Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Maddow: That has never happened at this scale in this way before when it comes to programing changes, presumably because it's not the right way to treat people and it's inefficient and it's unnecessary, and it kind of drops the bottom out of whether or not people feel like...

49,294 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Candice 🌻🌻 🇺🇸 🇺🇦🌻🌻
Candice 🌻🌻 🇺🇸 🇺🇦🌻🌻1 год назад

Watched her tonight. She’s absolutely right and I’m glad she just put it right out there.

Фото профиля Michael Anton Fischer
Michael Anton Fischer1 год назад

There is no second best. To be the optimal medium of exchange and unit of account, it's best to not have to convert between different moneys. And since network effects grow exponentially with the number of users, once a certain user threshold has been passed, any new monetary technology has to be significantly better than the dominant one to replace it.

Фото профиля The Future is a F’ing Nightmare
The Future is a F’ing Nightmare1 год назад

“Treat people well.” - Rachel Maddow Hint: People don’t want to continue working for an organization that doesn’t treat people well. @MSNBC 🧐

Фото профиля Banti Prasad
Banti Prasad1 год назад

Maddow's statement raises questions about workplace ethics and effective management practices. When large-scale sudden changes occur in fields like programming, they can negatively impact employee morale and work culture. This not only increases instability but also worsens the workplace environment.

Фото профиля Douglas Wacker
Douglas Wacker1 год назад

If only MSNBC executives would understand that bootlicking the current administration is not the path to a successful business strategy, and what is really their goal, a greater profit margin. My condolences to the hard-chargers who suffer the consequences.

Фото профиля D.S.S.
D.S.S.1 год назад

They should fire HER…they WILL unless they ARE racist….🤷🏻‍♂️

Фото профиля Ignacio David Castro!
Ignacio David Castro!1 год назад

Respect to her for publicly having her colleagues backs.

Фото профиля Dj Omega Mvp
Dj Omega Mvp1 год назад

She’s the next one to go down. That leaves Mika and Traitor Joe all by themselves in that channel—those two were quick to kiss the ring of dictator trump from the start.

Фото профиля MAGA LION
MAGA LION1 год назад

Maddow is next on the firing list. She's an idiot and just called MSNBC racist for firing joy reid lmao

Фото профиля Emilio Cazadores
Emilio Cazadores1 год назад

They fired the only non white prime time host. Inc Fox news light

Фото профиля DCHAZM823
DCHAZM8231 год назад

She doesn't even realize she is the reason.

Похожие видео

Remote Viewer Sounds Alarm on Future Political Crisis Remote Viewer, Nyiam, looked at the future U.S. president of 2030, and saw a MAJOR psyop campaign meant to manipulate the mass population: "I see a motorcade moving. So my assumption here is some people involved with this target move in a motorcade. They don't travel alone. They have a security detail. You know, they're chauffeured around. They have an itinerary they're following. They're meeting with high level people. Law enforcement would be at the scene or aware that they're going somewhere." "And it reminded me of, like, when, you know, and all the leaders, like, go to the G7 or the G8, whatever it is now, GS six, 7 or 8, whatever number it's at right now. It's like that, like, oh, all these important people are coming somewhere and, you know, everyone can see that. Like, oh, here comes the motorcade." "I see, stage an audience, watching this. It's like, you know, podium people on stage type event here. It does have an official governmental feel. And it feels like a warning or a projection, foretelling. So, like they're saying, hey, something's going to happen or this is happening, and it does feel like a kind of desperate measures." "Last straw, mood to it. Like, you know, bad news. Like we're gonna have to make some compromises. You know, people aren't going to be happy to hear this kind of announcement." "I see, could be a courtroom. It does have, judges and jury kind of mood to it. You know, there's people sitting here, there's some other people seated. It has a debate or crisis management theme to it. I get the idea of an uprising and the idea of implementing controls in an emergency situation, almost like the lockdowns." "You know what I mean? Like they're talking like, oh, this happened. So in this situation, we're going to have to do something that we don't usually do, like, like a lockdown or an emergency measures type, discussion or maybe approval or something like that." "It does feel very panicked and rushed. It's like, figure it out. Fluid situation scrambling quickly reacting again. The idea of moving groups or swapping or changing, people or assets. And when I say assets, I'm feeling like it's more like people, like relocating them or switching them their positions, switching someone's positions. Sudden change is very reactionary." "It's a very much like an oh sh*t kind of moment. There's this feeling I get with this", "...something's getting out of control, and it does feel like putting a lid on it, putting the fire out, stunting its growth, you know, trapping it in and blocking it and preventing it." "All that, all that kind of stuff, applying the pressure. And it has a walls closing in kind of feel to it, like setting up boundaries or putting up walls or defenses to prevent or stifle something from happening, hurting the sheep. That was the kind of last impression I had. There." "...Changing something up that you not supposed to change. You know, the whole idea of reorganizing or shifting or swapping or moving something or someone. And it does have, like a, you know, legalities kind of feel to it. Maybe the precedence has something to do with it, like, a very rare and unusual type response that this triggers,"

Future Forecasting Group

17,614 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"My feeling is this. I'm not pro-immigration. I'm not anti-immigration. What I want is for people who are not corrupt, who are well-informed about the issue, to figure out what the best level of immigration is and to set up a process that works. I don't want to see any illegals. I want to see people who come in legally. I want to see the number. Maybe it's a high number. Maybe it's a low number. I don't know, but I'd like to see the right number. I'd like us to at least aspire to it. And then most important of all, and I see this in both England and the US, somewhere along the line, we apparently decided it was impolite to ask people who wished to come to our countries, whether they liked us and aspired to be a part of our civilization. And my feeling is whatever the number is that we should be allowing in, I don't want any who don't aspire to be American. I want people who like it, who want to make the place better and want to participate in it because they see it as good. We should not be letting people in who want to destroy it. Obviously, I can't imagine that anyone has to say that out loud, but apparently it has to be said out loud because it's not obvious to a lot of people. And the point is, it is what I just said anti-immigrant? No, it's anti-people who hate us. And I have a right to be anti-people who hate us..." - Bret Weinstein on immigration, with Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

The Darkhorse Podcast

152,191 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад