Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: The U.S. presented Ukrainian officials a one-page document last week as Trump's "final offer" and awaits an answer from President Zelensky on Wednesday. The deal includes: U.S. recognition of Crimea as part of Russia. Unofficial recognition of Russian control of nearly all areas occupied since the... show more

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,222,542 subscribers

1,819,295 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Finanzen Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von CALL TO ACTIVISM

CALL TO ACTIVISMvor 1 Jahr

Per Axios, Ukraine would lose all land marked in red. Basically EVERYTHING Putin wants.

Profilbild von Estadio Deportes

Estadio Deportesvor 1 Jahr

#ExtraCancha HUBO REUNIÓN 🙌 La noche de ayer, el presidente Trump anunció que tendría una reunión con Canadá y México la mañana de hoy. ¿Qué se sabe? Te lo contamos. 👇 #Trump #Sheinbaum #Aranceles

Profilbild von Cooper

Coopervor 1 Jahr

This isn’t a peace deal This is surrender

Profilbild von Nikos Unity

Nikos Unityvor 1 Jahr

Trump just offered Putin the spoils of war and handed Zelensky a knife for Ukraine’s back.

Profilbild von WhiskeyWench 🇺🇸✌🏻🖕🏼✌🏻🇺🇸

WhiskeyWench 🇺🇸✌🏻🖕🏼✌🏻🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

I hope Zelensky tells Donald to fuck himself in the face.

Profilbild von LuvaBrutha

LuvaBruthavor 1 Jahr

Wow that’s such a weak bitch move from the President of the United States! Russia invaded Ukraine, killed their citizens and just took over. Trump wants Ukraine to just surrender. Is this a signal to China to go ahead and invade Taiwan.

Profilbild von John Kind

John Kindvor 1 Jahr

So now the US is just conveying Russia’s demands and spoils as a “peace treaty” to a US ally that Russia invaded

Profilbild von Brian Lutz

Brian Lutzvor 1 Jahr

lol, you gotta be kidding me ...

Profilbild von Jennifer Krumins

Jennifer Kruminsvor 1 Jahr

@ZelenskyyUa DON'T TAKE the DEAL! @POTUS is an evil COWARD who is happily selling his soul so he can be Putins henchman. 😈

Profilbild von David Byrnes 🍀

David Byrnes 🍀vor 1 Jahr

Ok, but what does Ukraine get out of it in return for not resisting Russian occupation of their lands?

Profilbild von Jim Johnson

Jim Johnsonvor 1 Jahr

Basically, "Ukraine gives up everything Russia got so far and otherwise gets nothing." Exactly what we'd expect from Putin's lapdog.

Ähnliche Videos

U.S. and Ukrainian officials are discussing the potential of bringing President Zelenskyy to the U.S. this week as part of President Trump's push to get an agreement on Ukraine by Thanksgiving, according to multiple U.S. and Ukrainian officials familiar with the discussions. Margaret Brennan breaks down the latest on the Ukraine-Russia peace talks.

U.S. and Ukrainian officials are discussing the potential of bringing President Zelenskyy to the U.S. this week as part of President Trump's push to get an agreement on Ukraine by Thanksgiving, according to multiple U.S. and Ukrainian officials familiar with the discussions. Margaret Brennan breaks down the latest on the Ukraine-Russia peace talks.

CBS News

56,484 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says the future of occupied Crimea is "a done deal," as President Trump's proposed peace deal for the Ukraine-Russia war includes officially recognizing Russia's control of Crimea. Asked if there will be any negotiation over the future of Crimea, Lavrov says, "Russia does not negotiate its own territory."

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says the future of occupied Crimea is "a done deal," as President Trump's proposed peace deal for the Ukraine-Russia war includes officially recognizing Russia's control of Crimea. Asked if there will be any negotiation over the future of Crimea, Lavrov says, "Russia does not negotiate its own territory."

Face The Nation

32,545 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨RUSSIA OFFICIALLY DECLARES CONDITIONS TO END WAR🚨 Russia has officially declared its conditions for ending the war, according to MFA Lavrov in an interview with a Brazilian newspaper: 1. Demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine; 2. Ukraine must not join NATO; 3. International recognition of the annexation of Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia; 4. Lifting of sanctions against Russia and the return of frozen assets; 5. Rejection by Russia of the U.S. proposal to transfer control over the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant to Washington and Ukraine; 6. Cancellation of language laws in Ukraine, especially those that "restrict" the use of the "Russian language, culture, and church".

🚨RUSSIA OFFICIALLY DECLARES CONDITIONS TO END WAR🚨 Russia has officially declared its conditions for ending the war, according to MFA Lavrov in an interview with a Brazilian newspaper: 1. Demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine; 2. Ukraine must not join NATO; 3. International recognition of the annexation of Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia; 4. Lifting of sanctions against Russia and the return of frozen assets; 5. Rejection by Russia of the U.S. proposal to transfer control over the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant to Washington and Ukraine; 6. Cancellation of language laws in Ukraine, especially those that "restrict" the use of the "Russian language, culture, and church".

Patriot in Chief🦅🇺🇸

5,341,658 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Separate from the draft Ukraine-Russia peace plan, there is another document focused on U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine, Ukrainian Amb. to the U.S. Olga Stefanishnya says. “It’s been publicly leaked as well, that the U.S. will stand up together with our allies, in case of the Russian aggression from the territory of the Russian Federation.”

Separate from the draft Ukraine-Russia peace plan, there is another document focused on U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine, Ukrainian Amb. to the U.S. Olga Stefanishnya says. “It’s been publicly leaked as well, that the U.S. will stand up together with our allies, in case of the Russian aggression from the territory of the Russian Federation.”

Face The Nation

15,582 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Ukrainian and American officials met over the weekend in Switzerland to discuss a 28-point proposal floated last week by the White House to end the Ukraine war with Russia. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the conversations “is probably the most productive day we have had on this issue,” but that “work remains.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Monday that the suggested legal recognition of Russian sovereignty over captured territory in the east of his country remained a "main problem" in negotiations as President Trump pushes for a deal to end Moscow's nearly-four-year war on Ukraine.

Ukrainian and American officials met over the weekend in Switzerland to discuss a 28-point proposal floated last week by the White House to end the Ukraine war with Russia. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the conversations “is probably the most productive day we have had on this issue,” but that “work remains.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Monday that the suggested legal recognition of Russian sovereignty over captured territory in the east of his country remained a "main problem" in negotiations as President Trump pushes for a deal to end Moscow's nearly-four-year war on Ukraine.

CBS News

23,600 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

💡Question: Has Russia invaded anyone since the collapse of the USSR without an implicit or explicit greenlight from the United States? GROK: No, Russia has not invaded any country since the collapse of the USSR in 1991 without at least some level of implicit or explicit acquiescence from the United States or major Western powers, though the extent and nature of this acquiescence vary by case. Below is a concise analysis of major Russian military interventions post-1991, focusing on invasions (defined as significant, direct military operations on another country’s territory) and the U.S. stance in each case: Chechnya (1994–1996, 1999–2009): These were internal conflicts within Russia’s borders, not invasions of sovereign states. The U.S. expressed concerns about human rights but did not oppose Russia’s actions militarily or diplomatically in a significant way, effectively giving tacit acceptance. Georgia (2008): Russia intervened in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, supporting separatists and engaging Georgian forces. The U.S. provided rhetorical condemnation and humanitarian aid to Georgia but avoided direct confrontation or sanctions that would challenge Russia’s actions. The Bush administration’s muted response, focusing on diplomacy, can be seen as implicit acquiescence, especially as NATO expansion discussions slowed. Ukraine (2014, Crimea Annexation; 2022, Full-Scale Invasion):2014 (Crimea): Russia annexed Crimea and supported separatists in eastern Ukraine. The U.S. imposed sanctions but avoided military escalation or direct opposition. The Obama administration’s focus on diplomacy and limited sanctions signaled implicit tolerance, as stronger measures (e.g., lethal aid to Ukraine) were initially withheld. 2022 (Full-Scale Invasion): Russia’s invasion was met with strong U.S. condemnation, extensive sanctions, and military aid to Ukraine. However, prior to the invasion, mixed signals from the Biden administration (e.g., downplaying the likelihood of invasion, not preemptively deploying significant deterrence) could be interpreted as a lack of clear red lines, potentially perceived by Russia as implicit leeway. Once the invasion began, the U.S. response was robust but reactive, not preventive. Syria (2015–present): Russia intervened to support the Assad regime. The U.S., under Obama, had already engaged in Syria against ISIS and implicitly coordinated with Russia to avoid direct clashes (e.g., deconfliction agreements). This coordination suggests an explicit greenlight for Russia’s presence, as the U.S. prioritized counterterrorism over opposing Russian actions. In each case, the U.S. either avoided direct confrontation, limited its response to sanctions and rhetoric, or coordinated to avoid escalation, effectively allowing Russia’s actions to proceed without significant obstruction. No invasion stands out as entirely free of U.S. acquiescence, though the degree varies from explicit (Syria) to implicit (Georgia, Ukraine). Russia’s strategic calculations often exploit perceived gaps in U.S. resolve or competing priorities, such as counterterrorism or avoiding NATO-Russia conflict.

💡Question: Has Russia invaded anyone since the collapse of the USSR without an implicit or explicit greenlight from the United States? GROK: No, Russia has not invaded any country since the collapse of the USSR in 1991 without at least some level of implicit or explicit acquiescence from the United States or major Western powers, though the extent and nature of this acquiescence vary by case. Below is a concise analysis of major Russian military interventions post-1991, focusing on invasions (defined as significant, direct military operations on another country’s territory) and the U.S. stance in each case: Chechnya (1994–1996, 1999–2009): These were internal conflicts within Russia’s borders, not invasions of sovereign states. The U.S. expressed concerns about human rights but did not oppose Russia’s actions militarily or diplomatically in a significant way, effectively giving tacit acceptance. Georgia (2008): Russia intervened in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, supporting separatists and engaging Georgian forces. The U.S. provided rhetorical condemnation and humanitarian aid to Georgia but avoided direct confrontation or sanctions that would challenge Russia’s actions. The Bush administration’s muted response, focusing on diplomacy, can be seen as implicit acquiescence, especially as NATO expansion discussions slowed. Ukraine (2014, Crimea Annexation; 2022, Full-Scale Invasion):2014 (Crimea): Russia annexed Crimea and supported separatists in eastern Ukraine. The U.S. imposed sanctions but avoided military escalation or direct opposition. The Obama administration’s focus on diplomacy and limited sanctions signaled implicit tolerance, as stronger measures (e.g., lethal aid to Ukraine) were initially withheld. 2022 (Full-Scale Invasion): Russia’s invasion was met with strong U.S. condemnation, extensive sanctions, and military aid to Ukraine. However, prior to the invasion, mixed signals from the Biden administration (e.g., downplaying the likelihood of invasion, not preemptively deploying significant deterrence) could be interpreted as a lack of clear red lines, potentially perceived by Russia as implicit leeway. Once the invasion began, the U.S. response was robust but reactive, not preventive. Syria (2015–present): Russia intervened to support the Assad regime. The U.S., under Obama, had already engaged in Syria against ISIS and implicitly coordinated with Russia to avoid direct clashes (e.g., deconfliction agreements). This coordination suggests an explicit greenlight for Russia’s presence, as the U.S. prioritized counterterrorism over opposing Russian actions. In each case, the U.S. either avoided direct confrontation, limited its response to sanctions and rhetoric, or coordinated to avoid escalation, effectively allowing Russia’s actions to proceed without significant obstruction. No invasion stands out as entirely free of U.S. acquiescence, though the degree varies from explicit (Syria) to implicit (Georgia, Ukraine). Russia’s strategic calculations often exploit perceived gaps in U.S. resolve or competing priorities, such as counterterrorism or avoiding NATO-Russia conflict.

Igor Sushko

244,504 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A Chinese cargo ship visited the occupied port of Sevastopol in Crimea, under sanctions since 2014 — faking its route and making an unprecedented series of stops by a major foreign vessel to one of the Ukrainian ports seized by Russia. w/ Chris Cook Financial Times

A Chinese cargo ship visited the occupied port of Sevastopol in Crimea, under sanctions since 2014 — faking its route and making an unprecedented series of stops by a major foreign vessel to one of the Ukrainian ports seized by Russia. w/ Chris Cook Financial Times

Christopher Miller

115,095 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Question: Are Ukrainian attacks on Russia oil facilities sanctions by another means, as the U.S. grants Russia waivers? Ukrainian Amb Olga Stefanishyna: “I would say that this is a way of enforcing sanctions…any source of Russian fuel that the Russian government gains resources from is the direct fuel of war.”

Question: Are Ukrainian attacks on Russia oil facilities sanctions by another means, as the U.S. grants Russia waivers? Ukrainian Amb Olga Stefanishyna: “I would say that this is a way of enforcing sanctions…any source of Russian fuel that the Russian government gains resources from is the direct fuel of war.”

Jim Sciutto

53,397 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦 Russia is ready to sign a peace agreement on Ukraine, but some specific points still need to be finalized — says Lavrov. ▪️ Russia wants guarantees that a ceasefire will not be used again to strengthen the Ukrainian Armed Forces and that arms supplies must stop. ▪️ Russia has not received any proposals from the U.S. regarding the transfer of control over the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, Lavrov noted. ▪️ If necessary, Russia will explain to the U.S. that the plant is in safe hands and that any changes in its control are out of the question. ▪️ Russia has also not received any U.S. proposals concerning the lifting of sanctions, although Washington is reportedly interested in restoring business ties. ▪️ Russia is not negotiating over the integrity of its territory — the issue of Crimea is closed, and Trump understands that. ▪️ Russia only targets military objectives or civilian infrastructure being used by Ukrainian forces. ▪️ Lavrov personally sent Marco Rubio and the UN a list of Ukraine’s violations of the moratorium on attacks against energy facilities. - RVvoenkor

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦 Russia is ready to sign a peace agreement on Ukraine, but some specific points still need to be finalized — says Lavrov. ▪️ Russia wants guarantees that a ceasefire will not be used again to strengthen the Ukrainian Armed Forces and that arms supplies must stop. ▪️ Russia has not received any proposals from the U.S. regarding the transfer of control over the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, Lavrov noted. ▪️ If necessary, Russia will explain to the U.S. that the plant is in safe hands and that any changes in its control are out of the question. ▪️ Russia has also not received any U.S. proposals concerning the lifting of sanctions, although Washington is reportedly interested in restoring business ties. ▪️ Russia is not negotiating over the integrity of its territory — the issue of Crimea is closed, and Trump understands that. ▪️ Russia only targets military objectives or civilian infrastructure being used by Ukrainian forces. ▪️ Lavrov personally sent Marco Rubio and the UN a list of Ukraine’s violations of the moratorium on attacks against energy facilities. - RVvoenkor

Zlatti71

48,853 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A recap of Russia’s unchanged peace terms, as outlined by President Putin on June 14, 2024: — Full withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from the Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions. — Ukraine’s renunciation of plans to join NATO and commitment to a neutral, non-aligned, non-nuclear status. — Demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine in accordance with the parameters agreed upon during the 2022 Istanbul talks. — Guaranteed protection of the rights, freedoms, and interests of Ukraine’s Russian-speaking population. — Recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions. — Lifting of all Western sanctions against Russia. 🔗 Source:

A recap of Russia’s unchanged peace terms, as outlined by President Putin on June 14, 2024: — Full withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from the Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions. — Ukraine’s renunciation of plans to join NATO and commitment to a neutral, non-aligned, non-nuclear status. — Demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine in accordance with the parameters agreed upon during the 2022 Istanbul talks. — Guaranteed protection of the rights, freedoms, and interests of Ukraine’s Russian-speaking population. — Recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions. — Lifting of all Western sanctions against Russia. 🔗 Source:

Russia Direct

60,898 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Zelensky proposes a defensive military alliance that includes the EU + Ukraine, Turkey, Norway, and the UK. This will enable control of the seas, skies, and land of all Europe as the United States withdraws from NATO. The alliance will be stronger than Russia.

🚨 BREAKING: Zelensky proposes a defensive military alliance that includes the EU + Ukraine, Turkey, Norway, and the UK. This will enable control of the seas, skies, and land of all Europe as the United States withdraws from NATO. The alliance will be stronger than Russia.

Igor Sushko

1,279,822 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

⚡ Ushakov: The U.S. proposed a "acceptable" plan to the Kremlin According to Putin's aide Yury Ushakov, Washington presented a proposal that Moscow considers "acceptable." The talks were initiated by Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff. Polish outlet Onet claims to have obtained the details of the proposal: 🔵 A ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia — not a peace treaty; 🔵 De facto recognition of occupied territories by "freezing" the issue for 49–99 years; 🔵 Lifting most sanctions imposed on Russia; 🔵 Eventual return to importing Russian gas and oil; 🔵 No guarantees regarding NATO’s non-expansion; 🔵 The U.S. will not stop military support for Ukraine.

⚡ Ushakov: The U.S. proposed a "acceptable" plan to the Kremlin According to Putin's aide Yury Ushakov, Washington presented a proposal that Moscow considers "acceptable." The talks were initiated by Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff. Polish outlet Onet claims to have obtained the details of the proposal: 🔵 A ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia — not a peace treaty; 🔵 De facto recognition of occupied territories by "freezing" the issue for 49–99 years; 🔵 Lifting most sanctions imposed on Russia; 🔵 Eventual return to importing Russian gas and oil; 🔵 No guarantees regarding NATO’s non-expansion; 🔵 The U.S. will not stop military support for Ukraine.

NEXTA

449,951 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

❗️An overview of Trump's attacks on Zelensky at the FII PRIORITY summit, mocking him and claiming the war could end in a year—or lead to WWIII. He accuses Ukraine of breaking a rare metals deal with the U.S., calls Zelensky unpopular for refusing elections, and insists Ukraine is "shattered" while demanding the U.S. be reimbursed for its aid. He also falsely claims Russia has lost 900K soldiers and Ukraine 700K, portraying himself as a "peacemaker."

❗️An overview of Trump's attacks on Zelensky at the FII PRIORITY summit, mocking him and claiming the war could end in a year—or lead to WWIII. He accuses Ukraine of breaking a rare metals deal with the U.S., calls Zelensky unpopular for refusing elections, and insists Ukraine is "shattered" while demanding the U.S. be reimbursed for its aid. He also falsely claims Russia has lost 900K soldiers and Ukraine 700K, portraying himself as a "peacemaker."

NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦

117,583 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I met with the Marshal of the Polish Senate, Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska. I am grateful for the principled stance on Ukraine’s territorial integrity, effective cooperation with the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and support for Ukrainian initiatives. Progress is also being made on matters of historical memory. We discussed it today. I briefed her on the current situation in Ukraine and our diplomatic efforts to achieve peace. We also addressed cooperation with the U.S. Congress and the importance of transatlantic unity on sanctions and the recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. Thank you for supporting our people.

I met with the Marshal of the Polish Senate, Małgorzata Kidawa-Błońska. I am grateful for the principled stance on Ukraine’s territorial integrity, effective cooperation with the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and support for Ukrainian initiatives. Progress is also being made on matters of historical memory. We discussed it today. I briefed her on the current situation in Ukraine and our diplomatic efforts to achieve peace. We also addressed cooperation with the U.S. Congress and the importance of transatlantic unity on sanctions and the recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. Thank you for supporting our people.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

85,249 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

JUST IN: Peace on the table. Ukraine agrees to a deal to end the war with Russia, a U.S. official tells Fox News. U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll and his team met with Russian officials in Abu Dhabi Monday and Tuesday to discuss a potential Ukraine peace framework—with the U.S. remaining “optimistic” about the deal. The diplomatic flurry follows the leak of the 28-point peace plan, which many European leaders and U.S. lawmakers view as largely favorable to Russia. | America's Newsroom

JUST IN: Peace on the table. Ukraine agrees to a deal to end the war with Russia, a U.S. official tells Fox News. U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll and his team met with Russian officials in Abu Dhabi Monday and Tuesday to discuss a potential Ukraine peace framework—with the U.S. remaining “optimistic” about the deal. The diplomatic flurry follows the leak of the 28-point peace plan, which many European leaders and U.S. lawmakers view as largely favorable to Russia. | America's Newsroom

Fox News

285,552 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten