Marcus Rogers 6 - Here is another one…

Here are 7 things you should know about my Mom’s interview with Marcus Rogers. a 🧵/ 1 - @MarcusjRogers is the only person who has been covering this story who seems to be seeking and submitting to pastoral counsel as part of his process. #daystar

2 - In July 2024, rumors about Pete reached their peak, spreading rapidly among trusted ministry partners and friends. While whispers of these allegations had been circulating since March, they gained significant traction during this time. It became evident that these previously debunked accusations were being reignited—this time actively fueled by Jonathan and Suzy, who were determined to spread these harmful falsehoods to anyone willing to listen. Understanding the gravity of the situation and the potential damage these escalating rumors could cause, Pete took immediate action. On the advice of his attorney, he voluntarily underwent a polygraph examination to clear his name. The results were definitive: Pete passed the test with a probability he was telling the truth at 99.5% accuracy, confirming he was innocent. (More on the polygraph examination in the next tweet.) In @reachjulieroys article, she falsely implies that Doug Weiss was involved in orchestrating the polygraph process. This claim is entirely baseless. Doug had no involvement whatsoever and was completely unaware that Pete had even taken a polygraph test until after the results were finalized. This deliberate misrepresentation is yet another example of how Roys manipulates the narrative, distorting key facts to fit her agenda rather than presenting the truth. #daystar

3 - To set the record straight, I am sharing screenshots of Pete’s polygraph results. a. The first screenshot contains the name of the polygrapher, Ralph Standefer, who has absolutely no connection to Doug Weiss, despite the false claims by Jonathan Lamb and Julie Roys. b. The second screenshot shows Mr. Standefer’s conclusion that “the statistical probability that Pete told the truth was 99.5%.” The polygraph examination was conducted by Ralph Standefer on July 19, 2024. Mr. Standefer is a highly respected, licensed polygraph examiner in Texas with over two decades of experience. He graduated as Salutatorian of his class at the Texas DPS Polygraph School in 2003 and is a member of the American Polygraph Association, the American Association of Police Polygraphs, and the Texas Association of Law Enforcement Polygraph Investigators. In his most recent role, he served as the Internal Affairs Unit Commander and the department’s Polygraph Examiner from 2015 until 2024. Over the course of his career, he conducted more than 1,500 polygraph examinations for employment screenings, criminal investigations, and internal investigations. These facts unequivocally demonstrate the credibility of the polygraph process and refute the unfounded allegations made by Jonathan Lamb and Julie Roys. It is clear that their narrative is not rooted in truth but, instead, what appears to be a coordinated smear campaign.

4 - Marcus was provided a copy of this email. Some context, my brother hired an attorney to argue that making a positive statement about our mom’s new husband violated his religious rights. Jonathan sought a contract, an ironclad assurance that he would become president of Daystar. In return, he threatened not to release secret recordings of private meetings.

5 - Our prayer call center has been inundated with hundreds of messages like this. Every day people are clearly discerning the truth.

7- @suzycatlamb and @j_lamb false allegations have not passed the smell test at any reputable newsdesks because they have presented ZERO evidence that abuse occurred.

I listened to both audio recordings, and my initial reaction was, "So what?" Is this supposed to convince us that Jonathan has an erratic wife? Rachel probably chuckled at the woman who called Jonathan's wife a "bowl of Jello," as she can relate to such tactics used to discredit someone. This just makes Rachel seem like a high school bully for choosing to leak this particular audio. Also, in one of the a previous recording taken by Jonathan, he tells his mom that she has been censoring negative comments, I can see that happening here. Where are the audios supporting Jonathan and Suzy? Rachel, you can do better.