Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Martin Scorsese on why plot doesn't matter "Marty said many times that plot is irrelevant to him. He wants to follow the soul of that certain character and all the plot mechanics or how things work out are sort of secondary." "You take a film like Vertigo. The plot... show more

Ren Clips

1,030 subscribers

694,247 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Искусство Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"I didn't mastermind the plot to remove Obasa...." Desmond Elliot. This is absolute fallacy. You were never accused of masterminding the plot, what you were accused of by the security report was your obvious involvement in it. You said you were in South Africa when it happened, let us agree but you never denied that CoS asked you to do a press conference to dissociate yourself from the plot. Did CoS tell you to do that or not? Did you do it? Were you still in SA then too? You said the President appealed to all of you that were involved and you realised that you guys "acted on wrong information", meaning you regret your action, YOUR ACTION, you inclusive. Now, if indeed you weren't involved in the plot, why were you crying openly on the TV the day Obasa returned back as Speaker???? You were part of the plot to rubbish the leadership of Lagos and this is very glaring. So, stop acting. This is not Nollywood!

"I didn't mastermind the plot to remove Obasa...." Desmond Elliot. This is absolute fallacy. You were never accused of masterminding the plot, what you were accused of by the security report was your obvious involvement in it. You said you were in South Africa when it happened, let us agree but you never denied that CoS asked you to do a press conference to dissociate yourself from the plot. Did CoS tell you to do that or not? Did you do it? Were you still in SA then too? You said the President appealed to all of you that were involved and you realised that you guys "acted on wrong information", meaning you regret your action, YOUR ACTION, you inclusive. Now, if indeed you weren't involved in the plot, why were you crying openly on the TV the day Obasa returned back as Speaker???? You were part of the plot to rubbish the leadership of Lagos and this is very glaring. So, stop acting. This is not Nollywood!

Ayekooto

213,862 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jack Posobiec During this interview just now he said something very interesting at the end. He says candidly… what makes him different than other politicians is that he doesn’t PLOT THINGS out. He’s focused on the JOB he was elected to do. This is a VERY humble man.

Jack Posobiec During this interview just now he said something very interesting at the end. He says candidly… what makes him different than other politicians is that he doesn’t PLOT THINGS out. He’s focused on the JOB he was elected to do. This is a VERY humble man.

Johnny St.Pete

25,087 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"When I read the plot of it sounded like the plot of the movie was 'Barbie crushes a slave revolt.'..You really do feel sorry for Ken -- esp Ryan Gossling's Ken--bc Barbie is so mean to him, & shitty to him. And that works if the movie is called 'Ken.'" - L., MA WATCH NOW:

"When I read the plot of it sounded like the plot of the movie was 'Barbie crushes a slave revolt.'..You really do feel sorry for Ken -- esp Ryan Gossling's Ken--bc Barbie is so mean to him, & shitty to him. And that works if the movie is called 'Ken.'" - L., MA WATCH NOW:

Briahna Joy Gray

57,292 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Emily Blunt on the plot of Disclosure Day “What can you tell us about the plot of the movie itself?” “The big idea of it is that question that sparked the fires of human imagination for years. Are we alone or are we not alone? And if we aren't, why are the people in power hiding the truth from us? And so the movie is like a life or death race against time for those that believe the truth belongs to 8 billion people and those who believe that it doesn't and they want to keep it secret.”

Emily Blunt on the plot of Disclosure Day “What can you tell us about the plot of the movie itself?” “The big idea of it is that question that sparked the fires of human imagination for years. Are we alone or are we not alone? And if we aren't, why are the people in power hiding the truth from us? And so the movie is like a life or death race against time for those that believe the truth belongs to 8 billion people and those who believe that it doesn't and they want to keep it secret.”

Red Panda Koala

195,682 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Martin Scorsese explains why money doesn't mean anything to him: "When I’m dealing with a Hollywood film, that means I have to do a certain kind of subject matter that will make a certain amount of money. If I decide to make less money, that means I can take a risk on subject matter. So the only criterion on the films I’m willing to take risks on is that it be truthful, that it be honest about your own feelings and truthful to what you know to be the reality around you or the reality of the human condition of the characters. If it’s something that’s not honest, not truthful, then it’s a problem. If you don’t believe in it, why are you making it? You’re going to offend people to make some money? What for? It doesn’t mean anything. The money doesn’t mean anything. All that matters is the work, just what’s up on the screen. So that’s it. I’m not like some great person who’s out there undaunted, fighting off all these people." (From Scorsese's interview with Anthony Decurtis, 1990) Clip from: After Hours (1985) Director: Martin Scorsese

Martin Scorsese explains why money doesn't mean anything to him: "When I’m dealing with a Hollywood film, that means I have to do a certain kind of subject matter that will make a certain amount of money. If I decide to make less money, that means I can take a risk on subject matter. So the only criterion on the films I’m willing to take risks on is that it be truthful, that it be honest about your own feelings and truthful to what you know to be the reality around you or the reality of the human condition of the characters. If it’s something that’s not honest, not truthful, then it’s a problem. If you don’t believe in it, why are you making it? You’re going to offend people to make some money? What for? It doesn’t mean anything. The money doesn’t mean anything. All that matters is the work, just what’s up on the screen. So that’s it. I’m not like some great person who’s out there undaunted, fighting off all these people." (From Scorsese's interview with Anthony Decurtis, 1990) Clip from: After Hours (1985) Director: Martin Scorsese

DepressedBergman

21,602 просмотров • 1 год назад

Christopher Nolan and David Fincher both cited Terrence Malick as a huge inspiration and praised his visual language. Nolan stated, “Malick's influence on my work is very clear, and Malick more than almost any other filmmaker I could name, his work is immediately recognizable. His films are all very, very connected with each other, and they’re very recognizably his work but it’s very tough to put your finger on why that is or what you’re seeing in that. The technique is not immediately obvious. I think it's that unifying mind behind the films that really shows the unique nature of his vision and that he is a very controlling creative.” Fincher added that, “I think that with Malick you go to have something else illuminated for you other than, you know, what would it be like to get away with murder. You're going to see somebody who labored over something. You're going to see something that wasn't just the next thing on the assembly line. You’re seeing something that was thought about and meditated over, and you’re going to see this thing that's a one-off.”

Christopher Nolan and David Fincher both cited Terrence Malick as a huge inspiration and praised his visual language. Nolan stated, “Malick's influence on my work is very clear, and Malick more than almost any other filmmaker I could name, his work is immediately recognizable. His films are all very, very connected with each other, and they’re very recognizably his work but it’s very tough to put your finger on why that is or what you’re seeing in that. The technique is not immediately obvious. I think it's that unifying mind behind the films that really shows the unique nature of his vision and that he is a very controlling creative.” Fincher added that, “I think that with Malick you go to have something else illuminated for you other than, you know, what would it be like to get away with murder. You're going to see somebody who labored over something. You're going to see something that wasn't just the next thing on the assembly line. You’re seeing something that was thought about and meditated over, and you’re going to see this thing that's a one-off.”

Zak

113,524 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

NEW: Donald Trump says the existence of aliens is believable, says he has talked to pilots like "Tom Cruise but taller" who told him about UFOs they saw. "I've met with pilots like beautiful Tom Cruise, but taller. Handsome, perfect people." "There was something that was round in form and going four times faster than my super jet fighter plane." "You have no idea how many times I'm asked that question." "I've never been convinced... But a lot of people believe that it's true. A lot of very good, solid people believe it's true." "You have the deep state and you do have a deep state and certainly they could [be withholding information], but I don't think on this subject." "I was interested in it 'cause I've been asked so many times and I, I talk to people that have said that they've, you know, it was a sighting and it's very believable. It's very possible that there is something."

NEW: Donald Trump says the existence of aliens is believable, says he has talked to pilots like "Tom Cruise but taller" who told him about UFOs they saw. "I've met with pilots like beautiful Tom Cruise, but taller. Handsome, perfect people." "There was something that was round in form and going four times faster than my super jet fighter plane." "You have no idea how many times I'm asked that question." "I've never been convinced... But a lot of people believe that it's true. A lot of very good, solid people believe it's true." "You have the deep state and you do have a deep state and certainly they could [be withholding information], but I don't think on this subject." "I was interested in it 'cause I've been asked so many times and I, I talk to people that have said that they've, you know, it was a sighting and it's very believable. It's very possible that there is something."

Collin Rugg

5,035,761 просмотров • 2 лет назад

John Oliver admits there were more government fingerprints than “you would like” in the “kidnapping” plot of Gretchen Whitmer. “Remember when that group of men was arrested?” “Guess how many confidential informants seem to help that plot along?” “I’ll give you a clue — it is a lot more than you would like.” “And you… wonder if that plan could have even gotten off the ground if there hadn’t been ‘as many as a DOZEN confidential informants’ involved and ‘two undercover federal agents.’” So John Oliver is basically saying the government can shape or aid someone else’s sinister plot… then blame the useful idiots who carry it out.

John Oliver admits there were more government fingerprints than “you would like” in the “kidnapping” plot of Gretchen Whitmer. “Remember when that group of men was arrested?” “Guess how many confidential informants seem to help that plot along?” “I’ll give you a clue — it is a lot more than you would like.” “And you… wonder if that plan could have even gotten off the ground if there hadn’t been ‘as many as a DOZEN confidential informants’ involved and ‘two undercover federal agents.’” So John Oliver is basically saying the government can shape or aid someone else’s sinister plot… then blame the useful idiots who carry it out.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

547,584 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

SPIDER-MAN JUST DOESN’T WORK WELL IN A TEAM! this is such a huge point in across the spider-verse that simply reducing it to plot armour means you missed a very large portion of the movie 😭

SPIDER-MAN JUST DOESN’T WORK WELL IN A TEAM! this is such a huge point in across the spider-verse that simply reducing it to plot armour means you missed a very large portion of the movie 😭

trix ♡

557,923 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Dr. Oz on the "super flu": "Every year there's a flu vaccine. It doesn't always work very well. That's why it's been controversial of late. But like many illnesses, the best news out there is if you can take care of yourself so that when you do end up running into the flu, you can overwhelm it."

Dr. Oz on the "super flu": "Every year there's a flu vaccine. It doesn't always work very well. That's why it's been controversial of late. But like many illnesses, the best news out there is if you can take care of yourself so that when you do end up running into the flu, you can overwhelm it."

Aaron Rupar

637,456 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

David Perell

86,765 просмотров • 1 год назад

Andrew Huberman on why you can't think your way out of stress: Huberman is asked what he means when he says you cannot control the mind with the mind. His answer reframes how we should approach stress, anxiety, and emotional regulation entirely. "If you're very upset, it's hard to talk yourself out of it. If you're stressed, it's hard to think yourself out of it." He explains that when we're in heightened emotional states, we tend to default to mental strategies, rationalizing, "third personing" ourselves, texting a friend, trying to reason our way back to calm. But according to Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D., this rarely works: "It's very hard to get yourself out of those states with thinking alone." The solution, he argues, lies not in the mind but in the body. "The beauty of the autonomic nervous system is that it traverses the brain and the body and it connects to essentially all the organs of the body. And it's a two-way street such that certain behaviors, even certain patterns of breathing etc. allow us to shift between very very alert and stressed and very calm." This two-way street is the key insight. The body doesn't just receive signals from the brain, it also sends them back. Shifting your physiology shifts your mental state, which in turn shifts the kinds of thoughts and actions available to you. "If you're very very stressed, you're very very upset, two things happen. One, it's very hard to take your focus off whatever it is that's upsetting you. And if you don't know what's upsetting you, you know, pure anxiety, but you don't know why, it's very hard to take your mind off of the feelings of anxiety." In other words, anxiety hijacks your attention and then traps you there. Trying to think your way out only tightens the grip. The way out is to move through the body first: "If we turn to the body and certain behaviors, we are able to move ourselves along the autonomic continuum. And at that point, when we've done that successfully, we are able to think about things differently." "If you can't control the mind with the mind, look to the body to control the mind."

Andrew Huberman on why you can't think your way out of stress: Huberman is asked what he means when he says you cannot control the mind with the mind. His answer reframes how we should approach stress, anxiety, and emotional regulation entirely. "If you're very upset, it's hard to talk yourself out of it. If you're stressed, it's hard to think yourself out of it." He explains that when we're in heightened emotional states, we tend to default to mental strategies, rationalizing, "third personing" ourselves, texting a friend, trying to reason our way back to calm. But according to Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D., this rarely works: "It's very hard to get yourself out of those states with thinking alone." The solution, he argues, lies not in the mind but in the body. "The beauty of the autonomic nervous system is that it traverses the brain and the body and it connects to essentially all the organs of the body. And it's a two-way street such that certain behaviors, even certain patterns of breathing etc. allow us to shift between very very alert and stressed and very calm." This two-way street is the key insight. The body doesn't just receive signals from the brain, it also sends them back. Shifting your physiology shifts your mental state, which in turn shifts the kinds of thoughts and actions available to you. "If you're very very stressed, you're very very upset, two things happen. One, it's very hard to take your focus off whatever it is that's upsetting you. And if you don't know what's upsetting you, you know, pure anxiety, but you don't know why, it's very hard to take your mind off of the feelings of anxiety." In other words, anxiety hijacks your attention and then traps you there. Trying to think your way out only tightens the grip. The way out is to move through the body first: "If we turn to the body and certain behaviors, we are able to move ourselves along the autonomic continuum. And at that point, when we've done that successfully, we are able to think about things differently." "If you can't control the mind with the mind, look to the body to control the mind."

Kevin Tanaka

27,792 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Kinzinger: To me, it was very personal, very, very difficult for my family and me. And so you see some of that in the film. But most importantly, what this is, is a warning to America. You’ll see this in the film again — we lay out a very compelling case against Trump. But it shows, again, that what I did wasn’t courageous — it was just my job. There is, though, an intense cost to that. You see that cost laid out in this film, and it shows why, when people say, “Why don’t other Republicans speak out?” — this brings home that there is a cost to doing so. And we need to, frankly, elect and hire people who are willing to do tough things

Kinzinger: To me, it was very personal, very, very difficult for my family and me. And so you see some of that in the film. But most importantly, what this is, is a warning to America. You’ll see this in the film again — we lay out a very compelling case against Trump. But it shows, again, that what I did wasn’t courageous — it was just my job. There is, though, an intense cost to that. You see that cost laid out in this film, and it shows why, when people say, “Why don’t other Republicans speak out?” — this brings home that there is a cost to doing so. And we need to, frankly, elect and hire people who are willing to do tough things

Acyn

151,606 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Mikel Arteta on how hard it is to sign the best players: "But that's the demands, I think, as you said. I think for the margins to improve, there are very few players in the market that are available to do that and bring that to the club. But again, we are actively looking to improve that and we're going to try."

Mikel Arteta on how hard it is to sign the best players: "But that's the demands, I think, as you said. I think for the margins to improve, there are very few players in the market that are available to do that and bring that to the club. But again, we are actively looking to improve that and we're going to try."

Connor Humm

30,397 просмотров • 8 дней назад

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

Founder Mode

12,339 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Sam Altman on what startup ideas actually work “What you are looking for are good ideas that look like bad ideas. These are things that you can articulate why there’s a reason this is going to be huge that most of the world is missing. Unfortunately, what most people end up chasing are bad ideas that look like good ideas. I would say this is where 90% of all angel capital in the startup ecosystem goes.” Sam elaborates on why founders and investors alike make this mistake so frequently: “The one common way that people make this mistake (pursuing bad ideas that look like good ideas) is chasing the thing that worked two years ago. If you ever find yourself doing that, be very skeptical. If you find yourself tempted to invest in a company where there are hundreds of others working on the same thing, be very skeptical. If you find yourself tempted to invest in something that the founders work super hard to convince you is not going to be a long-term commodity, be very skeptical. It is absolutely true that you want something that has real pricing power that comes from a network effect, a moat, a barrier to entry, whatever it is. But when that’s true, it’s so obvious. So the more a founder tries to sell you on why they’re super differentiated and why they have this long-term competitive advantage, the more skeptical you should be.” He continues: “I have found this framework of asking, ‘Is this a good idea that seems bad? Or is this a bad idea that seems good?’ has helped me make good decisions a bunch of times.” Source: Y Combinator (Mar 2018)

Sam Altman on what startup ideas actually work “What you are looking for are good ideas that look like bad ideas. These are things that you can articulate why there’s a reason this is going to be huge that most of the world is missing. Unfortunately, what most people end up chasing are bad ideas that look like good ideas. I would say this is where 90% of all angel capital in the startup ecosystem goes.” Sam elaborates on why founders and investors alike make this mistake so frequently: “The one common way that people make this mistake (pursuing bad ideas that look like good ideas) is chasing the thing that worked two years ago. If you ever find yourself doing that, be very skeptical. If you find yourself tempted to invest in a company where there are hundreds of others working on the same thing, be very skeptical. If you find yourself tempted to invest in something that the founders work super hard to convince you is not going to be a long-term commodity, be very skeptical. It is absolutely true that you want something that has real pricing power that comes from a network effect, a moat, a barrier to entry, whatever it is. But when that’s true, it’s so obvious. So the more a founder tries to sell you on why they’re super differentiated and why they have this long-term competitive advantage, the more skeptical you should be.” He continues: “I have found this framework of asking, ‘Is this a good idea that seems bad? Or is this a bad idea that seems good?’ has helped me make good decisions a bunch of times.” Source: Y Combinator (Mar 2018)

Startup Archive

14,506 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Yesterday was July 20, a date that for many is very difficult. Both on July 20 and every day of the year, we know that depression is a very hard battle. If you are going through this, I want you to know that you are not alone in this.

Yesterday was July 20, a date that for many is very difficult. Both on July 20 and every day of the year, we know that depression is a very hard battle. If you are going through this, I want you to know that you are not alone in this.

Linkin Park Live

15,779 просмотров • 2 лет назад