Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Mang0 supporting Smash Sisters isn't supporting women, it's him supporting something that was meant to be for women. Smash Sisters was originally created to give women a space to play, compete, and meet others in a scene that’s mostly male. It was made for REAL women to join big... show more

BibleWarriorBronson

2,378 subscribers

21,785 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is what Smash Sisters looked like in 2017. The recent attention that Smash Sisters has gotten, has made me realize that I had almost entirely forgotten that this group even exists. Smash Sisters events used to be scheduled into the streaming blocks of major tournaments. They had crew battles on the big stage streamed live in front of thousands of people. You could literally see top melee players in the crowd supporting these events, as evidenced in this video. So... why is it that we now only hear faint whispers of these events through locked down social media posts like this one? What happened? Simply - The group of people that Smash Sisters was created in order to platform and protect no longer exists within the melee community, at least not to a meaningful degree, and they have been replaced by an entirely different group of people. To deny that is to deny reality. This is not a hateful message. This is not a bigoted message. It is a truthful and well-meaning one. As stated in this video by the founders of Smash Sisters, the group was created in order to grow the melee scene by providing an incentive for women to sign up for smash events. That incentive being community. Comradery. By lowering the barrier of entry, it allows an opportunity for growth - particularly for those women who had an interest in smash, but lacked a support system, or for women who had qualms about signing up for a tournament, going 0-2, and then sitting around for three days by themselves. It was an inherently inclusive endeavor, and a net positive on the community. Now, Smash Sisters is completely unrecognizable. It is a pale imitation of what it once was, and was meant to be. Their events are, almost entirely, transgender exclusive - run by and competed in by individuals who regularly and openly advocate for violence, attempt to silence any and all criticism of the group in its current iteration, and call for the removal of individuals from the melee community who do not agree with their personal beliefs and ideologies. It is, now, inherently exclusionary and polarizing, and conceivably off-putting to those very same women for whom Smash Sisters was created in the first place.

This is what Smash Sisters looked like in 2017. The recent attention that Smash Sisters has gotten, has made me realize that I had almost entirely forgotten that this group even exists. Smash Sisters events used to be scheduled into the streaming blocks of major tournaments. They had crew battles on the big stage streamed live in front of thousands of people. You could literally see top melee players in the crowd supporting these events, as evidenced in this video. So... why is it that we now only hear faint whispers of these events through locked down social media posts like this one? What happened? Simply - The group of people that Smash Sisters was created in order to platform and protect no longer exists within the melee community, at least not to a meaningful degree, and they have been replaced by an entirely different group of people. To deny that is to deny reality. This is not a hateful message. This is not a bigoted message. It is a truthful and well-meaning one. As stated in this video by the founders of Smash Sisters, the group was created in order to grow the melee scene by providing an incentive for women to sign up for smash events. That incentive being community. Comradery. By lowering the barrier of entry, it allows an opportunity for growth - particularly for those women who had an interest in smash, but lacked a support system, or for women who had qualms about signing up for a tournament, going 0-2, and then sitting around for three days by themselves. It was an inherently inclusive endeavor, and a net positive on the community. Now, Smash Sisters is completely unrecognizable. It is a pale imitation of what it once was, and was meant to be. Their events are, almost entirely, transgender exclusive - run by and competed in by individuals who regularly and openly advocate for violence, attempt to silence any and all criticism of the group in its current iteration, and call for the removal of individuals from the melee community who do not agree with their personal beliefs and ideologies. It is, now, inherently exclusionary and polarizing, and conceivably off-putting to those very same women for whom Smash Sisters was created in the first place.

MeleeIsCooked

81,829 views • 1 year ago

Australia’s sex discrimination act (1984) was created specifically for women. By 2025, women aren’t even protected by it. But men who claim to be women are. I don’t know why the sex discrimination commissioner is determined to give women’s rights to men, all I know is she has.

Australia’s sex discrimination act (1984) was created specifically for women. By 2025, women aren’t even protected by it. But men who claim to be women are. I don’t know why the sex discrimination commissioner is determined to give women’s rights to men, all I know is she has.

Sall Grover

61,819 views • 1 year ago

Shawn Hatosy on Quinn: “I saw that it was an app that was made by women, for women, centered on listening to women, and their needs, and servicing their needs. […] It gives me the opportunity to step into this space with intention. We’re building something meaningful together.”

Shawn Hatosy on Quinn: “I saw that it was an app that was made by women, for women, centered on listening to women, and their needs, and servicing their needs. […] It gives me the opportunity to step into this space with intention. We’re building something meaningful together.”

tina 💜

321,323 views • 2 months ago

This is just sad! Trans people should be so embarrassed and ashamed of this whole thing. Why are you supporting the takeover of women’s spaces? It is such MALE behavior.. bullying women into submission. The trans women I know are so disgusted by this. Why not make your own trans women only space or make your own app or just deal with the fact that some women do not want you in their space BUT NO you have to act all entitled like a big man baby🤮 FU and that disgusting Trans CULT you all belong to. Repulsive. Sall Grover

This is just sad! Trans people should be so embarrassed and ashamed of this whole thing. Why are you supporting the takeover of women’s spaces? It is such MALE behavior.. bullying women into submission. The trans women I know are so disgusted by this. Why not make your own trans women only space or make your own app or just deal with the fact that some women do not want you in their space BUT NO you have to act all entitled like a big man baby🤮 FU and that disgusting Trans CULT you all belong to. Repulsive. Sall Grover

Buck Angel Transsexual

16,677 views • 2 months ago

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

Tamorah Shareef Muhammad

12,429,157 views • 2 years ago

“The other day, my staff informed me that I was invited to attend (CSW70) event for women in New York, and I was very happy. I responded within 3 hours, only to be told I could no longer attend because I responded ‘late’, this was the response from the Ministry of Women Affairs. I’m really concerned. How can we explain to Nigerians that there are only 4 women in the Senate, yet there is no unity, and a woman is being excluded from an event that concerns women of the world? I am not under suspension, and I don’t think I should be treated differently from other women.” —Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan reacts after she was excluded from the delegation list to attend CSW70 event in the New York

“The other day, my staff informed me that I was invited to attend (CSW70) event for women in New York, and I was very happy. I responded within 3 hours, only to be told I could no longer attend because I responded ‘late’, this was the response from the Ministry of Women Affairs. I’m really concerned. How can we explain to Nigerians that there are only 4 women in the Senate, yet there is no unity, and a woman is being excluded from an event that concerns women of the world? I am not under suspension, and I don’t think I should be treated differently from other women.” —Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan reacts after she was excluded from the delegation list to attend CSW70 event in the New York

CHUKS 🍥

80,476 views • 4 months ago

Anna Cody, Australia’s sex discrimination commissioner, intervened in a federal court case against women only spaces, the accurate definition of woman & biological sex, instead in favor of men who claim to be women. All while school aged girls are not drinking water at school to avoid having to use bathrooms with boys in them, while women are being charged with vilification for accurately calling men men, while women are being injured on sports fields by men who claim to be women, while lesbians are denied their own events, while women have their lives turned upside down & have to raise almost $2million to fight for women only spaces in court, she has sided specifically with men who claim to be women. She has attended “trans rights” speaking events but never “women’s rights” events. I know she has heard the voices of women who rely on women only spaces because we submitted affidavits from these women in the Tickle v Giggle court case. Women who have been abused, women who are in recovery, women whose faith relies on sex segregation, women with trauma, women whose day to day needs require woman only spaces, lesbian women denied lesbian only events. She has ignored it all in favor of men who claim to be women. In the Giggle v Tickle appeal, it’s Giggle saying that the law can serve everyone. Have your trans only spaces, have gay only spaces, have male only spaces, have women + men who claim to be women spaces if you want, just also have female only spaces. The sex discrimination commissioner is actively against this, in favor of whatever men who claim to be women want. When you allow school girls to go without adequate single sex bathrooms, lesbians to be denied to right of single sex association, every woman who needs woman only spaces to go without, you are discriminating against women, and you’re doing it on the basis of sex. Yes, the sex discrimination commissioner is discriminating against women on the basis of sex. So for her to stand on stage and say that she not only listens to women but centers women who have experienced discrimination in her work is a demonstrable lie. I know this because I have the receipts. The sex discrimination commissioner should be forced to resign because she is not accurately doing her job. She is welcome to be a trans rights activist elsewhere but it certainly shouldn’t be in the office of the SEX discrimination commission.

Anna Cody, Australia’s sex discrimination commissioner, intervened in a federal court case against women only spaces, the accurate definition of woman & biological sex, instead in favor of men who claim to be women. All while school aged girls are not drinking water at school to avoid having to use bathrooms with boys in them, while women are being charged with vilification for accurately calling men men, while women are being injured on sports fields by men who claim to be women, while lesbians are denied their own events, while women have their lives turned upside down & have to raise almost $2million to fight for women only spaces in court, she has sided specifically with men who claim to be women. She has attended “trans rights” speaking events but never “women’s rights” events. I know she has heard the voices of women who rely on women only spaces because we submitted affidavits from these women in the Tickle v Giggle court case. Women who have been abused, women who are in recovery, women whose faith relies on sex segregation, women with trauma, women whose day to day needs require woman only spaces, lesbian women denied lesbian only events. She has ignored it all in favor of men who claim to be women. In the Giggle v Tickle appeal, it’s Giggle saying that the law can serve everyone. Have your trans only spaces, have gay only spaces, have male only spaces, have women + men who claim to be women spaces if you want, just also have female only spaces. The sex discrimination commissioner is actively against this, in favor of whatever men who claim to be women want. When you allow school girls to go without adequate single sex bathrooms, lesbians to be denied to right of single sex association, every woman who needs woman only spaces to go without, you are discriminating against women, and you’re doing it on the basis of sex. Yes, the sex discrimination commissioner is discriminating against women on the basis of sex. So for her to stand on stage and say that she not only listens to women but centers women who have experienced discrimination in her work is a demonstrable lie. I know this because I have the receipts. The sex discrimination commissioner should be forced to resign because she is not accurately doing her job. She is welcome to be a trans rights activist elsewhere but it certainly shouldn’t be in the office of the SEX discrimination commission.

Sall Grover

90,143 views • 9 months ago

Japan’s longest-running rape crisis center was denied funding after the facility’s director was criticized for not referring to ‘transgender women’ as ‘women.’ Tokyo’s Rape Crisis Center was founded in 1983 by six women, half of whom were survivors of sexual assault. Michiko Orita, one of the founders, said she was harassed by a government official for protecting single sex services for rape survivors. “Male self-identified ‘women’ ignore the purpose of having a women-only space,” Orita said. “The desire not to have physical men in women-only spaces is not prejudice or a discriminatory attitude, but comes from evidence-based reality.”

Japan’s longest-running rape crisis center was denied funding after the facility’s director was criticized for not referring to ‘transgender women’ as ‘women.’ Tokyo’s Rape Crisis Center was founded in 1983 by six women, half of whom were survivors of sexual assault. Michiko Orita, one of the founders, said she was harassed by a government official for protecting single sex services for rape survivors. “Male self-identified ‘women’ ignore the purpose of having a women-only space,” Orita said. “The desire not to have physical men in women-only spaces is not prejudice or a discriminatory attitude, but comes from evidence-based reality.”

Genevieve Gluck

268,688 views • 2 years ago

She, along with other women, was dragging Ruchi Tiwari to who knows where, and now she says women are only meant to be tortured in Hinduism These liberal intellectuals will be the first ones to gnaw at others for their views Shameless

She, along with other women, was dragging Ruchi Tiwari to who knows where, and now she says women are only meant to be tortured in Hinduism These liberal intellectuals will be the first ones to gnaw at others for their views Shameless

Tushar ॐ♫₹

13,666 views • 5 months ago

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to: • Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us • Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians • A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed • Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the *fact* that men are not women • A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport • Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport • School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms • Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them The current *interpretation* of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished. Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane. This is not a “culture war”, Anthony Albanese. It’s a war on women & girls.

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to: • Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us • Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians • A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed • Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the fact that men are not women • A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport • Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport • School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms • Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them The current interpretation of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished. Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane. This is not a “culture war”, Anthony Albanese. It’s a war on women & girls.

Sall Grover

78,713 views • 1 month ago

The Full Federal Court ruled that a women-only app illegally excluded a biological male. 2 of the judges were women. The law, written by a woman. A Sex Discrimination Commissioner who is a woman. The legal architecture that once protected women was not dismantled by men. It was dismantled by women who mistook the performance of compassion for the substance of it. This is what suicidal empathy looks like in practice, and women are paying for it with their safety.

The Full Federal Court ruled that a women-only app illegally excluded a biological male. 2 of the judges were women. The law, written by a woman. A Sex Discrimination Commissioner who is a woman. The legal architecture that once protected women was not dismantled by men. It was dismantled by women who mistook the performance of compassion for the substance of it. This is what suicidal empathy looks like in practice, and women are paying for it with their safety.

Carlz J Söda 📸

22,574 views • 2 months ago

Betty Gilpin talks about how Jennifer Lopez changed the filming schedule for “Office Romance” so that Betty would not have to work on her daughter’s birthday and gave her more flexibility during production “It was a very unique and rare experience” Women supporting women 🙌

Betty Gilpin talks about how Jennifer Lopez changed the filming schedule for “Office Romance” so that Betty would not have to work on her daughter’s birthday and gave her more flexibility during production “It was a very unique and rare experience” Women supporting women 🙌

Jen Massive 👑💚

148,918 views • 1 month ago

Trump: "The whole issue of the women. Comfort women. Very specifically. We talked and that was a very big problem for Korea, not for Japan. Japan was, wanted to go, they want to get on. But Korea was very stuck on that."

Trump: "The whole issue of the women. Comfort women. Very specifically. We talked and that was a very big problem for Korea, not for Japan. Japan was, wanted to go, they want to get on. But Korea was very stuck on that."

Aaron Rupar

5,329,198 views • 10 months ago

Nadia Whittome MP The bare minimum that women are asking is not to have to share a women-only space with men like this. And yet you still fight for him and not them. Why?

Nadia Whittome MP The bare minimum that women are asking is not to have to share a women-only space with men like this. And yet you still fight for him and not them. Why?

Jill Foster

43,674 views • 11 days ago

"Modern women don't want to be submissive to their men. Women don't want to be corrected, they have a false sense of independence, but the truth is that women need men and those women that say they don't need a man are insane because they know the greatness and importance of a man..." Your thoughts on this

"Modern women don't want to be submissive to their men. Women don't want to be corrected, they have a false sense of independence, but the truth is that women need men and those women that say they don't need a man are insane because they know the greatness and importance of a man..." Your thoughts on this

African Hub

71,921 views • 1 year ago

It used to be a night for Muslim women, Then the men came to leer at the women & girls. Now any Muslim women who appear in the area are seen as bad women who only who want to be leered at by the men. They've shamed Muslim women into avoiding that road & one of their traditions.

It used to be a night for Muslim women, Then the men came to leer at the women & girls. Now any Muslim women who appear in the area are seen as bad women who only who want to be leered at by the men. They've shamed Muslim women into avoiding that road & one of their traditions.

Biology Rules Ok

18,372 views • 1 month ago

Do women like beards on men? Human male secondary sex characteristics evolved not to attract females, but rather to compete against other males. Consider the example of beards. Why do males develop facial hair during puberty? Evidence is mixed about whether women find beards attractive. Some women like them, others don’t, and for others, it depends. But there is clear evidence that men view other men with beards as more intimidating than clean-shaven men. Or take deep voices. Women, on average, tend to think deep voices are attractive. But in comparison, men are even more likely to find men with deep voices to be intimidating. The same basic pattern has been found for muscularity. Women find it to be attractive, up to a certain point. But men report feeling threatened by large physicality in other males. Such research suggests that intrasexual competition has given rise to male traits such as broad shoulders, large muscles, deep voices, and facial hair. Men evolved these traits not so much because women find them sexy, but more so because other men find them intimidating. As the psychologist Steve Stewart-Williams has written, secondary sex characteristics appear to be more like deers’ antlers than peacocks’ tails. The peacocks’ tail evolved to attract female peahens. But male deer evolved antlers not to impress female deer, but to compete with other males. That same logic seems to apply to the characteristics of human males.

Do women like beards on men? Human male secondary sex characteristics evolved not to attract females, but rather to compete against other males. Consider the example of beards. Why do males develop facial hair during puberty? Evidence is mixed about whether women find beards attractive. Some women like them, others don’t, and for others, it depends. But there is clear evidence that men view other men with beards as more intimidating than clean-shaven men. Or take deep voices. Women, on average, tend to think deep voices are attractive. But in comparison, men are even more likely to find men with deep voices to be intimidating. The same basic pattern has been found for muscularity. Women find it to be attractive, up to a certain point. But men report feeling threatened by large physicality in other males. Such research suggests that intrasexual competition has given rise to male traits such as broad shoulders, large muscles, deep voices, and facial hair. Men evolved these traits not so much because women find them sexy, but more so because other men find them intimidating. As the psychologist Steve Stewart-Williams has written, secondary sex characteristics appear to be more like deers’ antlers than peacocks’ tails. The peacocks’ tail evolved to attract female peahens. But male deer evolved antlers not to impress female deer, but to compete with other males. That same logic seems to apply to the characteristics of human males.

Rob Henderson

50,861 views • 4 months ago

#WATCH | Leena Nair, global CEO of Chanel after meeting PM Modi in Paris, says, "It was an absolute pleasure to meet the Prime Minister. It was a proud moment for me to talk to him. He was very encouraging about my achievements. But importantly, he was very keen that I continued to support other women and girls and be a role model for many women and girls coming out of India. So you could see his passion and commitment to support women more and more in business, in all avenues to grow and develop."

#WATCH | Leena Nair, global CEO of Chanel after meeting PM Modi in Paris, says, "It was an absolute pleasure to meet the Prime Minister. It was a proud moment for me to talk to him. He was very encouraging about my achievements. But importantly, he was very keen that I continued to support other women and girls and be a role model for many women and girls coming out of India. So you could see his passion and commitment to support women more and more in business, in all avenues to grow and develop."

ANI

421,273 views • 3 years ago