Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Mark Zuckerberg (Mark Zuckerberg) just explained how the new Muse agent’s secured virtual machine works. Every Muse user can have a confidential cloud virtual machine containing highly private personal data, while the system is designed so even Meta itself cannot see that content. "you don't want someone to have...

rohanpaul_ai's profile picture

Rohan Paul

156,802 subscribers

157,811 просмотров • 5 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly executed the marketing profession. He didn’t announce it. He described it. Zuckerberg: “The AI is actually probably going to be able to find who is going to be interested in your product better than you can.” He is not pitching a better ad tool. He is telling you that your intuition about your own customer is now inferior to his algorithm. For twenty years, the internet was built on demographics. Age. Location. Income. Founders built careers defending customer personas in boardrooms. Zuckerberg is telling you to burn them. Zuckerberg: “Don’t constrain who we’re going to reach.” When you tell the system who to target, you are not helping it. You are crippling it. Every audience filter a marketer applies is a ceiling disguised as a strategy. Human targeting is no longer a competitive advantage. It is a tax. And the takeover does not stop at the audience. It swallows the creative itself. Zuckerberg: “We’re going to be able to come up with like 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.” No agency on Earth can test four thousand variations in real time. The machine does not have taste. It has math. And math does not lose to intuition at scale. For a generation, distribution was the skill. When every company on Earth plugs into the same omniscient ad engine, distribution stops being a weapon. It becomes infrastructure. Like bandwidth. Like cloud compute. Nobody wins because they have better access to AWS. Soon, nobody will win because they have a better media buyer. Which leaves exactly one variable on the board. Zuckerberg: “You just focus on building the best product.” For a decade, mediocre products survived on superior distribution. Bad products with great funnels printed money. That arbitrage is dead. When distribution becomes a utility, the product has nowhere left to hide. Marketing was the mask. Zuckerberg just pulled it off. Most companies are about to find out they never had a product. They had a campaign.
1:25

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly executed the marketing profession. He didn’t announce it. He described it. Zuckerberg: “The AI is actually probably going to be able to find who is going to be interested in your product better than you can.” He is not pitching a better ad tool. He is telling you that your intuition about your own customer is now inferior to his algorithm. For twenty years, the internet was built on demographics. Age. Location. Income. Founders built careers defending customer personas in boardrooms. Zuckerberg is telling you to burn them. Zuckerberg: “Don’t constrain who we’re going to reach.” When you tell the system who to target, you are not helping it. You are crippling it. Every audience filter a marketer applies is a ceiling disguised as a strategy. Human targeting is no longer a competitive advantage. It is a tax. And the takeover does not stop at the audience. It swallows the creative itself. Zuckerberg: “We’re going to be able to come up with like 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.” No agency on Earth can test four thousand variations in real time. The machine does not have taste. It has math. And math does not lose to intuition at scale. For a generation, distribution was the skill. When every company on Earth plugs into the same omniscient ad engine, distribution stops being a weapon. It becomes infrastructure. Like bandwidth. Like cloud compute. Nobody wins because they have better access to AWS. Soon, nobody will win because they have a better media buyer. Which leaves exactly one variable on the board. Zuckerberg: “You just focus on building the best product.” For a decade, mediocre products survived on superior distribution. Bad products with great funnels printed money. That arbitrage is dead. When distribution becomes a utility, the product has nowhere left to hide. Marketing was the mask. Zuckerberg just pulled it off. Most companies are about to find out they never had a product. They had a campaign.

Dustin

139,573 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

you don't have to keep your laptop open for your agents to keep running just type /handoff and send your agent to the cloud with Devin (and close your laptop) from there, your agent gets: - its own Linux VM - shell, IDE, browser - full desktop Computer Use - end-to-end test recordings - ready-to-review PRs - it's own review agent you can continue your session from your phone, computer, or anywhere with an internet connection and you can send as many sessions as you'd like in parallel.
0:35

you don't have to keep your laptop open for your agents to keep running just type /handoff and send your agent to the cloud with Devin (and close your laptop) from there, your agent gets: - its own Linux VM - shell, IDE, browser - full desktop Computer Use - end-to-end test recordings - ready-to-review PRs - it's own review agent you can continue your session from your phone, computer, or anywhere with an internet connection and you can send as many sessions as you'd like in parallel.

nader dabit

61,479 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"You have to practice and play and behave like a winner if you want to win games. It is not just something that you can decide to be. You have to be that every single day in your approach and in your execution."
0:27

"You have to practice and play and behave like a winner if you want to win games. It is not just something that you can decide to be. You have to be that every single day in your approach and in your execution."

The Winning Difference

27,697 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

“After 10 years in development, Mark Zuckerberg says Meta has unveiled what may be the future of communication.” Cleo Abram: I'd love to just hear in your voice what are these? Mark Zuckerberg: Well, these are the First full holographic augmented reality glasses I think that exist in the world. We've made I think it's a few thousand or something, right? Very hard to make each one of these, but this is the culmination of 10 years of research and development that we've done to basically miniaturize all the Computing that you need to have glasses—not a headset—but glasses that can put full Holograms into the world with a wide field of view. So you can imagine sort of in the future we'd be having a version of this conversation where, you know, maybe I or you are not even here. It's like one of us is physically here and the other one is here as a kind of a full body hologram. And it's not just a video call; you can actually interact, you can do things.
1:11

“After 10 years in development, Mark Zuckerberg says Meta has unveiled what may be the future of communication.” Cleo Abram: I'd love to just hear in your voice what are these? Mark Zuckerberg: Well, these are the First full holographic augmented reality glasses I think that exist in the world. We've made I think it's a few thousand or something, right? Very hard to make each one of these, but this is the culmination of 10 years of research and development that we've done to basically miniaturize all the Computing that you need to have glasses—not a headset—but glasses that can put full Holograms into the world with a wide field of view. So you can imagine sort of in the future we'd be having a version of this conversation where, you know, maybe I or you are not even here. It's like one of us is physically here and the other one is here as a kind of a full body hologram. And it's not just a video call; you can actually interact, you can do things.

SatisfyZone

95,640 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mark Zuckerberg (Mark Zuckerberg) on Muse, Meta's personal AI agent I recently sat down with Zuckerberg for episode two of the Sources podcast. We go deep on Muse, Meta's new (and, in my experience over the last few days, very capable) agent that comes with its own virtual machine and can do much more than a chatbot. Zuck, in fact, is confident that Muse will pay for itself by making people money. We also discuss his views on the data center backlash, his concerns about the concentration of power in AI, Meta's recent youth-safety settlement, privacy concerns about Meta's smart glasses, and more. Timestamps: 00:00 Zuckerberg’s Vision for AI 08:34 Data Centers, Jobs and Local Communities 15:03 Why Meta Is Building Personal Superintelligence 19:14 How Zuckerberg Uses Muse 25:00 Muse Pricing and Business Model 30:31 Privacy and Security for Personal Agents 41:06 Who Will Win the Personal AI Agent Market? 44:31 Rebuilding Meta’s AI Lab 54:09 AI Safety and Working With Government 01:01:51 Smart Glasses and Privacy 01:05:50 Teen Safety and Social Media Limits Thanks to the show's premier sponsors: Granola, Mercury, and Atlassian
1:10:10

Mark Zuckerberg (Mark Zuckerberg) on Muse, Meta's personal AI agent I recently sat down with Zuckerberg for episode two of the Sources podcast. We go deep on Muse, Meta's new (and, in my experience over the last few days, very capable) agent that comes with its own virtual machine and can do much more than a chatbot. Zuck, in fact, is confident that Muse will pay for itself by making people money. We also discuss his views on the data center backlash, his concerns about the concentration of power in AI, Meta's recent youth-safety settlement, privacy concerns about Meta's smart glasses, and more. Timestamps: 00:00 Zuckerberg’s Vision for AI 08:34 Data Centers, Jobs and Local Communities 15:03 Why Meta Is Building Personal Superintelligence 19:14 How Zuckerberg Uses Muse 25:00 Muse Pricing and Business Model 30:31 Privacy and Security for Personal Agents 41:06 Who Will Win the Personal AI Agent Market? 44:31 Rebuilding Meta’s AI Lab 54:09 AI Safety and Working With Government 01:01:51 Smart Glasses and Privacy 01:05:50 Teen Safety and Social Media Limits Thanks to the show's premier sponsors: Granola, Mercury, and Atlassian

Alex Heath

225,378 просмотров • 5 дней назад

IMAGINE MARK ZUCKERBERG IS RIGHT: In a recent interview with Complex, Zuckerberg talks about the future of the Meta glasses He talks about the transition from flip phones to smart phones, when smart phones came out it was clear that in 5 years all flip phones would become them He used this same concept on glasses. Billions of people wear glasses if that is for actual need or even sunglasses, and now technological infused glasses are coming out and who is the leader in it? Mark Zuckerberg and Meta What if Zuckerberg is right and in 5 years from now it will be the norm to have some level of technology in your eyewear? $META would go to a whole new level if that event played out
0:36

IMAGINE MARK ZUCKERBERG IS RIGHT: In a recent interview with Complex, Zuckerberg talks about the future of the Meta glasses He talks about the transition from flip phones to smart phones, when smart phones came out it was clear that in 5 years all flip phones would become them He used this same concept on glasses. Billions of people wear glasses if that is for actual need or even sunglasses, and now technological infused glasses are coming out and who is the leader in it? Mark Zuckerberg and Meta What if Zuckerberg is right and in 5 years from now it will be the norm to have some level of technology in your eyewear? $META would go to a whole new level if that event played out

dray

12,466 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here is the actual GOP candidate for President of the United States attempting to say something about Mark Zuckerberg which is literally all I can figure out from this 90-SECOND LONG SENTENCE. 😵‍💫 “So Mark Zuckerberg called me first of all he called me a few times she called me after the event that he said that was really amazing it was very brave and you know and he actually announced he's not going to support a Democrat because he can't because he respected me for what I did that day I think what I did maybe was a norm to me it was a normal response but I was called by Mark Zuckerberg yesterday the day before on this same subject and he actually apologized he said they made a mistake etc etc in the correcting mistake a Google nobody called from Google one of the things I do in a show like yours you you show you know you see them Fox but what you really see it is all over the place they take clips of your show that you're doing right now with me and if I do a good job they're going to vote for me they're going to vote for me because it's not just on Fox it's on Fox is a smaller part of it you're on all over this those little beautiful cell phones you're on you're all over the place you have a product you have a great product you have a great brand so you have to get out you have to get out you have to do things like your show and other shows and Google has been very bad they've been very irresponsible and I have a feeling that Google isn't going to be close to shut down because I don't think Congress is going to take it I really don't think so Google has to be careful now I will say this I believe Mark Zuckerberg he called me so he called me a lot they are working and I think they fixed it but what can he's not doing what he did four years ago with the five hundred million dollars I don't believe.”
1:30

Here is the actual GOP candidate for President of the United States attempting to say something about Mark Zuckerberg which is literally all I can figure out from this 90-SECOND LONG SENTENCE. 😵‍💫 “So Mark Zuckerberg called me first of all he called me a few times she called me after the event that he said that was really amazing it was very brave and you know and he actually announced he's not going to support a Democrat because he can't because he respected me for what I did that day I think what I did maybe was a norm to me it was a normal response but I was called by Mark Zuckerberg yesterday the day before on this same subject and he actually apologized he said they made a mistake etc etc in the correcting mistake a Google nobody called from Google one of the things I do in a show like yours you you show you know you see them Fox but what you really see it is all over the place they take clips of your show that you're doing right now with me and if I do a good job they're going to vote for me they're going to vote for me because it's not just on Fox it's on Fox is a smaller part of it you're on all over this those little beautiful cell phones you're on you're all over the place you have a product you have a great product you have a great brand so you have to get out you have to get out you have to do things like your show and other shows and Google has been very bad they've been very irresponsible and I have a feeling that Google isn't going to be close to shut down because I don't think Congress is going to take it I really don't think so Google has to be careful now I will say this I believe Mark Zuckerberg he called me so he called me a lot they are working and I think they fixed it but what can he's not doing what he did four years ago with the five hundred million dollars I don't believe.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

2,250,292 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Just when you thought claw machines couldn’t be more of a scam. Try operating it from your phone. But there's something here that I really like. I can't quite articulate what it is yet. It feels like the future. It's a claw machine, but not just any claw machine. These are connected to the internet and people can play them from anywhere in the world, from their phones. They're controlling a real physical machine in real time, trying to win real physical prizes. And if they win, the prize either gets mailed to them or converted into a digital form and emailed to them instantly. You will not believe how many plays this thing got in one night. People are obsessed with this because it takes the satisfaction of a claw machine, the nostalgia, the challenge, the thrill of winning something, and it makes it accessible from anywhere at any time. You don't have to be at an arcade. You don't have to be at a mall. You can be sitting on your couch at midnight and decide you want to try to win a toy or a gift card or whatever's loaded in the machine. And this is interesting because you only need to own one physical machine, but you can have thousands of people playing it all over the world. And if multiple people want to play at the same time, then you can charge extra. If you have a fixed supply and high demand, your price goes up. The prizes can be anything, toys, electronics, gift cards, merch, whatever. People can share with their friends. They play over and over. It becomes content. It becomes competition. People stream themselves trying to win. And my mind is exploding with possibilities because it's not just a vending machine business. It's an entertainment business, it's e-commerce, it's gamification, it's live streaming, all wrapped into one. And someone just figured out how to make it work with a claw machine. 10,000 plays. That's how many plays this guy got overnight on his virtual claw machine business. You could do this with anything.
1:26

Just when you thought claw machines couldn’t be more of a scam. Try operating it from your phone. But there's something here that I really like. I can't quite articulate what it is yet. It feels like the future. It's a claw machine, but not just any claw machine. These are connected to the internet and people can play them from anywhere in the world, from their phones. They're controlling a real physical machine in real time, trying to win real physical prizes. And if they win, the prize either gets mailed to them or converted into a digital form and emailed to them instantly. You will not believe how many plays this thing got in one night. People are obsessed with this because it takes the satisfaction of a claw machine, the nostalgia, the challenge, the thrill of winning something, and it makes it accessible from anywhere at any time. You don't have to be at an arcade. You don't have to be at a mall. You can be sitting on your couch at midnight and decide you want to try to win a toy or a gift card or whatever's loaded in the machine. And this is interesting because you only need to own one physical machine, but you can have thousands of people playing it all over the world. And if multiple people want to play at the same time, then you can charge extra. If you have a fixed supply and high demand, your price goes up. The prizes can be anything, toys, electronics, gift cards, merch, whatever. People can share with their friends. They play over and over. It becomes content. It becomes competition. People stream themselves trying to win. And my mind is exploding with possibilities because it's not just a vending machine business. It's an entertainment business, it's e-commerce, it's gamification, it's live streaming, all wrapped into one. And someone just figured out how to make it work with a claw machine. 10,000 plays. That's how many plays this guy got overnight on his virtual claw machine business. You could do this with anything.

Chris Koerner

49,171 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Mark Zuckerberg Says Everyone Will Want AI Glasses in the Future “They can see what you see and hear what you hear and you can talk to them throughout the day … We're also very focused on … personal relationships … Having an AI that can help you with that is going to be super valuable.”
1:52

Mark Zuckerberg Says Everyone Will Want AI Glasses in the Future “They can see what you see and hear what you hear and you can talk to them throughout the day … We're also very focused on … personal relationships … Having an AI that can help you with that is going to be super valuable.”

Chief Nerd

71,152 просмотров • 1 год назад

"You have to practice and play and behave like a winner if you want to win games. You can't just decide you're going to be that day a winner. That's not how it is. You have to be that every single day in your approach and in your execution."
0:27

"You have to practice and play and behave like a winner if you want to win games. You can't just decide you're going to be that day a winner. That's not how it is. You have to be that every single day in your approach and in your execution."

The Winning Difference

42,040 просмотров • 1 год назад

Mark Zuckerberg says he learned to fly helicopters because he was tired of being driven everywhere "You want your car to have almost as much horsepower as your helicopter" "My security team convinced me for 10 years that I should just let them drive me places" "Eventually I was just like, I can't do this. I need the freedom. I need to be able to drive myself" "So I started learning how to fly helicopters... It's a good tool to have in the arsenal"
0:55

Mark Zuckerberg says he learned to fly helicopters because he was tired of being driven everywhere "You want your car to have almost as much horsepower as your helicopter" "My security team convinced me for 10 years that I should just let them drive me places" "Eventually I was just like, I can't do this. I need the freedom. I need to be able to drive myself" "So I started learning how to fly helicopters... It's a good tool to have in the arsenal"

dank

2,447,906 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"He wanted his life back. He didn't want to have to work on holidays. He didn't want to be away from more family gatherings. He didn't want to have to...take a shower with your phone up against the shower door so you can see a text that's coming in, or take your phone with you to the urinal and hold it in one hand while you take care of your business in the other. That's the life that we live." - Adam Schefter on Woj's retirement
1:08

"He wanted his life back. He didn't want to have to work on holidays. He didn't want to be away from more family gatherings. He didn't want to have to...take a shower with your phone up against the shower door so you can see a text that's coming in, or take your phone with you to the urinal and hold it in one hand while you take care of your business in the other. That's the life that we live." - Adam Schefter on Woj's retirement

Awful Announcing

3,053,271 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Mark Zuckerberg paid $500 million dollars during the 2020 election in Swing States and “captured the county clerks and the Secretaries of States in these states” to ensure they were flooded with ballot drop boxes “What happened in the 2020 election?l “Oh, I think it was rigged” “Mark Zuckerberg investing $500 million in a Get Out the Democrat vote campaign. And they focused on the, on the swing states, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona. They focused in, what they did is they basically did what I would refer to as agency capture. They went in and they captured the, the county clerks and the secretaries of States in these states. They basically said, we have a get out the Vote campaign program, and if you will implement it exactly the way that we say that you must implement it. We will give you massive amounts of money to run your elections, But if you do not run it the way that we say, then we can claw all that money back. Well, think about it, if you're a small county in Wisconsin and you get $300,000 from Mark Zuckerberg's Foundation to make sure that there are drop boxes in your, in your Democrat heavy areas, — if you do not carry out, you take that money, you sign that contract and you do not do exactly what that foundation said, you were gonna have to use public money to pay it back, you most likely would've ended up in prison.” So flood our swing states with drop boxes they can put unlimited amounts of fraudulent mail in ballots in or we will throw you in prison…. Mark Zuckerberg can NEVER be trusted. He rigged the 2020 election “That's just one example of the way that the election was rigged. The Mark Zuckerberg money was huge.”
2:03

Mark Zuckerberg paid $500 million dollars during the 2020 election in Swing States and “captured the county clerks and the Secretaries of States in these states” to ensure they were flooded with ballot drop boxes “What happened in the 2020 election?l “Oh, I think it was rigged” “Mark Zuckerberg investing $500 million in a Get Out the Democrat vote campaign. And they focused on the, on the swing states, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona. They focused in, what they did is they basically did what I would refer to as agency capture. They went in and they captured the, the county clerks and the secretaries of States in these states. They basically said, we have a get out the Vote campaign program, and if you will implement it exactly the way that we say that you must implement it. We will give you massive amounts of money to run your elections, But if you do not run it the way that we say, then we can claw all that money back. Well, think about it, if you're a small county in Wisconsin and you get $300,000 from Mark Zuckerberg's Foundation to make sure that there are drop boxes in your, in your Democrat heavy areas, — if you do not carry out, you take that money, you sign that contract and you do not do exactly what that foundation said, you were gonna have to use public money to pay it back, you most likely would've ended up in prison.” So flood our swing states with drop boxes they can put unlimited amounts of fraudulent mail in ballots in or we will throw you in prison…. Mark Zuckerberg can NEVER be trusted. He rigged the 2020 election “That's just one example of the way that the election was rigged. The Mark Zuckerberg money was huge.”

Wall Street Apes

407,912 просмотров • 1 год назад

Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: “Every business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.” Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitor’s agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while it’s handling yours, it’s handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: “Do you want a future where you’re interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?” One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: “What open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.” The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone else’s terms. At someone else’s price. Inside someone else’s guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: “A lot of creators will have their own AIs. It’s like a richer world when there’s a diversity of different things.” Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.
0:58

Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: “Every business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.” Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitor’s agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while it’s handling yours, it’s handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: “Do you want a future where you’re interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?” One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: “What open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.” The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone else’s terms. At someone else’s price. Inside someone else’s guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: “A lot of creators will have their own AIs. It’s like a richer world when there’s a diversity of different things.” Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.

Dustin

507,064 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

If successful entrepreneurs leave CA because they don't want to pay yet another new tax he designed then SO BE IT says the Berkeley prof with a shrug. SO BE IT that Elon Musk, Ellison, Brin, Page, and Zuckerberg have all left??? No interest in what you might be doing wrong?
0:21

If successful entrepreneurs leave CA because they don't want to pay yet another new tax he designed then SO BE IT says the Berkeley prof with a shrug. SO BE IT that Elon Musk, Ellison, Brin, Page, and Zuckerberg have all left??? No interest in what you might be doing wrong?

Joshua Rauh

30,432 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"Ever notice how you don't actually own anything anymore? Your music, your movies, your cloud storage—all of it is just a subscription." "You think you have things, but you only have access to things." "Your identity lives inside a digital system you have no control over, and it can be flagged, restricted, or revoked automatically with no warning." "In this society, you don't have freedom anymore. You just access it as long as the system recognises you." "Welcome to neo-feudalism—a world where your entire life is one system update away from disappearing."
1:06

"Ever notice how you don't actually own anything anymore? Your music, your movies, your cloud storage—all of it is just a subscription." "You think you have things, but you only have access to things." "Your identity lives inside a digital system you have no control over, and it can be flagged, restricted, or revoked automatically with no warning." "In this society, you don't have freedom anymore. You just access it as long as the system recognises you." "Welcome to neo-feudalism—a world where your entire life is one system update away from disappearing."

Wide Awake Media

47,709 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The future of warfare. "Anyone who's making contact with the enemy is going to have superhuman augmented vision that allows them to never miss anything. You have extraordinary superhuman hearing." "You're able to mark targets in the environment without projecting anything in the environment. You can seamlessly see in your heads-up display where all of your friends are, where all of the innocents and noncombatants are, and have that all just seamlessly presented to you as if you're Superman. You can see through walls. You can see through night. You can see through fog. You are Superman." Palmer Luckey
13:01

The future of warfare. "Anyone who's making contact with the enemy is going to have superhuman augmented vision that allows them to never miss anything. You have extraordinary superhuman hearing." "You're able to mark targets in the environment without projecting anything in the environment. You can seamlessly see in your heads-up display where all of your friends are, where all of the innocents and noncombatants are, and have that all just seamlessly presented to you as if you're Superman. You can see through walls. You can see through night. You can see through fog. You are Superman." Palmer Luckey

Shawn Ryan

374,138 просмотров • 1 год назад