Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

MARTA slashed police positions & posts... but kept their fully funded $1.5 MILLION Office of Diversity & Inclusion intact Average DEI staffer salary: ~$100k Average MARTA Police Officer: ~$51k 11 Democrats control the entire budget for MARTA - are you surprised?

David Khait

82,934 subscribers

112,420 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 There were a couple of hundred NSW police who for a variety of reasons, did not to take the COVID vax and who were therefore dismissed. Many have moved on to new careers but there's around 50 who loved being a police officer and who very much want to return ... or work in security but can't because they've been slapped with a Section 181D on their record which prohibits that. Many are dads with young families. Shortly after Mal Lanyon was appointed Police Commissioner he told Ben Fordham Live on 2GB Sydney that he would look into this matter of the COVID cops. Today Commissioner Lanyon told Budget Estimates he is keen to meet with some of these dismissed police and their families so he can hear their stories. If you are a former NSW police officer and in this category please get in contact with my office. Libertarian Party NSW (Liberal Democrats)

🚨 There were a couple of hundred NSW police who for a variety of reasons, did not to take the COVID vax and who were therefore dismissed. Many have moved on to new careers but there's around 50 who loved being a police officer and who very much want to return ... or work in security but can't because they've been slapped with a Section 181D on their record which prohibits that. Many are dads with young families. Shortly after Mal Lanyon was appointed Police Commissioner he told Ben Fordham Live on 2GB Sydney that he would look into this matter of the COVID cops. Today Commissioner Lanyon told Budget Estimates he is keen to meet with some of these dismissed police and their families so he can hear their stories. If you are a former NSW police officer and in this category please get in contact with my office. Libertarian Party NSW (Liberal Democrats)

John Ruddick MLC - Libertarian

10,083 views • 6 months ago

Well, there you have it. On the same day Mayor Johnson agrees not to veto a budget that secures a CTU contract bailout, he returns to signing off on meaningless executive orders in a flimsy attempt to reassert himself as politically relevant. Johnson’s latest gambit limits CPD “Overtime Spending”. More theatrics, the Mayor’s Office already exercises complete control over CPD Overtime Spending. Johnson obviously took the step not only create the impression he is taking action to control spending, but also for the purpose of appeasing his core supporters, the defund-the-police bloc. Remember, CPD Overtime Spending is $150 -200 million higher annually than in 2019 because Chicago has over 1,700 fewer cops. Johnson himself eliminated 833 CPD officer positions. The consequences of CPD shortages are significant: Even with higher Overtime Spending, police officer shortages have led to half of high-priority 911 calls with no police car available to respond and record low arrest rates. Yet, Johnson continues to insist public safety is his “number on priority.”

Well, there you have it. On the same day Mayor Johnson agrees not to veto a budget that secures a CTU contract bailout, he returns to signing off on meaningless executive orders in a flimsy attempt to reassert himself as politically relevant. Johnson’s latest gambit limits CPD “Overtime Spending”. More theatrics, the Mayor’s Office already exercises complete control over CPD Overtime Spending. Johnson obviously took the step not only create the impression he is taking action to control spending, but also for the purpose of appeasing his core supporters, the defund-the-police bloc. Remember, CPD Overtime Spending is $150 -200 million higher annually than in 2019 because Chicago has over 1,700 fewer cops. Johnson himself eliminated 833 CPD officer positions. The consequences of CPD shortages are significant: Even with higher Overtime Spending, police officer shortages have led to half of high-priority 911 calls with no police car available to respond and record low arrest rates. Yet, Johnson continues to insist public safety is his “number on priority.”

Paul Vallas

287,990 views • 8 months ago

I am not as yet, but more and more people are becoming State Nationals and withdrawing for the United States Corporations and it's policy enforcement. Remember, ALL cities are corporations and Police Officer work for cities and NOT "unincorporated" areas that are controlled by counties. Take a listen to this gentleman NOT get a ticket or have his unregistered vehicle towed by the "Police" or "policy enforcement officer". It's a tricky dance with English diction in order to not fall into their enforcement jurisdiction. This gentleman handled it perfectly. In order to be a State national you need to change the type of passport you have which will legally allow you to travel freely in the United States and the rest of the world for that matter. Also there are several court documents, state documents, with your name change that needs to happen in order for you to fully retrieve your trust. Had he been ticketed or his vehicle towed by an uninformed Deputy or Police Officer, the court would release the ticket and give him his "automobile" back with no fees paid. If you are a police officer and you really want to be in Constitutional "law enforcement" you need to work with a County as a Sheriff Deputy, or in my case, a criminal investigator working for the county District Attorney's office. Interesting to say the least...

I am not as yet, but more and more people are becoming State Nationals and withdrawing for the United States Corporations and it's policy enforcement. Remember, ALL cities are corporations and Police Officer work for cities and NOT "unincorporated" areas that are controlled by counties. Take a listen to this gentleman NOT get a ticket or have his unregistered vehicle towed by the "Police" or "policy enforcement officer". It's a tricky dance with English diction in order to not fall into their enforcement jurisdiction. This gentleman handled it perfectly. In order to be a State national you need to change the type of passport you have which will legally allow you to travel freely in the United States and the rest of the world for that matter. Also there are several court documents, state documents, with your name change that needs to happen in order for you to fully retrieve your trust. Had he been ticketed or his vehicle towed by an uninformed Deputy or Police Officer, the court would release the ticket and give him his "automobile" back with no fees paid. If you are a police officer and you really want to be in Constitutional "law enforcement" you need to work with a County as a Sheriff Deputy, or in my case, a criminal investigator working for the county District Attorney's office. Interesting to say the least...

DeepWebSlinger

19,219 views • 6 months ago

I can’t believe I’m saying this but CNN just did some amazing reporting CNN used internet archives to find a top Democrat running for Senate in Michigan scrubbed his social media of thousands of posts showing his intention is to defund the police Muslim Democrat candidate Abdul El-Sayed “deleted thousands of tweets before launching his campaign. Among them were ones from 2020, in which he fully backed the controversial defund the police movement, calling police standing armies, and saying that cities should shift funding from law enforcement to social services. In interviews at the time, he regularly said things like this. ‘When we talk about the question of, quote, unquote, defunding the police, it's a question of asking, how do we right size government away from the racist ideologies that have led us to investing in war material for policing rather than public health for children’ Now, those posts are gone. His website doesn't mention police at all. It's a big shift from his old rhetoric and it's not hard to see why. A Fox News poll from July, 2020 showed 82% of Michigan registered voters had a favorable view of their local police.” CNN literally just caught another Democrat hiding their true intentions because they’re running for office Muslim Democrat Abdul El-Sayed’ religion has been a notable aspect of his public profile, including during his 2018 bid to become the first Muslim governor in U.S. history (he lost the Democratic primary) and now in his 2026 Senate campaign. This is the Muslim takeover, they’re lying to get into positions of power

Wall Street Apes

254,026 views • 10 months ago

No matter what American white racists wants you to believe, Indians! please do not fall for it!! and don't let it shake your self confidence. Indians make up just 1.5% of the US population which is around 5.1 million people. But their impact is massive, share it with those basement dweller racists, whenever they throw a slur at you from their basement. The Impact 👇 1. They contribute over 5-6% of the country's taxes ($250–300 billion annually) when they are just about 1% of total population. 2. 10% Of all US patents have an Indian inventor. 3. 10% of doctors are of Indian origin, serving nearly 30% of patients. 4. They own 60% of all hotels in the US. 5. 11% of US unicorns have an Indian founder. 6. 70% of US colleges have an Indian in top leadership. 7. 78% of Indians in the US have a college degree (vs. 36% national average). 8. Indian kids have won over 80% of Spelling Bees in the past 30+ years. 9. Even in food: Indian restaurants are just 1% of total, but 3% of Michelin-starred ones are Indian. 10. Plus, in 2023 alone, the Indian diaspora donated $1.5 billion to US causes and $800 million to India. This is real soft power earned through hard work, education, and entrepreneurship. But those basement dwellers high on conspiracies, blaming Indians for their miserable lives...will still stick to their delusion where all Indians are frauds, scammers and with fake degrees!!

No matter what American white racists wants you to believe, Indians! please do not fall for it!! and don't let it shake your self confidence. Indians make up just 1.5% of the US population which is around 5.1 million people. But their impact is massive, share it with those basement dweller racists, whenever they throw a slur at you from their basement. The Impact 👇 1. They contribute over 5-6% of the country's taxes ($250–300 billion annually) when they are just about 1% of total population. 2. 10% Of all US patents have an Indian inventor. 3. 10% of doctors are of Indian origin, serving nearly 30% of patients. 4. They own 60% of all hotels in the US. 5. 11% of US unicorns have an Indian founder. 6. 70% of US colleges have an Indian in top leadership. 7. 78% of Indians in the US have a college degree (vs. 36% national average). 8. Indian kids have won over 80% of Spelling Bees in the past 30+ years. 9. Even in food: Indian restaurants are just 1% of total, but 3% of Michelin-starred ones are Indian. 10. Plus, in 2023 alone, the Indian diaspora donated $1.5 billion to US causes and $800 million to India. This is real soft power earned through hard work, education, and entrepreneurship. But those basement dwellers high on conspiracies, blaming Indians for their miserable lives...will still stick to their delusion where all Indians are frauds, scammers and with fake degrees!!

XUnfiltered

21,648 views • 3 months ago

Some Democrats are solely blaming Donald Trump for corporate America moving away from DEI. The truth is that corporations have been wanting to move away from DEI for years and Trump became a convenient scapegoat. The honeymoon phase of DEI ended a long time ago, they just didn't know how to officially separate from it. Just like any relationship that you move too fast with, the emotions of the situation blind you from seeing the true character of your partner and you over-implement good faith translations of behavior to rationalize an inevitably doomed relationship. The DEI industry has existed for a long time in one form or another but in reaction to the nationwide high emotions of the moment post the death of George Floyd, corporate America decided to marry DEI initiatives in our nation's moment of grief. Prior to 2020, most corporations didn't see the value in the initiatives of DEI and the practicality of fully adopting this shift in corporate culture. It's not to say that corporations didn't want a diverse workforce, it's just that DEI in practice prioritizes diversity as a significant factor in employment instead of a convenient byproduct. However, there was always a brewing industry waiting for the moment where this ideological framework could catch corporations on the rebound. As far back as 2015, Consulting firm McKinsey & Company, published a foundational report called "Diversity Matters" which became the key business case that influenced corporate DEI throughout the 2010s. The first inclination that this sudden marriage to DEI was destined to fail was because full adaptation of DEI by creating another department and C-Suite position as a Diversity Officer means raising financial demands for something that doesn't make money. In response to my New York Post article, titled "Why the diversity-industrial complex bubble burst," I appeared on Varney & Co on August 7th, 2023. In this segment I made this statement, "I think within corporations, ultimately it's about the bottom dollar. And the reason I personally knew that this was going to be much of a fad within corporate America to some degree." "It may not disappear completely, but it's going to drastically reduce itself. The reason being is because the DEI doesn't earn any money. And how do you actually rate the performance of diversity, equity and inclusion?" What many people don't understand about DEI is that it's not just a couple of added training sessions, it's that in the largest corporations in America, it's a behemoth of a department that radically alters how they operate and what they spend their money on. Investing money on a department structure that yields no profits yet spends money like a gambler is destined to disappear, especially in an economic downturn. Who even benefits from DEI? Most would presume that black people or other minorities are the primary beneficiaries of DEI positions in corporate America: They'd be wrong. White women benefit most from DEI because women are included in the diversity equation. It's estimated that about 63%-76% of CDOs (Chief Diversity Officers) are white women; 3%-4% are black (Zappia). Ironically, DEI is a white dominated field even in the non C-suite diversity positions. The association SHRM's 2021 data showed 61% of DEI professionals were women, the vast majority white women. The push to blame Donald Trump for DEI falling out of favor ignores the multitude of reasons why corporations fell out of love. Post-George Floyd, many corporations saw this as a public relations opportunity, throwing millions of dollars at any organization with "black" in its title and letting the world know about their alleged pledges. What they didn't expect was that making their diversity initiatives public brings them more scrutiny, not less. It's generally in the best interest of a company to remain neutral, especially if they provide a product for the public. When you take a stance and announce it, you risk losing a portion of your customer base or attacks from adversaries. Al Sharpton and other activists threatened a boycott against Target for their decision to drop all DEI initiatives and their racial equity program, which they pledged to invest $2 billion in black-owned businesses by the end of 2025. Their decision came January 24th, four days after Trump signed his executive order demanding the dismantling of DEI in the federal government. However, Trump was the scapegoat in their decision making. Target has been the "target" of activists and boycotts for their stance on social issues and product choices. In May 2023, the boycott stemming from their Pride Month collection contributed to a 5.4% drop in in-store sales and a 10.9% decline in online sales in Q2 2023, with CEO Brian Cornell acknowledging “negative guest reaction” as a factor. Oh, and we can't forget the many lawsuits brought against corporations stemming from diversity practices. IBM, Starbucks, Novant Health, have all faced lawsuits involving some form of discriminatory action due to diversity initiatives. And that's the final nail in the coffin of corporate DEI; it's legally questionable in practice. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The EEOC's Commissioner has stated publicly when replying to Mark Cuban's endorsement of diversity based hiring practices. "You’re dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law. As a general rule, race/sex can’t even be a ‘motivating factor’—nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It’s important employers understand the ground rules here.” Corporate America's relationship with DEI is coming to an end because the honeymoon phase is over and rationality is coming back to the forefront. There are way too many risks and financial burdens involved with these types of divisive practices to maintain this high-maintenance relationship. Just like any trend, DEI came into prominence quickly and now it's going away just as fast. And that's not Trump's doing: Corporate America was ready for this break-up.

Some Democrats are solely blaming Donald Trump for corporate America moving away from DEI. The truth is that corporations have been wanting to move away from DEI for years and Trump became a convenient scapegoat. The honeymoon phase of DEI ended a long time ago, they just didn't know how to officially separate from it. Just like any relationship that you move too fast with, the emotions of the situation blind you from seeing the true character of your partner and you over-implement good faith translations of behavior to rationalize an inevitably doomed relationship. The DEI industry has existed for a long time in one form or another but in reaction to the nationwide high emotions of the moment post the death of George Floyd, corporate America decided to marry DEI initiatives in our nation's moment of grief. Prior to 2020, most corporations didn't see the value in the initiatives of DEI and the practicality of fully adopting this shift in corporate culture. It's not to say that corporations didn't want a diverse workforce, it's just that DEI in practice prioritizes diversity as a significant factor in employment instead of a convenient byproduct. However, there was always a brewing industry waiting for the moment where this ideological framework could catch corporations on the rebound. As far back as 2015, Consulting firm McKinsey & Company, published a foundational report called "Diversity Matters" which became the key business case that influenced corporate DEI throughout the 2010s. The first inclination that this sudden marriage to DEI was destined to fail was because full adaptation of DEI by creating another department and C-Suite position as a Diversity Officer means raising financial demands for something that doesn't make money. In response to my New York Post article, titled "Why the diversity-industrial complex bubble burst," I appeared on Varney & Co on August 7th, 2023. In this segment I made this statement, "I think within corporations, ultimately it's about the bottom dollar. And the reason I personally knew that this was going to be much of a fad within corporate America to some degree." "It may not disappear completely, but it's going to drastically reduce itself. The reason being is because the DEI doesn't earn any money. And how do you actually rate the performance of diversity, equity and inclusion?" What many people don't understand about DEI is that it's not just a couple of added training sessions, it's that in the largest corporations in America, it's a behemoth of a department that radically alters how they operate and what they spend their money on. Investing money on a department structure that yields no profits yet spends money like a gambler is destined to disappear, especially in an economic downturn. Who even benefits from DEI? Most would presume that black people or other minorities are the primary beneficiaries of DEI positions in corporate America: They'd be wrong. White women benefit most from DEI because women are included in the diversity equation. It's estimated that about 63%-76% of CDOs (Chief Diversity Officers) are white women; 3%-4% are black (Zappia). Ironically, DEI is a white dominated field even in the non C-suite diversity positions. The association SHRM's 2021 data showed 61% of DEI professionals were women, the vast majority white women. The push to blame Donald Trump for DEI falling out of favor ignores the multitude of reasons why corporations fell out of love. Post-George Floyd, many corporations saw this as a public relations opportunity, throwing millions of dollars at any organization with "black" in its title and letting the world know about their alleged pledges. What they didn't expect was that making their diversity initiatives public brings them more scrutiny, not less. It's generally in the best interest of a company to remain neutral, especially if they provide a product for the public. When you take a stance and announce it, you risk losing a portion of your customer base or attacks from adversaries. Al Sharpton and other activists threatened a boycott against Target for their decision to drop all DEI initiatives and their racial equity program, which they pledged to invest $2 billion in black-owned businesses by the end of 2025. Their decision came January 24th, four days after Trump signed his executive order demanding the dismantling of DEI in the federal government. However, Trump was the scapegoat in their decision making. Target has been the "target" of activists and boycotts for their stance on social issues and product choices. In May 2023, the boycott stemming from their Pride Month collection contributed to a 5.4% drop in in-store sales and a 10.9% decline in online sales in Q2 2023, with CEO Brian Cornell acknowledging “negative guest reaction” as a factor. Oh, and we can't forget the many lawsuits brought against corporations stemming from diversity practices. IBM, Starbucks, Novant Health, have all faced lawsuits involving some form of discriminatory action due to diversity initiatives. And that's the final nail in the coffin of corporate DEI; it's legally questionable in practice. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The EEOC's Commissioner has stated publicly when replying to Mark Cuban's endorsement of diversity based hiring practices. "You’re dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law. As a general rule, race/sex can’t even be a ‘motivating factor’—nor a plus factor, tie-breaker, or tipping point. It’s important employers understand the ground rules here.” Corporate America's relationship with DEI is coming to an end because the honeymoon phase is over and rationality is coming back to the forefront. There are way too many risks and financial burdens involved with these types of divisive practices to maintain this high-maintenance relationship. Just like any trend, DEI came into prominence quickly and now it's going away just as fast. And that's not Trump's doing: Corporate America was ready for this break-up.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

46,539 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Mamdani Taps Failed DA Candidate Who Ran on 80% Jail Cut, 20-Year Max, and Wants to Use Police Scandals to Shrink NYPD Toward “Abolition” Janos Marton, Chief Advocacy Officer at and a failed Manhattan DA candidate, now sits on Zohran Mamdani’s Committee on Community Safety. Marton suggests controversies are golden opportunities to actually work toward abolishing the police. “If you're actually serious about police reform, I think the answer lies not so much in, you know, sending a couple of bad cops to jail. The answer lies in how do you use that, that incident, the publicity around that moment to shrink the size of the police budget so that there's fewer police officers." "You know, which Which matters not only on the day to day level of what's happening on the street, but from a political purpose, from a political standpoint, you know, the smaller the police department, the smaller the number of retired police officers and their families, the less political influence they have." "I've never seen across the United States a single budget that eliminates police officers, but if you have fewer of them, you're shrinking the system in the right direction towards abolition.” Here in his DA platform: 80% jail cut, near-zero pretrial detention, and a 20-year cap: “I was running on a platform that called on using jail and prison as a last resort, to basically eliminate the use of pretrial detention except for very exceptional circumstances, which is why we called for cutting the jail population by 80% in Manhattan.” “It called for reforming the way we sentence people, the boldest sentencing reform in the United States, a 20-year cap. That, would, you know, basically be the maximum sentence that would bring us in line with other countries. And, you know, in addition to being a cap for the longest sentences that would right-size the rest of the sentencing system that we have.” And Marton wanted to end the "war on drugs." “It called for ending the war on drugs, eliminating the Office of Special Narcotics Prosecutor, which is one of the driving forces behind the war on drugs in New York.” If you can’t win an election, you just sneak your agenda in the back door, as long as the mayor is just as radical.

🚨 Mamdani Taps Failed DA Candidate Who Ran on 80% Jail Cut, 20-Year Max, and Wants to Use Police Scandals to Shrink NYPD Toward “Abolition” Janos Marton, Chief Advocacy Officer at and a failed Manhattan DA candidate, now sits on Zohran Mamdani’s Committee on Community Safety. Marton suggests controversies are golden opportunities to actually work toward abolishing the police. “If you're actually serious about police reform, I think the answer lies not so much in, you know, sending a couple of bad cops to jail. The answer lies in how do you use that, that incident, the publicity around that moment to shrink the size of the police budget so that there's fewer police officers." "You know, which Which matters not only on the day to day level of what's happening on the street, but from a political purpose, from a political standpoint, you know, the smaller the police department, the smaller the number of retired police officers and their families, the less political influence they have." "I've never seen across the United States a single budget that eliminates police officers, but if you have fewer of them, you're shrinking the system in the right direction towards abolition.” Here in his DA platform: 80% jail cut, near-zero pretrial detention, and a 20-year cap: “I was running on a platform that called on using jail and prison as a last resort, to basically eliminate the use of pretrial detention except for very exceptional circumstances, which is why we called for cutting the jail population by 80% in Manhattan.” “It called for reforming the way we sentence people, the boldest sentencing reform in the United States, a 20-year cap. That, would, you know, basically be the maximum sentence that would bring us in line with other countries. And, you know, in addition to being a cap for the longest sentences that would right-size the rest of the sentencing system that we have.” And Marton wanted to end the "war on drugs." “It called for ending the war on drugs, eliminating the Office of Special Narcotics Prosecutor, which is one of the driving forces behind the war on drugs in New York.” If you can’t win an election, you just sneak your agenda in the back door, as long as the mayor is just as radical.

Stu Smith

21,972 views • 9 months ago

$These cops need to get their license suspended... Remember that police SUV that crashed through the steel gate at 42 Division in Toronto? It just got a whole lot more expensive for taxpayers… We have an update to that story we aired earlier this year that we called “Gategate”. It took place at Toronto Police 42 Division in east end Toronto. And it involved a police SUV smashing through a steel gate. It wasn’t pretty. Ok, accidents happen. But there are two kinds of accidents. Those that are entirely preventable and those that aren’t. Which is to say it’s one thing to unexpectedly hit a patch of black ice and endure that stomach-churning experience of your car turning into the Tilt-A-Whirl ride down at the midway. But it’s quite another thing to hit a steel gate as you slowly enter a parking lot – and continue to plow right through that aforementioned gate. And how did this even happen? Did the officer experience a medical incident? Was the officer impaired? Or, most likely, was the officer distracted by the in-dash computer and/or cellphone? So, what’s the scandalous part, you ask? Well, you’re never going to believe this, folks, but the police tried to cover up this mishap. But why? The police are publicly funded. Taxpayers have skin in the game. Of note, the Toronto Police Service is embroiled in so many scandals of late – too numerous to list in this space, alas. But the standard mea culpa response from the brass is a promise to be more transparent and more accountable in the future. Yet the precise opposite is true. At the first whiff of a scandal, they circle the wagons. They deploy the cone of silence. And the only way we hear about new scandalous shenanigans is thanks to insider whistleblowers reaching out to us. Such was the case with the 42 Division incident. Indeed, our sources told us the replacement cost of that gate was in the neighbourhood of $25,000. And get this: in our original report, we outsmarted ourselves. We remarked that now we know the reason for those bash bars affixed to the front end of police cruisers. After all, even a full-size SUV can experience damage by ramrodding the vehicle through a steel gate. But the thing is, we misspoke. Those bash bars did NOT protect the SUV. Because our sources tell us that since the Explorer experienced A-pillar damage, it was deemed to be a write-off. Something else to put on the taxpayer tab, we suppose… Oh, and we have more information. We allegedly have the name of the police officer who was behind the wheel when this incident occurred. That would be Plainclothes Police Constable Melissa Hasiuk. (Of note: if you’re serving as a plainclothes officer, isn’t your cover blown by driving a fully marked police cruiser? We can only think of the SCTV character, RCMP Plainclothes Officer Curtis Edgit, who had little success in blending in with the populace as he was always on horseback…) In any event, we again reached out to 42 Division to get Hasiuk’s side of the story. As previously noted, the cops say they are going to be more accountable and more transparent. But one of the officers on the desk claimed he was unaware of the gate issue. Which is a brazen lie, of course. Speaking of accountability, there’s another angle to this story: namely, if somebody who wasn’t a police officer crashed through a steel gate, that person would be charged with careless driving or even dangerous driving. That person would be fined. That person would receive demerit points. That person’s auto insurance premiums would spike. But when it comes to Hasiuk, it’s apparently no harm, no foul. And, of course, she’s not on the hook for that $25,000 gate nor that fractured Ford. Of note, a base model Explorer starts at $54,895 – and that’s without the police package. It should also be noted that Constable Hasiuk earned $171,335 plus benefits last year. That was a 16.9% increase over her 2024 salary. Bottom line: must be so sweet being part of that exclusive club wherein it’s one law for me, and one law for thee…$

These cops need to get their license suspended... Remember that police SUV that crashed through the steel gate at 42 Division in Toronto? It just got a whole lot more expensive for taxpayers… We have an update to that story we aired earlier this year that we called “Gategate”. It took place at Toronto Police 42 Division in east end Toronto. And it involved a police SUV smashing through a steel gate. It wasn’t pretty. Ok, accidents happen. But there are two kinds of accidents. Those that are entirely preventable and those that aren’t. Which is to say it’s one thing to unexpectedly hit a patch of black ice and endure that stomach-churning experience of your car turning into the Tilt-A-Whirl ride down at the midway. But it’s quite another thing to hit a steel gate as you slowly enter a parking lot – and continue to plow right through that aforementioned gate. And how did this even happen? Did the officer experience a medical incident? Was the officer impaired? Or, most likely, was the officer distracted by the in-dash computer and/or cellphone? So, what’s the scandalous part, you ask? Well, you’re never going to believe this, folks, but the police tried to cover up this mishap. But why? The police are publicly funded. Taxpayers have skin in the game. Of note, the Toronto Police Service is embroiled in so many scandals of late – too numerous to list in this space, alas. But the standard mea culpa response from the brass is a promise to be more transparent and more accountable in the future. Yet the precise opposite is true. At the first whiff of a scandal, they circle the wagons. They deploy the cone of silence. And the only way we hear about new scandalous shenanigans is thanks to insider whistleblowers reaching out to us. Such was the case with the 42 Division incident. Indeed, our sources told us the replacement cost of that gate was in the neighbourhood of $25,000. And get this: in our original report, we outsmarted ourselves. We remarked that now we know the reason for those bash bars affixed to the front end of police cruisers. After all, even a full-size SUV can experience damage by ramrodding the vehicle through a steel gate. But the thing is, we misspoke. Those bash bars did NOT protect the SUV. Because our sources tell us that since the Explorer experienced A-pillar damage, it was deemed to be a write-off. Something else to put on the taxpayer tab, we suppose… Oh, and we have more information. We allegedly have the name of the police officer who was behind the wheel when this incident occurred. That would be Plainclothes Police Constable Melissa Hasiuk. (Of note: if you’re serving as a plainclothes officer, isn’t your cover blown by driving a fully marked police cruiser? We can only think of the SCTV character, RCMP Plainclothes Officer Curtis Edgit, who had little success in blending in with the populace as he was always on horseback…) In any event, we again reached out to 42 Division to get Hasiuk’s side of the story. As previously noted, the cops say they are going to be more accountable and more transparent. But one of the officers on the desk claimed he was unaware of the gate issue. Which is a brazen lie, of course. Speaking of accountability, there’s another angle to this story: namely, if somebody who wasn’t a police officer crashed through a steel gate, that person would be charged with careless driving or even dangerous driving. That person would be fined. That person would receive demerit points. That person’s auto insurance premiums would spike. But when it comes to Hasiuk, it’s apparently no harm, no foul. And, of course, she’s not on the hook for that $25,000 gate nor that fractured Ford. Of note, a base model Explorer starts at $54,895 – and that’s without the police package. It should also be noted that Constable Hasiuk earned $171,335 plus benefits last year. That was a 16.9% increase over her 2024 salary. Bottom line: must be so sweet being part of that exclusive club wherein it’s one law for me, and one law for thee…

Rebel News

29,901 views • 3 months ago

Jay Jones, the Democrat running for Attorney General in Virginia, has been caught fantasizing about shooting Republicans, killing their kids, and "pissing on their graves." His own words. This is the man who wants to be the state’s top law enforcement officer. The one who would control prosecutions, policing, and justice. And he openly dreams about murdering half the state, there are nearly 2 million Republicans living in Virginia. Even MSNBC says he should drop out. President Trump and JD Vance demand it. And still, Virginia Democrats defend him. They don’t condemn, they only protect. This is raw, unapologetic hate. It’s a candidate who treats Republicans not as citizens, but as enemies to be erased. Virginia must draw the line right now. Jay Jones should be forced to drop out, investigated, and should be nowhere near power, ever. If Democrats won’t police their own, the people of Virginia must. At the ballot box. Loudly. Decisively. Absolutely. Reject Jay Jones. Period.

Jay Jones, the Democrat running for Attorney General in Virginia, has been caught fantasizing about shooting Republicans, killing their kids, and "pissing on their graves." His own words. This is the man who wants to be the state’s top law enforcement officer. The one who would control prosecutions, policing, and justice. And he openly dreams about murdering half the state, there are nearly 2 million Republicans living in Virginia. Even MSNBC says he should drop out. President Trump and JD Vance demand it. And still, Virginia Democrats defend him. They don’t condemn, they only protect. This is raw, unapologetic hate. It’s a candidate who treats Republicans not as citizens, but as enemies to be erased. Virginia must draw the line right now. Jay Jones should be forced to drop out, investigated, and should be nowhere near power, ever. If Democrats won’t police their own, the people of Virginia must. At the ballot box. Loudly. Decisively. Absolutely. Reject Jay Jones. Period.

Benny Johnson

74,480 views • 11 months ago

Black American explains why you only see White liberals protesting for Democrats and not Black People anymore “You know why you're not seeing a lot of black people out there protesting against ICE? You know why you're seeing predominantly white people only at these events? It's because back in 2020, the Democrats utilized the black demographic to go out and riot and act a fool. And they said, oh, if you just elect us, we'll give you reparations and we'll force the police to wear body cameras and all these wonderful, amazing things, right? So black people showed up like we are known to do, and we voted up and down for one side of the aisle. And what do we get for it? Nothing as usual because many of us never learn. But now here in 2026, we're seeing individuals who were slavishly devoted to the Democrat party. Now they're seeing the Democrats over their entire four years in office under Joe Biden, they went out of their way to ingratiate themselves to illegal immigrants. And they sometimes prioritized illegal immigrants, even in black communities ahead of black American citizens. And black people are sitting there saying, wait, you said you were going to give us reparation, you're going to give us X, Y and Z, and we got nothing for it. So the silver lining is a lot of people are waking up and realizing the Democrats are only courting their next prospective voting bloc. They want to exploit illegal immigrants for an entire generation, much like they've supported the black community for the previous several generations. — So if you're wondering why you only see predominantly white liberals out here acting a fool, rioting and protesting against ICE, it's because ICE is threatening their ability to cater to that next demographic that they desperately want to lock in for an entire generation. And that's just the God's honest truth”

Black American explains why you only see White liberals protesting for Democrats and not Black People anymore “You know why you're not seeing a lot of black people out there protesting against ICE? You know why you're seeing predominantly white people only at these events? It's because back in 2020, the Democrats utilized the black demographic to go out and riot and act a fool. And they said, oh, if you just elect us, we'll give you reparations and we'll force the police to wear body cameras and all these wonderful, amazing things, right? So black people showed up like we are known to do, and we voted up and down for one side of the aisle. And what do we get for it? Nothing as usual because many of us never learn. But now here in 2026, we're seeing individuals who were slavishly devoted to the Democrat party. Now they're seeing the Democrats over their entire four years in office under Joe Biden, they went out of their way to ingratiate themselves to illegal immigrants. And they sometimes prioritized illegal immigrants, even in black communities ahead of black American citizens. And black people are sitting there saying, wait, you said you were going to give us reparation, you're going to give us X, Y and Z, and we got nothing for it. So the silver lining is a lot of people are waking up and realizing the Democrats are only courting their next prospective voting bloc. They want to exploit illegal immigrants for an entire generation, much like they've supported the black community for the previous several generations. — So if you're wondering why you only see predominantly white liberals out here acting a fool, rioting and protesting against ICE, it's because ICE is threatening their ability to cater to that next demographic that they desperately want to lock in for an entire generation. And that's just the God's honest truth”

Wall Street Apes

469,122 views • 7 months ago

🚨🚨🚨NEW: Bodycam video shows police at the Tucson International Airport reading Sheriff Nanos a Miranda warning after he brought an undeclared, loaded gun to a TSA checkpoint on his way to vacation in Laguna Beach. Nanos was not charged, but he missed his flight and had to stow the weapon in his car. County residents complained to the Board of Supervisors previously that they believe he was treated more leniently than the average citizen would have been. Active-duty members of law enforcement are typically allowed to fly armed if they meet federal requirements and declare their weapons in advance. As for the streamers, the Pima County Attorney's Office declined to comment on their cases. "Due to ongoing litigation, we are not able to provide a comment at this time. Thank you for your understanding, we will share updates when it becomes legally appropriate."

🚨🚨🚨NEW: Bodycam video shows police at the Tucson International Airport reading Sheriff Nanos a Miranda warning after he brought an undeclared, loaded gun to a TSA checkpoint on his way to vacation in Laguna Beach. Nanos was not charged, but he missed his flight and had to stow the weapon in his car. County residents complained to the Board of Supervisors previously that they believe he was treated more leniently than the average citizen would have been. Active-duty members of law enforcement are typically allowed to fly armed if they meet federal requirements and declare their weapons in advance. As for the streamers, the Pima County Attorney's Office declined to comment on their cases. "Due to ongoing litigation, we are not able to provide a comment at this time. Thank you for your understanding, we will share updates when it becomes legally appropriate."

Michael Ruiz

229,277 views • 3 months ago

EXPOSED: T-Mobile paid out $81.5 million in salaries to Foreigners in 2025 alone. If you’re in Collin County Texas, you’ve seen your city completely change - you probably feel like a minority in your local Costco. Not only is T-Mobile raising prices on consumers after promising not to with Price Lock while the Executives are making the most money they’ve made in their lives, but T-Mobile is also hiring foreigners for jobs that Americans can do while also laying off Americans. T-Mobile paid out $81,517,687.06 in salaries to H-1B employees. T-Mobile employed 549 H-1Bs, 68 of those visas have now been withdrawn which most likely means the employee left the company. T-Mobile employed 261 H-1Bs in Washington State ◦$42 million in salaries paid to foreigners T-Mobile employed 87 H-1Bs in Texas ◦$12.3 million in salaries paid to foreigners T-Mobile employed 78 H-1Bs in Kansas ◦$9.4 million in salaries paid to foreigners T-Mobile employed 55 H-1Bs in Georgia ◦$8 million in salaries paid to foreigners 97% of T-Mobile’s H-1Bs were salaries above $100k Most Notable positions on H-1B SVP, Chief Brand & Corporate Communications Officer - Annual Salary of $540,000 Sr Director, Business Development Data & AI - Annual Salary of $265,000

Marc Palasciano

402,604 views • 8 months ago

🚨Is the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors about to DEFUND school resource officers to fund more DEI? At a March 2nd meeting, Supervisor Juli Briskman told the county’s DEI department that she hopes the board will not fund a large resource request (elementary SROs), and if that happens, other budget requests like more DEI positions could be funded. The County Administrator already included funding in the proposed budget to fund school resource officers in elementary schools, something Briskman opposes as do most Democrats on the school board like April Chandler and Anne Donohue. On Thursday at 5:15 pm, the Loudoun County School Board is holding a special meeting and is expected to vote on the Sheriff’s proposal to add school resource officers in all elementary schools. Right now, the Democrat majority on the school board is expected to formally oppose the SRO proposal. We’ll keep you updated. Some believe this is being done now so Democrats on the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, like Briskman, can make the argument to take the SRO funding out of the county’s proposed budget. “Why fund elementary school SROs if the school board doesn’t want them?” Right now, there are school resource officers in all middle and high schools in Loudoun County. The Sheriff says the county needs school resource officers in elementary schools because of how many calls of service there are at elementary schools and he says SRO’s can protect the most vulnerable kids in the county when seconds count. Elementary school shootings have been on the rise over the past ten years. The sheriff’s office also tells me there are hundreds of instances where SROs have had to leave middle schools to respond to threats at elementary schools each year. The sheriff’s office was told by the school admin last year that if they want school resource officers in elementary schools, they should get the funding first, and then LCPS will talk. But now it appears the school board is moving the goal posts. The sheriff’s office was able to get the funding, but now there’s an effort underway by Briskman and some school board members to pull the funding and prevent school resource officers in elementary schools.

🚨Is the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors about to DEFUND school resource officers to fund more DEI? At a March 2nd meeting, Supervisor Juli Briskman told the county’s DEI department that she hopes the board will not fund a large resource request (elementary SROs), and if that happens, other budget requests like more DEI positions could be funded. The County Administrator already included funding in the proposed budget to fund school resource officers in elementary schools, something Briskman opposes as do most Democrats on the school board like April Chandler and Anne Donohue. On Thursday at 5:15 pm, the Loudoun County School Board is holding a special meeting and is expected to vote on the Sheriff’s proposal to add school resource officers in all elementary schools. Right now, the Democrat majority on the school board is expected to formally oppose the SRO proposal. We’ll keep you updated. Some believe this is being done now so Democrats on the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, like Briskman, can make the argument to take the SRO funding out of the county’s proposed budget. “Why fund elementary school SROs if the school board doesn’t want them?” Right now, there are school resource officers in all middle and high schools in Loudoun County. The Sheriff says the county needs school resource officers in elementary schools because of how many calls of service there are at elementary schools and he says SRO’s can protect the most vulnerable kids in the county when seconds count. Elementary school shootings have been on the rise over the past ten years. The sheriff’s office also tells me there are hundreds of instances where SROs have had to leave middle schools to respond to threats at elementary schools each year. The sheriff’s office was told by the school admin last year that if they want school resource officers in elementary schools, they should get the funding first, and then LCPS will talk. But now it appears the school board is moving the goal posts. The sheriff’s office was able to get the funding, but now there’s an effort underway by Briskman and some school board members to pull the funding and prevent school resource officers in elementary schools.

Nick Minock

27,869 views • 6 months ago

University drops job posting after DEI requirement exposed, professor says ‘I would not be hired’ today | Preston Mizell, Fox News University of Washington requires a 'one-page diversity statement' for new professor applications A University of Washington professor unleashed on the college’s strict diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) requirements for new hires and a teacher performance rubric that includes a scorecard measuring DEI strategy used to assess potential professor performance. Stuart Reges, a non-tenured teaching professor at UW’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, said he wouldn’t have been hired under the strict DEI pledge requirements, despite his academic achievements at the university. "You have to say that you have deep knowledge of the DEIs in order to get a high rating on all of this," Reges told Fox News Digital. "Funny thing is, I'm convinced I would not be hired if I applied today. There's just no way, even though I've won the Distinguished Teaching Award here at the university." The University of Washington’s listing for an associate professor of school psychology role includes a mandatory "diversity statement" for all applicants, signifying a pledge to the university’s "commitment to racial equity." "A one-page diversity statement describing your identity, positionality, experience and commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion and alignment to the APA's Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Framework," the job posting reads. "In addition, describe your philosophy of teaching and learning, including how your work will further the College of Education’s commitment to racial equity and social justice." Seattle Red radio host Jason Rantz also blasted the university’s hiring policy, saying in his recent op-ed that "this application process makes it easier to discriminate against conservatives, which is precisely why you won’t hear the far-left faculty speak out." "The university isn’t looking for diverse thought; it’s enforcing a monoculture of approved political opinions," Rantz added. In addition to the mandatory application diversity statement, the professor explained that a grading rubric to assess a potential professor's performance includes a section labeled "Diversity," ranking applicants on a scale of poor to excellent. A "Poor" rating describes the professor displaying "little evidence of potential to contribute to the UW Diversity Blueprint." "I've known faculty, very talented faculty who've left because of this kind of pressure and people who won't even apply," Reges explained. "I think a lot of grad students who might've wanted a career in teaching are kind of saying, why bother?" "I mean, look at all of the crap that you have to deal with," Reges added. "You have to kind of basically make up a statement that's going to make them happy saying the things that you're going to do." The publicly funded University of Washington’s dedication to "challenge" itself to implement DEI policies brings into question its alignment with President Donald Trump’s executive order from January titled: "President Donald J. Trump Protects Civil Rights and Merit-Based Opportunity by Ending Illegal DEI." "Many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism," the executive order reads. In March, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) launched investigations into a number of universities for "race-exclusionary practices in education programs and activities." The University of Washington was among those universities being investigated. "The University of Washington does not view diversity and access as being in opposition to merit and excellence, and we remain committed to providing access to excellence for all," a spokesperson for the university told Fox News Digital. "Our hiring practices adhere to state and federal laws in ensuring that race is not a factor in hiring, and the UW has acted proactively when such a violation is known to have occurred." "Schools, colleges and departments within the University have significant latitude in their hiring practices, however all must adhere to state and federal laws," the spokesperson added. "The College of Education search referenced in a recent local commentator’s blog post was in compliance with these laws, but to prevent any ambiguity or misinterpretation, we are canceling it and providing additional guidance on hiring practices before it is reposted," the spokesperson continued. "We are also reviewing hiring practices more broadly to ensure that they follow state and federal laws." Read more:

University drops job posting after DEI requirement exposed, professor says ‘I would not be hired’ today | Preston Mizell, Fox News University of Washington requires a 'one-page diversity statement' for new professor applications A University of Washington professor unleashed on the college’s strict diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) requirements for new hires and a teacher performance rubric that includes a scorecard measuring DEI strategy used to assess potential professor performance. Stuart Reges, a non-tenured teaching professor at UW’s Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, said he wouldn’t have been hired under the strict DEI pledge requirements, despite his academic achievements at the university. "You have to say that you have deep knowledge of the DEIs in order to get a high rating on all of this," Reges told Fox News Digital. "Funny thing is, I'm convinced I would not be hired if I applied today. There's just no way, even though I've won the Distinguished Teaching Award here at the university." The University of Washington’s listing for an associate professor of school psychology role includes a mandatory "diversity statement" for all applicants, signifying a pledge to the university’s "commitment to racial equity." "A one-page diversity statement describing your identity, positionality, experience and commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion and alignment to the APA's Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Framework," the job posting reads. "In addition, describe your philosophy of teaching and learning, including how your work will further the College of Education’s commitment to racial equity and social justice." Seattle Red radio host Jason Rantz also blasted the university’s hiring policy, saying in his recent op-ed that "this application process makes it easier to discriminate against conservatives, which is precisely why you won’t hear the far-left faculty speak out." "The university isn’t looking for diverse thought; it’s enforcing a monoculture of approved political opinions," Rantz added. In addition to the mandatory application diversity statement, the professor explained that a grading rubric to assess a potential professor's performance includes a section labeled "Diversity," ranking applicants on a scale of poor to excellent. A "Poor" rating describes the professor displaying "little evidence of potential to contribute to the UW Diversity Blueprint." "I've known faculty, very talented faculty who've left because of this kind of pressure and people who won't even apply," Reges explained. "I think a lot of grad students who might've wanted a career in teaching are kind of saying, why bother?" "I mean, look at all of the crap that you have to deal with," Reges added. "You have to kind of basically make up a statement that's going to make them happy saying the things that you're going to do." The publicly funded University of Washington’s dedication to "challenge" itself to implement DEI policies brings into question its alignment with President Donald Trump’s executive order from January titled: "President Donald J. Trump Protects Civil Rights and Merit-Based Opportunity by Ending Illegal DEI." "Many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism," the executive order reads. In March, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) launched investigations into a number of universities for "race-exclusionary practices in education programs and activities." The University of Washington was among those universities being investigated. "The University of Washington does not view diversity and access as being in opposition to merit and excellence, and we remain committed to providing access to excellence for all," a spokesperson for the university told Fox News Digital. "Our hiring practices adhere to state and federal laws in ensuring that race is not a factor in hiring, and the UW has acted proactively when such a violation is known to have occurred." "Schools, colleges and departments within the University have significant latitude in their hiring practices, however all must adhere to state and federal laws," the spokesperson added. "The College of Education search referenced in a recent local commentator’s blog post was in compliance with these laws, but to prevent any ambiguity or misinterpretation, we are canceling it and providing additional guidance on hiring practices before it is reposted," the spokesperson continued. "We are also reviewing hiring practices more broadly to ensure that they follow state and federal laws." Read more:

Owen Gregorian

94,153 views • 10 months ago

APPARENTLY YOU CAN'T WORK FOR THE PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF'S OFFICE IF YOU'RE A WHITE MAN. Last night, I saw this Philadelphia Sheriff’s Office recruitment commercial that chilled me to the bone. It features a squad of BLACK FEMALE OFFICERS line-dancing to a song called "Boots on the Ground." No men. No white people. Just out-of-shape black women dancing like they had conquered something. Because they HAVE CONQUERED SOMETHING. Apparently LAW & ORDER has QUIETLY been taken over by DEI. In 2019, they "elected" their FIRST BLACK FEMALE sheriff. If you go to the PSO website, you also wont see ONE SINGLE WHITE PERSON. And when I went to find the ad, I discovered that it's not just philadelphia - it's Atlanta, Hampton, Memphis, Leon County, Flagler County, and Winston-Salem too. Now, I know i should be happy that "my people" are rising up and taking over things... ...but I simply don't consider BLACK WOMEN to be the face of law enforcement and personal security. In fact, they've been marching for LESS OR NO POLICE since 2020. They've been marching for no cash bail and early release and no imprisonment at all for black criminals. That's not law ENFORCEMENT, that's law ERADICATION. And here's the good part: starting salary is $53,923, and the recruitment bonus is $10,784! DEI is secretly wrecking law enforcement departments all across the country with defund-the-police activists in uniforms. Welcome to the new face of “law and order” — boots on the ground, but with high heels and red soles.

APPARENTLY YOU CAN'T WORK FOR THE PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF'S OFFICE IF YOU'RE A WHITE MAN. Last night, I saw this Philadelphia Sheriff’s Office recruitment commercial that chilled me to the bone. It features a squad of BLACK FEMALE OFFICERS line-dancing to a song called "Boots on the Ground." No men. No white people. Just out-of-shape black women dancing like they had conquered something. Because they HAVE CONQUERED SOMETHING. Apparently LAW & ORDER has QUIETLY been taken over by DEI. In 2019, they "elected" their FIRST BLACK FEMALE sheriff. If you go to the PSO website, you also wont see ONE SINGLE WHITE PERSON. And when I went to find the ad, I discovered that it's not just philadelphia - it's Atlanta, Hampton, Memphis, Leon County, Flagler County, and Winston-Salem too. Now, I know i should be happy that "my people" are rising up and taking over things... ...but I simply don't consider BLACK WOMEN to be the face of law enforcement and personal security. In fact, they've been marching for LESS OR NO POLICE since 2020. They've been marching for no cash bail and early release and no imprisonment at all for black criminals. That's not law ENFORCEMENT, that's law ERADICATION. And here's the good part: starting salary is $53,923, and the recruitment bonus is $10,784! DEI is secretly wrecking law enforcement departments all across the country with defund-the-police activists in uniforms. Welcome to the new face of “law and order” — boots on the ground, but with high heels and red soles.

Byl Holte

413,902 views • 10 months ago

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan and Chris Williamson torch AOC’s “Woke 1.0” Rebrand: “If you really believed in Defund the Police EXPLAIN what the hell you thought would happen when the police disappeared.” “You owe America an explanation for how you ever thought less policing would mean less crime.” CONTEXT: There’s an important piece of history here that makes Rogan’s question much harder to dismiss. AOC wasn’t merely associated with the phrase “defund the police.” In 2020, after New York officials proposed roughly $1 billion in reductions and transfers from the NYPD budget, she responded: “Defunding police means defunding police.” She argued the proposal didn’t go nearly far enough. And when she was asked what a country with defunded police would actually look like, her answer was: “It looks like a suburb.” Her theory was that affluent communities stay safer partly because they invest heavily in housing, education, health and young people, reducing the conditions that produce crime before police ever become involved. Fast-forward to 2026. AOC was recently asked about progressive candidates walking away from controversial positions from that era and said a local councilman has a saying: “Woke one was crazy.” She argued that COVID-era politics opened the “Overton window” dramatically and said politicians should be judged partly on what they believe now. ROGAN: “What did you think defund the police meant? Everyone's gonna eat mushrooms and we're all going to be flower children?” WORTH NOTING: Here’s where the argument gets more interesting than the slogan. There is strong evidence that police manpower actually affects crime. A major study published in the American Economic Review: Insights estimated that each additional police officer prevented roughly 0.1 homicides, with the homicide-reduction benefit per capita roughly twice as large for Black victims as for white victims. Another natural-experiment study of federal police-hiring grants found that cities receiving funding increased their police forces by about 3.2% and subsequently experienced about a 3.5% reduction in victimization-weighted crime. But the first study also found a real cost that helps explain why the 2020 debate existed in the first place: Larger police forces produced more arrests for low-level “quality-of-life” offenses, with Black Americans disproportionately bearing that burden. So there were legitimate problems progressives were trying to solve. And redirecting some responsibilities like mental-health crises, homelessness, addiction, and youth intervention away from armed police is a very different proposition from simply pretending police don't deter crime. But that actually makes Rogan’s central question more important: AOC had a specific theory in 2020. Spend less on policing. Invest more upstream. Build communities where fewer situations require police in the first place. Six years later, saying “Woke 1 was crazy” leaves an obvious unanswered question: Which parts were crazy? Was defunding police itself a mistake? Was the underlying policy right but the slogan disastrous? Does she still believe police budgets should be substantially reduced? Or did the evidence change her mind? Politicians absolutely should be allowed to change their views. But Rogan’s argument is that changing your mind and explaining why you changed it are two different things. MAIN TAKEAWAY: If “Woke 1” really was crazy, the interesting story isn't that politicians moved on. It’s figuring out what they learned from it.

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan and Chris Williamson torch AOC’s “Woke 1.0” Rebrand: “If you really believed in Defund the Police EXPLAIN what the hell you thought would happen when the police disappeared.” “You owe America an explanation for how you ever thought less policing would mean less crime.” CONTEXT: There’s an important piece of history here that makes Rogan’s question much harder to dismiss. AOC wasn’t merely associated with the phrase “defund the police.” In 2020, after New York officials proposed roughly $1 billion in reductions and transfers from the NYPD budget, she responded: “Defunding police means defunding police.” She argued the proposal didn’t go nearly far enough. And when she was asked what a country with defunded police would actually look like, her answer was: “It looks like a suburb.” Her theory was that affluent communities stay safer partly because they invest heavily in housing, education, health and young people, reducing the conditions that produce crime before police ever become involved. Fast-forward to 2026. AOC was recently asked about progressive candidates walking away from controversial positions from that era and said a local councilman has a saying: “Woke one was crazy.” She argued that COVID-era politics opened the “Overton window” dramatically and said politicians should be judged partly on what they believe now. ROGAN: “What did you think defund the police meant? Everyone's gonna eat mushrooms and we're all going to be flower children?” WORTH NOTING: Here’s where the argument gets more interesting than the slogan. There is strong evidence that police manpower actually affects crime. A major study published in the American Economic Review: Insights estimated that each additional police officer prevented roughly 0.1 homicides, with the homicide-reduction benefit per capita roughly twice as large for Black victims as for white victims. Another natural-experiment study of federal police-hiring grants found that cities receiving funding increased their police forces by about 3.2% and subsequently experienced about a 3.5% reduction in victimization-weighted crime. But the first study also found a real cost that helps explain why the 2020 debate existed in the first place: Larger police forces produced more arrests for low-level “quality-of-life” offenses, with Black Americans disproportionately bearing that burden. So there were legitimate problems progressives were trying to solve. And redirecting some responsibilities like mental-health crises, homelessness, addiction, and youth intervention away from armed police is a very different proposition from simply pretending police don't deter crime. But that actually makes Rogan’s central question more important: AOC had a specific theory in 2020. Spend less on policing. Invest more upstream. Build communities where fewer situations require police in the first place. Six years later, saying “Woke 1 was crazy” leaves an obvious unanswered question: Which parts were crazy? Was defunding police itself a mistake? Was the underlying policy right but the slogan disastrous? Does she still believe police budgets should be substantially reduced? Or did the evidence change her mind? Politicians absolutely should be allowed to change their views. But Rogan’s argument is that changing your mind and explaining why you changed it are two different things. MAIN TAKEAWAY: If “Woke 1” really was crazy, the interesting story isn't that politicians moved on. It’s figuring out what they learned from it.

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

113,610 views • 18 days ago

🚨Islamization of the NYPD rages on..... NYPD Headquarters Has Been Arabified. And They're Boasting About It From Inside One Police Plaza This is not some fringe event. This is the official Arab American Law Enforcement Fraternal Association (AALFA/ALFA), now fully recognized by the NYPD, holding their Arab Heritage Festival inside police headquarters. They're serving Egyptian koshary to Americans in the heart of NYPD command. They're flying flags from Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Sudan, and 22 Arab countries. They're proudly declaring: "We represent the Arabs... We are the bridge between the community and the police... We have a seat at the table... We can speak on behalf of the Arabs." Founder Detective Hassan Diab (11 years on the job) says it plainly: "We started from scratch... Now we have almost 500 members... sergeants, captains... All the Arab officials, plus the military, united under one umbrella at One Police Plaza." Their message to the Arab community? "Be the change. Join the police force. Be the voice." "If an Arab police officer comes to you, it's better... Language speaks for itself." Ten years ago they say the Arab/Islamic community was "absent." Now? They're at the table, and they want more. More officers. More influence. More cultural events inside the very building that is supposed to enforce American law impartially. This is how institutions fall. Not with tanks in the street, but with ethnic blocs, special associations, "bridges," and festivals that turn police HQ into a celebration of foreign identity. NYPD isn't supposed to have an official Arab bloc pushing recruitment by ethnicity and language. It's supposed to be American - color-blind, loyal to the Constitution, not 22 Arab nations. They're not hiding it. They're celebrating it. On camera. At One Police Plaza. This is the arabification of your police department, all happening in real time, with official NYPD blessing. The "voice" they're building isn't yours. More Here:

🚨Islamization of the NYPD rages on..... NYPD Headquarters Has Been Arabified. And They're Boasting About It From Inside One Police Plaza This is not some fringe event. This is the official Arab American Law Enforcement Fraternal Association (AALFA/ALFA), now fully recognized by the NYPD, holding their Arab Heritage Festival inside police headquarters. They're serving Egyptian koshary to Americans in the heart of NYPD command. They're flying flags from Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Sudan, and 22 Arab countries. They're proudly declaring: "We represent the Arabs... We are the bridge between the community and the police... We have a seat at the table... We can speak on behalf of the Arabs." Founder Detective Hassan Diab (11 years on the job) says it plainly: "We started from scratch... Now we have almost 500 members... sergeants, captains... All the Arab officials, plus the military, united under one umbrella at One Police Plaza." Their message to the Arab community? "Be the change. Join the police force. Be the voice." "If an Arab police officer comes to you, it's better... Language speaks for itself." Ten years ago they say the Arab/Islamic community was "absent." Now? They're at the table, and they want more. More officers. More influence. More cultural events inside the very building that is supposed to enforce American law impartially. This is how institutions fall. Not with tanks in the street, but with ethnic blocs, special associations, "bridges," and festivals that turn police HQ into a celebration of foreign identity. NYPD isn't supposed to have an official Arab bloc pushing recruitment by ethnicity and language. It's supposed to be American - color-blind, loyal to the Constitution, not 22 Arab nations. They're not hiding it. They're celebrating it. On camera. At One Police Plaza. This is the arabification of your police department, all happening in real time, with official NYPD blessing. The "voice" they're building isn't yours. More Here:

Amy Mek

128,177 views • 3 months ago