Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Mark Steyn explains the stark demographic reality: a 90% population with 1.3 children per couple and a 10% population with 3.5 children will have roughly the same number of grandchildren in only two generations. The transformation is already underway.(2010)
13,689,429 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 38

Mark Steyn shows how stark differences in birth rates between groups can produce dramatic population shifts in a remarkably short time - roughly two generations. The transformation, he argues, is already well underway. This full interview explores the cultural and political consequences of refusing to face that reality. Once the numbers are set in motion, the question is no longer whether change will come, but how fast and on whose terms.👇

Birth rates eventually become election results. The people having the children will inherit every institution the childless majority assumed belonged to them forever.

Exactly. The institutions follow the cradles. Everything else is temporary.

The arithmetic of birth rates is only the first layer. Aldous Huxley already saw what follows when numbers, technology and the hunger for control meet: a society that manages its own decline while calling it progress.👇

They hope this solves aging issues 🤣

It doesn’t solve aging. It changes who inherits the country after the aging is complete.

Sadly, this started a long time ago. I meet with a group of octogenarians. We counted around the table one meeting. I gave birth to one child. That child married and had 2 grandchildren. A second person gave birth to one child. That child remained childless. A third person gave birth to two children, only one of whom lived to give birth to a grandchild. A fourth person gave birth to two children, one of whom had two children. Two of the people adopted children. One person was childless, but had a step child. Of those sitting around the table, half never gave birth. Since the adopted children had been born to someone else, the net production out of the eight of us was five grandchildren. We’re talking octogenarians here. Sure this is a small sample, but it also illustrates the fact that the birth rate dropped precipitously once the birth control pill became a standard part of life which it did three years after my child was born.

Average numbers always hide the stark reality. The shift happening beneath the surface will completely transform the West in just a couple of generations.

Population destruction starts with overtaxation (including inflation). A single income was enough for a happy family. As government grew, two incomes were needed for the same standard of living, then children had to be taken out of the picture.

I just did a quick calculation, and yes it’s surprisingly true.

The numbers never lied. The only surprise is how long it took for the obvious arithmetic to be treated as news.

Muslims don’t work they’re just takers.

- Elon Musk quotes a 2010 Mark Steyn clip explaining how Western birth rate statistics blend low fertility in the ~90% majority population (1.3 children per woman) with much higher rates in a ~10% minority (3.5 children per woman). - This averaging conceals rapid demographic change: the high-fertility group produces roughly as many grandchildren as the low-fertility majority after only two generations despite its small starting size. - Musk stresses that “demographics is destiny,” pointing to the long-term societal shifts driven by these persistent fertility differences.

Mark Steyn was the best thing on GBNews.

Demographic jihad has being planned and going on for years. Check for declarations of various Muslim leaders (including Erdogan and a former Algerian president... "our victory is in our women's wombs"). This, PLUS the Idiocracy (as in 2006 movie) syndrome is leading us to our doom

The math: Generation 1: 90 to 10 (Parents) Generation 2: 117 to 35 (Children) Generation 3: 152 to 122 (Grandchildren) Generation 4: 198 to 427 (Great grandchildren) Each generation is about 25 years By the 4th generation, the incumbent population is a minority Generation 5: 257 to 1494 By the 5th generation, the incumbent population is only 14.5%. It will wiped out through systemic religious conversion The 6th generation will not remember your original religion, traditions, customs and culture, as they will only be 6% - an inconsequential minority! So the baby-producers start at 10%, and in 6 generations end up at 94% We currently are somewhere between the 1st and the 2nd generation, where the unwanted illegal invaders are a clear minority 50 years down the line, the population of the incumbent and the undesirables will be equal In number I'm not saying this, the math is!

I had that book on my bookshelf since it was published. It's a prophecy fulfilled now as it happening to the West and civilization level declines are real. Good luck Gen-Z, you'll see the consequences soon enough.

@MarkSteynOnline is always ahead of the curve.

My grandmother had 21 children . Also 2 died at birth. I wished I could have had a lot more children but it didn’t happen. It’s so important to bring children into the world. I just hope our world keeps growing. I hope it can be a better place for them to keep our world growing. Safe also .

Recorded on April 26, 2010 Mark Steyn, a writer, political commentator, and cultural critic, breaks down the numbers and explains why they spell doom for the Western world with Hoover fellow Peter Robinson on Uncommon Knowledge. .

Taxation on the productive white population, has introduced economic stress that reduces the size of their families. White people are struggling to have families while subsidizing the families of others . The undesirables force Whites out of neighborhoods,schools and cities .

Replacement Rate is rather simple math that is somehow overlooked by the populace. Birth rate foretells societal momentum. Western cultures are in clear downward trend.

Mark Steyn is great, especially when he was Thomas Dolby singing "she blinded me with science".

Can you at least tag @MarkSteynOnline if you are sharing his content?

Perfect

It's not independent variables. The up bring of a pro child family is very likely higher than a only child household. Religion is one of the biggest drivers in fertility, and it's not an independent.

🤔😕

Wow

Documentary: Demographic Winter

Mark Steyn is a climate change denier--enough said.

It's like cancer it takes over from within.

Fascinating. Truly. And pure common sense.

The arithmetic doesn’t care about our feelings. Two generations of that differential and the ratios invert. It’s not a prediction. It’s already the working equation.

Already done for in the USA... The Boosters are Illegal Migrants - especially the fertile ones already expecting or due to bear children. I did some SWAG-ging of Immigration/Naturalization Stats. In the last year(s) of the Biden& Mayorkas Open Borders Racket, we probably had 6.1 Million Legal&Illegal, Full&White-Mixed Hispanic-Latinos vs 1.2 Million Euro-Whites added to the Headcount - a 5:1 Ratio. I presume we passed through the 2:1 Ratio sometime during the Obama Admin. Trump2ndT may slow things down; but I'm convinced that the Full&White-Mixed Hispanic-Latinos have started birthing more than Euro-Whites several years ago... probably during Trump1stT I expect Hispanic-Latinos to become the Majority within CONUS (Alaska & Hawa'ii exceptions) in about 35yrs.

I'm starting to understand, a little more where the idea of a dying civilization is coming from now. Thank you 🙂

So good to be older. Hoping my grandchildren have spines.

So, you are saying he watched the movie Idiocracy (2006)...

Math is Good™



