正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Manufactured Headlines vs Real Influence This is the difference between Catherine, Princess of Wales and Meghan Markle in a nutshell. Look at Catherine in Italy. She isn’t producing a dozen headlines every day about where she is, what she’s thinking, what she’s wearing or what some “source” supposedly told...

71,918 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Meghan Markle can copy Diana’s clothes. She can copy the poses, the expressions, the carefully staged photos, and she can have endless articles written trying to sell the idea of “Diana 2.0.” What she can never copy is why people loved Diana in the first place. Diana’s connection with people wasn’t created by PR teams, media leaks, paid narratives, or carefully curated branding. It came from a genuine ability to connect with ordinary people in a way that felt natural and authentic. People saw compassion, warmth, vulnerability, and empathy. They felt that she genuinely cared about the people she met. You cannot manufacture that. You cannot buy it. You cannot force the public to believe it through headlines. The curtsy comparison is a perfect example. Diana carried herself with grace and respect because she understood the institution she had married into and knew that one day her son would inherit it. Whatever disagreements she had with the monarchy, she never seemed to lose sight of the fact that William’s future was tied to it. Meghan chose to turn a curtsy into a joke for a global audience. Diana understood the significance of the role. Meghan appeared more interested in mocking it. The more Meghan tries to recreate Diana’s image, the more obvious it becomes that she is imitating the surface while missing the substance. Wearing similar outfits doesn’t create the same legacy. Recreating photographs doesn’t create the same impact. Invoking Diana’s name doesn’t create the same emotional connection. Diana became Diana because people chose to admire her. Not because the media told them to. Not because a PR team convinced them to. No amount of media campaigning can make people see Meghan as Diana 2.0 if the public doesn’t genuinely feel it for themselves.

Queen Esther

144,029 次观看 • 3 个月前

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 次观看 • 2 个月前

The BBC and the British press will never get over the fact that all their attempts to diminish and break this woman, from the time she was simply a 23 year old courting the Future King of the UK, to now as the Future Queen Consort of the UK, all failed. Out of ALL the Royal Women in the World and in the BRF, Catherine is ONLY one they single out to call her by a nickname and her maiden name🤡 "Kate Middleton" is NOT even her name; It was NEVER her name. She was born and raised "Catherine Elizabeth Middleton". She always introduces herself as "Catherine". "Kate" is a childhood nickname used by her family and friends. Are you her family? are your her friend?🤡 So the BBC saying "Kate", who is "Kate"?🤡 The level of disrespect and familiarity is off the chart and that is why you do not allow this familiarity with people from the get-go. How hard is it to call someone by their given name? Why is she the only one singled out ? Because, my dears, They cannot get over the fact that Catherine has never and will never lower herself to play their media games and give her any access to herself or her family🔥 Catherine, just like William, are organically popular, they have never needed the press to hype them up or do PR for them. The press has zero control over them and that is what they are punishing Catherine for. And you wonder why Prince William treats the British press like with the "detached contempt" he does ?🤡 They can try but they cannot diminish Catherine. In Life, there are women who need crowns and titles to feel like Royalty. But Catherine is of the breed of women who naturally exude all the attribute of a Queen. Just look at her and you see Royalty personified. No one, not even blood royals, have her natural grace, elegance, poise and pull with the British Public. No one. You cannot teach her level of grace, you are born with it or not😌 Catherine never made a fuss about Titles because she is a woman who knows who she is and where she is going in Life and that is why she will keep shining for being herself, and the BBC will keep covering her so they can feed their children and pay their bills☕️ #CatherineTheGreat #PrincessofWales 📹 Kensington Palace

Canellecitadelle

227,038 次观看 • 9 个月前

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."

Brian Kight

308,877 次观看 • 1 年前

Meghan Markle could have had all of this. If she’d just accepted that the Crown wasn’t there to serve her, but that she was there to serve something much bigger than herself, she could have become one of the most significant royals in modern times. Coming from Hollywood, she had a front row seat to the exact world she was so desperate to impress. After years of chasing status in those circles, she found herself in a position where the very people she desperately wanted validation from would have been standing when she walked into the room because of the institution she represented. The thing she never got is that the respect isn’t for the individual. It’s for the Crown, the role, and the centuries of service behind it. Those who understand that thrive. Those who think they’re bigger than it? They crash and burn. A few years ago, when the monarchy was under real pressure and Catherine was fighting serious health issues, Harry and Meghan had a genuine chance to step up and build something positive. Instead they chose to wage war on the very institution that gave them their platform in the first place. They wanted the prominence without the protocol, the status without the hierarchy, and the influence without any accountability. The saddest part is Meghan couldn’t accept playing second fiddle to Catherine. In the end, refusing to accept her place in the institution is exactly what cost her the platform she had inside it. Pride really has undone a lot of people. And it might end up being the defining lesson of Meghan Markle’s whole story.

Queen Esther

452,801 次观看 • 2 个月前

Meghan Markle: Writing About ‘Princess Kate’ in 2014, ‘I Didn’t Know the Royal Family’ in 2021 Meghan sat with Oprah and said she went into royal life naively. The family was not something they followed at home. She did no research. She never looked her husband up. Everything she needed to know, Harry was already telling her. Then she added the line that gives the game away: thank God she hadn’t researched, or she would have been in her head about it. Hold that against how ordinary people behave. It is not normal adult behaviour. Most people marrying into any close family do some homework. They ask questions. They learn the names, the dynamics, the rules of the house. They do it out of respect, self-preservation and basic courtesy. Marrying into the British monarchy is that instinct multiplied. You are not joining a nice family in Surrey. You are walking into an institution with protocol, history, press machinery and a public that already has opinions before you open your mouth. Saying you felt no need to look any of that up, and that Harry telling you “everything we thought I needed to know” was enough, is not charming innocence. She made not bothering to look sound like a personality trait. It puts the burden on them to brief you, protect you, and translate a 1,200-year-old system around your feelings. Ordinary people do not get that luxury and do not expect it. Put her words next to the record and it gets sharper than naivety. She did not grow up in a vacuum. In 2014, on her own blog, she was writing about William and Kate’s wedding, “Princess Kate,” pomp, and grown women clinging to the fantasy. That is not “it wasn’t part of conversation.” That is a woman who had already formed a take. Then she sat with Oprah and gave us the other side of the story: blank slate, never researched, never looked him up, thank God she hadn’t or she would have been “in her head.” That’s the bit that should stop people. “I didn’t know” is the setup for “so none of this is on me.” If she walked in wide-eyed, every clash becomes proof the institution failed her, instead of a clash between her expectations and a job she declined to study. Naivety becomes a moral alibi. Normal people in that position would have done the opposite. They would have over-prepared. They would have been slightly embarrassed not to know the anthem, the curtsy, the difference between the family and the institution. She framed not knowing as virtue. That is not how a respectful newcomer talks. That is how someone talks when the story they need is: I was unspoiled, they were the problem. This is her being uniquely evil. It is a habit. Rewrite the small facts until they serve the larger narrative of injured innocence. If the blogs she wrote get rewritten, the Google search gets rewritten, and “I didn’t know” becomes the convenient version, why would the rest of the interview be any different?

Queen Esther

89,089 次观看 • 6 天前