正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Many low-carbon technologies require copper. From renewable power installations such as solar panels and wind turbines, to modern applications including #ElectricVehicles, many of the key pillars of a low-carbon world rely on copper. More: #GlencoreCopper #MetalOfTheFuture

9 条评论

Pawlo Dlaboha 的头像
Pawlo Dlaboha3 年前

Glencore is a criminal organization and should be treated as such!

Pawlo Dlaboha 的头像
Pawlo Dlaboha3 年前

Glencore is a criminal@organization. Period.

Mex Sim 的头像
Mex Sim3 年前

Copper is like meat in SA, anything with copper will be stripped so consumers will have to insure these products

Richard Curtis 的头像
Richard Curtis3 年前

Chad

Richard Curtis 的头像
Richard Curtis3 年前

Congo

Richard Curtis 的头像
Richard Curtis3 年前

Peru

Richard Curtis 的头像
Richard Curtis3 年前

Child labour and acid dumping

Richard Curtis 的头像
Richard Curtis3 年前

US...bad water

Zapper 的头像
Zapper2 年前

Voetsek

相关视频

Replacing gas with renewables for California’s electricity has reduced twice the carbon as all the world’s carbon capture projects Just to give an idea of how insanely useless carbon capture and direct air capture are, consider the following. All 77 of the world’s carbon-capture facilities capture about 64 million tonnes of CO2 per year. But a quarter of that CO2 is added back to the air from the energy needed to capture and pipe the CO2 and more is added back because 82 percent of all CO2 captured is used to dig more oil out of the ground, a process that releases 85 percent of the captured CO2 back to the air. Accounting for both leaves a net of only 19 million tonnes of CO2 per year captured. Yet from 2023 to 2026, California’s main electricity grid replaced 61 percent of its fossil gas with wind-water-solar electricity plus imports, which themselves are 57 percent wind-water-solar. This replacement of gas has eliminated 38 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent per year, or twice the current world net carbon capture rate. What is more, replacing the gas has also eliminated the mining and processing of the gas, the health costs of the air pollution from mining and burning the gas, and the need for and cost of capture equipment and carbon dioxide pipelines. Carbon capture and direct air capture only increase air pollution health damage, mining, pipelines, and costs. Plus, a single dollar spent on carbon capture simply increases carbon dioxide relative to spending the same dollar on renewables replacing a fossil source. The bottom line is that we should invest in electrification and replacing fossil fuels with clean, renewable energy instead of subsidizing carbon capture, direct air capture, and related gimmicks. CCUS projects Energy, health, and climate costs of carbon capture and direct air capture versus 100%-wind-water-solar climate policies in 149 countries The health and climate impacts of carbon capture and direct air capture Fossil gas use down 61% in California YouTube

Mark Z. Jacobson

10,636 次观看 • 3 个月前