Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Mark Cuban reveals why OpenAI will never make back the trillion dollars they're planning to spend on AI infrastructure "They'll never get it. They're just burning away that money at scale. It's not that AI is not going to work but look at Apple, right? They haven't spent next...

229,894 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

John Fredericks explains the fraud in Minnesota is not going to stop because Democrats are involved and it’s a trade off for the entire Somalian community’s votes “We've got a whistleblower that is a TSA agent at the Minneapolis International Airport who said on a weekly basis, two Somali men would go through with bags and bags of cash, hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, go right in the baggage, put it on the airplane, take it out of the country. Nobody said anything, even though they had to log it in. All the cops looked the other way. Everybody looked the other way. Why? Because they're all in the take. There's no doubt about it. You've got videos now with this young journalist out there. You've got videos that he put up where basically Somalian parents go in with their children, check them in, get an envelope for cash and leave, right? So they just keep stealing the money in perpetuity and why not? Now, here's why it's not going to stop — T is why the Democrats are going to continue to defend them. You have to understand the way the Democrats look at this, not like we do. These are their future voters. They need illegals in here voting. This is the only way they stay in power. So this is their voting block. This is why they're resisting all the immigration deportations, because every time somebody is deported, they're just losing one of their voters and one of their foot soldiers. So that's what the problem is. So they're gonna look the other way, the Florida's gonna go on, they're gonna keep stealing your money every day, no one cares, and Minnesota politicians are gonna protect them because they elect them.“

Wall Street Apes

54,008 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

What started as a standard White House announcement quickly turned into one of the most revealing Oval Office moments of the year. Trump was there to declare that Washington, D.C. will host the 2027 NFL Draft. But when reporters started firing off questions, the real fireworks began. First up: immigration. A reporter asked Trump about a new program offering undocumented immigrants $1,000 to self-deport. His answer was blunt—and surprisingly layered. “Yeah, we have millions of people that have come into this country illegally through an administration that didn't know what they were doing. They didn't have a clue. And now we find out officially they didn't, because the president was incompetent. But I could have told you that before.” He explained the idea behind the plan: offer people money to leave—and if they take the offer and prove to be hard-working, they might be allowed back in the right way. “But what we thought we'd do is to self-deport where we're going to pay each one a certain amount of money, and we're going to get him a beautiful flight back to where they came from. And they have a period of time.” “And if they make it, we're going to work with them so that maybe someday, with a little work, they can come back in if they're good people, if they're the kind of people that we want in our company, industrious people that could love our country. And if they're not, they won't. But it will give them a path to becoming, you know, to coming back into the country.” He made it clear that there would be no second chances for those who ignore the opportunity. “So we're going to have, self-deportation, where they deport themselves out of our country, and we'll work with them, and we're going to try. And if if we think they're good, they have, you know, the people we want in our country, they're going to come back into our country. We'll give them a little easier route. But if they don't work and if we take them out after the date, then, they're never coming back.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

351,051 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

374,014 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Elon Musk exposes California Democrat NGOs make a fortune off the homeless “They're getting close to a million dollars per drug zombie — They need to keep them in the area so they get the revenue — They don't arrest the drug dealers because otherwise the drug zombies would leave” “Homeless is the wrong word. Like, homeless implies that somebody got a little behind on their mortgage payments and if they just got a job offer, they'd be back on their feet. But someone who is totally dead inside shuffling along down the street with a needle dangling out of their leg, you know, taking a dump in the middle of the street, they're not, like, one job offer away from getting back on their feet. You know, these sort of charities, they get this money. The money is proportionate to the number of homeless people. Their incentive structure is to maximize the number of drug zombies, not minimize it. That's why they don't arrest the drug dealers 'cause if they arrest the drug dealers, the drug zombies leave and they would stop getting money from the state of California and from- from all the charities. This is a diabolical scam. You're taxed on any money going through the system in San Francisco and that money goes to the homeless industrial complex. When you add up all the money that's flowing, they're getting close to a million dollars per drug zombie. It's like $900,000 or something, like some crazy amount of money is going to these organizations. So they wanna keep people just barely alive. They need to keep them in the area so they get the revenue. They don't arrest the drug dealers because otherwise the drug zombies would leave. If they get too much drugs then they die, so they're kept in this perpetual zone of being addicted, but just barely alive.”

Wall Street Apes

549,103 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg explains why he has never believed in delegation (and why founders shouldn't either): Most CEOs believe their job is to hire great people and get out of the way, but Mark disagrees. "I basically don't believe in delegation." He explains his thinking: "There's so much going on across the company that I can't possibly get involved in all of it. So all these people are going to have a ton of stuff that they're going to do." But that's not a reason to step back. It's a reason to be selective and then go deep. "Fundamentally, if there is a decision that I want to be involved with, I'm going to be involved in it." His argument is simple: if you're the one accountable for everything, why would you ever accept being locked out of something important? "If you're running the company and you're on the hook for everything and there's something that's important at whatever level of detail in the organization, I don't get the logic of saying I'm not going to be involved in that." He's not calling for micromanagement, and he acknowledges he can't be everywhere. What he's rejecting is the idea that hierarchy should be a barrier. That founders should stay in their lane. That diving into the details is somehow a sign of poor leadership. Mark Zuckerberg does add one caveat: "You want to have humility and know that if you're diving into some decision, you may not have the most context immediately." But humility about context is different from staying out entirely. His conclusion is a cultural one: "You want to have the cultural expectation that things are not going to be so hierarchical and you're just going to dive into whatever you want."

Big Brain Business

20,055 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Devs will “cash in” AI gains as time. Dax Raad(dax), creator of OpenCode, on the incentive problem most companies are ignoring: “We forget how big the software engineering industry is. Every company in the world employs software engineers to some degree. The majority of these environments aren't like the most motivating, exciting environments. Most people there are trying to do their job, go home to their kids, have a reasonable life. You give them a button that lets them do their work faster. The natural place for them to go is to hit that button as much as possible, do the same amount of work and just cash in that extra time, right? Which makes total sense. If you have no reason to be above and beyond motivated, you're not going to really use that to push your organization harder. Yeah, these tools may make you more productive, but be really realistic about your employees. Where are they going to cash in those gains? Obviously some companies are not like that. Employees are motivated. They have good reason to be. They're compensated in a way that makes sense, but most places aren't like that. The problem with that is usually in those environments there will be a couple people that are irrationally motivated because they love the work they do, et cetera, even though the rest of the company isn't as motivated. They're usually the ones that are trying to make sure everything is good quality, trying to push everyone to try harder. They're all now overwhelmed by slop PRs. And we've had a few people on our team that have joined and their previous company was like this. They were the person that still cared. The rest of the organization just hits the button and gets their tasks done and they're drowning in just garbage and they're getting burnt out and they're leaving.”

The Pragmatic Engineer

315,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten