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh argues that it is unfair for President Julius Malema to label Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi a coward, maintaining that Mkhwanazi would have made the same statements even if Malema had been present at the Ad Hoc Committee. But that view overlooks a key point: accountability is not just about what is said, but what is deliberately left unsaid. The criticism from President Malemaโ€™s side is rooted in the claim that Mkhwanazi failed to disclose that he himself requested the meeting, and that sensitive details regarding the investigation into AKAโ€™s murder were shared in that context. So, this omission becomes central to the question of integrity. Mpofu-Walsh further argues that supporting Mkhwanazi does not make one his โ€œball-boyโ€ or โ€œball-girl,โ€ and credits him with exposing significant institutional rot in a short period. He insists that while criticism is fair game, calling Mkhwanazi a coward crosses the line, describing him instead as โ€œextremely brave.โ€ The real issue, however, is not about praise or insults it is whether all relevant facts are being placed before the public. In political and law enforcement matters alike, partial transparency can be just as contentious as outright silence. We are NOT Mkhwanazi Fanatics!

๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Apostle Dr D Mekgwe๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ

10,854 views โ€ข 6 months ago

Because the South African government is not a vigilante group, it runs the state and states engage diplomatically not through insults on social media. President Cyril Ramaphosa knows exactly what he is doing, and in my view he is doing the right thing. Many South African companies have outgrown the South African market. Take MTN, for example. If you removed MTN from its African operations outside of South Africa, it would become a much smaller company because South Africa contributes only about 18% of MTNโ€™s total earnings. The remaining 82% comes from its operations across the rest of Africa. As the MTN CEO explains below, those relationships have to be nurtured. You cannot allow xenophobia and Afrophobia to destroy them. These companies pay taxes in South Africa, and the profits they generate across the continent ultimately benefit the South African economy. Their expansion creates value for shareholders, supports jobs at home, contributes to tax revenue, and strengthens South Africaโ€™s economic position. It would therefore be foolish for President Ramaphosa not to engage with his African counterparts. Failing to do so would damage not only diplomatic relations, but also trade and investment ties that are vital to South African companies operating across the continent. If African governments were to adopt a united position against South African businesses because of deteriorating relations, the South African economy would suffer significantly. That is why diplomacy is not a luxury; it is an economic necessity. Unfortunately, many of those fuelling these problems either do not understand how modern economies work or simply do not read enough to appreciate the importance of regional trade, investment, and economic interdependence.

Hopewell Chinโ€™ono

72,241 views โ€ข 2 months ago

VIDEO | Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Vikas Singh on NALSAR controversy, says, "BCI chairman is behaving like the BCI is his personal property. Whenever he issues an order, letter or direction, he does not even refer to under which provision of the Act or regulation he's making such kind of an order... The resolution, the order which was passed was wholly illegal. And in fact, some people had also approached me, and we were about to mention the matter in the morning. A writ petition also was to be filed. And I'm 100% sure it would have been stayed by the Supreme Court. Probably he got a hint of that and he started withdrawing in phases. First, he withdrew partially, then NALSAR passed a resolution on whether they can do such an inquiry or not, which is also permissible, and they will consider it in the executive committee. So he realised that they may ultimately say that they will not do even that inquiry which he said should happen in the second letter. So at night, he tweeted that he will withdraw completely. He has to understand that he is the chairman of the regulator of the entire legal profession. He has to set the right standards for the youngsters to follow. I am not trying to, for once, even suggest that what the children did with regard to not protesting against the CJI coming for the convocation. But that is their right under the Constitution. They may be ill-advised, they may be, you know, not doing the right thing. They may be justified also..." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

71,961 views โ€ข 1 month ago