Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
👀 "Man City claim they have irrefutable evidence." 🤯 "Why do they think they're going to get a different result with the appeal board?" Angelina Kelly, Alan Brazil and Ray Parlour dissect the latest on Manchester City appealing their guilty verdict.
70,984 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
30 Kommentare

So basically this is TalkSport not having a clue about the ongoing case isn’t it 😂 a million miles behind

Because there’s an assumption that it’s all one pot of money - this drives every decision. If city show there are 3 companies then it becomes very different legally. The law needs more than a gut feel or idea - the fact the PL and judges never spoke to the main sponsor is huge.

There's absolutely no way they get anything from this sham appeal. Fucking 114? Nah 😂🤣

This is like walking into the nearest Wetherspoons and asking the fellas in there at 9am the same fucking questions. As less informed than as it gets.

Where was this “irrefutable evidence” during the due process? Where was this magical and undeniable evidence since 2018? Stop with this bollocks, they’ve been found guilty! They didn’t come to this conclusion overnight! Cheating wankers.

She hasnt got a clue seriously

Because it’s the process to follow to eventually go to a higher court who may agree that the money came from somewhere else and not the owners, technicality but that’s the point they are making, may very well get off

'We do not accept that we were on a very dangerous path...' Man City. 🫣

Angelina Kelly a absolute embarrassment- par of the red cartel

Arrogant idiots !!.

Up yours talksport

Man City are to big to be relegated.

When you say dissect …….

If Manchester City is truly guilty of all 115 charges, it exposes deep corruption within the Premier League. It would also mean City isn't the only club playing dirty—this whole ordeal feels like it's driven by jealousy and targeted hatred against a team's success."

Everyone is desperate for a Angelina Kelly's opinion arebt they 🤪

Please be very careful with the context of what you are writing. To some football is life and lives will be lost because of speculative journalism. Lets not lose to suicide

If it was irrefutable then why were they found guilty? Obvious cheats.

How can a government of UAE 🇦🇪 be funding the club are they in contract with city ?

The Brains Trust debating issues they have zero understanding of. Classic TalkShite!

From Manchester she says doesn't mention the school's colleges sports complex or the even all the student accommodation in Salford

Because the process as rigged, they dismissed witnesses the no reasons given and used the edited emails that were proven fake at CAS, There is a reason they won’t take it to criminal court If we did it shouldn’t they all be locked up for fraud?

Don't listen to guesswork, bias reporting or sensationalism etc. Just listen to those who actually know.. ⬇️ #ManCity #PL

Love the 'they did a lot of good work for charity and the community' - so did Jimmy Saville 😀

Their "irrefutable evidence" should have long since been presented. Probably because it is not irrefutable.

Why didn’t they share that? 🤷♂️🤣

Appeal panel has legal professionals Not that joke of a panel

the irrefutable evidence will probably be for the independent enquiry's eyes only and it will be inside a massive big brown envelope

They are drowning a fish constantly ridiculous 🙄

Even if we’ve to take the @premiere league to God….we will😂

Perhaps the new panel (Muhammad, Ali, and Ahmed) may conclude that the original panel just misunderstood Citeh’s irrefutable evidence 😂😂😂


![🤯 "I think they [Man City] believe they have the right arguments to bring this back." 👀 "They are defiant and believe they have winnable arguments." Stefan Borson explains Man City's reaction to being found guilty on 114 out of 115 charges regarding financial rule breaches.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2104556742298255846/media/HTTWvpWWkAA2kcc.jpg)











