正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

33,467 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

2 条评论

Samuelr 🇻🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱 的头像
Samuelr 🇻🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱1 年前

Matra 🇫🇷Magic Missile 🌡️💥

Leonof Alférez 的头像
Leonof Alférez1 年前

Esta mierda no sirve para nada, en muchas guerras se demostró que era ineficaz. Era mejor el R-60 o el AIM-9

相关视频

DRONE SWARMS: CHEAP, SNEAKY, AND MAKING MISSILES LOOK STUPID For decades, military power was a flex; stealth jets, billion-dollar programs, advanced missile systems. The assumption was simple: the more expensive your toys, the safer you were. Enter the $10,000 Shahed drone, and suddenly that logic looks like a bad investment pitch. Because the real problem with drone swarms isn’t just that they’re cheap. It’s that they’re hard to see, annoyingly persistent, and perfectly happy to show up in numbers that make most defense systems sweat. This is the part nobody likes to admit: modern air defense is built for impressive threats, not annoying ones. A fighter jet? Big, expensive, predictable behavior, worth the missile. A swarm of low-flying, semi-autonomous drones stitched together with off-the-shelf parts? That's nightmare fuel. You can absolutely shoot them down… if you enjoy the idea of firing a six-figure interceptor at something that costs less than a used car. Do that a few dozen times and congratulations, you’ve successfully defended your airspace straight into a budget crisis. This is what the new battlefield looks like: not a contest of who has the best technology, but who can afford to keep pressing “fire” the longest. But cost is only half the problem. Detection is where things get ugly. These drones fly low, slow, and just quietly enough to blend into the background noise of reality. Radar doesn’t love them. Infrared barely notices them. By the time you’re sure they’re there, they’re already uncomfortably close to something you’d prefer not to explode. So now you’re playing hide-and-seek with something designed to be found too late. Naturally, the solution isn’t one system. It’s all of them. Sensors layered on sensors. Jammers trying to cut signals that may not even matter anymore. Guns sweeping the sky like it’s 1943 again. Smart ammunition that explodes near targets because hitting them directly is apparently too much to ask. And yes, lasers… because nothing says “we’re adapting” like turning science fiction into a workaround. The pitch sounds great: pennies per shot, instant engagement, no reloads. The reality? Still weather-dependent, still power-hungry, and still not a magic wand when the sky looks like a mechanical beehive. Meanwhile, the offense is getting smarter. AI is turning swarms into coordinated systems that don’t just fly, they think, adjust, reroute, and overwhelm. Lose a few drones? Fine. The rest adapt. The mission continues. Nobody sends condolence letters to a pile of circuit boards. We’ve spent decades perfecting exquisite, high-cost ways to destroy things… only to discover that the future belongs to whoever can afford to lose the most stuff the fastest. Source: Military Merchandise YT

Mario Nawfal

51,338 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸 Air Force One: when the Empire speaks, Europe remains silent By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 On board Air Force One, Donald Trump does not engage in diplomacy. He engages in strategic accounting. "We can do whatever we want." Official translation: we are the international order. European translation: yes, sir. The scene is now familiar. Trump speaks. Europe screams. Then Europe sits back down. And finally, Europe explains that this wasn't really what he meant, that it all deserves nuance, dialogue, and enhanced transatlantic cooperation. European dignity now hangs by a Twitter thread and an impromptu press conference. 1 - Automatic indignation, chronic impotence In Brussels, Paris, Berlin, and Copenhagen, people were outraged in unison. Sovereignty! International law! Territorial integrity! The same words, worn out from overuse, uttered at every strategic humiliation. Then nothing. Because after words, action is needed. And there, there is no one. Greenland? An American missile base, a central part of NATO's Arctic defense system, a territory already militarily locked down by Washington. Trump isn't stealing anything. He's simply reminding us that the safe is already his. The Europeans are discovering the bill, but they signed the contract long ago. 2 - NATO: Europe's strategic straitjacket The European Union loves to talk about sovereignty... as long as it doesn't involve any autonomous decision-making. Security: United States. Deterrence: United States. Intelligence: United States. Arctic: United States. And then Europe is surprised that Washington decides alone. How dare they. When Trump says "we can do whatever we want," it's not a threat. It's a mathematical statement of fact. Europe has outsourced its power, privatized its defense, and subcontracted its geopolitics. You don't challenge an owner when you live in their house. 3 - The great comedy of firmness So we play the usual game: — indignant statements, — emergency meetings, — improbable trade threats, — imaginary "European bazooka." Then comes the magic phrase: "we must avoid escalation." Understand: we have absolutely no real leverage. Europe will never sanction the United States. Europe will never break with NATO. Europe will never defend Greenland other than through tweets. And Trump knows it. That's why he speaks without gloves. Trump is not the problem, he is the mirror. Trump shocks because he removes the makeup. Where his predecessors wrapped American domination in morality, values, and multilateral summits, he throws the raw truth from a presidential plane. The rules-based order? His rules. Respect for allies? Conditional. European sovereignty? Decorative. And the EU, true to form, still confuses respect with voluntary submission. Conclusion: assumed vassalage Europeans can continue to shout, express outrage, and pretend to exist diplomatically. But as long as they remain militarily dependent, economically aligned, and strategically absent, Trump can do whatever he wants. Greenland is not an annexation. It is a wake-up call. A brutal, humiliating, but perfectly consistent wake-up call: when you give up your power for thirty years, all that remains is indignation as foreign policy. And Trump does not negotiate with the indignant.

Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆

10,921 次观看 • 7 个月前