Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Major findings into the Pfizer Clinical protocol ! You have 2 processes to manufacture the Pfizer’s vaccine, the results provided the 95 % of efficacy was on process 1 Billions of people have received jabs manufactured with the process 2 tested on 250 participants on which no result was... show more
955,541 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
10 Yorum

@Cyrilhanouna @SoMabrouk @Cdanslair @DiedSuddenly_ @NTDNews @MamansLouves @JanJekielek @SenRonJohnson @JETAR9 @mjgranger1 @ParentsVigil @karlitozero @BBarucker @sedatif @LobservateurLi2 @SudRadio @TonyNikolic10 @AssociationPEC @JoshWalkos @SenRandPaul @MicheleRivasi @v_joron @MullerBronnL @MartineWonner @noel_sylviane @SGoyChavent @alainhoupert @EmeryOkundji @EloVeut @RealGeorgeWebb1 @Fynnderella1 @SoniadlpCaen @OPECST_ @AndersonAfDMdEP @CristianTerhes @Rob_Roos

Découvertes majeurs dans le protocole clinique Pfizer! Les résultats d'efficacité fournis, les fameux 95 % d'efficacité, sont issus des participants ayant reçu les doses fabriqués avec le procédé de fabrication 1. Des milliards de personnes ont reçu des vaccins fabriqués selon le procédé 2, testé sur 250 participants, aucun résultat n'a été fourni sur ce procédé de fabrication ! Le plus grand scandale de l'histoire de l'industrie pharmaceutique ! merci à @RepublicWelsh pour cette discussion documents sources : Protocole Merci à @joshg99 , @canceledmouse @FluoridePoison @Fynnderella1 de m'avoir alertée sur ce sujet connu depuis janvier 2021. @MicheleRivasi avait posé la question sur ce nouveau procédé au parlement européen !

L' @EMA_News a subi une attaque de hackers qui ont rendu publiques les échanges entre le comité chargé de la revue des résultats #pfizer et le laboratoire Ils étaient inquiets du changement de procédés !! J'en parle dans mon livre "Tous vaccinés, tous protégés ?" @Tredaniel sources

A publication on the documents stolen by hackers revealed that @EMA_News was concerned by this change in manufacturing process But a few days later @EMA_News approved the vaccine ! Into the manufacturing section of we can read "During the procedure, a number of issues were highlighted relating to the GMP status of the manufacture of the active substance and of the testing sites of the finished product for the purpose of batch release. These issues were classified as a Major Objection (MO). After further information was obtained from the sites and inspectors, the MO was considered resolved. EU GMP certificates for the manufacturing and testing sites were subsequently obtained. In conclusion, appropriate manufacturing authorisations and GMP certificates are in place for all active substance and finished product manufacturing sites." ??? Authorization without ANY RESULTS of efficacy ???? Authorization with immunogenicity and safety data on 250 participants ?????

Christine, The 95% was the Relative Risk Reduction the Absolute Risk Reduction 0.84% is the important measurement as it is used to calculate the number needed to vaccinate NNV. The public has been deceived by fear, obfuscation and dis/misinformation promoted by a paid press.

yes you're right but according to the guidelines to analyse vaccines into clinical trial, the main criterion, the vaccine efficacy is assessed by the RRR

It looks like ALL they had was self reported adverse events ONLY up to 14 weeks after the 2nd dose (from your link nejm 10.10.20)

How not to record what you don’t want to see …

La FDA est forcément au courant et donc impliquée.

Mais ils sont tous au courant !!
