Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇮🇷|MACH 7. THE INTERCEPTOR DOES NOT EXIST. IRGC Aerospace Advisor, Brig. Gen. Balali: "Our missiles hit at Mach 7. To stop them, the enemy needs even faster interceptors." Read that sentence again. It is not a threat. It is a physics problem Washington cannot solve. What Mach 7 Means...

450,395 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

20 Yorum

Bread profil fotoğrafı
Bread8 gün önce

But Iran has not been able to hit a single air craft carrier this entire war. They were much closer before and it’s not that Iran hasn’t tried they just don’t have as good of tech as they brag about.

Ibinabo Bernard profil fotoğrafı
Ibinabo Bernard8 gün önce

I believe with all this technology Iranians must be living a life of luxury, please tell me that.

Stefan Breit profil fotoğrafı
Stefan Breit8 gün önce

Then shut up and show us! The US attacked you twice already in the last days. You loose credibility of you not act and they use salami slice tactics to bomb your air defense away. How long do you wanna wait??? Restraint doesn't work, they will just come again and again.

tim profil fotoğrafı
tim8 gün önce

Iran has proved that they are true manipulators , evil and warmongers. They are at extreme of hypocrisy second only to Taliban or Israel

Kidobutai profil fotoğrafı
Kidobutai8 gün önce

Iran has a Mach 7 missile but the US doesn't? How ?

MOCez🇷🇺🇮🇶🇾🇪🇨🇳🇵🇰🇵🇸🇱🇧🇮🇷🇰🇵🇪🇸☀️ profil fotoğrafı
MOCez🇷🇺🇮🇶🇾🇪🇨🇳🇵🇰🇵🇸🇱🇧🇮🇷🇰🇵🇪🇸☀️8 gün önce

So the only warfare edge the US have on Iran is Nuke, so why wasting time?, why not build the fkin bomb?.

LaCulpaNoEsDelPig profil fotoğrafı
LaCulpaNoEsDelPig8 gün önce

🤣🤣🤣🤣

LuD Wick-01 profil fotoğrafı
LuD Wick-018 gün önce

As if those guys cared about the death toll

GreatMan profil fotoğrafı
GreatMan8 gün önce

Just launch it

Tury Brasca profil fotoğrafı
Tury Brasca8 gün önce

Lo q no entiendo con lo potente q es Irán pq no ha ganado ya la.guerra?

عبدالعزيز بن سليمان الكبان🇸🇦 profil fotoğrafı
عبدالعزيز بن سليمان الكبان🇸🇦8 gün önce

ضراط في تنك

Pulp Fiction profil fotoğrafı
Pulp Fiction8 gün önce

Fattah-1 and 2 have much higher speeds than Mach 7. The US Pac-3 interceptor is old & just does not have the capacity to intercept these. Only the S-500 of Russia has, I think.

Workoutcta profil fotoğrafı
Workoutcta8 gün önce

A huevo!!!! Vamos Irán!!!!!

Luís Avental profil fotoğrafı
Luís Avental8 gün önce

Just use them to finish Israel or one day they will become useless like your armed forces

Bruce Lee profil fotoğrafı
Bruce Lee8 gün önce

Love to it tested on Israel

tran thanh tung profil fotoğrafı
tran thanh tung8 gün önce

Vậy thì lấy ra mà bắn hàng không mẫu hạm của Mỹ kìa, nói dóc lắm thế!

Abel Cardoso profil fotoğrafı
Abel Cardoso8 gün önce

Faz sentido essa análise, @grok?

David Tay profil fotoğrafı
David Tay8 gün önce

Mach 7 isn’t a threat — it’s a physics problem. At 2.4 km/s the kill window collapses to seconds. Existing Patriot/THAAD/Aegis geometry wasn’t built for maneuvering hypersonic glide vehicles. Detection range+predictive guidance + higher-energy interceptors are the real solution

Charles profil fotoğrafı
Charles8 gün önce

Need Mack 7 to read that post

mvdb profil fotoğrafı
mvdb8 gün önce

But they did got intercepted so your long post here is invalid. Do not pretend thwy have some wonderweapons now.

Benzer Videolar

BREAKING: Satellite imagery shows an Iranian ballistic missile struck the AN/FPS-132 phased array radar at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. If the damage is as severe as the imagery suggests, Iran just destroyed a $1.1 billion piece of equipment that took years to build and cannot be replaced on any timeline relevant to this war. The AN/FPS-132 is not an ordinary radar. It is one of a handful of early warning sensors in the entire US global missile defence architecture. It detects ballistic missile launches at ranges exceeding 5,000 kilometres. It provides the initial tracking data that allows Patriot, THAAD, and Aegis systems to calculate intercept solutions. Without it, every other layer of missile defence in the Gulf theatre is operating with compressed reaction times and degraded situational awareness. Qatar intercepted 101 ballistic missiles during this conflict. Sixty-five missiles and twelve drones were fired at Al Udeid specifically. The base’s layered defences stopped nearly all of them. Two got through. One of them appears to have hit the single most valuable sensor in the entire region. This is the mathematics of asymmetric warfare in a single event. Iran does not need to overwhelm the defence system. It needs one missile to reach one target. The defender has to intercept everything. The attacker has to succeed once. A ballistic missile costs Iran a fraction of what the radar costs. Even at the most generous estimate of Iranian missile production costs, the exchange ratio is hundreds to one in the attacker’s favour. Now connect this to the insurance mechanism. I have written all day that the B-2 and B-52 campaigns are destroying Iran’s conventional military but not its ability to threaten asymmetric targets. This is the proof. The most heavily defended air base in the Middle East, housing CENTCOM’s forward headquarters, protected by Patriot batteries and the most advanced interception systems the US deploys, just lost its primary early warning radar to a single ballistic missile that evaded every layer. If the US military cannot protect a $1.1 billion radar inside its own most fortified base, on what basis does any reinsurer model that a tanker transiting the Strait of Hormuz is protectable by Navy escorts? The DFC insurance backstop announced hours ago promised Navy escorts would secure Gulf shipping. The AN/FPS-132 strike demonstrates that even the most sophisticated US defensive systems cannot guarantee protection against Iranian ballistic missiles in a saturation attack environment. One missile. One radar. $1.1 billion. And a defence architecture that just revealed its fundamental constraint: perfection is required, and perfection is impossible. The escorts cannot guarantee what the base defences could not. The insurance market already knew this. Now the satellite imagery proves it.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

3,111,787 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

What is Netanyahu expected to say to the president? The main problem with the ballistic-missile story is that the Iranians have caught on to the daylight—the gap—between Israel and the United States. What happened here is that Donald Trump gave his word and then broke it. "We will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons." But he didn’t talk about conventional weapons—the ballistic missiles that threaten Israel. They threaten Israel to such an extent that Netanyahu himself, in a video announcing to the Israeli people that he was launching Operation Nation of Lions, said that two existential threats had developed. The nuclear threat—you’ve known about for years—but also the threat of thousands of ballistic missiles. What has happened since then? The Iranians are not acting at all on the nuclear front, as far as we know. They have not even extracted the enriched material buried underground. But they are very much intensifying their experiments with ballistic missiles. Either because they think it is threatening, or because, as Netanyahu says, it is an existential threat to Israel. We also have a race between the number of their missiles and the number of our missiles—and let’s say that both countries need to recover on this issue. Let’s ask the question now, and here I don’t have an answer. When Netanyahu goes to Washington to talk to Trump about this, is he talking to him about a combined attack—which seems a bit far-fetched to me, because the Americans really have no intention of getting involved in a conventional weapons conflict anywhere in the world; otherwise they would never get out of it—or is he content to give Israel permission to attack on its own, with the U.S. providing a defensive umbrella? One. Two, it should also be said, in this context, that there is a big debate in the Israeli cabinet and at the top about whether it is possible to launch an attack every six months. You cannot—unlike the nuclear project—you cannot eliminate the Iranian ballistic threat. Is it sustainable to come every six months, eight months, and launch another round, which includes them firing at us, all the flights leaving Israel, and all the implications for the economy? There is no decision in Israel. There is no decision in the U.S. that's what they will discuss.

Amit Segal

273,898 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce