Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 Mamdani’s Community Safety Team Now Includes NYU Scholar Who Calls Courts a Source of “Perpetual Punishments” and Casts Child Protective Services as Police Justine Olderman now holds a joint appointment as a Distinguished Scholar in Residence at NYU Law’s Center on Race, Equity and the Law. Before that,... she spent years at the Bronx Defenders, eventually running the group as executive director. She has now been tapped for Zohran Mamdani’s Committee on Community Safety during the transition. Here is her worldview on courts and “safety”: once a criminal case ends, she says that single “touch point” in the system triggers “perpetual punishments” that keep people trapped in “various legal and non-legal, you know, punitive systems,” even when the case outcome looks good on paper. Those “punishments” include deportation, eviction, and child welfare involvement: a criminal conviction “could land somebody in deportation proceedings,” “could mean that they were evicted from their home,” and “can even trigger a child welfare investigation and lead to family separation.” Olderman describes these downstream consequences as causing “unbearable amounts of trauma and harm” that radiate through families and “pass from generation to generation.” As public defenders, she says, they operate “inside the belly of this legal beast” and therefore have a duty not just to represent clients but to attack the “systemic drivers” of system involvement. That includes redefining “policing” so that people see Administration for Children's Services as the police as well. Notice how she uses ACS to avoid people see this department as protecting children. My view is the opposite. If NYPD finds a meth lab, there are kids in the home, and the person running it is here illegally, ACS and ICE getting involved is not “perpetual punishment,” it is how a basic justice system is supposed to work. Olderman’s “perpetual punishment” worldview is now being baked into Mamdani’s vision of “community safety” for New York City.show more

Stu Smith

34,945 subscribers

30,261 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 Mamdani Community Safety Pick Says NYPD “Harass, Abuse, and Kill” Trans People and Pushes to Decriminalize Sex Work Meet Deborah Lolai, now a clinical instructor at Harvard Law’s LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic and a member of Zohran Mamdani’s Transition Committee on Community Safety. Formerly at Bronx Defenders, where she drew criticism for celebrating a police officer’s death in a friendly-fire incident, Lolai lays out her worldview clearly in this 2020 video: “The NYPD continues to profile LGBTQ people, specifically trans and gender non-conforming people. They continue to harass them, abuse them, and kill them.” “We need to do things that directly impact transgender non-conforming women of color, like decriminalize sex work. There’s a bill right now on the state level that would decriminalize sex work… and we need to be pushing for it.” She explicitly frames this agenda as part of a broader revolt that would soon become the Summer of Floyd, in the spirit of the Stonewall uprising: “It’s inextricably tied to the larger uprisings that are happening in our country right now.”

Stu Smith

71,014 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 Mamdani "Community Safety" Pick Says Some Revolutionaries “Need To Be High” To “Take Over The State” Meet Kassandra Frederique, head of the Drug Policy Alliance and now a member of Zohran Mamdani’s Committee on Community Safety. In this interview about overdose deaths like Michael K. Williams, she describes herself as an abolitionist, a revolutionary, and argues there is a place for being high inside the movement: “As someone who is an abolitionist and also works to be a drug policy reformer, every day I have to fight the prohibitionists inside of me.” When celebrities die from overdoses, she has a wobble, then reaffirms the ideology: “When I heard that Whitney Houston passed, when I heard that Prince passed, you know, yesterday when I heard Michael K. Williams passed, it was a blow. And I go through my own existential crisis about like what am I doing? Is this, am I on the right side? I always come back to the point that the work that I do, the things that I believe in are right.” She frames it explicitly as Black revolutionary politics: “As Black people, and as Black people, what I assume as revolutionaries, the three of us talking, we’re like, you cannot be high when we’re trying to, you know, take over the state.” Then she flips it and justifies needing high people in the movement: “I think there are some people in our movement that need to be high so that they can imagine the world that we can’t see currently.” And she still ties all of this back to “the revolution”: “I think that for the revolution to actually happen, we need all those people to be working together.” Deaths like Michael K. Williams become a brief “existential crisis” before she decides she is still on “the right side” and doubles down on safe supply, testing, and a movement where some people “need to be high.” This is who Mamdani chose for his Committee on Community Safety.

🚨 Mamdani "Community Safety" Pick Says Some Revolutionaries “Need To Be High” To “Take Over The State” Meet Kassandra Frederique, head of the Drug Policy Alliance and now a member of Zohran Mamdani’s Committee on Community Safety. In this interview about overdose deaths like Michael K. Williams, she describes herself as an abolitionist, a revolutionary, and argues there is a place for being high inside the movement: “As someone who is an abolitionist and also works to be a drug policy reformer, every day I have to fight the prohibitionists inside of me.” When celebrities die from overdoses, she has a wobble, then reaffirms the ideology: “When I heard that Whitney Houston passed, when I heard that Prince passed, you know, yesterday when I heard Michael K. Williams passed, it was a blow. And I go through my own existential crisis about like what am I doing? Is this, am I on the right side? I always come back to the point that the work that I do, the things that I believe in are right.” She frames it explicitly as Black revolutionary politics: “As Black people, and as Black people, what I assume as revolutionaries, the three of us talking, we’re like, you cannot be high when we’re trying to, you know, take over the state.” Then she flips it and justifies needing high people in the movement: “I think there are some people in our movement that need to be high so that they can imagine the world that we can’t see currently.” And she still ties all of this back to “the revolution”: “I think that for the revolution to actually happen, we need all those people to be working together.” Deaths like Michael K. Williams become a brief “existential crisis” before she decides she is still on “the right side” and doubles down on safe supply, testing, and a movement where some people “need to be high.” This is who Mamdani chose for his Committee on Community Safety.

Stu Smith

89,841 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

NEW: Casey Anthony, who was accused of m*rdering her daughter, has come out as an LGBTQ and women’s rights advocate, says she is “standing in the light.” Anthony claims it’s her duty to defend people who are being attacked. “One of the main reasons that I'm doing this is there are people close to me who have been targeted and attacked recently.” “As a proponent for the LGBTQ community for our legal community, women's rights, I feel that it's important that I use this platform that was thrust upon me and now look at as a blessing as opposed to the curse that it has been since 2008.”

NEW: Casey Anthony, who was accused of m*rdering her daughter, has come out as an LGBTQ and women’s rights advocate, says she is “standing in the light.” Anthony claims it’s her duty to defend people who are being attacked. “One of the main reasons that I'm doing this is there are people close to me who have been targeted and attacked recently.” “As a proponent for the LGBTQ community for our legal community, women's rights, I feel that it's important that I use this platform that was thrust upon me and now look at as a blessing as opposed to the curse that it has been since 2008.”

Collin Rugg

1,061,824 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 UPenn Law Professor Says Child Protective Services Is Part of a White Supremacist Kidnapping Regime, "Abolition is the Only Answer" Dorothy E. Roberts, the George A. Weiss University Professor of Law and Sociology and the Raymond Pace and Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander Professor of Civil Rights, is not just critiquing child protective services. She says the “family policing system” literally kidnaps children, exists to uphold a “capitalist, racist, white supremacist, patriarchal, ableist system,” and must be abolished outright. This is an Ivy League civil-rights and law professor telling an audience that abolishing CPS is the only way to keep children safe. “We see that abolition is the only answer to the harms that the system is inflicting on children and also the only answer to truly supporting families and keeping children safe.” “I think that at abolishing the family policing system is a necessary step. Even to imagine more creatively about families, but it’s also a necessary step to stop the punishment of families that don’t meet the, you know, heterosexist, racist family norm.” Roberts argues that child protective services is a false front that survives only because any real change would threaten the racial capitalist system she believes it protects. “What it’s really protecting is the idea that this nation cares about the safety of children and the the reason why children aren’t safe is because of their pathological parents, they’re deficient parents. Therefore, you know, why, why have that, why believe that? Because then you don’t need radical social change.” Roberts says her experience has taught her that the time for reform is over. “I, so I know very well from personal experience that reform does not work, and that’s what led me to write my book Torn Apart, that takes a very strong and clear stand for abolition as the only way, again, not only to end the harms that this system inflicts, but also to imagine and create the approach that we need to truly keep children safe and support families.” You would hope UPenn would be embarrassed by this. Based on their track record the past few years, they will probably just keep their heads in the sand.

🚨 UPenn Law Professor Says Child Protective Services Is Part of a White Supremacist Kidnapping Regime, "Abolition is the Only Answer" Dorothy E. Roberts, the George A. Weiss University Professor of Law and Sociology and the Raymond Pace and Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander Professor of Civil Rights, is not just critiquing child protective services. She says the “family policing system” literally kidnaps children, exists to uphold a “capitalist, racist, white supremacist, patriarchal, ableist system,” and must be abolished outright. This is an Ivy League civil-rights and law professor telling an audience that abolishing CPS is the only way to keep children safe. “We see that abolition is the only answer to the harms that the system is inflicting on children and also the only answer to truly supporting families and keeping children safe.” “I think that at abolishing the family policing system is a necessary step. Even to imagine more creatively about families, but it’s also a necessary step to stop the punishment of families that don’t meet the, you know, heterosexist, racist family norm.” Roberts argues that child protective services is a false front that survives only because any real change would threaten the racial capitalist system she believes it protects. “What it’s really protecting is the idea that this nation cares about the safety of children and the the reason why children aren’t safe is because of their pathological parents, they’re deficient parents. Therefore, you know, why, why have that, why believe that? Because then you don’t need radical social change.” Roberts says her experience has taught her that the time for reform is over. “I, so I know very well from personal experience that reform does not work, and that’s what led me to write my book Torn Apart, that takes a very strong and clear stand for abolition as the only way, again, not only to end the harms that this system inflicts, but also to imagine and create the approach that we need to truly keep children safe and support families.” You would hope UPenn would be embarrassed by this. Based on their track record the past few years, they will probably just keep their heads in the sand.

Stu Smith

65,264 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: Casey Anthony who was accused of murdering her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Anthony in 2008, just JOINED TikTok. In her video, she introduces herself as a legal advocate and researcher, stating, “I am a legal advocate. I am a researcher. I’ve been in the legal field…” Anthony positions herself as a proponent for both the LGBTQ community and women’s rights, mentioning, “So as a proponent for the LGBTQ community. For our legal community. Women’s rights.” Additionally, she has launched BlueSky and Substack accounts where she continues to identify as a legal advocate and expresses intentions to assist others in navigating the legal system. There is a lack of publicly available credentials supporting her newfound advocacy role. Her highly publicized trial ended in 2011 with her acquittal on charges of murder, though she was found guilty of providing false information to law enforcement. It’s appalling that Casey Anthony is now offering legal advice to people, given her past. The fact that she’s trying to profit from it is downright disgusting. Thoughts?

🚨BREAKING: Casey Anthony who was accused of murdering her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Anthony in 2008, just JOINED TikTok. In her video, she introduces herself as a legal advocate and researcher, stating, “I am a legal advocate. I am a researcher. I’ve been in the legal field…” Anthony positions herself as a proponent for both the LGBTQ community and women’s rights, mentioning, “So as a proponent for the LGBTQ community. For our legal community. Women’s rights.” Additionally, she has launched BlueSky and Substack accounts where she continues to identify as a legal advocate and expresses intentions to assist others in navigating the legal system. There is a lack of publicly available credentials supporting her newfound advocacy role. Her highly publicized trial ended in 2011 with her acquittal on charges of murder, though she was found guilty of providing false information to law enforcement. It’s appalling that Casey Anthony is now offering legal advice to people, given her past. The fact that she’s trying to profit from it is downright disgusting. Thoughts?

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

695,750 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani just announced COGE (Commission of Government Efficiency) and he takes a shot at Elon Musk in the process. "COGE, COGE, yes. Now, Elon Musk manipulated the fact that so many people across this country want to see a government that is more efficient. He used that as a justification to simply slash and burn so much of the services that Americans rely on. What we are speaking about is a sincere fulfillment of a vision that ensures that city government is operating with the same level of focus that a working class New Yorker is when they're trying to balance their bills. And that means looking at the processes we have, that means looking at the procedures of city government, and that means looking at anything we can do to deliver a more efficient and more excellent government... It's just the name and what it should have been. I think government efficiency, these are words that somehow have been understood as if they are Republican priorities when in fact they are the priorities of anyone who believes in the public sector. And yet Elon Musk took that language and used it to cut as many jobs that were as critical as possible for so many of the neediest people across the country and across the world. Ours is going to be a focus on actually delivering efficiency, not as a byword for cutting services, but actually a sincere commitment to efficiency."

BREAKING: Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani just announced COGE (Commission of Government Efficiency) and he takes a shot at Elon Musk in the process. "COGE, COGE, yes. Now, Elon Musk manipulated the fact that so many people across this country want to see a government that is more efficient. He used that as a justification to simply slash and burn so much of the services that Americans rely on. What we are speaking about is a sincere fulfillment of a vision that ensures that city government is operating with the same level of focus that a working class New Yorker is when they're trying to balance their bills. And that means looking at the processes we have, that means looking at the procedures of city government, and that means looking at anything we can do to deliver a more efficient and more excellent government... It's just the name and what it should have been. I think government efficiency, these are words that somehow have been understood as if they are Republican priorities when in fact they are the priorities of anyone who believes in the public sector. And yet Elon Musk took that language and used it to cut as many jobs that were as critical as possible for so many of the neediest people across the country and across the world. Ours is going to be a focus on actually delivering efficiency, not as a byword for cutting services, but actually a sincere commitment to efficiency."

Ed Krassenstein

525,423 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,842 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 Weather Underground-Era Militant Laura Whitehorn: “Those Pretty Little Reforms” Make the System “More Impervious to Attack,” “Support Every Single Person on the Left,” and Demands “No Exclusions…Based on the Crime” — Even in “Cases That Involve Killing Cops” The Weather Underground generation didn’t fade away with age. They’re treated as elders of today’s radical left and, in many ways, still shape a discourse that continues to gain steam and influence. At 80, Laura Whitehorn—a Weather Underground–era militant who did over 14 years in federal prison for the 1983 U.S. Capitol bombing and related “Resistance Conspiracy” attacks—is still on Zoom panels about “punishment and solidarity,” telling organizers that “those pretty little reforms end up making the, the system more impervious to attack,” and insisting that you “support every single person on the left, no matter what we think, even if they're not in our group or they're in another group, we are, we must unite against the state.” From there, she pushes a maximalist abolition line: “We insist on no exclusions in any kind of effort to get people out… no exclusions based on the crime, the nature of the crime, because that is the way the movement has been built for years.” “Why else, why else live if we're not going to fight for one another?” As she tells it, “the whole point of mass incarceration, which is about destroying black and brown communities, is to destroy resistance,” and “mass incarceration was a response to the revolutionary movements…in the 60s and 70s.” The “lesson of this moment,” she says, is that it’s not about “little reforms,” but about “the building of a powerful movement to overturn the system and to undo the racist punishment system.” She applies that logic to murder cases: “We are trying to get these guys out of prison, and they have cases that involve killing cops, and so they are targeted by the cops, and we can't get any support.” Her answer is simple: “Get the person out of prison and then argue with them about their tactics if you don't like them, but if we allow the state to define what's acceptable, that's really going to kill us.” She even praises the Center for Constitutional Rights for stepping in on these cases, saying “hard cases make big changes in in power struggles”—and that’s the same CCR whose legal director, Baher Azmy, now sits on Zohran Mamdani’s “Legal Affairs” transition operation. What I’m watching on a radical Zoom call with a former terrorist isn’t some fringe example. It’s directly connected to people plugged into Mamdani’s transition team.

🚨 Weather Underground-Era Militant Laura Whitehorn: “Those Pretty Little Reforms” Make the System “More Impervious to Attack,” “Support Every Single Person on the Left,” and Demands “No Exclusions…Based on the Crime” — Even in “Cases That Involve Killing Cops” The Weather Underground generation didn’t fade away with age. They’re treated as elders of today’s radical left and, in many ways, still shape a discourse that continues to gain steam and influence. At 80, Laura Whitehorn—a Weather Underground–era militant who did over 14 years in federal prison for the 1983 U.S. Capitol bombing and related “Resistance Conspiracy” attacks—is still on Zoom panels about “punishment and solidarity,” telling organizers that “those pretty little reforms end up making the, the system more impervious to attack,” and insisting that you “support every single person on the left, no matter what we think, even if they're not in our group or they're in another group, we are, we must unite against the state.” From there, she pushes a maximalist abolition line: “We insist on no exclusions in any kind of effort to get people out… no exclusions based on the crime, the nature of the crime, because that is the way the movement has been built for years.” “Why else, why else live if we're not going to fight for one another?” As she tells it, “the whole point of mass incarceration, which is about destroying black and brown communities, is to destroy resistance,” and “mass incarceration was a response to the revolutionary movements…in the 60s and 70s.” The “lesson of this moment,” she says, is that it’s not about “little reforms,” but about “the building of a powerful movement to overturn the system and to undo the racist punishment system.” She applies that logic to murder cases: “We are trying to get these guys out of prison, and they have cases that involve killing cops, and so they are targeted by the cops, and we can't get any support.” Her answer is simple: “Get the person out of prison and then argue with them about their tactics if you don't like them, but if we allow the state to define what's acceptable, that's really going to kill us.” She even praises the Center for Constitutional Rights for stepping in on these cases, saying “hard cases make big changes in in power struggles”—and that’s the same CCR whose legal director, Baher Azmy, now sits on Zohran Mamdani’s “Legal Affairs” transition operation. What I’m watching on a radical Zoom call with a former terrorist isn’t some fringe example. It’s directly connected to people plugged into Mamdani’s transition team.

Stu Smith

16,583 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The system is broken, but people don’t realise it until it’s too late and they themselves are in it. Most of the public still believes the legal system operates with fairness, integrity, and justice. But those who enter the family courts—especially victim-survivors of abuse—discover something very different. They learn that the system is not designed to protect them or their children. They learn that speaking up is punished. They learn that “contact at all costs” is the default, even when it means placing children with abusers. In the recently released documentary, Kate Kniveton bravely shares how draining the process has been: financially, emotionally, and psychologically. But she’d do it all again to protect her child. Every survivor-parent I have represented has looked into the jaws of family court, steeled themselves, and continued fighting on, doing whatever it takes to protect their children. And I've seen the family court harm them in ways the abuse they escaped never could. These women's courage is extraordinary. They deserve safety and belief. For now, Kate and her child are safe. But the future is uncertain because the law still presumes contact is in a child’s best interests, even when there’s clear evidence of abuse. As I argue in He Said She Said, this presumption is not just outdated—it is dangerous. It protects perpetrators and punishes protective parents, especially mothers. Kate’s story is one of rare legal recognition. But the system she faced is routine. And while her bravery has helped expose the reality of the family courts, we should not expect survivors to carry this burden alone. We must change the law. End the presumption of contact. Protect children. Believe survivors.

The system is broken, but people don’t realise it until it’s too late and they themselves are in it. Most of the public still believes the legal system operates with fairness, integrity, and justice. But those who enter the family courts—especially victim-survivors of abuse—discover something very different. They learn that the system is not designed to protect them or their children. They learn that speaking up is punished. They learn that “contact at all costs” is the default, even when it means placing children with abusers. In the recently released documentary, Kate Kniveton bravely shares how draining the process has been: financially, emotionally, and psychologically. But she’d do it all again to protect her child. Every survivor-parent I have represented has looked into the jaws of family court, steeled themselves, and continued fighting on, doing whatever it takes to protect their children. And I've seen the family court harm them in ways the abuse they escaped never could. These women's courage is extraordinary. They deserve safety and belief. For now, Kate and her child are safe. But the future is uncertain because the law still presumes contact is in a child’s best interests, even when there’s clear evidence of abuse. As I argue in He Said She Said, this presumption is not just outdated—it is dangerous. It protects perpetrators and punishes protective parents, especially mothers. Kate’s story is one of rare legal recognition. But the system she faced is routine. And while her bravery has helped expose the reality of the family courts, we should not expect survivors to carry this burden alone. We must change the law. End the presumption of contact. Protect children. Believe survivors.

Dr Charlotte Proudman

11,131 просмотров • 1 год назад

Fear and anger can be clearly seen in a video that has surfaced from Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a woman is speaking out about what she says is happening to Hindu families in the area. In the video she claims that Uttam Nagar is slowly being turned into something like “Pakistan”, where Hindus are being attacked and even small children are becoming targets. She says the situation has become so serious that violence and even killings are being talked about, yet no strong action is being taken. According to the woman, a small child was almost killed during the incident and if neighbors had not stepped in to help at the right time, the outcome could have been far worse. The woman also makes serious allegations against the police. She claims that when they called the police while hiding inside their house, no help arrived. She further says that the police take money and try to suppress such cases instead of taking action against the people responsible. She questions how something as small as water accidentally spilling could turn into such a violent attack. Her words in the video show the fear, anger and frustration that many Hindu families in that locality say they are facing today.

Fear and anger can be clearly seen in a video that has surfaced from Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a woman is speaking out about what she says is happening to Hindu families in the area. In the video she claims that Uttam Nagar is slowly being turned into something like “Pakistan”, where Hindus are being attacked and even small children are becoming targets. She says the situation has become so serious that violence and even killings are being talked about, yet no strong action is being taken. According to the woman, a small child was almost killed during the incident and if neighbors had not stepped in to help at the right time, the outcome could have been far worse. The woman also makes serious allegations against the police. She claims that when they called the police while hiding inside their house, no help arrived. She further says that the police take money and try to suppress such cases instead of taking action against the people responsible. She questions how something as small as water accidentally spilling could turn into such a violent attack. Her words in the video show the fear, anger and frustration that many Hindu families in that locality say they are facing today.

Arpit

15,337 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A nurse and injury attorney stood up in Hurst City Hall and said what every reasonable person watching that video already knows. She described being pulled over in this same area years ago. The officer was courteous. There was no ticket, no violence, no attempt to prove a point, and she was sent on her way. She told the council that Taneisha Thompson, a woman she has never even met, deserved that same basic dignity and restraint. She explained that in hospitals, nurses see people at their absolute worst and are still trained to protect life, not harm it. Even when they are disrespected, they do not drag patients, slam them to the ground or put their lives at risk. From her medical and legal perspective, the way this officer grabbed Taneisha from her car by the neck could have killed her. That is not de‑escalation. That is not public safety. That is raw, dangerous force. Her point was simple and powerful: if nurses can endure the worst behavior and still choose care and restraint, we must demand at least that same standard from police officers in Hurst. That is the minimum Taneisha deserved, and it is the minimum this community is entitled to going forward.

A nurse and injury attorney stood up in Hurst City Hall and said what every reasonable person watching that video already knows. She described being pulled over in this same area years ago. The officer was courteous. There was no ticket, no violence, no attempt to prove a point, and she was sent on her way. She told the council that Taneisha Thompson, a woman she has never even met, deserved that same basic dignity and restraint. She explained that in hospitals, nurses see people at their absolute worst and are still trained to protect life, not harm it. Even when they are disrespected, they do not drag patients, slam them to the ground or put their lives at risk. From her medical and legal perspective, the way this officer grabbed Taneisha from her car by the neck could have killed her. That is not de‑escalation. That is not public safety. That is raw, dangerous force. Her point was simple and powerful: if nurses can endure the worst behavior and still choose care and restraint, we must demand at least that same standard from police officers in Hurst. That is the minimum Taneisha deserved, and it is the minimum this community is entitled to going forward.

Lee Merritt

43,143 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 The Decarceral DA Candidate Who Wanted to Strip Power from the Police Commissioner and Push a $30–$50 Minimum Wage Is Now on Mamdani’s Legal Affairs Team Tahanie Aboushi is a former Democratic candidate for Manhattan DA. In 2021, she ran on a platform of declining to prosecute charges tied to poverty, mental illness, drug use, or prostitution, and shifting away from what she called “knee-jerk, prosecute-at-all-costs, revenge-type prosecution.” Aboushi now sits on Zohran Mamdani’s Legal Affairs transition team—bringing that same decarceral, “systemic oppression” worldview into the upcoming mayoral administration. In her telling, prisons are sites of violence and police power has to be stripped back: “Our prisons and jails are not safe and they’re not sanitary and they’re violent.” “We need to take the final determination of discipline for police officers away from the police commissioner.” She also talks like a wage-policy maximalist, saying—a few years ago—that she’s effectively on board with a $30–$50 pay floor: “I’m a fan of, you know, $30 to $50 an hour type thing… people can’t afford even some of the most basic things, choosing between trying to ride the subway and getting a meal.” You can see the CRT-inflected worldview really crystallize in how she talks about crime and victimhood: “We still criminalize communities of color to scapegoat for the powerful and privileged who get away with things… we’ve made people of color to be the face of crime in this city, and that’s why for me part of my platform is to be tough on white-collar crime.” “If I say the word criminal, what gender and race comes to mind? If I say the word victim, what gender and race comes to mind? And why do we have those notions?” Believe it or not, this is yet another failed DA candidate now embedded on Mamdani’s transition team.

🚨 The Decarceral DA Candidate Who Wanted to Strip Power from the Police Commissioner and Push a $30–$50 Minimum Wage Is Now on Mamdani’s Legal Affairs Team Tahanie Aboushi is a former Democratic candidate for Manhattan DA. In 2021, she ran on a platform of declining to prosecute charges tied to poverty, mental illness, drug use, or prostitution, and shifting away from what she called “knee-jerk, prosecute-at-all-costs, revenge-type prosecution.” Aboushi now sits on Zohran Mamdani’s Legal Affairs transition team—bringing that same decarceral, “systemic oppression” worldview into the upcoming mayoral administration. In her telling, prisons are sites of violence and police power has to be stripped back: “Our prisons and jails are not safe and they’re not sanitary and they’re violent.” “We need to take the final determination of discipline for police officers away from the police commissioner.” She also talks like a wage-policy maximalist, saying—a few years ago—that she’s effectively on board with a $30–$50 pay floor: “I’m a fan of, you know, $30 to $50 an hour type thing… people can’t afford even some of the most basic things, choosing between trying to ride the subway and getting a meal.” You can see the CRT-inflected worldview really crystallize in how she talks about crime and victimhood: “We still criminalize communities of color to scapegoat for the powerful and privileged who get away with things… we’ve made people of color to be the face of crime in this city, and that’s why for me part of my platform is to be tough on white-collar crime.” “If I say the word criminal, what gender and race comes to mind? If I say the word victim, what gender and race comes to mind? And why do we have those notions?” Believe it or not, this is yet another failed DA candidate now embedded on Mamdani’s transition team.

Stu Smith

68,412 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

American is extremely frustrated because she’s wants to get on disability She says the amount of work they are making her do to prove she’s disabled, she might as well just apply for a job. But she won’t give up because she wants disability “They make you have to prove this and this and this and this, and they make you do the work to get all your medical records, and they make you do all the work to prove everything, and they make you do all the work to apply with all their paperwork that they've made. Hundreds of papers that you have to go through. I mean, tons of paperwork that you have to go through — How am I supposed to do the work that goes into this when it's nearly the same amount of work as getting a job. Like, applying for disability is the same process as applying for a job, basically” I think it’s pretty clear this is most likely abuse of our welfare system Her profile bio says she’s 27 and an activist…..

Wall Street Apes

233,153 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

JUST IN: LA Mayor Karen Bass says the people of LA have a “rapid response network” to protest and disrupt on demand. The mayor appeared glum on CNN as she tried blaming Trump for her riots. “I will tell you that it is peaceful now, but we do not know where and when the next raids will be.” “That is the concern because people in this city have a rapid response network. If they see ICE, they go out and they protest.”

JUST IN: LA Mayor Karen Bass says the people of LA have a “rapid response network” to protest and disrupt on demand. The mayor appeared glum on CNN as she tried blaming Trump for her riots. “I will tell you that it is peaceful now, but we do not know where and when the next raids will be.” “That is the concern because people in this city have a rapid response network. If they see ICE, they go out and they protest.”

Collin Rugg

567,962 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 New Mamdani Transition Team Member Says Cops Are “Violence Workers” and NYPD–Israel Training Trips “Pervert American Politics” Alex Vitale — author of The End of Policing, sociology professor at Brooklyn College, CUNY Graduate Center, and now officially part of Zohran Mamdani’s transition team on “community safety” — gave this talk eleven days before George Floyd, when “defund” hadn’t even gone mainstream. He was already a true believer. “Police are violence workers… if you don’t want racism and violence, don’t get the police involved.” “The institution of policing exists historically to facilitate racial inequality… emerging out of colonialism, slavery, and industrial capitalism.” “We see our battle with immigrants and gangs and Black people as the same as their battle with terrorists, meaning the Palestinian people.” The clip may be low-res, but the takeaway isn’t. This is the worldview now sitting inside Mamdani’s transition team, and it’s a preview of the policies to come.

🚨 New Mamdani Transition Team Member Says Cops Are “Violence Workers” and NYPD–Israel Training Trips “Pervert American Politics” Alex Vitale — author of The End of Policing, sociology professor at Brooklyn College, CUNY Graduate Center, and now officially part of Zohran Mamdani’s transition team on “community safety” — gave this talk eleven days before George Floyd, when “defund” hadn’t even gone mainstream. He was already a true believer. “Police are violence workers… if you don’t want racism and violence, don’t get the police involved.” “The institution of policing exists historically to facilitate racial inequality… emerging out of colonialism, slavery, and industrial capitalism.” “We see our battle with immigrants and gangs and Black people as the same as their battle with terrorists, meaning the Palestinian people.” The clip may be low-res, but the takeaway isn’t. This is the worldview now sitting inside Mamdani’s transition team, and it’s a preview of the policies to come.

Stu Smith

93,509 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: UK police have reportedly released on bail the 30-year-old man suspected of throwing a 3-year-old boy into a crocodile enclosure in what is being investigated as attempted murder, and they still have not publicly named him. Absolutely unreal. A little child is still fighting for his life, a brave zoo worker reportedly risked everything to help save him, and the public is once again left watching a justice system that looks faster at protecting process than protecting innocent people. This is why people are furious. Not because they hate law and order, but because they want law and order to actually mean something when the victim is a child and the alleged crime is this horrific. The UK has a serious problem when ordinary citizens look at cases like this and feel the system has more caution for the suspect than urgency for the child, the family, and the public’s right to know what happened. There should be full transparency, serious accountability, and no soft handling when a child is nearly killed in broad daylight. Pray for that little boy. Pray for his family. And pray that justice is not buried under cowardice, excuses, or another broken system protecting itself. 🙏🏻 FOLLOW Mr Pool

🚨 JUST IN: UK police have reportedly released on bail the 30-year-old man suspected of throwing a 3-year-old boy into a crocodile enclosure in what is being investigated as attempted murder, and they still have not publicly named him. Absolutely unreal. A little child is still fighting for his life, a brave zoo worker reportedly risked everything to help save him, and the public is once again left watching a justice system that looks faster at protecting process than protecting innocent people. This is why people are furious. Not because they hate law and order, but because they want law and order to actually mean something when the victim is a child and the alleged crime is this horrific. The UK has a serious problem when ordinary citizens look at cases like this and feel the system has more caution for the suspect than urgency for the child, the family, and the public’s right to know what happened. There should be full transparency, serious accountability, and no soft handling when a child is nearly killed in broad daylight. Pray for that little boy. Pray for his family. And pray that justice is not buried under cowardice, excuses, or another broken system protecting itself. 🙏🏻 FOLLOW Mr Pool

Mr Pool

130,203 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 JUST IN: UK police have reportedly released on bail the 30-year-old man suspected of throwing a 3-year-old boy into a crocodile enclosure in what is being investigated as attempted murder, and they still have not publicly named him. Absolutely unreal. A little child is still fighting for his life, a brave zoo worker reportedly risked everything to help save him, and the public is once again left watching a justice system that looks faster at protecting process than protecting innocent people. This is why people are furious. Not because they hate law and order, but because they want law and order to actually mean something when the victim is a child and the alleged crime is this horrific. The UK has a serious problem when ordinary citizens look at cases like this and feel the system has more caution for the suspect than urgency for the child, the family, and the public’s right to know what happened. There should be full transparency, serious accountability, and no soft handling when a child is nearly killed in broad daylight. Pray for that little boy. Pray for his family. And pray that justice is not buried under cowardice, excuses, or another broken system protecting itself. 🙏🏻

🚨 JUST IN: UK police have reportedly released on bail the 30-year-old man suspected of throwing a 3-year-old boy into a crocodile enclosure in what is being investigated as attempted murder, and they still have not publicly named him. Absolutely unreal. A little child is still fighting for his life, a brave zoo worker reportedly risked everything to help save him, and the public is once again left watching a justice system that looks faster at protecting process than protecting innocent people. This is why people are furious. Not because they hate law and order, but because they want law and order to actually mean something when the victim is a child and the alleged crime is this horrific. The UK has a serious problem when ordinary citizens look at cases like this and feel the system has more caution for the suspect than urgency for the child, the family, and the public’s right to know what happened. There should be full transparency, serious accountability, and no soft handling when a child is nearly killed in broad daylight. Pray for that little boy. Pray for his family. And pray that justice is not buried under cowardice, excuses, or another broken system protecting itself. 🙏🏻

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

54,475 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 Sheriff Chad Bianco nails it! Legal immigrants paid their dues for the American Dream. Illegals get it free. No wonder they’re furious! “They went through the legal process of doing it. It certainly is not fair to any of them that people are just allowed to break the law and come into the law and get all of these free things that they didn't get. They had to come here and struggle, and they had to come here and work very hard for the American dream, and the American dream is you work as hard as you can to achieve as much as you want. Yeah. That's really the American dream. But when you have a situation now that they are working as hard as they possibly can to achieve the American dream and it, it's been 12 years that they've been working here and they've been paying their taxes and they've been law-abiding, and now they're watching people come across the border, free flow across the border, getting free everything, and, and being allowed to stay here, taking away from them, they're angry, t- and rightfully so.”

🚨 Sheriff Chad Bianco nails it! Legal immigrants paid their dues for the American Dream. Illegals get it free. No wonder they’re furious! “They went through the legal process of doing it. It certainly is not fair to any of them that people are just allowed to break the law and come into the law and get all of these free things that they didn't get. They had to come here and struggle, and they had to come here and work very hard for the American dream, and the American dream is you work as hard as you can to achieve as much as you want. Yeah. That's really the American dream. But when you have a situation now that they are working as hard as they possibly can to achieve the American dream and it, it's been 12 years that they've been working here and they've been paying their taxes and they've been law-abiding, and now they're watching people come across the border, free flow across the border, getting free everything, and, and being allowed to stay here, taking away from them, they're angry, t- and rightfully so.”

Gunther Eagleman™

19,496 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад