Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Mandelson was appointed because those around PM said it would be good move. Mandelson did a job for the time he was in. PM should have said he’d appointed in national interests then dismissed when it became apparent that it might look like a mistake. End.

KarlTurnerMP's profile picture

Karl Turner MP

60,559 subscribers

12,871 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Was that known at the time of the appointment.. if we appointed this person knowing this, it doesn't just rebound on Peter Mandelson, it rebounds on the PM too" Andrew Fisher on Starmer sacking Mandelson
2:18

"Was that known at the time of the appointment.. if we appointed this person knowing this, it doesn't just rebound on Peter Mandelson, it rebounds on the PM too" Andrew Fisher on Starmer sacking Mandelson

Saul Staniforth

11,155 views • 10 months ago

Starmer personally appointed Mandelson, the “best pal” of a paedo. In so doing he has humiliated us on international stage Did the PM mislead the House in saying “full due process was followed during the appointment” when in fact he had already appointed & announced Mandelson before full due process had in fact commenced
4:07

Starmer personally appointed Mandelson, the “best pal” of a paedo. In so doing he has humiliated us on international stage Did the PM mislead the House in saying “full due process was followed during the appointment” when in fact he had already appointed & announced Mandelson before full due process had in fact commenced

Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧

51,594 views • 10 months ago

“Who first suggested to the Prime Minister that Mandelson should be appointed as our ambassador to the United States, or was it just his own idea?” A good question from Julian Lewis MP. Which the PM simply didn’t answer.
0:38

“Who first suggested to the Prime Minister that Mandelson should be appointed as our ambassador to the United States, or was it just his own idea?” A good question from Julian Lewis MP. Which the PM simply didn’t answer.

Mark Wallace

34,842 views • 2 months ago

PM appointed Mandelson for good or bad. He regrets it now. But we cannot move on from this sorry saga. Why? Because we are searching for obfuscation. I don’t believe PM lied, frankly, but others do. And that’s the trouble. We must show that he hasn’t lied.
2:00

PM appointed Mandelson for good or bad. He regrets it now. But we cannot move on from this sorry saga. Why? Because we are searching for obfuscation. I don’t believe PM lied, frankly, but others do. And that’s the trouble. We must show that he hasn’t lied.

Karl Turner MP

31,752 views • 2 months ago

Alexander: If we knew then what we know now Mandelson wouldnt have been appointed "What about the fact Mandelson stayed at Epsteins house in 2009 after he was convicted.. was that known?" "I'm not aware of what was Mandelsons diary" erm, Starmer was asked about it in Jan 2024
0:47

Alexander: If we knew then what we know now Mandelson wouldnt have been appointed "What about the fact Mandelson stayed at Epsteins house in 2009 after he was convicted.. was that known?" "I'm not aware of what was Mandelsons diary" erm, Starmer was asked about it in Jan 2024

Saul Staniforth

156,314 views • 10 months ago

.Richard Burgon MP: "how did it even get to the stage where the PM was interviewing Mandelson.. the simple answer is political. It's because it suited the interests of a tiny faction in the Labour party, funded by big business, who wanted Mandelson at the heart of things.." 🎯
1:45

.Richard Burgon MP: "how did it even get to the stage where the PM was interviewing Mandelson.. the simple answer is political. It's because it suited the interests of a tiny faction in the Labour party, funded by big business, who wanted Mandelson at the heart of things.." 🎯

Saul Staniforth

25,367 views • 4 months ago

🚨 Jon Sopel exposed Robert Jenrick’s opportunism who got angry and tried to put the journalist on trial and failed. The audience saw it for what it was. Jenrick: “John, I'm not gonna take any lessons from the man who said that Peter Mandelson was a class act, when he was appointed as our ambassador to Washington.” Sopel: “Nigel Farage said much the same.” Jenrick: “Didn't you also go on telly and say that Hugh Edwards, after he'd committed the most appalling crime- Sopel: “I think everyone can see that you're deflecting because- Well, you- know, this, I'm not seeking elected office.” Fiona Bruce: “I- in fairness-John's not asking anyone to vote for him.” Jenrick: “Do you think that Peter Mandelson is a class act, John? distance yourself from Peter Mandelson, John?” Sopel: “I've said on the podcast repeatedly- that what we've learned about Peter Mandelson has absolutely, completely changed- But you knew, you...” Jenrick: When you said he was a class act- Okay, okay! Fiona Bruce: “Robert, I might remind you that, that your current leader, Nigel Farage, also said some very complimentary things about Peter Mandelson when he was appointed.” #bbcqt
1:16

🚨 Jon Sopel exposed Robert Jenrick’s opportunism who got angry and tried to put the journalist on trial and failed. The audience saw it for what it was. Jenrick: “John, I'm not gonna take any lessons from the man who said that Peter Mandelson was a class act, when he was appointed as our ambassador to Washington.” Sopel: “Nigel Farage said much the same.” Jenrick: “Didn't you also go on telly and say that Hugh Edwards, after he'd committed the most appalling crime- Sopel: “I think everyone can see that you're deflecting because- Well, you- know, this, I'm not seeking elected office.” Fiona Bruce: “I- in fairness-John's not asking anyone to vote for him.” Jenrick: “Do you think that Peter Mandelson is a class act, John? distance yourself from Peter Mandelson, John?” Sopel: “I've said on the podcast repeatedly- that what we've learned about Peter Mandelson has absolutely, completely changed- But you knew, you...” Jenrick: When you said he was a class act- Okay, okay! Fiona Bruce: “Robert, I might remind you that, that your current leader, Nigel Farage, also said some very complimentary things about Peter Mandelson when he was appointed.” #bbcqt

Liz Webster

162,864 views • 4 months ago

Sir Keir Starmer said that he would never have appointed Lord Peter Mandelson to the post of UK ambassador to the US if he had known what he knows now about the extent of his association with Epstein. Beth Rigby asks: What did the PM know and when?
3:20

Sir Keir Starmer said that he would never have appointed Lord Peter Mandelson to the post of UK ambassador to the US if he had known what he knows now about the extent of his association with Epstein. Beth Rigby asks: What did the PM know and when?

Sky News

52,621 views • 10 months ago

PM says it is 'staggering' he was not told about Mandelson failing his security vetting 'That I wasn't told that he had failed security vetting when I was telling Parliament that due process had been followed is unforgivable,' said the PM
1:35

PM says it is 'staggering' he was not told about Mandelson failing his security vetting 'That I wasn't told that he had failed security vetting when I was telling Parliament that due process had been followed is unforgivable,' said the PM

ITVPolitics

13,059 views • 2 months ago

The “forensic Starmer” myth died a death here. Liz Kendall didn’t defend him. She exposed the problem. In that exchange with Trevor Phillips, she admits the appointment was wrong, admits the facts mattered, admits the seriousness… then still says Starmer isn’t responsible. That’s not a defence. That’s damage control. Because the facts don’t move. He appointed Peter Mandelson, then blamed process when it blew up. Leadership isn’t about what you would have done. It’s about what you did. So here’s the question that killed the whole performance: If it was this serious… why make the appointment in the first place? #StarmerOut Liz Kendall #starmer #mandelson
3:46

The “forensic Starmer” myth died a death here. Liz Kendall didn’t defend him. She exposed the problem. In that exchange with Trevor Phillips, she admits the appointment was wrong, admits the facts mattered, admits the seriousness… then still says Starmer isn’t responsible. That’s not a defence. That’s damage control. Because the facts don’t move. He appointed Peter Mandelson, then blamed process when it blew up. Leadership isn’t about what you would have done. It’s about what you did. So here’s the question that killed the whole performance: If it was this serious… why make the appointment in the first place? #StarmerOut Liz Kendall #starmer #mandelson

Labour Heartlands

23,654 views • 2 months ago

The reason Mandelson was appointed US Ambassador was *because* he was a duplicitous liar. He was there to lie to, and about, Trump. Brown, Blair & Starmer appointed him to high office time and again because he was lying for them. They all knew he was a liar. They're all culpable.
0:39

The reason Mandelson was appointed US Ambassador was *because* he was a duplicitous liar. He was there to lie to, and about, Trump. Brown, Blair & Starmer appointed him to high office time and again because he was lying for them. They all knew he was a liar. They're all culpable.

MSM Monitor

73,809 views • 5 months ago

Wilfred Frost: "If a boss.. text's you you might just agree with them because it makes your life easier. So sometimes we'll be giving an MP grief today cus they agreed with what Peter Mandelson said, but they might not have felt it" So Peter Mandelson was the boss? Got it.
0:33

Wilfred Frost: "If a boss.. text's you you might just agree with them because it makes your life easier. So sometimes we'll be giving an MP grief today cus they agreed with what Peter Mandelson said, but they might not have felt it" So Peter Mandelson was the boss? Got it.

Saul Staniforth

19,457 views • 1 month ago

Asked directly if PM should resign, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar does not say no... Asked if PM got it wrong on Mandelson, Sarwar says it was "clearly a mistake to even consider him to be capable of being ambassador"
2:17

Asked directly if PM should resign, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar does not say no... Asked if PM got it wrong on Mandelson, Sarwar says it was "clearly a mistake to even consider him to be capable of being ambassador"

Andrew Learmonth

138,341 views • 5 months ago

The announcement of a police investigation into the Mandelson scandal is welcome. But it should not distract us from asking why Mandelson was ever appointed as ambassador in the first place. Keir Starmer, and his Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney, have serious questions to answer.
0:36

The announcement of a police investigation into the Mandelson scandal is welcome. But it should not distract us from asking why Mandelson was ever appointed as ambassador in the first place. Keir Starmer, and his Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney, have serious questions to answer.

Kemi Badenoch

112,292 views • 5 months ago

Peter Mandelson was director of a company that funds the Russian arms industry. This was noted in the official advice to Keir Starmer on whether he should appoint Mandelson to be US Ambassador. Yet Starmer appointed him anyway, to arguably our most sensitive diplomatic role.
1:28

Peter Mandelson was director of a company that funds the Russian arms industry. This was noted in the official advice to Keir Starmer on whether he should appoint Mandelson to be US Ambassador. Yet Starmer appointed him anyway, to arguably our most sensitive diplomatic role.

Katie Lam

30,770 views • 2 months ago

🚨 This is utterly DAMNING for Keir Starmer. "It's been clear that the PM wanted to make this appointment *himself*" Olly Robbins explains *EXACTLY* how Peter Mandelson was appointed and it proves unequivocally that Keir Starmer lied. Watch until the end. He's finished!
2:15

🚨 This is utterly DAMNING for Keir Starmer. "It's been clear that the PM wanted to make this appointment *himself*" Olly Robbins explains *EXACTLY* how Peter Mandelson was appointed and it proves unequivocally that Keir Starmer lied. Watch until the end. He's finished!

Lee Harris

244,866 views • 2 months ago

It was a pleasure to speak with Mike Graham 🇬🇧. Keir Starmer needs to resign over appointing Peter Mandelson. In opposition he said the “buck stops with the PM”. Now that he is PM, he is allowing others to resign whilst he desperately clings on. We also need a general election.
10:17

It was a pleasure to speak with Mike Graham 🇬🇧. Keir Starmer needs to resign over appointing Peter Mandelson. In opposition he said the “buck stops with the PM”. Now that he is PM, he is allowing others to resign whilst he desperately clings on. We also need a general election.

Chris Rose

16,152 views • 5 months ago

"It was a huge mistake to bring Mandelson back. It was a massive, massive mistake" Labour MP Clive Efford tells Sky's Matt Barbet that Keir Starmer needs to have 'a good hard look at who is giving him information' 📺 Sky 501
2:03

"It was a huge mistake to bring Mandelson back. It was a massive, massive mistake" Labour MP Clive Efford tells Sky's Matt Barbet that Keir Starmer needs to have 'a good hard look at who is giving him information' 📺 Sky 501

Sky News Politics

21,773 views • 5 months ago

🚨 🧵 BOMBSHELL. Holy… After initially refusing to answer twice. After a 3rd question (5:11 below) Keir Starmer has CONFESSED he was made aware of Peter Mandelson's ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at the time he appointed him US ambassador. Starmer then goes on to keep saying that Mandelson lied to him. So… he just took his word for it. With no thorough investigation (bar an obviously feeble attempt by the security committee, as Kemi said, it was in Google) and then made him Ambassador to the United States? And then spoke highly of him TWICE at the Dispatch box? Even though he now admits that he was made aware of the relationship. It’s also EXTREMELY concerning to National Security that the Security committee also just… took Mandelson’s word for it. Again, as Kemi said, it was on bloody google! All in all, the fact Starmer has now confessed he knew about the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein post-Epstein conviction and pre-appointment of Mandelson to Ambassodor is SHOCKING All details MUST be released to the public immediately. There MUST be a public I have also added two other questions on Mandelson/Epstein in the thread below by Ed Davey and another MP that I think are also important in my opinion.
14:07

🚨 🧵 BOMBSHELL. Holy… After initially refusing to answer twice. After a 3rd question (5:11 below) Keir Starmer has CONFESSED he was made aware of Peter Mandelson's ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein at the time he appointed him US ambassador. Starmer then goes on to keep saying that Mandelson lied to him. So… he just took his word for it. With no thorough investigation (bar an obviously feeble attempt by the security committee, as Kemi said, it was in Google) and then made him Ambassador to the United States? And then spoke highly of him TWICE at the Dispatch box? Even though he now admits that he was made aware of the relationship. It’s also EXTREMELY concerning to National Security that the Security committee also just… took Mandelson’s word for it. Again, as Kemi said, it was on bloody google! All in all, the fact Starmer has now confessed he knew about the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein post-Epstein conviction and pre-appointment of Mandelson to Ambassodor is SHOCKING All details MUST be released to the public immediately. There MUST be a public I have also added two other questions on Mandelson/Epstein in the thread below by Ed Davey and another MP that I think are also important in my opinion.

Kosher

32,064 views • 5 months ago

Sorcha Eastwood with a Q for the PM "What was it about the twice disgraced paedophile adjacent self styled prince of darkness that you found so attractive to put into this job?" Starmer is the frontman for a faction Mandelson was a key part of, he wanted the job, so he got it
0:31

Sorcha Eastwood with a Q for the PM "What was it about the twice disgraced paedophile adjacent self styled prince of darkness that you found so attractive to put into this job?" Starmer is the frontman for a faction Mandelson was a key part of, he wanted the job, so he got it

Saul Staniforth

562,407 views • 2 months ago