Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Madison Test Constance's Limits Constance wanted a challenge to see how much weight she could handle #bbwwiththinchicks #bbwdomination #bbwfacesitting #squash #smother #petite #CCC #DDP #follow Clips4Sale.com Mistress Madison 📍 Chicago, IL

modelconstance1's profile picture

constance

17,995 subscribers

21,387 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#bbwwiththinchicks#bbwdomination#bbwfacesitting#squash#smother#petite#CCC#DDP#follow
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

FKA twigs is exactly where she’s meant to be. On Saturday night, FKA twigs sold out her first arena show at Madison Square Garden, a venue she was told wasn’t “for her.” She proved every single one of those people wrong. twigs has been grinding for years, and it showed in every second of her performance. She commanded the stage with total control, her dancing singular and untouchable. She brought with her an extraordinary crew of backup dancers, singers, emcees, voguers, and intrumentalists. The show even carved out an electric tribute to New York’s ballroom scene that was met with pure bliss. What sets FKA twigs apart is how much she means it. There’s no faking a twigs-level of devotion. She’s spent years obsessively sharpening her vision and honing her craft in order to prepare for a moment exactly like this one. And the crowd could absolutely feel the weight of that. The energy in the Garden was overwhelming as twigs took her fans through the full spectrum of emotion: from euphoric, sweat-soaked dance floor release to sickening heartbreak that settled over the room like a thick fog. For the finale, twigs performed her 2019 classic “Cellophane,” her voice breaking open on the repeated question, “Didn’t I do it for you?”—before channeling the song’s emotional spiral into a breathtaking pole descent. Naturally, the audience erupted. FKA twigs has undeniably arrived.
1:05

FKA twigs is exactly where she’s meant to be. On Saturday night, FKA twigs sold out her first arena show at Madison Square Garden, a venue she was told wasn’t “for her.” She proved every single one of those people wrong. twigs has been grinding for years, and it showed in every second of her performance. She commanded the stage with total control, her dancing singular and untouchable. She brought with her an extraordinary crew of backup dancers, singers, emcees, voguers, and intrumentalists. The show even carved out an electric tribute to New York’s ballroom scene that was met with pure bliss. What sets FKA twigs apart is how much she means it. There’s no faking a twigs-level of devotion. She’s spent years obsessively sharpening her vision and honing her craft in order to prepare for a moment exactly like this one. And the crowd could absolutely feel the weight of that. The energy in the Garden was overwhelming as twigs took her fans through the full spectrum of emotion: from euphoric, sweat-soaked dance floor release to sickening heartbreak that settled over the room like a thick fog. For the finale, twigs performed her 2019 classic “Cellophane,” her voice breaking open on the repeated question, “Didn’t I do it for you?”—before channeling the song’s emotional spiral into a breathtaking pole descent. Naturally, the audience erupted. FKA twigs has undeniably arrived.

Pigeons & Planes

36,574 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A 2-day-old foal bouncing with excitement to see her mom 🐎💞 I watched this video and found it so adorable 🥰 It’s just a little filly, only two days old, named Miss Tehya. They were leading her out of the barn. And yet her legs kept bouncing, her head stretched forward as if she was about to meet someone very important. She wanted to run to her mom. Her legs were still clumsy, her steps unsteady, but you could clearly see how happy she was. It was as if the only thing worth doing at that moment was getting closer to her mother. Foals can usually stand up and follow their mothers just a few hours after birth. That’s an instinct that keeps them from being left behind. But watching Miss Tehya, it didn’t feel like just instinct. It felt more like a little child eagerly running toward the person she trusts the most. Miss Tehya was born at a rescue farm and is being raised safely. But while watching the video, I didn’t think much about that. I just saw a baby horse happy to be with her mom, and it made my heart feel a little lighter. For people who raise horses, this moment probably means even more. It reminds us that the bond between a mare and her foal starts very early, and that keeping them close from the very beginning really matters. Just a two-day-old foal, bouncing along toward her mother. But it was enough to make me smile ☺️
1:56

A 2-day-old foal bouncing with excitement to see her mom 🐎💞 I watched this video and found it so adorable 🥰 It’s just a little filly, only two days old, named Miss Tehya. They were leading her out of the barn. And yet her legs kept bouncing, her head stretched forward as if she was about to meet someone very important. She wanted to run to her mom. Her legs were still clumsy, her steps unsteady, but you could clearly see how happy she was. It was as if the only thing worth doing at that moment was getting closer to her mother. Foals can usually stand up and follow their mothers just a few hours after birth. That’s an instinct that keeps them from being left behind. But watching Miss Tehya, it didn’t feel like just instinct. It felt more like a little child eagerly running toward the person she trusts the most. Miss Tehya was born at a rescue farm and is being raised safely. But while watching the video, I didn’t think much about that. I just saw a baby horse happy to be with her mom, and it made my heart feel a little lighter. For people who raise horses, this moment probably means even more. It reminds us that the bond between a mare and her foal starts very early, and that keeping them close from the very beginning really matters. Just a two-day-old foal, bouncing along toward her mother. But it was enough to make me smile ☺️

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

355,092 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Teacher (Actresss) Lek: My daughter called and told me, 'Mom, you’re acting with Lisa!' I didn’t even know before that — I found out from my daughter too. So I was like, 'Oh really?' Then I went to check the news and was like, 'Oh, it’s true.' But Lisa joined later — we had already started filming when they announced that she’d be part of the cast. MC: How was it working with Lisa, ma’am? Lek: She’s such a lovely girl. I honestly didn’t expect that, because usually kids who grow up abroad have a certain kind of energy, which, to be fair, is just like how we were when we were young. That’s probably why older people found us cheeky back then. And now I’ve become one of those adults who sees kids that way too (laughs). But Lisa… no, when she first met me, she greeted me so politely. And when she talked to me, she’d kneel down and say, 'Teacher (touches my knee), is it okay if I dance like this?' I was so surprised, I told her, 'Oh, you can sit on the chair' She has such good manners, speaks so nicely, and is very respectful. Sometimes when I was sitting in the room eating snacks, she’d say, 'Teacher, I’m hungry.' So I told her, 'Try this one, it’s delicious.' She’d take just one bite, and when I told her to have more, she said, 'I can’t, teacher.' I think she’s probably careful about her weight. I even told her, 'When I was young, I was just as skinny as you.' We’d just chat casually, laugh, and joke around. I’d tell her old stories from when I was young. Sometimes she’d start to talk about something that was bothering her, she’d begin to open up, then stop herself. She knows she can’t say too much. Even though we got close and trusted each other, she still knew there were limits. And that’s absolutely right, in this industry or outside of it, you can’t tell everything to anyone. At her level, she has to be very careful about what she says. I could really see how disciplined she is. 🔗 #LISA LLOUD #TheWhiteLotus #LISAxTheWhiteLotus
2:13

Teacher (Actresss) Lek: My daughter called and told me, 'Mom, you’re acting with Lisa!' I didn’t even know before that — I found out from my daughter too. So I was like, 'Oh really?' Then I went to check the news and was like, 'Oh, it’s true.' But Lisa joined later — we had already started filming when they announced that she’d be part of the cast. MC: How was it working with Lisa, ma’am? Lek: She’s such a lovely girl. I honestly didn’t expect that, because usually kids who grow up abroad have a certain kind of energy, which, to be fair, is just like how we were when we were young. That’s probably why older people found us cheeky back then. And now I’ve become one of those adults who sees kids that way too (laughs). But Lisa… no, when she first met me, she greeted me so politely. And when she talked to me, she’d kneel down and say, 'Teacher (touches my knee), is it okay if I dance like this?' I was so surprised, I told her, 'Oh, you can sit on the chair' She has such good manners, speaks so nicely, and is very respectful. Sometimes when I was sitting in the room eating snacks, she’d say, 'Teacher, I’m hungry.' So I told her, 'Try this one, it’s delicious.' She’d take just one bite, and when I told her to have more, she said, 'I can’t, teacher.' I think she’s probably careful about her weight. I even told her, 'When I was young, I was just as skinny as you.' We’d just chat casually, laugh, and joke around. I’d tell her old stories from when I was young. Sometimes she’d start to talk about something that was bothering her, she’d begin to open up, then stop herself. She knows she can’t say too much. Even though we got close and trusted each other, she still knew there were limits. And that’s absolutely right, in this industry or outside of it, you can’t tell everything to anyone. At her level, she has to be very careful about what she says. I could really see how disciplined she is. 🔗 #LISA LLOUD #TheWhiteLotus #LISAxTheWhiteLotus

LALICE UPDATES

118,648 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Serika's "Are You Having Fun, Sensei?" from Blue Archive Fes 2026 I love Serika. I've always wanted to work a part-time job at a restaurant or similar, just for the valuable experience, to see things from the other side, but it just seems too intimidating to do alone. With Serika, I'm sure any part-time job would be fun, be it handing out flyers, acting as nighttime security guards, pulling out weeds, cleaning the streets, being an assistant in a convenience store, patrolling the streets at night, delivering milk in the morning, cosplaying as a miko at a Shinto shrine (all part-time jobs she's done before), or simply working at a familiar ramen restaurant. I'd love Serika to show me how she makes ramen! And, obviously, I'd donate all the money that's left after occasionally hanging out with her to the Foreclosure Task Force, to help settle their, or rather our debt. I'd love to be a part of it. You know, in the idol event, Serika asks the girls what they think of her idol outfit. Why not me? Because "I only ever praise her". To which I reply that I'm just speaking my mind. Because it's true. Serika deserves all the praise and compliments she can get. She's a hard-working, kind-hearted and adorable girl. If only she could do something about that naïvety of hers... I can fix her, I swear. We just need to get married first. Okay, I think I'm getting ahead of myself. But it is important to note that she was the First Princess, the Original Cat. After I rescued her from her kidnappers, she got SO flustered when I called her my princess and myself her prince in shining armour! Maybe because it's because she'd already seen me as her prince charming, so me saying it out loud was too much to handle? In any case, calling me "brain dead" was a bit harsh. But it was cute so it's okay. She's cute when she's angry. But that doesn't mean I want her to get angry. I want her to be happy, first and foremost. Maybe as we spend time together, she could gradually accept that my compliments are genuine? I might have to tone them down a notch for that, which is sad, but it's for a greater cause—Serika permitting me to praise her, and by extension accepting all her good qualities. If she hears me call her cute every day, and she knows I mean it, what choice would she have but to realise that she is in fact cute? So yes, I wouldn't want to make her angry, at least not too much. A smile suits her adorable face best, after all.
2:39

Serika's "Are You Having Fun, Sensei?" from Blue Archive Fes 2026 I love Serika. I've always wanted to work a part-time job at a restaurant or similar, just for the valuable experience, to see things from the other side, but it just seems too intimidating to do alone. With Serika, I'm sure any part-time job would be fun, be it handing out flyers, acting as nighttime security guards, pulling out weeds, cleaning the streets, being an assistant in a convenience store, patrolling the streets at night, delivering milk in the morning, cosplaying as a miko at a Shinto shrine (all part-time jobs she's done before), or simply working at a familiar ramen restaurant. I'd love Serika to show me how she makes ramen! And, obviously, I'd donate all the money that's left after occasionally hanging out with her to the Foreclosure Task Force, to help settle their, or rather our debt. I'd love to be a part of it. You know, in the idol event, Serika asks the girls what they think of her idol outfit. Why not me? Because "I only ever praise her". To which I reply that I'm just speaking my mind. Because it's true. Serika deserves all the praise and compliments she can get. She's a hard-working, kind-hearted and adorable girl. If only she could do something about that naïvety of hers... I can fix her, I swear. We just need to get married first. Okay, I think I'm getting ahead of myself. But it is important to note that she was the First Princess, the Original Cat. After I rescued her from her kidnappers, she got SO flustered when I called her my princess and myself her prince in shining armour! Maybe because it's because she'd already seen me as her prince charming, so me saying it out loud was too much to handle? In any case, calling me "brain dead" was a bit harsh. But it was cute so it's okay. She's cute when she's angry. But that doesn't mean I want her to get angry. I want her to be happy, first and foremost. Maybe as we spend time together, she could gradually accept that my compliments are genuine? I might have to tone them down a notch for that, which is sad, but it's for a greater cause—Serika permitting me to praise her, and by extension accepting all her good qualities. If she hears me call her cute every day, and she knows I mean it, what choice would she have but to realise that she is in fact cute? So yes, I wouldn't want to make her angry, at least not too much. A smile suits her adorable face best, after all.

Minend

18,989 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In my previous post, I shared my first impressions after trying BingX Ultra TradingView. But for me, a trading feature only proves its value when it actually improves my workflow in real market conditions not just on paper. So over the past few days, I decided to trade exclusively with Ultra TradingView and record the entire process to see whether it could genuinely make mobile trading more efficient. 1⃣ Workflow #1: Managing an Open BTC Position After identifying a support zone, I opened a BTC long at 59.397. 🎯 Take Profit: 59.491 🛡 Stop Loss: 59.342 What I really wanted to test wasn't the order execution speed, but how convenient it is to manage an open position afterward. Instead of switching to a separate Position panel like I usually do on other platforms, I simply dragged both my Take Profit and Stop Loss levels directly on the chart. Every adjustment was reflected instantly, making the entire position management process much more intuitive. 2⃣ Workflow #2: Planning Two ETH Scenarios For ETH, I didn't rush into a market order. Instead, I prepared two trading scenarios in advance. 📍 Long Entry: 1,564 📍 Short Entry: 1,573 Both pending orders were placed directly within the TradingView chart, allowing me to monitor my trading plan, adjust entry levels when needed, and manage multiple scenarios without leaving the chart. After several days of using Ultra TradingView, what impressed me most wasn't the 108 technical indicators or 86 drawing tools. It was the trading workflow itself. From market analysis to order placement and position management, everything happens on a single chart. For someone who trades frequently on mobile, eliminating unnecessary screen switching makes a noticeable difference especially during fast-moving markets. I've included the full trading session in the video below so you can see exactly how I used Ultra TradingView across these two different trading scenarios. If you've already tried it, I'd love to hear how it fits into your own trading workflow. #BingXUltraTV BingX
2:08

In my previous post, I shared my first impressions after trying BingX Ultra TradingView. But for me, a trading feature only proves its value when it actually improves my workflow in real market conditions not just on paper. So over the past few days, I decided to trade exclusively with Ultra TradingView and record the entire process to see whether it could genuinely make mobile trading more efficient. 1⃣ Workflow #1: Managing an Open BTC Position After identifying a support zone, I opened a BTC long at 59.397. 🎯 Take Profit: 59.491 🛡 Stop Loss: 59.342 What I really wanted to test wasn't the order execution speed, but how convenient it is to manage an open position afterward. Instead of switching to a separate Position panel like I usually do on other platforms, I simply dragged both my Take Profit and Stop Loss levels directly on the chart. Every adjustment was reflected instantly, making the entire position management process much more intuitive. 2⃣ Workflow #2: Planning Two ETH Scenarios For ETH, I didn't rush into a market order. Instead, I prepared two trading scenarios in advance. 📍 Long Entry: 1,564 📍 Short Entry: 1,573 Both pending orders were placed directly within the TradingView chart, allowing me to monitor my trading plan, adjust entry levels when needed, and manage multiple scenarios without leaving the chart. After several days of using Ultra TradingView, what impressed me most wasn't the 108 technical indicators or 86 drawing tools. It was the trading workflow itself. From market analysis to order placement and position management, everything happens on a single chart. For someone who trades frequently on mobile, eliminating unnecessary screen switching makes a noticeable difference especially during fast-moving markets. I've included the full trading session in the video below so you can see exactly how I used Ultra TradingView across these two different trading scenarios. If you've already tried it, I'd love to hear how it fits into your own trading workflow. #BingXUltraTV BingX

DGroup Capital 🇻🇳

19,651 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Seedance 2.5: Some Tips / Thoughts & Prompt Share I knew from the start that the story in this video was a little too ambitious for 30 seconds. Normally, it could easily have been a 2+ minute sequence but I wanted to squeeze it into 30 seconds because there were a few specific things I wanted to test. I used six different character references for this video and wrote the final prompt in Chinese. The council members were actually supposed to speak in an alien language but I think because I asked for English subtitles and wrote the dialogue itself in English, Seedance decided to make them speak English too. Seedance 2.5 follows prompts extremely well. Actually, "extremely strictly" might be a better way to describe it. You need to be very careful with timing. If you ask for too many actions within a very short time window, you may get what feels like a sped-up version of the scene. On the other hand, if you assign too much time to an action that should happen quickly, the result can feel unnaturally slow or almost like slow motion. At least, these are both things I've run into during my tests. The same applies when you use a shot list without timestamps. Depending on how much you ask the model to fit into each shot, the pacing can still end up too fast or too slow. Finding the right balance between the amount of action and the time available is very important. Another thing I noticed is that Seedance 2.5 can be very literal about motion and state transitions. For example, if a character is facing the camera and you want to see their back in the next moment, simply describing the next shot from behind may not be enough. If you don't explicitly say that the character turns around, the model can sometimes morph or transition directly into the rear view without performing the actual turn. Seedance 2.0 would usually handle these things on its own. So it helps to think not only about what you want to see but also how the scene gets there. Once you identify these kinds of issues and explicitly correct them in the prompt, you can usually get a much cleaner result. For scenes with multiple characters, dialogue and a lot of specific details, the 5,000-character prompt limit can also become restrictive in English. Sometimes there simply isn't enough room to describe everything properly. That's where Chinese prompts become useful. My original English prompt clearly needed much more detail, so I rewrote it in Chinese and used the extra space to describe the scene more precisely. You can see the result in the video. Prompt in the replies.
0:30

Seedance 2.5: Some Tips / Thoughts & Prompt Share I knew from the start that the story in this video was a little too ambitious for 30 seconds. Normally, it could easily have been a 2+ minute sequence but I wanted to squeeze it into 30 seconds because there were a few specific things I wanted to test. I used six different character references for this video and wrote the final prompt in Chinese. The council members were actually supposed to speak in an alien language but I think because I asked for English subtitles and wrote the dialogue itself in English, Seedance decided to make them speak English too. Seedance 2.5 follows prompts extremely well. Actually, "extremely strictly" might be a better way to describe it. You need to be very careful with timing. If you ask for too many actions within a very short time window, you may get what feels like a sped-up version of the scene. On the other hand, if you assign too much time to an action that should happen quickly, the result can feel unnaturally slow or almost like slow motion. At least, these are both things I've run into during my tests. The same applies when you use a shot list without timestamps. Depending on how much you ask the model to fit into each shot, the pacing can still end up too fast or too slow. Finding the right balance between the amount of action and the time available is very important. Another thing I noticed is that Seedance 2.5 can be very literal about motion and state transitions. For example, if a character is facing the camera and you want to see their back in the next moment, simply describing the next shot from behind may not be enough. If you don't explicitly say that the character turns around, the model can sometimes morph or transition directly into the rear view without performing the actual turn. Seedance 2.0 would usually handle these things on its own. So it helps to think not only about what you want to see but also how the scene gets there. Once you identify these kinds of issues and explicitly correct them in the prompt, you can usually get a much cleaner result. For scenes with multiple characters, dialogue and a lot of specific details, the 5,000-character prompt limit can also become restrictive in English. Sometimes there simply isn't enough room to describe everything properly. That's where Chinese prompts become useful. My original English prompt clearly needed much more detail, so I rewrote it in Chinese and used the extra space to describe the scene more precisely. You can see the result in the video. Prompt in the replies.

Kōda

14,687 просмотров • 19 дней назад

UgandaVsMollyKatanga Yesterday, Court turned into a legal brawl over a state witness’ perceived evasion. Come with me, I promise to explain. If you don’t have much time to read, just watch the video on this and subsequent posts. Background The state led evidence of their 23rd witness in this trial before Lady Justice Rosette Comfort Kania. Her name is DSP Bibiana Akongo and she told Court that she was the Lead Investigator in this case. Her evidence-in-chief, led by Assistant DPP Samali Wakooli was presented the week before last and starting last week, the defense has had its turn to challenge it. Their cross examination is led by a feisty, incisive Jet John Tumwebaze. Yesterday, the two sides came to ahead. The defense has sought to portray this witness as inexperienced, lacking training and untruthful. They pointed to her lack of specific homicide training. She said police had stopped giving specialized training. Yesterday, they pointed to the evidence given by an earlier witness, the Director of Forensics in Uganda Police Force to show that indeed, police still provides such training and has done so for years. They then turned to her claim of having investigated more than 10 murders by shooting to the head. The Judge had sent her to her former practice stations to bring proof because these cases, according to the defense weren’t on any public record. She returned with a few papers with what looked like a summary of cases. She said she didn’t have authorization to share detailed cases. But what really seemed to blow things over were two things. 1-The defense wanted to cross examine her on a blood pattern analysis report. You might recall that during the cross exam of the Director Forensics in police, Mr Andrew Mubiru, he had told court that the blood in the entire room belonged to Mrs Katanga, save for the one on the bed. This report goes into detail on how said blood could have got there. Mr Mubiru when asked how it could have got to the ceiling had casually said: she could have urinated there. This ticked off the defense. Anyway, fast forward to yesterday, the prosecution objected to this witness being cross examined on such a technical report. A huge argument ensued with the defense accusing the prosecution of trying to hide behind technicalities to protect the witness and “hide evidence that doesn’t favor them” yet they disclosed it. They said the court was the ultimate truth finder and that it should be allowed to go there. They said this witness had claimed expertise on a lot of areas (including “intelligence”) during her evidence-in-chief but now she’s protected from their questions. There was an impasse. Ultimately, Justice Kania ruled that the expert who wrote the report be presented to court as a court witness. Either side can then ask him whatever they please. The defense said: “much obliged, my Lord, we’ve got even better than we’d hoped for”. Then onto the mother of all fights! It stemmed from an expert medical report done in Jan 2024 at the behest of the ODPPUGANDA which found that Mrs Katanga was then fit enough to make a statement. The defense had taken umbrage at PW23’s claims that back in November, she’d gone to the ICU at IHK where Mrs Katanga was and found her seated and “not on life support like the rest of the ICU patients”. The defense wanted to use this report to, in their words, “test the veracity of this witness”. Prosecution wanted none of that. A legal fight ensued. What seemed to perturb the defense even more was the fact that the witness had earlier denied knowledge of this report, despite it being addressed to her and despite confirming that the prosecution had got it from her before disclosing it to the defense. It was on her file that she said she fully controlled as the lead investigator. Mr Tumwebaze asked her to read the first sentence of the report. Mr Muwaganya objected. Mr Elison Karuhanga said: my Lord, this witness should not be protected from her file! Chaos. (Video👇🏾)
16:15

UgandaVsMollyKatanga Yesterday, Court turned into a legal brawl over a state witness’ perceived evasion. Come with me, I promise to explain. If you don’t have much time to read, just watch the video on this and subsequent posts. Background The state led evidence of their 23rd witness in this trial before Lady Justice Rosette Comfort Kania. Her name is DSP Bibiana Akongo and she told Court that she was the Lead Investigator in this case. Her evidence-in-chief, led by Assistant DPP Samali Wakooli was presented the week before last and starting last week, the defense has had its turn to challenge it. Their cross examination is led by a feisty, incisive Jet John Tumwebaze. Yesterday, the two sides came to ahead. The defense has sought to portray this witness as inexperienced, lacking training and untruthful. They pointed to her lack of specific homicide training. She said police had stopped giving specialized training. Yesterday, they pointed to the evidence given by an earlier witness, the Director of Forensics in Uganda Police Force to show that indeed, police still provides such training and has done so for years. They then turned to her claim of having investigated more than 10 murders by shooting to the head. The Judge had sent her to her former practice stations to bring proof because these cases, according to the defense weren’t on any public record. She returned with a few papers with what looked like a summary of cases. She said she didn’t have authorization to share detailed cases. But what really seemed to blow things over were two things. 1-The defense wanted to cross examine her on a blood pattern analysis report. You might recall that during the cross exam of the Director Forensics in police, Mr Andrew Mubiru, he had told court that the blood in the entire room belonged to Mrs Katanga, save for the one on the bed. This report goes into detail on how said blood could have got there. Mr Mubiru when asked how it could have got to the ceiling had casually said: she could have urinated there. This ticked off the defense. Anyway, fast forward to yesterday, the prosecution objected to this witness being cross examined on such a technical report. A huge argument ensued with the defense accusing the prosecution of trying to hide behind technicalities to protect the witness and “hide evidence that doesn’t favor them” yet they disclosed it. They said the court was the ultimate truth finder and that it should be allowed to go there. They said this witness had claimed expertise on a lot of areas (including “intelligence”) during her evidence-in-chief but now she’s protected from their questions. There was an impasse. Ultimately, Justice Kania ruled that the expert who wrote the report be presented to court as a court witness. Either side can then ask him whatever they please. The defense said: “much obliged, my Lord, we’ve got even better than we’d hoped for”. Then onto the mother of all fights! It stemmed from an expert medical report done in Jan 2024 at the behest of the ODPPUGANDA which found that Mrs Katanga was then fit enough to make a statement. The defense had taken umbrage at PW23’s claims that back in November, she’d gone to the ICU at IHK where Mrs Katanga was and found her seated and “not on life support like the rest of the ICU patients”. The defense wanted to use this report to, in their words, “test the veracity of this witness”. Prosecution wanted none of that. A legal fight ensued. What seemed to perturb the defense even more was the fact that the witness had earlier denied knowledge of this report, despite it being addressed to her and despite confirming that the prosecution had got it from her before disclosing it to the defense. It was on her file that she said she fully controlled as the lead investigator. Mr Tumwebaze asked her to read the first sentence of the report. Mr Muwaganya objected. Mr Elison Karuhanga said: my Lord, this witness should not be protected from her file! Chaos. (Video👇🏾)

Anthony Natif

79,069 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Every Quiet Step of a Small Creature Learning to Trust Again 🐶❤️‍🩹 A puppy was placed in a small box to see whether she could walk. Her face was badly swollen, with so much soft-tissue swelling that her teeth were pressing into her cheek. When she tried to take a step, her tiny body trembled and tilted to one side. Her leg was broken. Before that, she had been found in a trash bin, with signs suggesting that her mouth had once been tightly restrained. When observing a creature that has endured a major ordeal, it is easy to become lost in the familiar emotions of pity. Yet behind this puppy’s initial silence and her smallest changes lies a remarkably subtle process of biological adaptation. Why did she spend her first day lying still without reacting, only to gradually restore her familiar behaviors in a particular sequence: wagging her tail, seeking human contact, barking, and finally climbing onto and resting her entire body on another dog? Her recovery did not happen as an instant transformation, but as a series of cautious steps by a creature learning how to adapt in order to survive. Throughout her first day in her new home, the puppy, later named Junie, remained completely silent and showed little outward emotion. She chose stillness. She did not whine, ask for food, or seek attention. For a young dog that normally depends on others for survival, this silence was notable. When a puppy experiences major trauma and loses the protection of her mother, she may become withdrawn. This is not necessarily a sign of giving up, but can be a form of self-protection and energy conservation. In nature, making sounds or moving while injured and without the protection of a group can increase the risk of being detected by predators. Remaining quiet can therefore be the safest response. The first change appeared on the morning of the second day, after Junie had her broken leg placed in a cast by a veterinarian. When her rescuer approached, her tail moved slightly. That small movement did not mean that all fear had disappeared. It was simply the first form of communication to return. It was like a tentative test of whether the space around her had become safe enough before she decided to take more familiar steps, such as approaching or seeking affection. By the third and fourth days, Junie began walking toward her caregiver and climbing into her lap. This showed that she was moving from simply lying still and enduring her condition toward actively seeking a source of security. Once the people around her no longer seemed threatening, her need for warmth and protection began to re-emerge. However, humans were not the only ones helping Junie learn how to be a puppy again. The other dogs in the household also became a kind of natural teacher. Puppies learn social rules, bite inhibition, and body-language cues from other dogs, often through direct interaction. Watching the older dogs rest calmly, move at an easy pace, and respond gently to sounds and movements around them could help Junie gradually settle and adjust to the rhythm of her surroundings. One of the most significant moments came when Junie barked for the first time while playing on the bed. The bark did not appear when she was frightened or in pain. It emerged during a moment of play. This suggests that Junie was not merely recovering physically; she was beginning to use her voice again when she felt safe enough to engage in play. After her cast was removed, Junie joined the entire group on a trip to the beach. There, a distinctive habit appeared and continued as she grew older: Junie would often relax and place her entire body weight across the backs or bodies of the other dogs. Animals that have experienced early isolation or lost a reliable source of safety may seek close physical contact as a way of regulating themselves. Pressure from another body can provide a sense of physical security and help reduce tension. The fact that the larger dogs in the household willingly accepted Junie’s behavior without pushing her away suggests that her gesture became part of the group’s way of expressing closeness. Junie’s recovery shows how a creature that has experienced trauma can gradually rebuild its sense of safety, one small piece at a time. Even after growing up, Junie continued climbing onto the backs of the other dogs and resting her full weight against them. It was more than simply an affectionate gesture. When an animal finds a group willing to carry its full weight without pushing it away, that physical contact can become a lasting anchor of safety.
2:17

Every Quiet Step of a Small Creature Learning to Trust Again 🐶❤️‍🩹 A puppy was placed in a small box to see whether she could walk. Her face was badly swollen, with so much soft-tissue swelling that her teeth were pressing into her cheek. When she tried to take a step, her tiny body trembled and tilted to one side. Her leg was broken. Before that, she had been found in a trash bin, with signs suggesting that her mouth had once been tightly restrained. When observing a creature that has endured a major ordeal, it is easy to become lost in the familiar emotions of pity. Yet behind this puppy’s initial silence and her smallest changes lies a remarkably subtle process of biological adaptation. Why did she spend her first day lying still without reacting, only to gradually restore her familiar behaviors in a particular sequence: wagging her tail, seeking human contact, barking, and finally climbing onto and resting her entire body on another dog? Her recovery did not happen as an instant transformation, but as a series of cautious steps by a creature learning how to adapt in order to survive. Throughout her first day in her new home, the puppy, later named Junie, remained completely silent and showed little outward emotion. She chose stillness. She did not whine, ask for food, or seek attention. For a young dog that normally depends on others for survival, this silence was notable. When a puppy experiences major trauma and loses the protection of her mother, she may become withdrawn. This is not necessarily a sign of giving up, but can be a form of self-protection and energy conservation. In nature, making sounds or moving while injured and without the protection of a group can increase the risk of being detected by predators. Remaining quiet can therefore be the safest response. The first change appeared on the morning of the second day, after Junie had her broken leg placed in a cast by a veterinarian. When her rescuer approached, her tail moved slightly. That small movement did not mean that all fear had disappeared. It was simply the first form of communication to return. It was like a tentative test of whether the space around her had become safe enough before she decided to take more familiar steps, such as approaching or seeking affection. By the third and fourth days, Junie began walking toward her caregiver and climbing into her lap. This showed that she was moving from simply lying still and enduring her condition toward actively seeking a source of security. Once the people around her no longer seemed threatening, her need for warmth and protection began to re-emerge. However, humans were not the only ones helping Junie learn how to be a puppy again. The other dogs in the household also became a kind of natural teacher. Puppies learn social rules, bite inhibition, and body-language cues from other dogs, often through direct interaction. Watching the older dogs rest calmly, move at an easy pace, and respond gently to sounds and movements around them could help Junie gradually settle and adjust to the rhythm of her surroundings. One of the most significant moments came when Junie barked for the first time while playing on the bed. The bark did not appear when she was frightened or in pain. It emerged during a moment of play. This suggests that Junie was not merely recovering physically; she was beginning to use her voice again when she felt safe enough to engage in play. After her cast was removed, Junie joined the entire group on a trip to the beach. There, a distinctive habit appeared and continued as she grew older: Junie would often relax and place her entire body weight across the backs or bodies of the other dogs. Animals that have experienced early isolation or lost a reliable source of safety may seek close physical contact as a way of regulating themselves. Pressure from another body can provide a sense of physical security and help reduce tension. The fact that the larger dogs in the household willingly accepted Junie’s behavior without pushing her away suggests that her gesture became part of the group’s way of expressing closeness. Junie’s recovery shows how a creature that has experienced trauma can gradually rebuild its sense of safety, one small piece at a time. Even after growing up, Junie continued climbing onto the backs of the other dogs and resting her full weight against them. It was more than simply an affectionate gesture. When an animal finds a group willing to carry its full weight without pushing it away, that physical contact can become a lasting anchor of safety.

Beauty of music and nature 🌺🌺

28,942 просмотров • 4 дней назад

In 1998, Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. Everyone advised Tim Cook not to join. "They thought it was headed straight down." He saw something different. A sparkle in Steve's eye. He spent 6 minutes explaining what Jobs actually taught him: Steve Jobs was a teacher. "He taught me the value of focus, the importance of simplicity, the fact that making things simple is so much harder than making things complex." "For those of us that were fortunate enough to work with him, he was the teacher of a lifetime." When Jobs recruited him, Cook trusted his gut. "There was a feeling I had in talking to Steve that he was a very different kind of CEO. He was focused on products, products, and products." "He had a belief that small teams could do amazing work. I love that vision." Everyone else was chasing enterprise. Jobs wanted consumers. "In an environment where everyone was going to an enterprise kind of company, he wanted to refocus Apple on consumers." "It was brilliant because at the time nobody was doing that. Everybody thought you could not make any money selling to consumers." "I've never thought it was a good idea to follow the herd." Cook saw what others missed. "I thought I had a chance of a lifetime to work with the creative genius that started the entire industry. I didn't want to pass that up." People had forgotten how close Apple was to death. "Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. It was a really awful time. People advised me not to come because they thought it was headed straight down." "But I saw something different. I saw the sparkle in Steve's eye. It meant we could pull off this turnaround for this American treasure." "I'm so glad to have been a part of that team." The teams that built Apple's greatest products were tiny. "He taught me the value of innovation, the fact that small teams could do amazing things." "I look at the size of the iPod team initially. I look at the size of the iPhone team. These were very small teams in the scheme of things." Jobs hired people who challenged him. "Hiring the best people to surround you that challenge you. That have skills that you don't. And being confident with that." The skill that made Jobs different wasn't conviction. It was flexibility. "He taught me not to be married to my past views. Not to be so proud you can't change your mind when you're presented with new evidence." "He could change like this." Cook was initially taken aback. "And then I became so enamored with it. Very few people have that skill because they get married to their past views." "I thought it was a brilliant skill." Did Jobs change Cook's mind? "Oh, he changed my mind about a lot of things. And he changed his mind about a lot of things." Did Cook ever change Jobs's mind? "Yes, of course. He loved to debate. He loved someone to debate him. You could always change his mind if you had the best idea." "We changed each other's minds. That's the reason it works so well." Cook sees supply chain as art. "Manufacturing has always interested me because I'm very curious about how things are made. I like to go to factories and see how things are put together, how they're created." "My undergraduate degree is in industrial engineering. It's essentially the study of people and machines and how the two working together can create things they couldn't create on their own." "I've always viewed the supply chain to be a bit of a piece of art when it's done correctly. It's a symphony of thousands of different components and parts coming together to create something." What did he sacrifice to get here? "Sleep. And fortunately, I love coffee." How much coffee? "Many cups. Please do not benchmark that." He starts every morning the same way. "I get up very early. I quickly go to the Mac and begin to go through the emails that have come in." "A lot of what I'm reading are from customers telling me how they're using our products and what it's doing for them." "I get notes that are positive and some that are not so positive. People feel free to reach out and voice their opinion. I think this is great because it keeps my hand on the pulse of the company." How does he handle criticism? "I have relatively thick skin. I try to internalize it and ask myself: is that accurate or not? Not just quickly put up a defensive shield and say why what we've done is right." What do people not realize about his job? "How much fun it is." "At times I hear other CEOs talk about how terrible their jobs are. Mine is fantastic. I love it." He made a 25-year plan in graduate school. "The first year or two was reasonably accurate. After that, it wasn't worth the paper it was written on." "Life has a way of happening and throwing you off from some well-crafted plan." "The most important thing is to roll with it. Make sure you recognize when doors are opening. And choose the one to walk through."
6:38

In 1998, Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. Everyone advised Tim Cook not to join. "They thought it was headed straight down." He saw something different. A sparkle in Steve's eye. He spent 6 minutes explaining what Jobs actually taught him: Steve Jobs was a teacher. "He taught me the value of focus, the importance of simplicity, the fact that making things simple is so much harder than making things complex." "For those of us that were fortunate enough to work with him, he was the teacher of a lifetime." When Jobs recruited him, Cook trusted his gut. "There was a feeling I had in talking to Steve that he was a very different kind of CEO. He was focused on products, products, and products." "He had a belief that small teams could do amazing work. I love that vision." Everyone else was chasing enterprise. Jobs wanted consumers. "In an environment where everyone was going to an enterprise kind of company, he wanted to refocus Apple on consumers." "It was brilliant because at the time nobody was doing that. Everybody thought you could not make any money selling to consumers." "I've never thought it was a good idea to follow the herd." Cook saw what others missed. "I thought I had a chance of a lifetime to work with the creative genius that started the entire industry. I didn't want to pass that up." People had forgotten how close Apple was to death. "Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy. It was a really awful time. People advised me not to come because they thought it was headed straight down." "But I saw something different. I saw the sparkle in Steve's eye. It meant we could pull off this turnaround for this American treasure." "I'm so glad to have been a part of that team." The teams that built Apple's greatest products were tiny. "He taught me the value of innovation, the fact that small teams could do amazing things." "I look at the size of the iPod team initially. I look at the size of the iPhone team. These were very small teams in the scheme of things." Jobs hired people who challenged him. "Hiring the best people to surround you that challenge you. That have skills that you don't. And being confident with that." The skill that made Jobs different wasn't conviction. It was flexibility. "He taught me not to be married to my past views. Not to be so proud you can't change your mind when you're presented with new evidence." "He could change like this." Cook was initially taken aback. "And then I became so enamored with it. Very few people have that skill because they get married to their past views." "I thought it was a brilliant skill." Did Jobs change Cook's mind? "Oh, he changed my mind about a lot of things. And he changed his mind about a lot of things." Did Cook ever change Jobs's mind? "Yes, of course. He loved to debate. He loved someone to debate him. You could always change his mind if you had the best idea." "We changed each other's minds. That's the reason it works so well." Cook sees supply chain as art. "Manufacturing has always interested me because I'm very curious about how things are made. I like to go to factories and see how things are put together, how they're created." "My undergraduate degree is in industrial engineering. It's essentially the study of people and machines and how the two working together can create things they couldn't create on their own." "I've always viewed the supply chain to be a bit of a piece of art when it's done correctly. It's a symphony of thousands of different components and parts coming together to create something." What did he sacrifice to get here? "Sleep. And fortunately, I love coffee." How much coffee? "Many cups. Please do not benchmark that." He starts every morning the same way. "I get up very early. I quickly go to the Mac and begin to go through the emails that have come in." "A lot of what I'm reading are from customers telling me how they're using our products and what it's doing for them." "I get notes that are positive and some that are not so positive. People feel free to reach out and voice their opinion. I think this is great because it keeps my hand on the pulse of the company." How does he handle criticism? "I have relatively thick skin. I try to internalize it and ask myself: is that accurate or not? Not just quickly put up a defensive shield and say why what we've done is right." What do people not realize about his job? "How much fun it is." "At times I hear other CEOs talk about how terrible their jobs are. Mine is fantastic. I love it." He made a 25-year plan in graduate school. "The first year or two was reasonably accurate. After that, it wasn't worth the paper it was written on." "Life has a way of happening and throwing you off from some well-crafted plan." "The most important thing is to roll with it. Make sure you recognize when doors are opening. And choose the one to walk through."

Jaynit

17,693 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Alex Fitzpatrick’s start to life on the PGA Tour has been exceptional. After earning membership via winning the Zurich Classic with his brother, Matt, he’s finished T9, 4 and T6 in 3 Signature Events, including a final round 65 yesterday at The Memorial for another top 10. After the round, he was asked if it was good prep for the US Open: “Absolutely, yeah. That played like a major championship out there. It certainly wasn't easy. I think only having two milkshakes this week was probably the key to playing well in the last round. But, no, it's a great test out there. I played really nicely today. I finally holed some putts, so it was nice shoot a low one and see where that leaves me.” He was also asked how nice it’s been to start so well on the PGA Tour: “Yeah, it's really rewarding. I guess that was always the thing after we won, it was, like, how is he going to do, is he going to carry on playing okay. I think that the biggest thing I took really was the win in India. I felt like that was a big weight off my shoulders. That was kind of something that I had wanted since I was young, to win on that TOUR, and I felt like that made it a little easier going into the Zurich not having as much pressure and just trying to enjoy it. “But it's definitely been really rewarding playing some good golf following that and, yeah, hopefully, that stays like that.” Alex says he’s going to play the next 3 weeks at the RBC Canadian Open, the US Open and then the Travelers. He also went to Shinnecock 10 days ago with Matt to check out the course ahead of his US Open debut. Alex’s journey this year has been a lot of fun to follow and hopefully he can keep trending for the rest of the season 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Alex PGA TOUR the Memorial
1:09

Alex Fitzpatrick’s start to life on the PGA Tour has been exceptional. After earning membership via winning the Zurich Classic with his brother, Matt, he’s finished T9, 4 and T6 in 3 Signature Events, including a final round 65 yesterday at The Memorial for another top 10. After the round, he was asked if it was good prep for the US Open: “Absolutely, yeah. That played like a major championship out there. It certainly wasn't easy. I think only having two milkshakes this week was probably the key to playing well in the last round. But, no, it's a great test out there. I played really nicely today. I finally holed some putts, so it was nice shoot a low one and see where that leaves me.” He was also asked how nice it’s been to start so well on the PGA Tour: “Yeah, it's really rewarding. I guess that was always the thing after we won, it was, like, how is he going to do, is he going to carry on playing okay. I think that the biggest thing I took really was the win in India. I felt like that was a big weight off my shoulders. That was kind of something that I had wanted since I was young, to win on that TOUR, and I felt like that made it a little easier going into the Zurich not having as much pressure and just trying to enjoy it. “But it's definitely been really rewarding playing some good golf following that and, yeah, hopefully, that stays like that.” Alex says he’s going to play the next 3 weeks at the RBC Canadian Open, the US Open and then the Travelers. He also went to Shinnecock 10 days ago with Matt to check out the course ahead of his US Open debut. Alex’s journey this year has been a lot of fun to follow and hopefully he can keep trending for the rest of the season 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Alex PGA TOUR the Memorial

Flushing It

313,696 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🌟And finally LIVE on I've seen many confused ARMY about the website, so here I'll try to explain in baby words. Basically, I've started to work on this project for over 3 months trying to bring new ideas that could be helpful for us to prepare for #ARIRANG comeback. The website is divided in 10 parts: 1⃣ - Meet our mascot Bombie 2⃣ - Streaming Guides 3⃣ - Quiz to test your knowledge 4⃣ - Find your best free premium trial on streaming platforms 5⃣ - Find ARMY to share family plan subscriptions. You need to select the service(Spotify,AM,YT) and the country. You have the option to create a group, or join a group. Once you are in a group, every person receives a small profile, click on the profile to see the handle. Once the group is filled, you can try to search each other on sns to initiate discussions. This was created as a place for ARMY from the same country and with the same goal in mind to be able to find each other. 6⃣ - Voting guides for Korean Award Shows 7⃣- Global Music Platforms & Charts Guide. Basically all the available charts around the world. This chart will help you to understand where to put your focus on and HOW TO PUT BTS AT #1 on EACH CHART. The idea is simple, search for your country and see how you can help: Green - important, Orange - not popular but good to have, Red - don't focus on. 8⃣ - Send me questions, suggestions or flag mistakes. I did my best to gather everything, however the amount of information on here is HUGE, there are very knowledgeable army that know much more tips&tricks, especially on their own their local charts - so your submission will help to correct and add more to this website 9⃣ - After exploring all the website, you have the chance to win an Army bomb. Add here all the stickers you found and follow Nicolle⁷ & Charlotte⁷ ✨ on X for further information related to the GA 🔟- FAQ Website (A summary about the website to help with the navigation) 🔸Following ARMYs advice (thank you for submissions) , I improved the website in the past few days and I'll thrive to improve it further 🔸What I had in mind when I started this was simple: gather all the information in one place, guide baby army, check your knowledge, know the strategy - be prepared for the comeback. 🔸Please see these tutorials if you still don't know how to proceed
0:28

🌟And finally LIVE on I've seen many confused ARMY about the website, so here I'll try to explain in baby words. Basically, I've started to work on this project for over 3 months trying to bring new ideas that could be helpful for us to prepare for #ARIRANG comeback. The website is divided in 10 parts: 1⃣ - Meet our mascot Bombie 2⃣ - Streaming Guides 3⃣ - Quiz to test your knowledge 4⃣ - Find your best free premium trial on streaming platforms 5⃣ - Find ARMY to share family plan subscriptions. You need to select the service(Spotify,AM,YT) and the country. You have the option to create a group, or join a group. Once you are in a group, every person receives a small profile, click on the profile to see the handle. Once the group is filled, you can try to search each other on sns to initiate discussions. This was created as a place for ARMY from the same country and with the same goal in mind to be able to find each other. 6⃣ - Voting guides for Korean Award Shows 7⃣- Global Music Platforms & Charts Guide. Basically all the available charts around the world. This chart will help you to understand where to put your focus on and HOW TO PUT BTS AT #1 on EACH CHART. The idea is simple, search for your country and see how you can help: Green - important, Orange - not popular but good to have, Red - don't focus on. 8⃣ - Send me questions, suggestions or flag mistakes. I did my best to gather everything, however the amount of information on here is HUGE, there are very knowledgeable army that know much more tips&tricks, especially on their own their local charts - so your submission will help to correct and add more to this website 9⃣ - After exploring all the website, you have the chance to win an Army bomb. Add here all the stickers you found and follow Nicolle⁷ & Charlotte⁷ ✨ on X for further information related to the GA 🔟- FAQ Website (A summary about the website to help with the navigation) 🔸Following ARMYs advice (thank you for submissions) , I improved the website in the past few days and I'll thrive to improve it further 🔸What I had in mind when I started this was simple: gather all the information in one place, guide baby army, check your knowledge, know the strategy - be prepared for the comeback. 🔸Please see these tutorials if you still don't know how to proceed

Nicolle⁷

154,704 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

There’s Something About Watching Someone Who Really Knows How to Dance The first thing I noticed was how little he seemed to care about the camera. He was dressed in a black suit and a fedora, dancing in front of some old-looking buildings, and at first I thought I would watch for a few seconds and move on. But then one step caught my attention. He slid into the beat, stopped almost exactly where the music seemed to ask him to, and moved on without making the transition look difficult. What I liked most was that you could actually see the dancing. His feet were doing the work. His shoulders moved with the music, his weight shifted from one side to the other, and every turn seemed to have a reason for being there. Nothing felt thrown in just to make the routine look complicated. I ended up watching the clip a few times, and that was when I realized what I found so satisfying about it. The movements were precise, but they didn’t look stiff. He had obviously spent a lot of time learning how to control his body, yet none of that effort was visible anymore. He looked relaxed. That kind of ease is difficult to fake. It also made me think about how differently we usually watch dance online. So many videos are built around quick cuts and short bursts of movement. You see a few seconds, get the most exciting part, and then the video moves on to something else. This one gives the dancing room to breathe. You can follow an entire sequence instead of trying to piece it together from edits. Maybe that is why the old-fashioned details work so well here. The suit and fedora, the architecture behind him, and the rhythm of the music all give the performance a particular character. But I don't think I enjoyed it simply because it reminded me of another era. The interesting thing is that the movement itself doesn't feel dated. A good dancer still looks like a good dancer. What surprised me most, though, was how much enjoyment seemed to be in it. He wasn’t dancing as if he were trying to prove something. There was a lightness to the performance, almost as if he knew the rhythm well enough that he could stop thinking about the steps and simply enjoy them. That is probably what kept me there. We spend so much time online watching people trying to catch our attention that it can be refreshing to watch someone who has already earned it without asking for it. No dramatic setup. No complicated explanation. Just music, movement, and someone who clearly knows what he is doing. And maybe that is why I watched it more than once. Not because it was spectacular. Because it was satisfying to watch someone be genuinely good at something. Have you ever stopped scrolling because a person was simply so good at what they were doing that you wanted to watch the whole thing?
0:59

There’s Something About Watching Someone Who Really Knows How to Dance The first thing I noticed was how little he seemed to care about the camera. He was dressed in a black suit and a fedora, dancing in front of some old-looking buildings, and at first I thought I would watch for a few seconds and move on. But then one step caught my attention. He slid into the beat, stopped almost exactly where the music seemed to ask him to, and moved on without making the transition look difficult. What I liked most was that you could actually see the dancing. His feet were doing the work. His shoulders moved with the music, his weight shifted from one side to the other, and every turn seemed to have a reason for being there. Nothing felt thrown in just to make the routine look complicated. I ended up watching the clip a few times, and that was when I realized what I found so satisfying about it. The movements were precise, but they didn’t look stiff. He had obviously spent a lot of time learning how to control his body, yet none of that effort was visible anymore. He looked relaxed. That kind of ease is difficult to fake. It also made me think about how differently we usually watch dance online. So many videos are built around quick cuts and short bursts of movement. You see a few seconds, get the most exciting part, and then the video moves on to something else. This one gives the dancing room to breathe. You can follow an entire sequence instead of trying to piece it together from edits. Maybe that is why the old-fashioned details work so well here. The suit and fedora, the architecture behind him, and the rhythm of the music all give the performance a particular character. But I don't think I enjoyed it simply because it reminded me of another era. The interesting thing is that the movement itself doesn't feel dated. A good dancer still looks like a good dancer. What surprised me most, though, was how much enjoyment seemed to be in it. He wasn’t dancing as if he were trying to prove something. There was a lightness to the performance, almost as if he knew the rhythm well enough that he could stop thinking about the steps and simply enjoy them. That is probably what kept me there. We spend so much time online watching people trying to catch our attention that it can be refreshing to watch someone who has already earned it without asking for it. No dramatic setup. No complicated explanation. Just music, movement, and someone who clearly knows what he is doing. And maybe that is why I watched it more than once. Not because it was spectacular. Because it was satisfying to watch someone be genuinely good at something. Have you ever stopped scrolling because a person was simply so good at what they were doing that you wanted to watch the whole thing?

Music over time🎻

45,364 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Make Shit Work Again People almost never come to our door after dark. Because we live in a (what used to be) a quiet place, and random visitors after dark are almost unheard of. So when the doorbell rang at 3:30am this morning I grabbed my shotgun. I racked the pump and shouted for the person at the door to identify themselves. Turns out it was a lady cop. Luckily the cops are used to armed homeowners around here. She shined a to flashlight identify herself, and I secured the gun and the dogs to see what she wanted. Turns out two people were shot across the street in the park. She wanted to know if your security cameras captured any footage of the incident. So I checked the app, and no—there was no footage (because our cameras point the other direction). And that was that. But I couldn’t get back to sleep—mostly because of the adrenaline. But also because I couldn’t help but notice that things are getting worse around here. This used to be a place where nothing happened. And now things definitely do happen. We used to live in LA. My wife and I did industry stuff. We had a good life as an urban childless couple, but then she got pregnant. We thought about the daunting challenge of raising kids in LA, and opted to get out. So we found a place in the Mountain West where nothing ever happens. It was a good place to raise kids. A place with good schools. A place where our children could wander the town by themselves. But it’s not that place anymore. Since Covid the schools have gone to shit. And a few weeks ago my son was at the neighborhood park (by himself) when a gang member pulled a gun on a parent at the playground. So early this morning I’m lying in bed, and I’m thinking about this. And I thought to myself, “We need to leave.” But then I had another thought—a disturbing thought. I thought, “But there’s no place else to go.” Because it’s almost everywhere now. Red State, Blue State, it doesn’t matter. And if it’s not there yet it will be soon. And if you think you’re safe, you’re not. Because this thing is coming for all of us. *** My politics in five words: I Want Shit To Work That’s it. I just want shit to work. And I don’t really care how that happens. I’m old enough to remember when shit did work. It never worked perfectly. But I don’t think shit has worked perfectly in the entire history of human endeavors. I mean, read the Bible—it’s all about shit not working perfectly. But I grew up in a time when things ran fairly well—far better than they do now. I’m not that old, but back in the day schools actually taught stuff. And there wasn’t choking bureaucracy in government and business and every other institution. And we could TRUST those institutions—because they weren’t rife with corruption. And if minor corruption happened to be discovered it was A BIG FUCKING DEAL—because the media wasn’t bent, and they’d actually report on the corruption. And things weren’t so expensive. A young person (me) could work a menial job afford a car and an apartment and still have money left over to take girls on dates. Because there was OPPORTUNITY for young people. Now I could go on and on, but I’m starting to sound like an old man shouting at a cloud, so let me just say, trust me kids: SHIT USED TO WORK. Spencer Pratt is about my age. He remembers when shit used to work. He remembers when you could count on the fire department to not let a giant part of your city burn down with residents inside. He remembers when you didn’t have to step over fentanyl zombies to take your kids to preschool. He remembers when there wasn’t human shit on the streets. He remembers when corrupt government officials were held accountable. He remembers when we could go about our lives and not worry—because shit worked. I can sum up Spencer Pratt’s campaign platform in four words: Make shit work again. So can he win the LA mayoral race? It depends on one question: Is it bad enough yet? I think it is bad enough. It’s so bad that it can no longer be ignored. And I think most Angelenos feel the same way. There’s a critical mass of people who remember when shit worked. They had no way to fix it. They couldn’t imagine a solution. And then one guy stood up and said he could fix it. Because none of these “intractable problems” are actually intractable. We know how to do this. We know how to fix things. We know how to Make. Shit. Work. Again. What was lacking was The Will to do it. And Spencer Pratt has The Will. No, I don’t live in LA anymore. But I’m pulling for Spencer. Because this election is so much larger than Los Angeles. Because there’s no where else to run to. Because we’ve got to make a stand. Somewhere. Anywhere. So vote for Spencer. And if you can’t vote then make a small donation. Because we have to make shit work again. Because we don’t have a choice.
3:28

Make Shit Work Again People almost never come to our door after dark. Because we live in a (what used to be) a quiet place, and random visitors after dark are almost unheard of. So when the doorbell rang at 3:30am this morning I grabbed my shotgun. I racked the pump and shouted for the person at the door to identify themselves. Turns out it was a lady cop. Luckily the cops are used to armed homeowners around here. She shined a to flashlight identify herself, and I secured the gun and the dogs to see what she wanted. Turns out two people were shot across the street in the park. She wanted to know if your security cameras captured any footage of the incident. So I checked the app, and no—there was no footage (because our cameras point the other direction). And that was that. But I couldn’t get back to sleep—mostly because of the adrenaline. But also because I couldn’t help but notice that things are getting worse around here. This used to be a place where nothing happened. And now things definitely do happen. We used to live in LA. My wife and I did industry stuff. We had a good life as an urban childless couple, but then she got pregnant. We thought about the daunting challenge of raising kids in LA, and opted to get out. So we found a place in the Mountain West where nothing ever happens. It was a good place to raise kids. A place with good schools. A place where our children could wander the town by themselves. But it’s not that place anymore. Since Covid the schools have gone to shit. And a few weeks ago my son was at the neighborhood park (by himself) when a gang member pulled a gun on a parent at the playground. So early this morning I’m lying in bed, and I’m thinking about this. And I thought to myself, “We need to leave.” But then I had another thought—a disturbing thought. I thought, “But there’s no place else to go.” Because it’s almost everywhere now. Red State, Blue State, it doesn’t matter. And if it’s not there yet it will be soon. And if you think you’re safe, you’re not. Because this thing is coming for all of us. *** My politics in five words: I Want Shit To Work That’s it. I just want shit to work. And I don’t really care how that happens. I’m old enough to remember when shit did work. It never worked perfectly. But I don’t think shit has worked perfectly in the entire history of human endeavors. I mean, read the Bible—it’s all about shit not working perfectly. But I grew up in a time when things ran fairly well—far better than they do now. I’m not that old, but back in the day schools actually taught stuff. And there wasn’t choking bureaucracy in government and business and every other institution. And we could TRUST those institutions—because they weren’t rife with corruption. And if minor corruption happened to be discovered it was A BIG FUCKING DEAL—because the media wasn’t bent, and they’d actually report on the corruption. And things weren’t so expensive. A young person (me) could work a menial job afford a car and an apartment and still have money left over to take girls on dates. Because there was OPPORTUNITY for young people. Now I could go on and on, but I’m starting to sound like an old man shouting at a cloud, so let me just say, trust me kids: SHIT USED TO WORK. Spencer Pratt is about my age. He remembers when shit used to work. He remembers when you could count on the fire department to not let a giant part of your city burn down with residents inside. He remembers when you didn’t have to step over fentanyl zombies to take your kids to preschool. He remembers when there wasn’t human shit on the streets. He remembers when corrupt government officials were held accountable. He remembers when we could go about our lives and not worry—because shit worked. I can sum up Spencer Pratt’s campaign platform in four words: Make shit work again. So can he win the LA mayoral race? It depends on one question: Is it bad enough yet? I think it is bad enough. It’s so bad that it can no longer be ignored. And I think most Angelenos feel the same way. There’s a critical mass of people who remember when shit worked. They had no way to fix it. They couldn’t imagine a solution. And then one guy stood up and said he could fix it. Because none of these “intractable problems” are actually intractable. We know how to do this. We know how to fix things. We know how to Make. Shit. Work. Again. What was lacking was The Will to do it. And Spencer Pratt has The Will. No, I don’t live in LA anymore. But I’m pulling for Spencer. Because this election is so much larger than Los Angeles. Because there’s no where else to run to. Because we’ve got to make a stand. Somewhere. Anywhere. So vote for Spencer. And if you can’t vote then make a small donation. Because we have to make shit work again. Because we don’t have a choice.

Rambo Van Halen

232,212 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

SHE'S DONE!!! Mario Kart 64 for the Sega Dreamcast is officially ready for public consumption, so here's a full 6+ minute video of gameplay, captured straight from my actual DC! Jnmartin has done it again! The footage you are watching shows every GP course in the game, including multiplayer footage as well. Yes, you can also save and load ghost files from the VMU! As this is our first release, I'm sure you will run into a minor bug here or there, especially given neither one of us could stress test 4 player very effectively using our hands and feet to drive... So be sure to open tickets for any minor issues you find... assuming you're playing on REAL HARDWARE. I can already tell you right now, emulators are having issues with this one! This was my first time getting to directly contribute to a jnmartin N64 port, and it was an absolute honor for me to be involved with his incredible work. There is nobody else who I have ever met with the cross-architecture knowledge of BOTH the Sega Dreamcast and Nintendo 64, combined with the raw grit, tenacity, and attention to detail required to pull this off and do the source material justice. Not only did I get to take my SH4ZAM library for DC math gainz out for a ride with MK64, but I also brought some new routines back from MK64 so everyone can use them! Finally, I got to be involved in laying the foundation for future jnmartin N64 ports, now that we have an optimized, accelerated audio and video back-end for various libultra functionality, including Fast3D. You can already see how much this has benefited future work based on how quickly jnmartin was able to get StarFox 64 up and running on DC... The man doesn't sleep, no. lol. I just wanted to thank everyone so much for the continued enthusiasm and support behind these ports. The support for our work and the Sega Dreamcast means the world to us! Thanks for helping to keep the dream alive! For instructions on how to build yourself a burnable CDI image or a DreamShell ISO for either your DC's SD card or IDE drive, please follow the README on the repository: NOTE: Windows users will need DreamSDK to build. My last-minute build fixes for DreamSDK are in this WIP branch here, which will probably be merged into the main branch tomorrow when jnmartin wakes up:
6:11

SHE'S DONE!!! Mario Kart 64 for the Sega Dreamcast is officially ready for public consumption, so here's a full 6+ minute video of gameplay, captured straight from my actual DC! Jnmartin has done it again! The footage you are watching shows every GP course in the game, including multiplayer footage as well. Yes, you can also save and load ghost files from the VMU! As this is our first release, I'm sure you will run into a minor bug here or there, especially given neither one of us could stress test 4 player very effectively using our hands and feet to drive... So be sure to open tickets for any minor issues you find... assuming you're playing on REAL HARDWARE. I can already tell you right now, emulators are having issues with this one! This was my first time getting to directly contribute to a jnmartin N64 port, and it was an absolute honor for me to be involved with his incredible work. There is nobody else who I have ever met with the cross-architecture knowledge of BOTH the Sega Dreamcast and Nintendo 64, combined with the raw grit, tenacity, and attention to detail required to pull this off and do the source material justice. Not only did I get to take my SH4ZAM library for DC math gainz out for a ride with MK64, but I also brought some new routines back from MK64 so everyone can use them! Finally, I got to be involved in laying the foundation for future jnmartin N64 ports, now that we have an optimized, accelerated audio and video back-end for various libultra functionality, including Fast3D. You can already see how much this has benefited future work based on how quickly jnmartin was able to get StarFox 64 up and running on DC... The man doesn't sleep, no. lol. I just wanted to thank everyone so much for the continued enthusiasm and support behind these ports. The support for our work and the Sega Dreamcast means the world to us! Thanks for helping to keep the dream alive! For instructions on how to build yourself a burnable CDI image or a DreamShell ISO for either your DC's SD card or IDE drive, please follow the README on the repository: NOTE: Windows users will need DreamSDK to build. My last-minute build fixes for DreamSDK are in this WIP branch here, which will probably be merged into the main branch tomorrow when jnmartin wakes up:

Falco Girgis

63,518 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.
12:38

"Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Mad might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department." - Towel, November 6, 2025 Rule #1 in Massachusetts politics right now; Do not mess with Attorney Corey Hopkins. She's going to get barred here just to reform the government (then I'll become her paralegal and we'll submit public records requests all day). Good plan. TRANSCRIPT (from Towel's coverage of the letter in question, uncovered by Attorney Hopkins); Hello and good evening. It is just past 6 p.m. on Monday, November 3rd, 2025. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis, and I'm back with you again for another developing news update, this time related to Boston Police Commissioner Cox responding to a developing series of scandals, in particular related to former Boston Police Officer—well, first former Canton Police Officer, then former Boston Police Officer—Kelly Dever. Now, Kelly Dever was an integral witness during the John O'Keefe and Karen Read trial about one specific series of events in the early morning of January 29, 2022—not really related to John's death per se, but related to the then-chief of the Canton Police Department, Ken Berkowitz, who was also potentially the person that went to the FBI about Brian Tully's MSP unit, Massachusetts State Police unit, detailed to the Norfolk DA, who were the same people that investigated Karen Read for John's death. Berkowitz was the same person who apparently went to the FBI in 2022 about Tully's unit through John Fanning covering up Sandra Birchmore's death at the hands of former Stoughton PD officer Matthew Farwell. Okay, Ken Berkowitz and Brian Higgins—then undercover ATF agent who himself had been in a relationship of some kind, we'll call it that, with Karen in the months before John's death. That's a whole story we will not get into. The point is, Higgins and Berkowitz go into the sally port. Now, Kelly Dever had been working since, I think it was 12 a.m. on January 28th. She worked—let me make sure I get this right now—she worked at 12 p.m., noon on January 28th to 8 p.m. Then she worked the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. Okay, she was doing 16 hours over those two days. At like 1:30 a.m., she saw Berkowitz and Higgins—or around there, maybe a little later—go into the area, an area of the Canton PD. Then—and we're going to find out—she had a meeting with Boston Police Commissioner Cox. Now, why did Commissioner Cox get himself in trouble? Well, not because of the interview we're going to watch, but instead because of an interview about a year ago where he said he knew nothing about the Kelly Dever situation or the Karen Read case. All right, now we're going to quickly come to find out that what we're about to hear from the commissioner is not the best answer in light of this little document found by the incredible Marbury v. Madison on X, Corey A. Hopkins, a business litigator based in North Carolina. Towel really likes Marbury v. Madison because, first of all, Marbury v. Madison is an awesome case, and it entrenched the supremacy of the judiciary as to saying what the law is by virtue of the Constitution. Solved a very complex problem related to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and, in particular, the emergence of political parties in 1796 and, in particular, 1800, and a slew of last-minute appointments by President Adams and a refusal by President Jefferson to commission—or one of the refusal by Jefferson's Secretary of State Madison to commission a justice of the peace. But it really was about the supremacy of the judiciary branch. Marbury v. Madison uses a lot of FOIAs, and what you're going to see right here is a FOIA request that resulted in this wonderful little document. And what does this show? All right, this document shows, folks, a letter from Stephen J. Kelleher, who's with the White Collar Public Corruption and Civil Rights Division of the FBI in Boston. It is a letter that Marbury v. Madison obtained via a FOIA, and it shows the DOJ reaching out to Commissioner Cox and saying, "Sir, hope all is well. Just a reminder—this was on February 22nd, 2024. The documents were released to the DA's office late last night." This has to do with federal documents about the investigation of John's death by the MSP unit run by Brian Tully working for the Norfolk DA. "The officer we spoke about is Kelly Dever. If you have any questions at all, feel free to call me. Vr. Steve." Okay, folks, this proves that Commissioner Cox was told about Kelly Dever and documents related to her testimony and what she saw Higgins and Berkowitz doing—which I don't think was related to John's death, but it's just embarrassing for Higgins. He was an undercover ATF agent, and embarrassing for Berkowitz. And although Berkowitz is now dead, he was either dying or not dead in 2024. And clearly, this was embarrassing, okay, to the Canton Police Chief, to the Boston Police, to Higgins, to all these people. All right. And so we see here, Cox knows about it. Cox then goes on a few months later—I think it was either after, I think it was right after Karen's second trial, but it was some months after this initial email was sent to Cox. And Cox, in his infinite wisdom, tells Boston 25 or Channel 5 or whatever it was at a news conference that he's basically never heard of Kelly Dever or the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case. Okay, that was a stupid thing to say because then this FOIA comes out in recent weeks. That leads to Alan Jackson to send a Brady letter to Mayor Michelle Wu, the Democratic mayor of Boston running unopposed in the coming election, saying that Cox should be on the Brady list. I think it was—yes, because Cox was not forthcoming about what he was told by the feds about Dever. Okay, now this is Cox's response. I just want to show you how bad of a response this is. Okay, this is a clip via Boston 25, just Cox's comment on these new developments, which—although Alan Jackson's Brady letter is what Cox was asked for comment on—even Alan Jackson himself has rightfully so given credit to Marbury v. Madison for their excellent find on this FOIA document that was unearthed. And this could cost Cox his position. All right, the Democrats in Boston already have the eye of President Trump. The DOJ is all over this unit, in my opinion, and the cover-up of Birchmore's death. Look at the DOJ's pattern of indictments, okay? Recently, not just the Jessica LeClair leaks, but also Sheriff Tompkins and other major Democrats. Look at what's going on here, folks. Think about the larger picture—the most recent indictment, the superseding indictment of Matt Farwell for the murder of Sandra Birchmore's unborn child. It's all coming together. And Commissioner Cox's answer is bad. And that's why I want to analyze it. It's not just like inappropriate. It is a bad, bad, bad answer. When I heard it, I had to immediately make a video to analyze it because that's how bad this answer is. It's short, but I'm going to tell you how bad it is after we listen to it. "But what I need, you know, it's not to be asked this question ever again because it's not—it has to pertain to anything to do with the police department. My condolences to the O'Keefe family for, you know, what they've gone through. And because we did lose a department member. But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us. And I'm not going to speak with this again." Okay, let me just make something clear. I'm not saying he was wrong. It's not wrong to invoke John's name. But doing it that way—that's grotesque. Okay, he didn't answer the question. He basically refused to do so. And again, if you didn't hear the statement—although I'm sure you did—he said, "What I need is to not be asked this question ever again pertaining to anything to do with the police department." What? "My condolences to the O'Keefe family for what they've gone through because we did lose a department member." John O'Keefe was an honorable member of the Boston PD and the SA offenders unit. "But outside of that, this has nothing to do with us, the Boston PD, and I'm not going to speak on this again." No, no, no, no—that you just cost yourself your job right there. I'm sorry. That was a terrible, terrible answer. I'm sorry for the volume. I'm just running it back. Terrible answer. The worst possible answer. You may well have just cost yourself your job because you ducked the question. Everyone knows that the question is about this document. Anyone following this knows. The implications are what Dever knew about Berkowitz and Higgins, and maybe that's not the most serious thing. But as President Nixon said, it is not the crime, it's the cover-up. Dever, whatever she did—not wanting to talk about certain things about Higgins and Berkowitz, unrelated to John's death, just because it's kind of embarrassing—that is not a problem really. It's a minor thing. You know what's a big deal? Dever definitely got Brady-listed or whatever because her testimony was a little weird. I think Alan Jackson also pressured her a little bit. But whatever, that's not the point here. Cox's response—that was bad. That was bad PR. That's like the kind of thing when Prince Andrew was forced to go out and do an interview with BBC One about Epstein, and it just cost him all his titles because he got no PR help; he got sandbagged. That kind of thing—somebody didn't prep him, or the people he was talking to didn't even think this would come up. That's a horrible answer. Twenty seconds can cost you your career if you have done something bad and you answer a tough question like that. It's defensive; it shows you have something to hide; it undermines people's faith in your ability to answer those kind of questions. That's the biggest problem for Commissioner Cox here. Instead of inspiring confidence and making it look like it was nothing or it was just a routine, he couldn't even address the fact that he was made aware in February, in particular, about Kelly Dever and he had knowledge—he had a meeting with her. Let's be clear: He put her on his schedule the very next day. Not only did he have recipient knowledge of what was going on with the federal investigation and the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case—Dever got called into his office the next day, which of course Cox initially tried to play off as just some routine meeting, as if he meets with all 2,600 or whatever of the Boston police force. No. Come on, folks. Come on, folks. Do we see what's playing out here? Marbury v. Madison might have just brought down the Commissioner of the Boston Police Department. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Enjoy the rest of your Monday. We'll see what other news comes in today. Sean Good on suspension. Michael Proctor's cell phone gate engulfing the world in a conflagration. Little towel basically running down the street from the masses, trying to insulate himself from the fallout of this God-forsaken situation. Institutional reform is coming—to the Norfolk DA, hopefully throughout the state police—so that the good people in law enforcement can keep helping the vulnerable and that the exploited, no matter how much pressure they come under, continue to speak their truth. And let me just say this: Whenever we stand against the flow of opinion on hotly contested issues, a man, a woman, and a Towel—do what they must in spite of the personal consequences, in spite of the dangers and obstacles and pressures. For that is the basis of all human morality. We will be there for each other in times of struggle. We will be side by side in times of joy. And when everything is on the line and when our principles matter the most, there will be no price too high to pay to center the voices of the unheard, to bring justice to the vulnerable, and to reform this God-forsaken justice system in Massachusetts so that we can all hand down a structural system to our future generations that is worthy of our Constitution, that is worthy of our collective intelligence, and that is worthy of the due reverence we all should be providing to the pursuit of justice. My name is Grant Smith-Ellis. Until next time, you're a towel, I am as well. Be well. God bless.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,006 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

If you follow Star Citizen, please RT. You can help me shout out a few people on this. So Will Price leads our ISC Gameplay Capture Team and dropped the first version of this scene in chat as a gag this week. It was a, "Haha, this is funny, too bad we can't do it" moment... But anyone who's ever worked alongside me will tell you that's usually the first and best reason I'll ever need to make something happen, and things started to move. Meanwhile our brilliant Kat Huckaby (✿•_•✿) was already working on a brand update for the show. I have a tendency to be very "xtra" and she was working to finally realize what I'd tried to do when I invented this branding way back in 2016, and everyone on the team was thrilled with the results. So, I finally had the logo I'd always wanted, and a kickass sequence that referenced the earliest days of the persistent universe (look up "Big Benny's Challenge" and Matt | BadNewsBaron 🚀 if you don't know or remember) and my current life in the UK, what I needed now was a track to lay under it that could not only hold it all up, but elevate it beyond its combined parts. I spent hours searching the libraries we had. Nothing fit. Nothing vibed. In desperation, I pinged Pedro Macedo Camacho at 12:39am in the morning. Of course, he was working, too. I was only looking for guidance, but he knew exactly what was needed, and he didn't hesitate to offer to create something special for our milestone. We only had an evening to work. We'd need to extend the sequence to fit the idea. We had to create moments for the new title to reveal. This was the 1,171 video I've made for CIG, and 500th in a legacy begun by others and entrusted to me by Ben “LOAF” Lesnick (important) that I take as seriously today as I did when he asked if I could do it in 2015 and I summoned up a lifetime of bullshit to tell him I could. 😜 But not one of those 1,171 was made by me alone. It's people like Will and Kat and Pedro and so, so many more that enable me to still love what I do, it's people like Ben and Sandi and Chris that take chances on weirdos like me, and folks who's names and faces you don't see nearly as often as mine who keep taking those chances with me week after week. It's 2:04am on another evening I can't sleep, and I just gave Twitter $4 so I could make this post. But my life doesn't get to be what it is without these people and others like David and Tom and David and Alex and Julian and Joe and Rena and Toby and Gemma and Vicki and Tyler and Elliott and more and more and I hope you'll forgive me taking this space on your timeline to say how much I love working with them. Ups and down and ups and downs, but always with love and appreciation for those who came before, those who are here now, and those that'll help make the next 500. 💖
0:25

If you follow Star Citizen, please RT. You can help me shout out a few people on this. So Will Price leads our ISC Gameplay Capture Team and dropped the first version of this scene in chat as a gag this week. It was a, "Haha, this is funny, too bad we can't do it" moment... But anyone who's ever worked alongside me will tell you that's usually the first and best reason I'll ever need to make something happen, and things started to move. Meanwhile our brilliant Kat Huckaby (✿•_•✿) was already working on a brand update for the show. I have a tendency to be very "xtra" and she was working to finally realize what I'd tried to do when I invented this branding way back in 2016, and everyone on the team was thrilled with the results. So, I finally had the logo I'd always wanted, and a kickass sequence that referenced the earliest days of the persistent universe (look up "Big Benny's Challenge" and Matt | BadNewsBaron 🚀 if you don't know or remember) and my current life in the UK, what I needed now was a track to lay under it that could not only hold it all up, but elevate it beyond its combined parts. I spent hours searching the libraries we had. Nothing fit. Nothing vibed. In desperation, I pinged Pedro Macedo Camacho at 12:39am in the morning. Of course, he was working, too. I was only looking for guidance, but he knew exactly what was needed, and he didn't hesitate to offer to create something special for our milestone. We only had an evening to work. We'd need to extend the sequence to fit the idea. We had to create moments for the new title to reveal. This was the 1,171 video I've made for CIG, and 500th in a legacy begun by others and entrusted to me by Ben “LOAF” Lesnick (important) that I take as seriously today as I did when he asked if I could do it in 2015 and I summoned up a lifetime of bullshit to tell him I could. 😜 But not one of those 1,171 was made by me alone. It's people like Will and Kat and Pedro and so, so many more that enable me to still love what I do, it's people like Ben and Sandi and Chris that take chances on weirdos like me, and folks who's names and faces you don't see nearly as often as mine who keep taking those chances with me week after week. It's 2:04am on another evening I can't sleep, and I just gave Twitter $4 so I could make this post. But my life doesn't get to be what it is without these people and others like David and Tom and David and Alex and Julian and Joe and Rena and Toby and Gemma and Vicki and Tyler and Elliott and more and more and I hope you'll forgive me taking this space on your timeline to say how much I love working with them. Ups and down and ups and downs, but always with love and appreciation for those who came before, those who are here now, and those that'll help make the next 500. 💖

Jared Huckaby, Prefers to Like Things

34,601 просмотров • 2 лет назад

There is a very brief moment in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring that, the more I think about it, the more significant it becomes: Frodo offers the Ring to Gandalf and asks him to keep it. It seems like a perfectly reasonable suggestion. If the Ring is really that dangerous, shouldn’t it be entrusted to someone powerful, wise, and more knowledgeable about the enemy than anyone else? But Gandalf immediately steps back and pushes Frodo’s hand away. “Do not tempt me, Frodo.” I think it is precisely that reaction that deserves our attention. Gandalf is not afraid of the Ring simply because it is an evil object. What catches my attention is what he says next: he admits that if he took it, he might come to desire to use it out of a “desire to do good.” And that is where I began to see the Ring’s temptation differently. It does not necessarily begin with the thought: “I want to do evil.” It can begin with a much more acceptable thought: “I could use this power to fix everything.” That is the truly frightening part. Gandalf is a character of immense power, but what stands out in this scene is not his power. It is his ability to recognize the limits of his own. He could easily convince himself that he would use the Ring to fight Sauron, protect the weak, and bring about a better order. On the surface, all of those purposes seem perfectly justified. But Gandalf seems to understand that the problem is not simply what intention you begin with. When someone has enough power to carry out what they believe is right, the boundary between “protecting others” and “deciding for others” can become dangerously thin. From that perspective, I no longer see “Do not tempt me” as an ordinary expression of humility. It sounds more like a confession. Gandalf does not say: “I am strong enough to resist the Ring.” He is almost saying: “I know that I am powerful enough to be changed by it.” That is what makes his refusal so admirable. He does not prove that he is immune to power. He admits that he could be tempted by it. And when I look at the other characters, I feel this even more clearly. Galadriel offers a beautiful contrast. When faced with the possibility of taking the Ring, she does not simply imagine herself becoming evil. What appears before her is a more powerful version of herself. A Galadriel who could reshape the world according to her own will. That is precisely what makes Galadriel’s scene so frightening. Because the temptation does not tell her: “Become evil.” It shows her: “You could become powerful enough that you would never again have to be helpless in the face of evil.” Gandalf and Galadriel therefore made me realize something: sometimes the most dangerous thing about power is not that it makes someone want to do evil, but that it makes a good person believe they have enough reason to use it. Boromir shows me another path. Boromir is not an evil man. He sees Gondor facing the threat of destruction and believes that the power of the Ring could be used against Sauron. What makes Boromir’s story so painful is that this idea is not entirely irrational. If the enemy possesses such a powerful weapon, why shouldn’t we use that very power to save the people we love? But that is where I see the difference between Boromir and Gandalf. Gandalf sees the trap while it is still disguised as a beautiful idea. Boromir, on the other hand, is pushed by circumstances until that idea becomes increasingly reasonable. And so Gandalf is not simply stronger than Boromir in terms of willpower. He recognizes earlier that there are forms of power that should not be justified solely by the purpose one hopes to achieve with them. This also explains why Frodo’s reaction to Gandalf’s refusal matters. Frodo naturally thinks: If Gandalf is stronger and wiser than I am, then perhaps he should be the one to keep the Ring. But Gandalf gives Frodo the exact opposite answer. The more powerful person is precisely the one who refuses to take it. And from there, the story presents a paradox that I find deeply beautiful: Is the strongest person always the person best suited to hold the greatest power? In the case of the Ring, the answer seems to be no. Frodo is not immune to the Ring. His journey proves the opposite. He too must endure its weight and eventually reaches the limits of his own strength. But Frodo does not begin the story with the ambition to use the Ring to rule or reshape the world. And perhaps that difference is what allows a small Hobbit to become the bearer of a burden that more powerful characters would not dare to accept. What impresses me most about Gandalf, then, is not how powerful he is. It is that he knows when his own power could become a danger. He does not try to prove: “I can control it.” He chooses instead to say: “I dare not take it.” It is only a small shift in perspective, but the meaning is completely different. Because power always tempts people to believe that they can control it, especially when they believe they are using it for a good purpose. Gandalf does the opposite. He refuses even the opportunity to become powerful enough to “fix” the world according to his own will. And the more I think about this scene, the more I feel that “Do not tempt me” is not only about the Ring. It speaks to a kind of temptation that is deeply human: when we believe we know what is best for others, it becomes very easy to start believing that we have the power to make that decision for them. Perhaps that is why Gandalf’s refusal does not feel to me like the moment when a powerful man steps back. It is the moment when a powerful man recognizes his own limits. And sometimes, the most valuable kind of strength is not the ability to wield great power. It is the ability to look at that power, know that you could use it, and still have enough clarity to say: No.
3:27

There is a very brief moment in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring that, the more I think about it, the more significant it becomes: Frodo offers the Ring to Gandalf and asks him to keep it. It seems like a perfectly reasonable suggestion. If the Ring is really that dangerous, shouldn’t it be entrusted to someone powerful, wise, and more knowledgeable about the enemy than anyone else? But Gandalf immediately steps back and pushes Frodo’s hand away. “Do not tempt me, Frodo.” I think it is precisely that reaction that deserves our attention. Gandalf is not afraid of the Ring simply because it is an evil object. What catches my attention is what he says next: he admits that if he took it, he might come to desire to use it out of a “desire to do good.” And that is where I began to see the Ring’s temptation differently. It does not necessarily begin with the thought: “I want to do evil.” It can begin with a much more acceptable thought: “I could use this power to fix everything.” That is the truly frightening part. Gandalf is a character of immense power, but what stands out in this scene is not his power. It is his ability to recognize the limits of his own. He could easily convince himself that he would use the Ring to fight Sauron, protect the weak, and bring about a better order. On the surface, all of those purposes seem perfectly justified. But Gandalf seems to understand that the problem is not simply what intention you begin with. When someone has enough power to carry out what they believe is right, the boundary between “protecting others” and “deciding for others” can become dangerously thin. From that perspective, I no longer see “Do not tempt me” as an ordinary expression of humility. It sounds more like a confession. Gandalf does not say: “I am strong enough to resist the Ring.” He is almost saying: “I know that I am powerful enough to be changed by it.” That is what makes his refusal so admirable. He does not prove that he is immune to power. He admits that he could be tempted by it. And when I look at the other characters, I feel this even more clearly. Galadriel offers a beautiful contrast. When faced with the possibility of taking the Ring, she does not simply imagine herself becoming evil. What appears before her is a more powerful version of herself. A Galadriel who could reshape the world according to her own will. That is precisely what makes Galadriel’s scene so frightening. Because the temptation does not tell her: “Become evil.” It shows her: “You could become powerful enough that you would never again have to be helpless in the face of evil.” Gandalf and Galadriel therefore made me realize something: sometimes the most dangerous thing about power is not that it makes someone want to do evil, but that it makes a good person believe they have enough reason to use it. Boromir shows me another path. Boromir is not an evil man. He sees Gondor facing the threat of destruction and believes that the power of the Ring could be used against Sauron. What makes Boromir’s story so painful is that this idea is not entirely irrational. If the enemy possesses such a powerful weapon, why shouldn’t we use that very power to save the people we love? But that is where I see the difference between Boromir and Gandalf. Gandalf sees the trap while it is still disguised as a beautiful idea. Boromir, on the other hand, is pushed by circumstances until that idea becomes increasingly reasonable. And so Gandalf is not simply stronger than Boromir in terms of willpower. He recognizes earlier that there are forms of power that should not be justified solely by the purpose one hopes to achieve with them. This also explains why Frodo’s reaction to Gandalf’s refusal matters. Frodo naturally thinks: If Gandalf is stronger and wiser than I am, then perhaps he should be the one to keep the Ring. But Gandalf gives Frodo the exact opposite answer. The more powerful person is precisely the one who refuses to take it. And from there, the story presents a paradox that I find deeply beautiful: Is the strongest person always the person best suited to hold the greatest power? In the case of the Ring, the answer seems to be no. Frodo is not immune to the Ring. His journey proves the opposite. He too must endure its weight and eventually reaches the limits of his own strength. But Frodo does not begin the story with the ambition to use the Ring to rule or reshape the world. And perhaps that difference is what allows a small Hobbit to become the bearer of a burden that more powerful characters would not dare to accept. What impresses me most about Gandalf, then, is not how powerful he is. It is that he knows when his own power could become a danger. He does not try to prove: “I can control it.” He chooses instead to say: “I dare not take it.” It is only a small shift in perspective, but the meaning is completely different. Because power always tempts people to believe that they can control it, especially when they believe they are using it for a good purpose. Gandalf does the opposite. He refuses even the opportunity to become powerful enough to “fix” the world according to his own will. And the more I think about this scene, the more I feel that “Do not tempt me” is not only about the Ring. It speaks to a kind of temptation that is deeply human: when we believe we know what is best for others, it becomes very easy to start believing that we have the power to make that decision for them. Perhaps that is why Gandalf’s refusal does not feel to me like the moment when a powerful man steps back. It is the moment when a powerful man recognizes his own limits. And sometimes, the most valuable kind of strength is not the ability to wield great power. It is the ability to look at that power, know that you could use it, and still have enough clarity to say: No.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

14,635 просмотров • 14 дней назад