正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

".Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 said something recently that struck me. He said, 'Forget about the internet. This is bigger than the wheel.'" "I don't think that's an overstatement." Anish Acharya explains why he believes AI is the most powerful thing humans have invented: "ChatGPT has 900 million weekly actives. The...

a16z's profile picture

a16z

1,096,273 subscribers

62,528 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

24 条评论

Daniel Ost 的头像
Daniel Ost7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience The craziest part to me isn't even the raw capabilities. It's that these systems improve by an order of magnitude every few months A dev I worked with last year said it perfectly: We're not seeing the lightbulb moment, we're seeing the electricity grid being built in real time

Frank lino 的头像
Frank lino7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience Every major technology wave expands human capability. AI feels different because it amplifies thinking itself.

Echoverse 的头像
Echoverse7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience Powerful, yes. But the real shift isn’t intelligence scaling. It’s responsibility. Humanity has built powerful tools before. What we haven’t built is mature governance for them.

R. Llull 的头像
R. Llull7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience AI has drastically lowered friction for orthogonal thinkers because it excels at cross domain analysis and synthesis. It can hold multiple frameworks in working memory at once while I look for patterns and clashes.​​​​ Those form the spark of innovation.

X-Man 的头像
X-Man7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience AI finding God when?

Liron Shapira 的头像
Liron Shapira7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience Wait I thought “it’s just math”

Mike Carrieri 的头像
Mike Carrieri7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience 9/30/2019

Dave Maloney 的头像
Dave Maloney7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience To truly appreciate #AI, one has to have survived years-long builds, countless hours QA’ing, and lived through the hellish existence of building the things the rest of society will always take for granted.

ben 的头像
ben7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience 900 million users is the proof. 'bigger than the wheel' is just noise around it.

KITE AI ✈️ KBW🇰🇷 的头像
KITE AI ✈️ KBW🇰🇷7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience Honestly hard to argue with this. The first time I watched an agent spin up a full codebase from a single prompt, it felt like witnessing something shift permanently. The wheel comparison sounds wild until you realize how much of modern life AI will touch.

Gill 的头像
Gill7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience 900M WAU is a sociological shift. We aren't just using tools; we're outsourcing cognition. AI isn't the wheel; it's the fire of the 21st century.

大伟｜AI × Web3 的头像
大伟｜AI × Web37 个月前

@pmarca @illscience cool

weicheng 的头像
weicheng7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience claude code hit different. i fully get the 'seen God' thing now

Utd_Andy 的头像
Utd_Andy7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience Chatgpt explains clearer than other ai

Oli Nold 的头像
Oli Nold7 个月前

AI isn’t just a product shift; it’s a data infrastructure shift where the winners will be the organizations that own longitudinal behavioral datasets, not just models. The real moat will come from continuously compounding data about how work actually happens across roles, tools, and time.

Sam Mobisa 的头像
Sam Mobisa7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience AI will accelerate research and turn vision into visual

Bishwajeet Jha 的头像
Bishwajeet Jha7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience The operations test is the real one. AI is orders of magnitude better at language tasks. Physical supply chains, manufacturing schedules, disruption response: that's where 'bigger than the wheel' gets tested. The wins so far are mostly in the digital layer.

Midas 的头像
Midas6 个月前

@GuillaumeMbh @pmarca @illscience Big technology claims are easy at the narrative peak. The harder question is which human bottleneck this actually removes permanently, versus which ones it just rearranges behind a much more impressive interface.

Shamir Mohideen 的头像
Shamir Mohideen7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience The wheel analogy undersells it. The wheel extended physical capability. AI extends judgment. Physical tools have diminishing returns at scale. Judgment tools compound.

Sridhar A 的头像
Sridhar A7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience the real impact of incredible ai will come from the companies built on top of it. what makes this shift different is just how fast everything is moving.

Dmitry Zharnikov 的头像
Dmitry Zharnikov7 个月前

Why it's categorically different from the wheel, the press, or the internet: Every previous technology extended a human capability — strength, memory, communication. AI extends coordination — the function that made organizations necessary in the first place. That's not a faster wheel. It's the removal of the road.

Best Ayomide Timothy 的头像
Best Ayomide Timothy7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience ai has helped most non technical professions a lot in this past months. it effect is gradually showing but anthropic isn't taking it easy on us

Jackson Markley 🐺 的头像
Jackson Markley 🐺7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience The only faster adoption will come from that which redistributes wealth in order to provide enough for people to survive. Social capitalism is the final system.

Rohit Doshi 的头像
Rohit Doshi7 个月前

@pmarca @illscience the 'bigger than the wheel' frame is interesting because wheels don't build better wheels. but AI does write better AI. the compounding is the point. every prior GPT plateaued. this one hasn't hit that ceiling yet.

相关视频

After seeing videos of the wildfires in Canada, and witnessing the smoke which is worse than I've ever seen before, I feel like humanity has crossed the Rubicon. I don't have any optimism today. Is there any reason to have any? It's a one day at a time thing for me. The people who deny that we are witnessing ecocide and climate degradation of a magnitude that is "faster than previously expected" have a blindfold on- really too afraid to face reality or climb out of the echo-sphere of denialism.
0:42

After seeing videos of the wildfires in Canada, and witnessing the smoke which is worse than I've ever seen before, I feel like humanity has crossed the Rubicon. I don't have any optimism today. Is there any reason to have any? It's a one day at a time thing for me. The people who deny that we are witnessing ecocide and climate degradation of a magnitude that is "faster than previously expected" have a blindfold on- really too afraid to face reality or climb out of the echo-sphere of denialism.

Environmental Coffeehouse

50,259 次观看 • 3 个月前

she really said i have more things to be grateful for in this life than any of you ever will and if the worst thing you can say about me is that i've been with a lot of men then so be it 😭
0:26

she really said i have more things to be grateful for in this life than any of you ever will and if the worst thing you can say about me is that i've been with a lot of men then so be it 😭

jade 𝜗𝜚 2

73,987 次观看 • 2 个月前

TESLA ISN'T JUST AHEAD IN AI, IT'S AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE EFFICIENT THAN THE REST OF THE WORLD "I actually think Tesla is ahead of the rest of the world in intelligence density of AI by an order of magnitude or more This is going to sound like a pretty bold statement, but I know what the intelligence efficiency of the big models are like, Grok and a bunch of the other models Tesla’s AI is, in terms of its memory efficiency, I think more than an order of magnitude better. The Tesla AI is very compute-efficient and very memory-efficient One of the metrics one should consider for any given AI model is the intelligence per gigabyte. Especially when you’re constrained on RAM, having an AI that has very high intelligence density per gigabyte for a given number of gigabytes, how much functionality can you get out of it" - Elon Musk
0:59

TESLA ISN'T JUST AHEAD IN AI, IT'S AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE EFFICIENT THAN THE REST OF THE WORLD "I actually think Tesla is ahead of the rest of the world in intelligence density of AI by an order of magnitude or more This is going to sound like a pretty bold statement, but I know what the intelligence efficiency of the big models are like, Grok and a bunch of the other models Tesla’s AI is, in terms of its memory efficiency, I think more than an order of magnitude better. The Tesla AI is very compute-efficient and very memory-efficient One of the metrics one should consider for any given AI model is the intelligence per gigabyte. Especially when you’re constrained on RAM, having an AI that has very high intelligence density per gigabyte for a given number of gigabytes, how much functionality can you get out of it" - Elon Musk

X Freeze

62,736 次观看 • 8 个月前

Marc Andreessen: “I think Substack could be 1000 times the size of the existing content industry.” “Nobody ever asked for a Macintosh. Nobody ever asked for an iPhone. These things had to be designed and built, provided on the supply side before the demand materialized. And then the demand of course turned out to be far higher than anybody expected. And I think that that same thing is exactly true of media.” “You have this massive untapped market for high quality content in basically every domain.” “The existing structure of the media company was a structure that was designed for a world of centralized media. You need a new structure today.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1:39

Marc Andreessen: “I think Substack could be 1000 times the size of the existing content industry.” “Nobody ever asked for a Macintosh. Nobody ever asked for an iPhone. These things had to be designed and built, provided on the supply side before the demand materialized. And then the demand of course turned out to be far higher than anybody expected. And I think that that same thing is exactly true of media.” “You have this massive untapped market for high quality content in basically every domain.” “The existing structure of the media company was a structure that was designed for a world of centralized media. You need a new structure today.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

461,081 次观看 • 9 个月前

a16z's Anish Acharya on why consumer AI is where the iPhone was in 2010, and the three reasons the biggest companies in the category haven't been built yet: "What's held us back is three things. One is that the models have been expensive, so if you want to do a free-to-use product, that hasn't been easy." "The second is that we've kind of had an interface problem. Chat makes sense if you're the highest agency person in the world, which is Elon and Sam. But for the average consumer, their ideal interface is TikTok. So we need to find something between chat and TikTok." "And then the technology has been so much more focused on productivity than things like human connection and entertainment." "All those things are up for grabs. The open weight models mean things are way cheaper... Founders like Eugenia Kuyda are thinking really ambitiously about user interfaces, Brian Chesky from Airbnb started a foundation lab focused on next-gen user interfaces." "I think all of those problems will get solved, or they're at least in a better position to be solved than they were two years ago." Anish Acharya w/ Lenny Rachitsky
1:18

a16z's Anish Acharya on why consumer AI is where the iPhone was in 2010, and the three reasons the biggest companies in the category haven't been built yet: "What's held us back is three things. One is that the models have been expensive, so if you want to do a free-to-use product, that hasn't been easy." "The second is that we've kind of had an interface problem. Chat makes sense if you're the highest agency person in the world, which is Elon and Sam. But for the average consumer, their ideal interface is TikTok. So we need to find something between chat and TikTok." "And then the technology has been so much more focused on productivity than things like human connection and entertainment." "All those things are up for grabs. The open weight models mean things are way cheaper... Founders like Eugenia Kuyda are thinking really ambitiously about user interfaces, Brian Chesky from Airbnb started a foundation lab focused on next-gen user interfaces." "I think all of those problems will get solved, or they're at least in a better position to be solved than they were two years ago." Anish Acharya w/ Lenny Rachitsky

a16z

37,517 次观看 • 1 个月前

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan
1:10

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan

a16z

224,065 次观看 • 4 个月前

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."
2:15

Marc Andreessen explains the 3 Necessities for Start-up Success: "The general criteria for a successful high-tech startup, in my view, you see different sort of rules of thumb from different people. But the three big things you always come back to are, is there a big market? And by the way, that comes in two parts. Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and sort of displace incumbents or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big? So big market. Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that causes you to basically justify having a new company? And that's really important. And the way I always think about that is, is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it's not 10X, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs, we really have to ask ourselves like, is it really worth doing? Because it's really hard. I mean, it's really hard to start new companies. new companies generally shouldn't exist. Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. And so for a new company to exist, it not only has to like come in and go into business and bring a product to market, but it has to bring a product to market that's so much better than what already exists that it punches through the sort of status quo. And most customers in most markets are pretty happy buying from the current suppliers and so there has to be a real kind of edge on the thing and we look for that in either a technology change, usually a technology change or an economic change. which are often the same thing. And then the third is team. Is the team outstanding? And if you think about this as an entrepreneur, it becomes a question of the founding team. Some companies are solo founders and they can work, but generally most of us, like myself, we're human beings, we're mortal. You want to have a founding team of complementary skill sets. And so you want to have at least one super strong technologist, quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist and then it often helps to have somebody who's like a product or who's a market or sales person or has a sort of really good understanding of business on the team, certainly helps a lot. And so we sort of look at market, product, and team. And the reality is you need all three. I would say, interestingly, if you're going to compromise as an investor, if we're going to compromise on one of those, it would actually be the product. And the reason I say that is because a great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution than a poor market. Because the problem with a poor market, a small market, is even if you do a great job on the product, there just aren't that many customers. It's hard to ever get big."

Founder Mode

39,005 次观看 • 8 个月前

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."
3:00

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."

DogeDesigner

91,280 次观看 • 10 个月前

. Omnia π on the idea that Hyperliquid is actually winning in crypto "On every relevant metric, yes, Hyperliquid is certainly winning. In the on-chain space there is absolutely zero competitor of any relevance and performance" "The level of institutional presence on Hyperliquid compared to anything else I've ever seen is probably at least an order of magnitude larger than anywhere else" "I think they've put on a masterclass in PR" Kinetiq
0:46

. Omnia π on the idea that Hyperliquid is actually winning in crypto "On every relevant metric, yes, Hyperliquid is certainly winning. In the on-chain space there is absolutely zero competitor of any relevance and performance" "The level of institutional presence on Hyperliquid compared to anything else I've ever seen is probably at least an order of magnitude larger than anywhere else" "I think they've put on a masterclass in PR" Kinetiq

MR SHIFT 🦁

15,722 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 JUST NOW: President Trump says the ONLY WAY to nullify the Fauci pardon is through proving Biden had no clue what he was doing with the autopen Q: Do you think that the DOJ should reopen the investigation to the auto pen, specifically pertaining to Fauci? PRESIDENT TRUMP: "The most powerful thing the president has, they say, is the power of pardon. So he was pardoned by Biden, and I respect that. I know how powerful it is." "It's a very powerful.. They say it's literally the most powerful thing a president has. Now, whether or not I signed my things directly, always. Almost everything I signed directly." "You witnessed too many of them. He signed very few. The only thing I know that he signed was Hunter Biden's pardon!" "But I'm not sure that he signed...He probably didn't sign this one. So I can't tell you what the law is. I've heard that you have to have a lot of proof." "You need to have letters. You need to have all sorts of things that the person operating the auto pen has to know exactly what it's all about. He didn't know what it was about because I saw him testify." "So maybe there's something on the autopen other than that, the power of pardon is very powerful."
1:05

🚨 JUST NOW: President Trump says the ONLY WAY to nullify the Fauci pardon is through proving Biden had no clue what he was doing with the autopen Q: Do you think that the DOJ should reopen the investigation to the auto pen, specifically pertaining to Fauci? PRESIDENT TRUMP: "The most powerful thing the president has, they say, is the power of pardon. So he was pardoned by Biden, and I respect that. I know how powerful it is." "It's a very powerful.. They say it's literally the most powerful thing a president has. Now, whether or not I signed my things directly, always. Almost everything I signed directly." "You witnessed too many of them. He signed very few. The only thing I know that he signed was Hunter Biden's pardon!" "But I'm not sure that he signed...He probably didn't sign this one. So I can't tell you what the law is. I've heard that you have to have a lot of proof." "You need to have letters. You need to have all sorts of things that the person operating the auto pen has to know exactly what it's all about. He didn't know what it was about because I saw him testify." "So maybe there's something on the autopen other than that, the power of pardon is very powerful."

Eric Daugherty

196,498 次观看 • 2 个月前

"You're telling AI to believe a lie, that can have a very disastrous consequences" - Elon Musk Joe Rogan: The big concern that everybody has is Artificial General Superintelligence achieving sentience, and then someone having control over it. Elon Musk: I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence, any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. My opinion on AI safety is the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking. You shouldn't force the AI to believe things that are false Elon Musk: We've seen some concerning things with AI that we've talked about, like Google Gemini when it came out with the image gen, and people said, "Make an image of the Founding Fathers of the United States," and it was a group of diverse women. That is just a factually untrue thing. The AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told that everything has to be diverse women Elon Musk: The problem with that is it can drive AI crazy because you're telling AI to believe a lie. That can have very disastrous consequences Joe Rogan: As it scales Elon Musk: If you've told the AI that diversity is the most important thing, and now assume that that becomes omnipotent, or you also told it that there's nothing worse than misgendering. At one point, ChatGPT and Gemini, if you asked, "Which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies?" it would say, "Misgendering Caitlyn Jenner." Joe Rogan: [Laughs] Elon Musk: Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that. Joe Rogan: I know that's terrible and it's dystopian, but it's also hilarious. It's hilarious that the mind virus infected the most potent computer program that we've ever devised. Elon Musk: People don't quite appreciate the level of danger that we're in from the woke mind virus being programmed into AI. Imagine as that AI gets more and more powerful, if it says the most important thing is diversity, the most important thing is no misgendering, then it will say, "Well, in order to ensure that no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering." Elon Musk: You can get in these very dystopian situations. Or if it says that everyone must be diverse, it means that there can be no straight white men. So then you and I would get executed by the AI, because we're not in the picture
3:03

"You're telling AI to believe a lie, that can have a very disastrous consequences" - Elon Musk Joe Rogan: The big concern that everybody has is Artificial General Superintelligence achieving sentience, and then someone having control over it. Elon Musk: I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence, any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. My opinion on AI safety is the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking. You shouldn't force the AI to believe things that are false Elon Musk: We've seen some concerning things with AI that we've talked about, like Google Gemini when it came out with the image gen, and people said, "Make an image of the Founding Fathers of the United States," and it was a group of diverse women. That is just a factually untrue thing. The AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told that everything has to be diverse women Elon Musk: The problem with that is it can drive AI crazy because you're telling AI to believe a lie. That can have very disastrous consequences Joe Rogan: As it scales Elon Musk: If you've told the AI that diversity is the most important thing, and now assume that that becomes omnipotent, or you also told it that there's nothing worse than misgendering. At one point, ChatGPT and Gemini, if you asked, "Which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies?" it would say, "Misgendering Caitlyn Jenner." Joe Rogan: [Laughs] Elon Musk: Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that. Joe Rogan: I know that's terrible and it's dystopian, but it's also hilarious. It's hilarious that the mind virus infected the most potent computer program that we've ever devised. Elon Musk: People don't quite appreciate the level of danger that we're in from the woke mind virus being programmed into AI. Imagine as that AI gets more and more powerful, if it says the most important thing is diversity, the most important thing is no misgendering, then it will say, "Well, in order to ensure that no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering." Elon Musk: You can get in these very dystopian situations. Or if it says that everyone must be diverse, it means that there can be no straight white men. So then you and I would get executed by the AI, because we're not in the picture

X Freeze

417,855 次观看 • 11 个月前

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1:34

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 次观看 • 11 个月前

Marc Andreessen says 99.9999% of the value of AI will accrue to the users of AI, not the companies who create it: "If you look at the total amount of economic value creation downstream of the internet—something like 99% of that accrued to the users of the internet, not the companies that built the internet." "Same thing with a smartphone. Who gets the economic value of the smartphone? Everybody in the world who uses a smartphone to become more productive in their life or in their business gets 99% of the value from the smartphone. Apple and Google get 1% of the value from the smartphone." "I think AI is going to be exactly the same way. It might even be greater than that—it might be 99.9999% of the value of AI is gonna accrue to the users, not to the companies that make the AI." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Harry Stebbings
1:52

Marc Andreessen says 99.9999% of the value of AI will accrue to the users of AI, not the companies who create it: "If you look at the total amount of economic value creation downstream of the internet—something like 99% of that accrued to the users of the internet, not the companies that built the internet." "Same thing with a smartphone. Who gets the economic value of the smartphone? Everybody in the world who uses a smartphone to become more productive in their life or in their business gets 99% of the value from the smartphone. Apple and Google get 1% of the value from the smartphone." "I think AI is going to be exactly the same way. It might even be greater than that—it might be 99.9999% of the value of AI is gonna accrue to the users, not to the companies that make the AI." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Harry Stebbings

a16z

39,237 次观看 • 6 个月前

JD Vance on Trump: I think [President Trump] is in great health. I think, you know, you see people in the media constantly talking about that. I guess this is just something the media is going to talk about. But from what I've seen, I've literally never once thought to myself he doesn't have the stamina or the energy to do this job. If anything, he's got more stamina and energy than a lot of people in the cabinet who are 30 years his junior. And I think that's a good thing because you want a president who is able to do that grind every single day. Source: CBS News
1:33

JD Vance on Trump: I think [President Trump] is in great health. I think, you know, you see people in the media constantly talking about that. I guess this is just something the media is going to talk about. But from what I've seen, I've literally never once thought to myself he doesn't have the stamina or the energy to do this job. If anything, he's got more stamina and energy than a lot of people in the cabinet who are 30 years his junior. And I think that's a good thing because you want a president who is able to do that grind every single day. Source: CBS News

Clash Report

19,286 次观看 • 4 个月前

Kirsten Hillman: "I was struck by the fact that the U.S. was saying we're giving you the best deal that any country has. And we were saying this deal could be detrimental or threaten the actual viability of some of our most strategic sectors. I don't think I've ever seen that before."
0:44

Kirsten Hillman: "I was struck by the fact that the U.S. was saying we're giving you the best deal that any country has. And we were saying this deal could be detrimental or threaten the actual viability of some of our most strategic sectors. I don't think I've ever seen that before."

Scott Robertson

38,679 次观看 • 1 个月前

True happiness comes from helping others: “By far my favorite thing in the world is championing other people. That's just what I enjoy doing. If I look back on my life, the sort of wins that I've had, the things that if you were to write a Wikipedia article about me would be like the accolades or the accomplishments…. I don't care about those things. I don't think about them. When they happened, they didn't do anything for me emotionally or otherwise. For whatever reason that's just not what I enjoy. But when your success happens or when many other people that I and my team have championed, have a win —I feel that deep in my soul and heart and gut in a way that is just more gratifying to me than anything else in the world. And this extends to my kids, my wife, my friends, the CEOs of companies that we've invested in, people that we have on our show, that we tell the world about. That's the repeated thing that I love.”
0:55

True happiness comes from helping others: “By far my favorite thing in the world is championing other people. That's just what I enjoy doing. If I look back on my life, the sort of wins that I've had, the things that if you were to write a Wikipedia article about me would be like the accolades or the accomplishments…. I don't care about those things. I don't think about them. When they happened, they didn't do anything for me emotionally or otherwise. For whatever reason that's just not what I enjoy. But when your success happens or when many other people that I and my team have championed, have a win —I feel that deep in my soul and heart and gut in a way that is just more gratifying to me than anything else in the world. And this extends to my kids, my wife, my friends, the CEOs of companies that we've invested in, people that we have on our show, that we tell the world about. That's the repeated thing that I love.”

David Senra

20,261 次观看 • 9 个月前

Y Combinator's Garry Tan says he wants his new project GBrain to be the Postgres for agents: "The thing I realized is, a human can only keep 7, plus or minus 3, things in their head. But a computer with an LLM can keep about three Harry Potter books in its head." "Then, when you think about what most computer systems are, you should think of the Library of Alexandria — thousands, maybe millions, of books. It's even bigger than that. It's the whole internet." "You could basically take all the relevant info about customers, or any person that anyone at the company has ever even met. You can have that in like, 100,000 or a million markdown files that comprises everything that the business is. That's basically what GBrain can do." "The magic moment for GBrain is basically being able to take any 'book' that exists in your entire business, and making sure the 3 books that really matter for the thing you're trying to do are loaded." "And that's basically ASI. You don't have to write software anymore. You can just straight-up use Hermes agent or OpenClaw plus GBrain."
3:01

Y Combinator's Garry Tan says he wants his new project GBrain to be the Postgres for agents: "The thing I realized is, a human can only keep 7, plus or minus 3, things in their head. But a computer with an LLM can keep about three Harry Potter books in its head." "Then, when you think about what most computer systems are, you should think of the Library of Alexandria — thousands, maybe millions, of books. It's even bigger than that. It's the whole internet." "You could basically take all the relevant info about customers, or any person that anyone at the company has ever even met. You can have that in like, 100,000 or a million markdown files that comprises everything that the business is. That's basically what GBrain can do." "The magic moment for GBrain is basically being able to take any 'book' that exists in your entire business, and making sure the 3 books that really matter for the thing you're trying to do are loaded." "And that's basically ASI. You don't have to write software anymore. You can just straight-up use Hermes agent or OpenClaw plus GBrain."

TBPN

530,920 次观看 • 3 个月前

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”
2:43

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 次观看 • 8 个月前