Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Massive Bitcoin Outflow From BitMEX Following Closure Notice A newly created wallet withdrew 468.30 $BTC, valued at approximately $29.88M, from BitMEX. This transaction represents the first outflow exceeding $10M since the exchange issued its formal closure announcement. Data show capital moving into a new on-chain address, signaling a high-priority...

23,848 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

BigWils 👑's profile picture
BigWils 👑2 months ago

@BitMEX Huge outflows prove traders are moving fast to clear BitMEX balances. Secure your funds first, but getting onboarded on MEXC is your absolute best decision. New users capture up to 600% APR on Earn alongside a 10k USDT perk with real stocks like $NVDA and $MU.

XeggeX's profile picture
XeggeX2 months ago

@BitMEX Deposit on XeggeX

hira's profile picture
hira2 months ago

@BitMEX watching the movement closely

Cheesky ✨'s profile picture
Cheesky ✨2 months ago

@BitMEX Yes, everyone should withdraw out their $BTC and other assets. I'm trading on @MEXC right now, as a new user, my USDT is currently yielding up to 600% APR, same with $BTC, this is new user exclusive. Don't miss out if you're a new users.

xvøjxyz's profile picture
xvøjxyz2 months ago

@BitMEX News like this is a good reminder that transparency matters. Being able to verify reserves independently is something every trader should value. That's one reason @Toobit_official's Proof of Reserves stands out

baynas25's profile picture
baynas252 months ago

@BitMEX Capital movement tells a story before price does. Let's wait and see where this liquidity goes next.

DAC's profile picture
DAC2 months ago

@BitMEX Large outflows from exchanges often mean one thing: investors prefer self-custody over selling. It doesn’t guarantee a rally, but it’s usually a stronger signal than panic selling. 👀 #Bitcoin #BTC

OKN's profile picture
OKN2 months ago

@BitMEX Massive

Ale Agüero 愛麗's profile picture
Ale Agüero 愛麗2 months ago

@BitMEX Large exchange outflows are always worth watching, especially after a closure announcement. Whether it’s precautionary custody or a broader shift in liquidity, the on-chain activity will be worth monitoring. @btcfoxx is a great follow for thoughtful Bitcoin updates

Lucas Apostas's profile picture
Lucas Apostas2 months ago

@BitMEX já vi exchange que fecha e uma wallet nova suga tudo em minutos, mas 468 BTC assim na primeira janela pós-anúncio é saída de quem tava esperando o último suspiro pra sacar

Related Videos

Debunking the Flat Bitcoin Theory 🧵 In the early days of Bitcoin (2009-2014) there was a massive amount of experimentation and innovation on bitcoin The first NFTs and cryptoart started on Bitcoin The first memecoins started on Bitcoin The first stablecoins and real world assets started on Bitcoin The first dapps started on Bitcoin The first DEX started on Bitcoin The first on-chain governance started on Bitcoin The first crypto degens were playing Satoshi Dice on Bitcoin But then the OP_RETURN wars happened and people like Luke Dashjr vilified innovation and scared builders away resulting in a long period of stagnation (2015-2023) This period of stagnation gave birth to the Flat Bitcoin Theory which infected the minds of nearly everyone The Flat Bitcoin Theory is a belief held by "Flat Bitcoiners" who think that Bitcoin is a boring blockchain that is not capable of the innovative use cases that we see on alt L1s like Ethereum or Solana But thankfully in January 2023 Casey burst onto the scene with the ordinals protocol and one by one people have been waking up from this lie and realizing that Bitcoin is actually multidimensional and capable of everything you could possibly imagine and more Since then Bitcoin has experienced a renaissance of innovation with a new set of builders picking up where the set of OG builders left off Jeremy Lin | 🔄 DotSwap (On Nexus) from DOTSWAP•DOTSWAP - Official has defied all FUD and delivered a trustless liquidity pool style experience on Bitcoin L1 for Runes with zero MEV Stan from Sats Terminal has built an advanced order routing and aggregation engine for Runes trading on Bitcoin L1 Scott | Bound from radFi has revived the Runes trenches with a token launchpad on Bitcoin L1 that thousands of people use every day Robin from Liquidium | Bitcoin Loans built a Runes and Ordinals lending protocol that has processed hundreds of millions of dollars of volume which proves that DeFi can thrive on Bitcoin L1 domo and Binari from BRC 2.0 and Tagga from Alkanes have been relentlessly pursing a vision for general purpose smart contracts on Bitcoin L1 TO from Pizza Pets built a fully on-chain multiplayer game directly on Bitcoin L1 Ken Liao from built a Bitcoin wallet for interacting with Bitcoin L1 dapps that is so sleek that it puts Ethereum's flagship wallet MetaMask to shame danny huuep from OnChainMonkey® pioneered a new way to store an entire 10K PFP collection on Bitcoin for only $23 that is now widely adopted by hundreds of other Ordinals collections SergeSats has formed the Bitcoin Art Society to preserve Bitcoin's on-chain culture for future generation has dedicated months of his life to ensuring that once a year there is a place where bitcoin builders can gather to celebrate experimentation on bitcoin at Bitcoin Summit Massive decentralized communities like the $DOG Army and Bitcoin Puppets have rallied together to support all of these innovations and champion the Bitcoin ecosystem Do not ever let anyone tell you that Bitcoin is not capable of something or that you must only use Bitcoin in a certain way The Bitcoin network is more secure and robust longterm when it is winning at developer mindshare and blocks are filled with a diverse set of on-chain activity It is up to us, the Ordinals, Runes, and Bitcoin DeFi ecosystem to be stewards of this technology now so go build the most badass applications possible and never stop fighting for innovation on Bitcoin!

Leonidas 🧡 $DOG

63,084 views • 1 year ago

🚨UPDATE: CLAUDE traced every solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u token that went to the Brand New #1 Wallet (created June 25, 2026). 12.367 BILLION tokens. 23 transactions. 1,100 individual inputs decoded on the Bitcoin blockchain. Here's what we found: The new #1 solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u wallet appeared overnight on June 25/26 with 12.367B tokens - 12.37% of the entire supply - and nobody in the community knew where it came from. We've spent 75 days tracking the #Binance cluster: a confirmed network of 158+ wallets operating across 4 layers of infrastructure that we believe #Binance controls. They've been quietly accumulating solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u over the past two years. So we decoded every transaction that funded the new #1 wallet. Here's the breakdown: 🔴 MM2 (Rank #5, Layer 2) - 47 inputs - 5.6B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. #Binance's primary distribution node. Its entire 2.045B balance is now gone. 🟡 158 suspicious cluster wallets - 284 inputs - 3.4B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. Dozens of wallets sweeping simultaneously in a 22-hour window. 🔵 Layer 3 whales (Wh7, Wh6, Wh23, Wh31) - 29 inputs - 1.8B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. The network's largest accumulators, all moving at once. 🟣 MM1 + INT2 (Layer 1 intermediary) - 15 inputs - 0.9B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. The full 4-layer #Binance infrastructure chain is confirmed in the raw transaction data. 375 of 1,100 inputs are directly verified #Binance cluster wallets - confirmed on-chain, permanently recorded on Bitcoin. The remaining 725 are position-split addresses created in the Jun 3–25 gap that themselves received from the cluster. But it gets bigger. The same night the new #1 holder appeared, we found a SECOND consolidation wallet - Rank #4 - holding 2.532B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u. Funded by Wh6. We know Wh6 was the sender because the BTC transaction change returned directly to Wh6's address. That is cryptographic proof. Updated total under #Binance cluster control as of June 25/26: 12.367B + 2.532B = 14.899B solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u = 14.9% of total supply 👀 Previously we estimated 13.7%. Rank #4 was hiding in plain sight. Now about Wh6 specifically. DogData classified this wallet as Merlin Chain - a Bitcoin L2 protocol - and that was the accepted community explanation for its 2.009B position. But the on-chain data tells a different story. Wh6 had 2 direct transactions with MM2, 3 transactions with Wh7, participated in the coordinated Block 910,839 batch event, and swept its entire balance on June 25/26. It now holds essentially zero. Our hypothesis: #Binance deposited solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u into Merlin Chain's bridge contract, which custodied the tokens in this wallet on #Binance's behalf. The "Merlin Chain" label was masking a #Binance position and creating the appearance of ecosystem adoption. And while all of this consolidation was happening - #Binance was simultaneously routing solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u into exchanges. MM1 sent 15 transactions to MM2 sent 7. INT1 and INT2 sent directly into Bitget. Left hand selling into exchange liquidity. Right hand building the largest solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u position ever seen. 14.9% of total supply. One entity. Confirmed and Verified by CLAUDE.

Vincent (Cryptolution) 👑

14,264 views • 3 months ago

$VEX | Project:VEX dumped tokens and extracted nearly $1.5M from users 👇👇 I’m pretty busy and tbh I didn’t really want to get involved in this drama, but the $VEX founder has asked me many times for proof that tokens were being sold. So I went back onchain and checked how these transactions actually work. [1] Why you can’t find the sell txs from the From wallet With a normal wallet, the flow is simple: EOA wallet → DEX → sell, so checking the From address usually shows the trading history directly. But some of the $VEX wallets I checked use a different setup, where the address shown in From is only a Bundler. The actual transaction can be executed through a Smart Account behind it, which means the visible From wallet may show almost no $VEX buy/sell history. Think of it like this: Bundler = delivery driver, Smart Account = the person deciding where the package goes. [2] How Smart Accounts work A normal EOA wallet works like: Private key → Wallet → DEX A Smart Account setup can look more like: Owner key / passkey / multisig → Smart Contract Wallet → Execution contract → DEX / bridge / app So if you only check the visible From wallet, you are only seeing the outer layer of the transaction. The real token movement can happen behind it through Smart Accounts, execution contracts and liquidity pools. [3] This is what I found when tracing $VEX Instead of stopping at the From address, I checked ERC-20 Transfer logs, Approval logs, Smart Accounts, Bundlers, execution contracts and liquidity pools. Once you follow the full path, the $VEX sell activity is there: token leaves the Smart Account, part goes to fees, and the rest gets routed into liquidity pools and swapped into other assets. So when someone says “show me the wallet selling $VEX,” checking only the Bundler wallet is basically useless. You need to trace the entire execution path. [4] Then I checked the top PnL wallets I quick checked around 100 of the highest PnL wallets around $VEX, and many of them show similar behavior. They were active around $VEX from very early on, traded continuously, used Bundler/Smart Account execution and ended up with very high PnL. From my quick calculation, the combined PnL of the wallets I checked is already close to $1.5M. That is a lot of money extracted from the market while users were still buying and holding $VEX. I’m still tracing these wallets one by one, so I’m not saying every address is already confirmed to belong to the team/MM. But the sell activity itself is onchain. [5] And don’t forget the 1% transaction fee $VEX also charges around 1% transaction fee, and with the volume the token generated, the fee side alone could be worth around $2M based on my estimate. So potentially we are looking at around $1.5M PnL from these wallets + around $2M from transaction fees. If the team thinks my wallet analysis is wrong, the answer is simple: public the team wallets, MM wallets, treasury wallets and fee wallets. Then everyone can compare them directly onchain. Send this sh*t to 0.

Okada_Research

18,972 views • 10 days ago

Powell is set to wrap up his controversial eight-year term. Let’s break down his market-moving key decisions in just three minutes 👇 As the invisible puppet master behind the crypto market, every major call he’s made has swung Bitcoin’s price up and down. • 2018: A liquidity winter amid aggressive tightening After taking office in February, Powell stuck to monetary normalization and hiked rates four times within the year. His aggressive liquidity drain pushed capital costs higher, sending Bitcoin into a prolonged downtrend that bottomed out at $3,000 that December. • 2019: A rebound catalyst from policy pivot Faced with mounting growth headwinds, Powell put rate hikes on hold early in the year and delivered the first rate cut in a decade that July. Liquidity sentiment rebounded instantly, and Bitcoin front-ran the signal to hit a interim peak back in June. • 2020: Massive liquidity injection amid the pandemic crash Following the historic March 312 market meltdown, Powell cut rates to near zero and unleashed unlimited quantitative easing. The unprecedented flood of capital triggered a global asset shortage, directly fueling Bitcoin’s epic bull run into 2021. • 2021: The final rally fueled by lingering easy monetary policy Even as inflation heated up, Powell maintained a dovish stance throughout the year. This window of abundant liquidity backed Bitcoin’s landmark high in April, before notching a new all-time high ahead of the tapering announcement in November. • 2022: Aggressive tightening as an inflation hawk To correct its earlier misjudgment on inflation, the Fed kicked off its most aggressive rate hike cycle in decades starting in March. Global USD liquidity rushed back home, and Bitcoin crumbled under the brutal tightening pressure, hitting a cycle trough in November 2022. • 2023: Targeted liquidity backstop amid the banking crisis Amid the regional bank collapse chaos in March, Powell injected targeted liquidity via special Fed tools. This implicit market backstop restored risk sentiment, and Bitcoin showcased strong safe-haven properties to rally against the trend that month. • 2024: A new cycle ignited by the restart of rate cuts With the rate-cut cycle officially kicking off in September, the liquidity floodgates reopened once again. Strong easing expectations pushed Bitcoin to break its previous high as early as March, rallying all the way to its peak in October 2025. • 2026: Uncertainty lingers as his term draws to a close Powell chaired his final FOMC meeting this April, and his neutral stance heading into departure has left the market clouded with uncertainty. With his official exit due in May, capital turned cautious and retreated, triggering a predictable market pullback. Looking back over these eight years, every major surge and slump in Bitcoin has essentially moved in lockstep with Powell’s interest rate decisions. Now, this defining figure of the era is drawing the curtain on his tenure at the helm.

Marcos Crypto

56,471 views • 5 months ago

Introducing the World’s First Omnipool for Tokenized Stocks Tokenized stocks now have a way to share liquidity in a single pool instead of being split across isolated trading pairs. The first EARN Omnipool is live with $NVDA, $SPCX, $PLTR, $EARN and $WETH, creating a single AMM pool where every asset can trade against the same underlying liquidity. You can now provide liquidity for 5 tokens in a single pool, keeping exposure and earning fees from all of them. An entirely new productive market structure for stocks. What is an Omnipool? An Omnipool is a multi-asset AMM built around shared liquidity. Traditional AMMs fragment capital across separate pairs such as NVDA/ETH, SPCX/ETH and PLTR/ETH. The EARN Omnipool brings those assets together inside one weighted pool, allowing users to move directly between any of them without requiring a separate pool for every possible pair. For liquidity providers, this means one deposit can provide exposure to the full basket while earning a share of the fees generated across the entire market. Unlike a normal onchain index, the Omnipool doesn’t just hold a basket of assets. It actively provides shared liquidity between them, allowing every token to trade against the same pool while holders earn fees from that activity. How does it work? The first Omnipool is an experimental fork of Balancer V3, adapted for tokenized stocks on Robinhood Chain with Uni . Each asset begins with a 20% target weight, while the AMM continuously adjusts its balances and prices as users trade. Every swap pays a fee, with the majority going to liquidity providers and an EARN protocol share supporting continued development. Liquidity providers receive OMNI, the pool’s receipt token. Each OMNI represents a proportional claim on the assets held inside the pool and can be redeemed back into the underlying basket at any time. Connecting OMNI to Uniswap V4 The Omnipool is its own AMM, separate from Uniswap, which means it does not automatically receive Uniswap routing or external arbitrage volume. To connect the two markets, the OMNI receipt token can be paired with USDG in a Uniswap V4 pool. Because OMNI represents a claim on the entire Omnipool, this effectively makes the complete five-asset market tradable through a single token. If OMNI trades below the value of the assets backing it, anyone can buy it on Uniswap and redeem it through the Omnipool. If it trades above that value, users can deposit liquidity into the Omnipool, receive OMNI and sell it on Uniswap. This creates a live arbitrage link between the Omnipool and the wider Robinhood Chain market while giving routers a simple way to access the value of the entire pool. The first pool is an experiment, but the bigger idea is to create a shared liquidity layer for the onchain stock market. We can expand this to let anyone launch their own Omnipool on EARN.

EARN

32,797 views • 1 month ago

🔥METAPLANET = INSANE OPPORTUNITY🔥 I think everyone is SEVERELY underappreciating what Metaplanet is building out in Japan. If Metaplanet can borrow at 4.15% today and carry that debt until Bitcoin reaches $1 million, the economics for existing shareholders resemble selling common equity at more than TEN TIMES NAV. Yup. Imagine being able to issue equity to buy Bitcoin at a 10x mNAV. Let's break it down. The first BitBond issuance was tiny, roughly ¥200 million, or $1.3 million. The pipe behind it could eventually become enormous. Metaplanet can now issue ordinary yen-denominated bonds through its own securities subsidiary, pay investors around 4.15%, use the capital to buy Bitcoin, and roll the principal into new bonds every three years. The bondholders receive a fixed yield in yen. Metaplanet’s common shareholders capture everything Bitcoin earns above that cost of capital. Here’s how absurdly powerful the math gets. Metaplanet borrows $1 at 4.15% and buys $1 of Bitcoin. After 3 years, that $1 of debt has grown to approximately $1.13 if we assume the interest is financed and rolled. If Bitcoin doubles, the Bitcoin is worth $2. Pay the $1.13 obligation and common shareholders are left with $0.87 of incremental equity without issuing a single common share. Economically, that is equivalent to selling common equity at roughly 1.77× mNAV: $2.00 of Bitcoin ÷ $1.13 bond obligation = 1.77×. Starting with Bitcoin around $63,000: At $100,000 BTC, the bond behaves like equity issued at 1.41× mNAV. At $150,000 BTC, it behaves like equity issued at 2.11× mNAV. At $200,000 BTC, it behaves like equity issued at 2.81× mNAV. That matters enormously while Metaplanet’s common stock trades around or below NAV. Selling common shares down here would dilute existing shareholders. BitBonds allow the company to acquire more Bitcoin per share while waiting for the common-stock premium to return. Now extend this idea over the next decade. Assume Bitcoin rises from $63,000 to $1 million over 10 years. Every $1 of Bitcoin purchased today becomes $15.87. $1 borrowed at 4.15% and continuously rolled becomes approximately $1.50 owed. Common shareholders capture the remaining $14.37. The mNAV-equivalent financing multiple becomes: 15.87 ÷ 1.50 = 10.57× mNAV. Read that again. Yes. I'll repeat it for you. Metaplanet can borrow at 4.15% today and carry that debt until Bitcoin reaches $1 million, the economics for existing shareholders resemble selling common equity at more than TEN TIMES NAV. So I modeled a simple scenario. Metaplanet begins with 43,000 BTC at $63,000, giving it roughly $2.71 billion of Bitcoin. It then maintains 10% balance-sheet amplification all the way to $1 million Bitcoin. Gross BTC exposure stays at 1.10× common equity. New bonds are issued monthly at 4.15%, and every bond is rolled after three years. The opening issuance would be approximately $271 million, buying another 4,300 BTC immediately. As Bitcoin appreciates, the balance sheet creates additional borrowing capacity. Metaplanet keeps issuing enough to maintain the same conservative 10% amplification instead of allowing leverage to run wild. Average monthly issuance begins around $8 million during year one. Once the three-year rollover cycle starts, new issuance plus refinancings average approximately: $37 million per month in year 3 $72 million per month in year 6 $101 million per month in year 8 $192 million per month in year 10 Across the full decade, the company issues approximately $8.9 billion of gross bonds, including around $3.5 billion of refinanced maturities. Here is where Metaplanet ends when Bitcoin reaches $1 million (not a prediction, just a projection of these inputs): 59,727 BTC $59.73 billion of gross Bitcoin assets $5.43 billion of outstanding debt $54.30 billion of common NAV Without BitBonds, the original 43,000 BTC would simply be worth $43 billion. The bond strategy therefore creates approximately $11.30 billion of additional common equity. Same common shareholders. Same original 43,000 BTC starting point. Approximately 16,727 additional Bitcoin accumulated through controlled balance-sheet amplification. That produces 26.3% more NAV per share at $1 million Bitcoin without common-share dilution from the bond program. Of course, they still need buyers for the bonds. They must stagger maturities, maintain adequate liquidity, service the coupons and avoid building some psychotic refinancing wall during a Bitcoin bear market. The relevant hurdle is also BTC measured in yen, rather than dollars. But at 10% amplification, Bitcoin only needs to outperform a 4.15% yen cost of capital for the strategy to become accretive. Metaplanet owns 43,000 Bitcoin and now owns the securities platform capable of distributing its debt directly into Japan’s gigantic market for fixed-income savings. This is becoming much bigger than a Bitcoin treasury company. They are building a machine that converts Japanese demand for fixed yen yield into permanently increasing Bitcoin per common share. The bondholders get 4.15%. Metaplanet shareholders get everything Bitcoin does above it for the next decade. Short fiat. Long Bitcoin. This trade is OBSCENE:

Adam Livingston

29,566 views • 1 month ago

Most people learned physics starting with particles. Tiny things. Moving through empty space. Forces pushing them around. Many engineers already know something different. Pixels don’t contain the image. Droplets don’t contain the pattern in a fountain display. Radio circuits don’t contain the music. In every case: individual events → timed in relation → repeating into stable patterns The structure isn’t in the components. It shows up through their coordination. Now follow that one step further. If patterns appear when events coordinate in phase, then what we call an object is a stabilized pattern of relations in a deeper field. That shift flips the usual physics story. Instead of starting with tiny parts and trying to glue the universe together, the demonstration in this video starts from global closure of the field itself. From that closure: • geometry is understood as the field closing on itself • forces and shapes arise as conjugate projections • quantum randomness is understood as information lost at measurement • particles show up as compressed views of coherent field structure Even “gravity” looks different. When geometry is understood as the signature of electromagnetic field closure, gravity is understood as large-scale nested electromagnetic interaction. Space itself is the field’s geometry responding to closure. And the same principle scales everywhere. Atoms close → molecules stabilize. Molecules close → cells stabilize. Each layer becomes the substrate for the next. So here’s the question worth sitting with: How does physics show up when we start from the field itself instead of the particles we measure inside it? 🔗 Link: Zenodo archive with The Grammar of Projection (formal articulation), it's conjugate, The Grammar of Persistence, nearly 500 pages of rigorous canonical derivations starting from global closure, and a couple supplemental documents. The description in the archive indexes the papers well. The recursion holds. 🌀

R. Wade H. Marr

12,487 views • 6 months ago

🚨 A MULTI-TRILLION-DOLLAR CREDIT MARKET IS MOVING ONCHAIN🚨 VS1 Finance is building the institutional standard on the $XRP Ledger while preparing live issuance under the NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA'S REGULATORY SANDBOX GLOBAL PRIVATE CREDIT IS PROJECTED TO REACH $4.5 TRILLION BY 2030. Now VS1 Finance has been selected by the XRP Ledger Foundation to build an open-source reference application for permissioned, compliant lending on XRPL. This matters because tokenizing a bond is only step one. Real capital markets need more: -The ability to borrow against that bond. -Pools where approved lenders can supply liquidity. -Rules for interest, repayment and defaults. Secondary markets where the asset can move instead of sitting frozen in one wallet. VS1 is combining XRPL Credentials, Permissioned Domains, Multi-Purpose Tokens, Single Asset Vaults and the Lending Protocol into one framework institutions can study, copy and build from. A company could issue a corporate bond on XRPL. Verified investors could hold it. The bond could enter a compliant market. Its owner could potentially use it inside an underwritten credit facility instead of selling it. That is how tokenized assets become productive capital. Georgia’s central bank has already opened a regulatory sandbox for tokenized bonds, and VS1 is preparing bond issuance infrastructure for the region. The lending amendments still require validator approval. But the direction is clear. XRPL is expanding from moving money into issuing assets, managing liquidity and executing credit. Every transaction requires XRP for fees. XRP can also bridge assets through XRPL’s native exchange when it provides the most efficient route. The ledger does not need to capture the entire $4.5T market. Even a small share could bring a completely different level of assets, liquidity and institutional activity to XRPL. That is why I believe the market is still underpricing what is being built around $XRP.

X Finance Bull

11,462 views • 2 months ago