Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Make Benz wants that the censorship industrial complex that stopped getting funded when Donald Trump cut USAID did not stop operating The NGOs and “censorship class” got jobs in the European Union, and are in a sense waiting until Democrats regain power This is serious “The censorship industrial complex,...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,382,175 subscribers

36,827 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

KomediHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨Mike Benz has begun working directly with the Trump administration on a new transparency drive exposing the NGOs and the taxpayer money that funded the Censorship Industrial Complex. Mike Benz "There is a censorship class in exile who are not out of jobs, they've simply gotten jobs in Europe with the EU."
0:48

🚨Mike Benz has begun working directly with the Trump administration on a new transparency drive exposing the NGOs and the taxpayer money that funded the Censorship Industrial Complex. Mike Benz "There is a censorship class in exile who are not out of jobs, they've simply gotten jobs in Europe with the EU."

jay plemons

55,220 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....
2:48

It's All Much Worse Than I Thought The corporate media are all-in on government censorship Over the last three years, we have come to learn of the role that our own government officials have played in demanding censorship by social media platforms. Some of this censorship was overt, particularly as it related to COVID. However, some of it was also done in secrecy, as we discovered in the Twitter Files. Many of us thought that once we had uncovered the censorship, governments would be sufficiently embarrassed to stop doing it. And to some extent, that has been the case. But now, governments around the world are stepping up their efforts to demand more censorship. Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation quietly announced it had resumed its outreach to social media companies. Scotland’s Police could even investigate comedians under a new hate speech law if someone complains about a joke. Major media outlets are currently working with government-funded censorship activists at the University of Washington and Stanford Internet Observatory to demand greater censorship in the name of “saving Democracy.” Without a doubt, those of us who have uncovered censorship have had an impact. On “60 Minutes” last Sunday, the government-funded advocates of censorship at the University of Washington said they have stopped demanding censorship of social media platforms. Simply drawing awareness to who is demanding censorship and who is funding them has weakened their power. But governments, government-funded NGOs, and the news media have been relentless in their demands for a crackdown on speech they deem hateful and false. At the Supreme Court last week, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed unironic concern that the First Amendment restricts the government’s ability to censor. And everyone from the New Yorker to the New York Times to NBC is suggesting that the only people who are worried about government censorship are Trump supporters, which is obviously false. The 60 Minutes segment was particularly shocking. Lesly Stahl never mentioned the mass censorship of accurate information about COVID’S origins, COVID vaccines, and lockdowns. She falsely suggested that shining a light on the censorship activists was tantamount to persecution. And she suggested that if the government didn’t do more to censor misinformation, Trump supporters would overthrow the government, which is a form of disinformation aimed at scaring people into giving up our first and most fundamental freedom. There are many reasons why they are doing this....

Michael Shellenberger

21,897,944 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

NEW: Damning Case Was Just Made That Censoring Hunter’s Laptop Was Taxpayer-Funded Election Interference Rep. Elise Stefanik: “The American people are smart. They know that this was not a hack and dump. This was illegal government censorship to protect and prop up Joe Biden on the eve of the 2020 election. And according to polling, of people who were now made aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story, 53% would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. So do you agree that the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story was determinative in the 2020 election, Ms. Morris?” Emma Morris: “Yeah, there are various polls that say that there would have been a change in the outcome of the election, and obviously, it’s immediately relevant to a decision on who to vote for — so obviously.” Rep. Elise Stefanik: “And do you believe that this government censorship was election interference?” Emma Morris: “Yes. Any censorship of speech prevents your ability to think clearly. Yes, of course.”
2:25

NEW: Damning Case Was Just Made That Censoring Hunter’s Laptop Was Taxpayer-Funded Election Interference Rep. Elise Stefanik: “The American people are smart. They know that this was not a hack and dump. This was illegal government censorship to protect and prop up Joe Biden on the eve of the 2020 election. And according to polling, of people who were now made aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story, 53% would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. So do you agree that the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story was determinative in the 2020 election, Ms. Morris?” Emma Morris: “Yeah, there are various polls that say that there would have been a change in the outcome of the election, and obviously, it’s immediately relevant to a decision on who to vote for — so obviously.” Rep. Elise Stefanik: “And do you believe that this government censorship was election interference?” Emma Morris: “Yes. Any censorship of speech prevents your ability to think clearly. Yes, of course.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

409,065 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

“The government has admitted that it was engaged in a censorship enterprise.” “We have a court order that says… just because the government labels something as disinformation, misinformation or malinformation, that doesn’t mean the government can… censor it.” Mark Chenoweth just broke down the groundbreaking lawsuit that forced the government to admit it engaged in “systematic” censorship of Covid-19 dissidents and information about Hunter Biden’s laptop. “The First Amendment protects false speech, or what the government thinks is false speech.” The lawsuit resulted in a consent decree which forced the government to admit that this censorship occurred and blocked the agencies that were sued from engaging in this behavior for 10 years. “That included the Office of the Surgeon General of the United States, the CDC… and the Department of Homeland Security, specifically the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.” But because it only resulted in a consent decree, not a court opinion, its scope is limited. “It only runs against the defendants who were sued, and it only benefits the particular plaintiffs in this lawsuit.” “There were some other agencies that were sued initially, including the FBI, [that] are not part of the consent decree.” “But we were able to go after most of the agencies that did most of the bad things in this lawsuit.” CPAC New Civil Liberties Alliance Full episode coming soon!
3:37

“The government has admitted that it was engaged in a censorship enterprise.” “We have a court order that says… just because the government labels something as disinformation, misinformation or malinformation, that doesn’t mean the government can… censor it.” Mark Chenoweth just broke down the groundbreaking lawsuit that forced the government to admit it engaged in “systematic” censorship of Covid-19 dissidents and information about Hunter Biden’s laptop. “The First Amendment protects false speech, or what the government thinks is false speech.” The lawsuit resulted in a consent decree which forced the government to admit that this censorship occurred and blocked the agencies that were sued from engaging in this behavior for 10 years. “That included the Office of the Surgeon General of the United States, the CDC… and the Department of Homeland Security, specifically the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.” But because it only resulted in a consent decree, not a court opinion, its scope is limited. “It only runs against the defendants who were sued, and it only benefits the particular plaintiffs in this lawsuit.” “There were some other agencies that were sued initially, including the FBI, [that] are not part of the consent decree.” “But we were able to go after most of the agencies that did most of the bad things in this lawsuit.” CPAC New Civil Liberties Alliance Full episode coming soon!

Jan Jekielek

19,812 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco says California Democrats are sending money to homeless NGOs and then getting the money back as campaign donations - They're opening nonprofits and NGOs - The government gives them $5 million - 90% of their money goes toward administrative costs, exorbitant salaries - “We're finding is those millions of dollars go into these nonprofits — the administrative part of the nonprofits are making millions and millions of dollars” - A portion of that money goes back into the campaign funds of the people that are giving them the money So it's a money laundering scheme through this homeless industrial complex that they don't want to fix. If they fix it, then the money stops, the money dries up. — It's $25 billion that is absolutely unaccounted for. They have no accounting measures. They have nothing to show of where that money went or what it went for. You can't tell me that that is not a crime, that there's not embezzlements going on and frauds” “Thousands and thousands of people that have become millionaires over the homeless crisis here”
1:33

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco says California Democrats are sending money to homeless NGOs and then getting the money back as campaign donations - They're opening nonprofits and NGOs - The government gives them $5 million - 90% of their money goes toward administrative costs, exorbitant salaries - “We're finding is those millions of dollars go into these nonprofits — the administrative part of the nonprofits are making millions and millions of dollars” - A portion of that money goes back into the campaign funds of the people that are giving them the money So it's a money laundering scheme through this homeless industrial complex that they don't want to fix. If they fix it, then the money stops, the money dries up. — It's $25 billion that is absolutely unaccounted for. They have no accounting measures. They have nothing to show of where that money went or what it went for. You can't tell me that that is not a crime, that there's not embezzlements going on and frauds” “Thousands and thousands of people that have become millionaires over the homeless crisis here”

Wall Street Apes

102,177 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Mike Benz on how USAID spent tens of millions of dollars of US taxpayer funds to remove Jair Bolsonaro from power and end free speech in Brazil: "When populist waves swept the world within the U. S. in 2016 with Trump and with what happened all over Europe with Marine Le Pen and Matteo Salvini and Nigel Farage, USAID declared censorship holy war against every single populist group, including Bolsonaro. Steve, I'm telling you right now, if USAID did not exist, Bolsonaro would still be the president of Brazil and Brazil would still have a free and open internet. It was USAID that spent tens of millions of dollars of American taxpayer money funding the push to get anti misinformation bills passed in the parliament there. Funding the legal advocates who pushed the censorship court there, the TSE, to crack down on Bolsonaro. tweets and WhatsApp and Telegram messages. They built a censorship octopus in Brazil and it was built entirely on USAID because USAID declared Bolsonaro a populist, Trump of the tropics, and then set up this operation to control the information ecosystem there. One of the USAID grantees even said on a public call that the purpose was to eliminate the, uh, the international exchange of ideas between the Trump movement and the Bolsonaro movement. That's what USAID does. They kill domestic populism because it gets in the way of their foreign policy goals."
1:22

Mike Benz on how USAID spent tens of millions of dollars of US taxpayer funds to remove Jair Bolsonaro from power and end free speech in Brazil: "When populist waves swept the world within the U. S. in 2016 with Trump and with what happened all over Europe with Marine Le Pen and Matteo Salvini and Nigel Farage, USAID declared censorship holy war against every single populist group, including Bolsonaro. Steve, I'm telling you right now, if USAID did not exist, Bolsonaro would still be the president of Brazil and Brazil would still have a free and open internet. It was USAID that spent tens of millions of dollars of American taxpayer money funding the push to get anti misinformation bills passed in the parliament there. Funding the legal advocates who pushed the censorship court there, the TSE, to crack down on Bolsonaro. tweets and WhatsApp and Telegram messages. They built a censorship octopus in Brazil and it was built entirely on USAID because USAID declared Bolsonaro a populist, Trump of the tropics, and then set up this operation to control the information ecosystem there. One of the USAID grantees even said on a public call that the purpose was to eliminate the, uh, the international exchange of ideas between the Trump movement and the Bolsonaro movement. That's what USAID does. They kill domestic populism because it gets in the way of their foreign policy goals."

Catch Up

68,929 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Miles Taylor: “So when Donald Trump makes a phone call to the head of FIFA, and asks for a favor, the head of FIFA is aware that the United States has, in the past, indicted FIFA officials and that in Donald Trump, they have someone willing to go easy on the charges on the people who are tied to that kind of corruption. This is NOT insignificant”
1:08

Miles Taylor: “So when Donald Trump makes a phone call to the head of FIFA, and asks for a favor, the head of FIFA is aware that the United States has, in the past, indicted FIFA officials and that in Donald Trump, they have someone willing to go easy on the charges on the people who are tied to that kind of corruption. This is NOT insignificant”

DEFIANCE.org

59,589 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

We finally have HARD PROOF: Democrats gave “$6 billion to a conglomerate of United Nations agencies and over 200 NGOs” to facilitate the illegal immigration invasion of America CONFIRMED: It was the United Nations who tried to take down America with the Democrat regime Mike Howell “I currently serve as the executive director of the Oversight Projects and previously was at DHS and on Capitol Hill conducting oversight of immigration matters. The United States of America is still reeling from the worst border invasion in its history.” “This invasion could not have been accomplished without a colossal partnership with the NGO community. Simply put, the government just did not have the capacity to get this many people in and around the country without the support of the nonprofits. And to that end, they gave them almost $6 billion to a conglomerate of UN agencies and over 200 NGOs to do just that” “The Oversight Project has led the way in exposing what I call this border industrial complex — We did the first of its kind study where we tracked illegal aliens by their cell phones as they went through these nonprofits at the border. In just a one month period in tracking 30,000 devices, so a very small subset of the 10 million that Biden had crossed the border We found out that the illegals went to nearly EVERY SINGLE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN THE UNITED STATES. We proved that every town was indeed a border town.”
1:48

We finally have HARD PROOF: Democrats gave “$6 billion to a conglomerate of United Nations agencies and over 200 NGOs” to facilitate the illegal immigration invasion of America CONFIRMED: It was the United Nations who tried to take down America with the Democrat regime Mike Howell “I currently serve as the executive director of the Oversight Projects and previously was at DHS and on Capitol Hill conducting oversight of immigration matters. The United States of America is still reeling from the worst border invasion in its history.” “This invasion could not have been accomplished without a colossal partnership with the NGO community. Simply put, the government just did not have the capacity to get this many people in and around the country without the support of the nonprofits. And to that end, they gave them almost $6 billion to a conglomerate of UN agencies and over 200 NGOs to do just that” “The Oversight Project has led the way in exposing what I call this border industrial complex — We did the first of its kind study where we tracked illegal aliens by their cell phones as they went through these nonprofits at the border. In just a one month period in tracking 30,000 devices, so a very small subset of the 10 million that Biden had crossed the border We found out that the illegals went to nearly EVERY SINGLE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IN THE UNITED STATES. We proved that every town was indeed a border town.”

Wall Street Apes

927,184 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Scott Jennings on the Trump administration’s handling of the U.S. economy: “What they did is not for short-term gain. It was for long-term reordering of the American economy. And if you talk to their people, Bessent and Hassett and the others, they believe what they did with the tariffs, what they did with the tax, that permanency and other tax cuts in the summer is going to lead to a boom in 2026.” “The January data suggest that they might be right. But there's other things going on here regarding what kind of jobs we have in America. One of the big things I look at in the chart today was, we have the lowest amount of federal government workforce since 1966.” “Yet private sector jobs going up, government jobs going down that was the purpose of what they were doing to grow the private sector to shrink jobs. I've been working in Republican politics for 26 years. Every Republican I've ever worked for said they were going to shrink the government. Trump's the only one that ever did it.” “We literally have the smallest federal workforce in '66 and as a percentage of the overall workforce, the smallest on record. I want more private sector. I want less government. So, if you're a Republican and you look at that, you're thinking, gosh, this guy's actually executing on what they always told us they were going to do.”
1:26

Scott Jennings on the Trump administration’s handling of the U.S. economy: “What they did is not for short-term gain. It was for long-term reordering of the American economy. And if you talk to their people, Bessent and Hassett and the others, they believe what they did with the tariffs, what they did with the tax, that permanency and other tax cuts in the summer is going to lead to a boom in 2026.” “The January data suggest that they might be right. But there's other things going on here regarding what kind of jobs we have in America. One of the big things I look at in the chart today was, we have the lowest amount of federal government workforce since 1966.” “Yet private sector jobs going up, government jobs going down that was the purpose of what they were doing to grow the private sector to shrink jobs. I've been working in Republican politics for 26 years. Every Republican I've ever worked for said they were going to shrink the government. Trump's the only one that ever did it.” “We literally have the smallest federal workforce in '66 and as a percentage of the overall workforce, the smallest on record. I want more private sector. I want less government. So, if you're a Republican and you look at that, you're thinking, gosh, this guy's actually executing on what they always told us they were going to do.”

RedWave Press

179,096 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

BREAKING: Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani just announced COGE (Commission of Government Efficiency) and he takes a shot at Elon Musk in the process. "COGE, COGE, yes. Now, Elon Musk manipulated the fact that so many people across this country want to see a government that is more efficient. He used that as a justification to simply slash and burn so much of the services that Americans rely on. What we are speaking about is a sincere fulfillment of a vision that ensures that city government is operating with the same level of focus that a working class New Yorker is when they're trying to balance their bills. And that means looking at the processes we have, that means looking at the procedures of city government, and that means looking at anything we can do to deliver a more efficient and more excellent government... It's just the name and what it should have been. I think government efficiency, these are words that somehow have been understood as if they are Republican priorities when in fact they are the priorities of anyone who believes in the public sector. And yet Elon Musk took that language and used it to cut as many jobs that were as critical as possible for so many of the neediest people across the country and across the world. Ours is going to be a focus on actually delivering efficiency, not as a byword for cutting services, but actually a sincere commitment to efficiency."
1:18

BREAKING: Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani just announced COGE (Commission of Government Efficiency) and he takes a shot at Elon Musk in the process. "COGE, COGE, yes. Now, Elon Musk manipulated the fact that so many people across this country want to see a government that is more efficient. He used that as a justification to simply slash and burn so much of the services that Americans rely on. What we are speaking about is a sincere fulfillment of a vision that ensures that city government is operating with the same level of focus that a working class New Yorker is when they're trying to balance their bills. And that means looking at the processes we have, that means looking at the procedures of city government, and that means looking at anything we can do to deliver a more efficient and more excellent government... It's just the name and what it should have been. I think government efficiency, these are words that somehow have been understood as if they are Republican priorities when in fact they are the priorities of anyone who believes in the public sector. And yet Elon Musk took that language and used it to cut as many jobs that were as critical as possible for so many of the neediest people across the country and across the world. Ours is going to be a focus on actually delivering efficiency, not as a byword for cutting services, but actually a sincere commitment to efficiency."

Ed Krassenstein

525,479 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Danny Sheehan -“until this group that is in charge of the UFO and ET secrets are, are dug out and exposed, president Trump is not going to be able to deal with the deep state.” “we have to invoke the entire power of the United States government and our criminal prosecutorial authority to dig these people out and to get this information from them” Source -That UFO podcast 🔗 in comments “These people are the core of the deep state and they reach into all kinds of other areas. But this is the core of the deep state. This is the most profound, deep secret that is held by the people that are, that are operational in the deep state. And they will not voluntarily tell the president, and they will not tell voluntarily tell the Congress. They're going to have to be compelled to do that.” “I've been asked to draft the complaint under the Federal Criminal Racketeering Act, the federal Criminal complaint against these people. And I'm in communication with high level people inside the Justice Department and inside the FBI who are perfectly prepared to go forward with criminally prosecuting these people that will put, that, will put the fear of God in them you know, that's coming to get them If they aren't going to, if they're gonna continue to, and up to this point in time, they haven't been threatened with that. They know they can get away with anything they want and, and that, that nobody's gonna do anything to them. So that we, we have to do that and we have to invoke the entire power of the, of the United States government and our criminal prosecutorial authority to dig these people out and to get this information from them and get it into the hands of the responsible people in Congress who have the adequate security clearances and can be adequately trusted to exercise authority on behalf of our people concerning this information.”
3:06

Danny Sheehan -“until this group that is in charge of the UFO and ET secrets are, are dug out and exposed, president Trump is not going to be able to deal with the deep state.” “we have to invoke the entire power of the United States government and our criminal prosecutorial authority to dig these people out and to get this information from them” Source -That UFO podcast 🔗 in comments “These people are the core of the deep state and they reach into all kinds of other areas. But this is the core of the deep state. This is the most profound, deep secret that is held by the people that are, that are operational in the deep state. And they will not voluntarily tell the president, and they will not tell voluntarily tell the Congress. They're going to have to be compelled to do that.” “I've been asked to draft the complaint under the Federal Criminal Racketeering Act, the federal Criminal complaint against these people. And I'm in communication with high level people inside the Justice Department and inside the FBI who are perfectly prepared to go forward with criminally prosecuting these people that will put, that, will put the fear of God in them you know, that's coming to get them If they aren't going to, if they're gonna continue to, and up to this point in time, they haven't been threatened with that. They know they can get away with anything they want and, and that, that nobody's gonna do anything to them. So that we, we have to do that and we have to invoke the entire power of the, of the United States government and our criminal prosecutorial authority to dig these people out and to get this information from them and get it into the hands of the responsible people in Congress who have the adequate security clearances and can be adequately trusted to exercise authority on behalf of our people concerning this information.”

neandrewthal

44,108 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 WOW! JD Vance is DIRECTLY calling out Israeli cabinet members for their personal attacks on President Trump "Donald J. Trump is the ONLY head of state in the ENTIRE WORLD who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time, and he happens to be the head of state of the world superpower. If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have ANYWHERE left in the entire world." "The other thing that I would say is that over the last 3 months, TWO-THIRDS of the defensive weapons that have protected your homeland have been built by AMERICAN HANDS and paid for by AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS. The problem for Israel is not Donald J. Trump, and anybody in Israel who thinks their biggest problem is the President of the United States needs to WAKE UP and smell the reality of the situation that country is in."
1:30

🚨 WOW! JD Vance is DIRECTLY calling out Israeli cabinet members for their personal attacks on President Trump "Donald J. Trump is the ONLY head of state in the ENTIRE WORLD who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time, and he happens to be the head of state of the world superpower. If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have ANYWHERE left in the entire world." "The other thing that I would say is that over the last 3 months, TWO-THIRDS of the defensive weapons that have protected your homeland have been built by AMERICAN HANDS and paid for by AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS. The problem for Israel is not Donald J. Trump, and anybody in Israel who thinks their biggest problem is the President of the United States needs to WAKE UP and smell the reality of the situation that country is in."

Nick Sortor

4,651,027 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce