Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Massive bombshell. Google promised its engineers they would never develop technologies for weapons or human rights violations. When workers discovered their tech was powering an active genocide, executives immediately fired 50 protesters. Big tech is weaponized by the Pentagon.

Furkan Gözükara

276,694 subscribers

29,438 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Health & Wellness Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Intel, Google, Microsoft, Cisco, PayPal, Adobe, Meta, Apple, Pinterest… Tech workers in Silicon Valley are calling out the double standards of their former employers, who claim to defend human rights, except when it comes to Palestine. In an unprecedented crackdown on free speech, some have been sanctioned or fired simply for challenging tech executives. Others chose to resign, saying that US tech companies enable Israel to carry out war crimes in Gaza and across the Middle East. But they tell TRT World that Palestine is revolutionising the tech industry, and that employees are now willing to launch a workers’ intifada to challenge corporate greed

Intel, Google, Microsoft, Cisco, PayPal, Adobe, Meta, Apple, Pinterest… Tech workers in Silicon Valley are calling out the double standards of their former employers, who claim to defend human rights, except when it comes to Palestine. In an unprecedented crackdown on free speech, some have been sanctioned or fired simply for challenging tech executives. Others chose to resign, saying that US tech companies enable Israel to carry out war crimes in Gaza and across the Middle East. But they tell TRT World that Palestine is revolutionising the tech industry, and that employees are now willing to launch a workers’ intifada to challenge corporate greed

TRT World

31,760 views • 5 months ago

JUST IN: Google has fired 28 employees who participated in a 10-hour pro-Palestine protest at their New York and Sunnyvale, California offices. The protesters demanded Google pull out of their $1.2 billion cloud contract with Israel. They failed miserably. “This evening, Google indiscriminately fired 28 workers, including those among us who did not directly participate in yesterday’s historic, bicoastal 10-hour sit-in protests,” said the fired workers. “We cannot comprehend how [Google leadership] are able to sleep at night while their tech has enabled 100,000 Palestinians killed, reported missing, or wounded in the last six months of Israel’s genocide — and counting.”

JUST IN: Google has fired 28 employees who participated in a 10-hour pro-Palestine protest at their New York and Sunnyvale, California offices. The protesters demanded Google pull out of their $1.2 billion cloud contract with Israel. They failed miserably. “This evening, Google indiscriminately fired 28 workers, including those among us who did not directly participate in yesterday’s historic, bicoastal 10-hour sit-in protests,” said the fired workers. “We cannot comprehend how [Google leadership] are able to sleep at night while their tech has enabled 100,000 Palestinians killed, reported missing, or wounded in the last six months of Israel’s genocide — and counting.”

Collin Rugg

3,148,897 views • 2 years ago

This is the United Nations now! The organization responsible for ensuring human rights! I received an invitation to attend this conference and I declined it after knowing that the people who are deeply complicit in the genocide in Lebanon and Palestine, killing civilians using AI technologies are being given the opportunity to brag about this in public using UN stage! I condemn the UN shameful partnership with criminal tech companies at this conference, as well as the human rights violations and violence that accompanied the removal of protesters.

This is the United Nations now! The organization responsible for ensuring human rights! I received an invitation to attend this conference and I declined it after knowing that the people who are deeply complicit in the genocide in Lebanon and Palestine, killing civilians using AI technologies are being given the opportunity to brag about this in public using UN stage! I condemn the UN shameful partnership with criminal tech companies at this conference, as well as the human rights violations and violence that accompanied the removal of protesters.

Mohamad Safa

187,784 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL UFO REVELATION FROM ROSS COULTHART 🚨 Jay Stratton (ex-UAP Task Force Director) has LEFT Radiance Technologies – the company rumored to be prepping for alien tech reverse engineering! 👽🛸 Insiders say a massive transfer of REAL non-human craft/tech from Lockheed Martin to Radiance was BLOCKED by the Pentagon. Stratton's role? Oversee it. Now he's gone because it fell through. Is this the cover-up cracking? Why block private sector access to crashed UFOs? What do YOU think is really going on? 👽🔥 #JayStratton #RossCoulthart

🚨 BOMBSHELL UFO REVELATION FROM ROSS COULTHART 🚨 Jay Stratton (ex-UAP Task Force Director) has LEFT Radiance Technologies – the company rumored to be prepping for alien tech reverse engineering! 👽🛸 Insiders say a massive transfer of REAL non-human craft/tech from Lockheed Martin to Radiance was BLOCKED by the Pentagon. Stratton's role? Oversee it. Now he's gone because it fell through. Is this the cover-up cracking? Why block private sector access to crashed UFOs? What do YOU think is really going on? 👽🔥 #JayStratton #RossCoulthart

Interstellar

123,561 views • 8 months ago

Upscrolled founder Issam Hijazi condemned major technology companies at Web Summit Qatar for their role in enabling Israel’s genocide in Gaza, saying big tech has already proven it is not ethical. He said technology supplied to certain regimes has facilitated mass killing in a confined area, explicitly pointing to Gaza, and said that with big tech profit consistently comes before human life. Hijazi said these companies show no concern for user wellbeing or mental health, monetise personal data when it is profitable, and deliberately design addictive platforms. He said big tech is not building for humanity, but generating revenue without regard for the human devastation their tools help enable.

Upscrolled founder Issam Hijazi condemned major technology companies at Web Summit Qatar for their role in enabling Israel’s genocide in Gaza, saying big tech has already proven it is not ethical. He said technology supplied to certain regimes has facilitated mass killing in a confined area, explicitly pointing to Gaza, and said that with big tech profit consistently comes before human life. Hijazi said these companies show no concern for user wellbeing or mental health, monetise personal data when it is profitable, and deliberately design addictive platforms. He said big tech is not building for humanity, but generating revenue without regard for the human devastation their tools help enable.

Middle East Eye

13,134 views • 6 months ago

Maplestory has seen 250M+ players in its 21 year history. So when they decided to build on a blockchain, their team prioritized dependable, scalable tech. MapleStory Universe is creating an experience for a massive playerbase where the expectation is 24/7 uptime. They did their research, talked to other games on Avalanche, and the choice was clear. 🕹️👇

Maplestory has seen 250M+ players in its 21 year history. So when they decided to build on a blockchain, their team prioritized dependable, scalable tech. MapleStory Universe is creating an experience for a massive playerbase where the expectation is 24/7 uptime. They did their research, talked to other games on Avalanche, and the choice was clear. 🕹️👇

Avalanche🔺

85,879 views • 1 year ago

Big Tech must be held legally accountable, says Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, and President Donald Trump’s “Ratepayer Protection Pledge” is a step in the right direction. “The idea that they [tech companies] would come to Missouri and ask for Missourians to pay for their electricity, or that they would take away power supply, or kick people off the grid – that’s ridiculous, and we ought to just ban that by legislation,” Hawley told The Lion, noting that his legislation would mandate companies to be “absolutely clear on what it is they actually require when it comes to power.” Josh Hawley

Big Tech must be held legally accountable, says Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, and President Donald Trump’s “Ratepayer Protection Pledge” is a step in the right direction. “The idea that they [tech companies] would come to Missouri and ask for Missourians to pay for their electricity, or that they would take away power supply, or kick people off the grid – that’s ridiculous, and we ought to just ban that by legislation,” Hawley told The Lion, noting that his legislation would mandate companies to be “absolutely clear on what it is they actually require when it comes to power.” Josh Hawley

The Lion

13,646 views • 5 months ago

REPORT: UK government officials are now drafting a law that would jail tech executives for up to FIVE YEARS if they refuse to build scanners that inspect EVERY photo, video, and message on your phone. Think about that. The claim is keeping children “safe.” But beneath the surface, this has all the hallmarks of a cover story for expanding surveillance. The proposal would force Apple, Google, and other tech giants to make it impossible for a child to send, receive, view, or share a single nude image, with executives who refuse facing up to five years in prison. The children are the headline; surveillance is the product. The new technology to accomplish this is called “client-side scanning.” Watch the video below to see how it works. This threat to jail Big Tech CEOs seems to be a bit of a farce because, let’s be honest, government and Big Tech are best friends. The threat of prison simply gives Big Tech an excuse to say, “Well, we have to comply. We have no choice.” Meanwhile, Microsoft and Apple themselves are reportedly among the companies that helped develop the technology behind client-side scanning. It’s one big club, and we ain’t in it.

REPORT: UK government officials are now drafting a law that would jail tech executives for up to FIVE YEARS if they refuse to build scanners that inspect EVERY photo, video, and message on your phone. Think about that. The claim is keeping children “safe.” But beneath the surface, this has all the hallmarks of a cover story for expanding surveillance. The proposal would force Apple, Google, and other tech giants to make it impossible for a child to send, receive, view, or share a single nude image, with executives who refuse facing up to five years in prison. The children are the headline; surveillance is the product. The new technology to accomplish this is called “client-side scanning.” Watch the video below to see how it works. This threat to jail Big Tech CEOs seems to be a bit of a farce because, let’s be honest, government and Big Tech are best friends. The threat of prison simply gives Big Tech an excuse to say, “Well, we have to comply. We have no choice.” Meanwhile, Microsoft and Apple themselves are reportedly among the companies that helped develop the technology behind client-side scanning. It’s one big club, and we ain’t in it.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

96,858 views • 2 months ago

Google just completely BETRAYED its principles and people. In 2018, 4,000 Google employees signed a letter demanding the company to stop helping the Pentagon use AI for drone strikes. Google listened. They dropped the contract and published a pledge promising they would NEVER use AI for weapons or surveillance. But Google just signed a $200 million deal to put its most powerful AI on the Pentagon's classified networks for "any lawful purpose." And the story behind how they got from Point A to Point B is one of the most calculated corporate betrayals in Silicon Valley history. Here's what happened: The 2018 protest was over Project Maven, a Pentagon program that used Google's AI to identify targets in drone footage. Employees said "Google should not be in the business of war." A dozen engineers quit. Thousands more signed petitions. Google folded and let the contract expire. Then they published their famous AI Principles: 1. No weapons 2. No surveillance 3. No technologies that cause harm Sundar Pichai personally announced them. That pledge lasted exactly as long as the contracts didn't matter. Because here's what Google did quietly over the next 7 years while everyone thought they were the "ethical" AI company: December 2022: Won a share of the Pentagon's $9 billion Joint Warfighting Cloud contract alongside Amazon, Microsoft, and Oracle. 2024: Deployed Gemini to 3 million Pentagon personnel. February 2025: Quietly DELETED the weapons and surveillance language from their AI Principles. No announcement or press conference. April 2026: Signed the classified deal with the Pentagon for "any lawful government purpose." They didn't have a change of heart. They had a change of revenue. And the timing of this deal is where it gets really dark: 600 Google employees, including 20+ directors and VPs from DeepMind, sent a letter to Pichai on Monday begging him not to sign. The letter said the only way to guarantee Google's AI wouldn't be used for lethal autonomous weapons or mass surveillance was to reject classified workloads entirely, because once the technology enters air-gapped military networks, nobody at Google can see what happens to it. But Google literally signed the deal WHILE THE EMPLOYEES SLEPT. One Google AI researcher told Business Insider: "When I went to bed yesterday, I was hopeful that the employee letter would have an effect. This morning I woke up to the worst-case version of the contract being signed." The contract says Google has NO right to control or veto how the government uses its AI. The Pentagon can request Google to adjust its AI safety settings. And the deal covers classified networks where Google employees cannot monitor what's being done with their own technology. They handed over the keys and gave up the right to ask what the car is being used for. Meanwhile Anthropic got BLACKLISTED as a "supply chain risk" for asking for two restrictions: No mass surveillance of Americans and no fully autonomous weapons without a human pressing the button. The Pentagon treated an American company like a foreign adversary for requesting the exact same principles Google publicly pledged in 2018 and then quietly deleted. The math sums up the whole story: Project Maven in 2018 was worth a few million dollars. Google walked away and got applauded for having principles. The classified AI market in 2026 is worth tens of billions. Google deleted the principles and signed the deal at midnight. Palantir took over Project Maven after Google dropped it. That investment grew to $13 billion. Google watched a competitor make billions off the contract they abandoned for ethics and decided that would never happen again. In 2018, principles beat profits. In 2026, profits buried the principles. Google sold their soul for money.

Google just completely BETRAYED its principles and people. In 2018, 4,000 Google employees signed a letter demanding the company to stop helping the Pentagon use AI for drone strikes. Google listened. They dropped the contract and published a pledge promising they would NEVER use AI for weapons or surveillance. But Google just signed a $200 million deal to put its most powerful AI on the Pentagon's classified networks for "any lawful purpose." And the story behind how they got from Point A to Point B is one of the most calculated corporate betrayals in Silicon Valley history. Here's what happened: The 2018 protest was over Project Maven, a Pentagon program that used Google's AI to identify targets in drone footage. Employees said "Google should not be in the business of war." A dozen engineers quit. Thousands more signed petitions. Google folded and let the contract expire. Then they published their famous AI Principles: 1. No weapons 2. No surveillance 3. No technologies that cause harm Sundar Pichai personally announced them. That pledge lasted exactly as long as the contracts didn't matter. Because here's what Google did quietly over the next 7 years while everyone thought they were the "ethical" AI company: December 2022: Won a share of the Pentagon's $9 billion Joint Warfighting Cloud contract alongside Amazon, Microsoft, and Oracle. 2024: Deployed Gemini to 3 million Pentagon personnel. February 2025: Quietly DELETED the weapons and surveillance language from their AI Principles. No announcement or press conference. April 2026: Signed the classified deal with the Pentagon for "any lawful government purpose." They didn't have a change of heart. They had a change of revenue. And the timing of this deal is where it gets really dark: 600 Google employees, including 20+ directors and VPs from DeepMind, sent a letter to Pichai on Monday begging him not to sign. The letter said the only way to guarantee Google's AI wouldn't be used for lethal autonomous weapons or mass surveillance was to reject classified workloads entirely, because once the technology enters air-gapped military networks, nobody at Google can see what happens to it. But Google literally signed the deal WHILE THE EMPLOYEES SLEPT. One Google AI researcher told Business Insider: "When I went to bed yesterday, I was hopeful that the employee letter would have an effect. This morning I woke up to the worst-case version of the contract being signed." The contract says Google has NO right to control or veto how the government uses its AI. The Pentagon can request Google to adjust its AI safety settings. And the deal covers classified networks where Google employees cannot monitor what's being done with their own technology. They handed over the keys and gave up the right to ask what the car is being used for. Meanwhile Anthropic got BLACKLISTED as a "supply chain risk" for asking for two restrictions: No mass surveillance of Americans and no fully autonomous weapons without a human pressing the button. The Pentagon treated an American company like a foreign adversary for requesting the exact same principles Google publicly pledged in 2018 and then quietly deleted. The math sums up the whole story: Project Maven in 2018 was worth a few million dollars. Google walked away and got applauded for having principles. The classified AI market in 2026 is worth tens of billions. Google deleted the principles and signed the deal at midnight. Palantir took over Project Maven after Google dropped it. That investment grew to $13 billion. Google watched a competitor make billions off the contract they abandoned for ethics and decided that would never happen again. In 2018, principles beat profits. In 2026, profits buried the principles. Google sold their soul for money.

Ricardo

27,550 views • 3 months ago

What would you do if you saw a 14 foot Aligator with human remains in its mouth on your walk home? A 13 foot, 8 inch long alligator was discovered in a Pinellas County, Florida waterway by a man walking home from a job interview. The gator had human remains in its mouth. When officials tried to pull it from the waterway with a big truck, the gator started pulling the truck backwards. They are still trying to figure out who the human was. The massive gator was put down. Is this not terrifying? (video from FOX 13 Tampa Bay)

What would you do if you saw a 14 foot Aligator with human remains in its mouth on your walk home? A 13 foot, 8 inch long alligator was discovered in a Pinellas County, Florida waterway by a man walking home from a job interview. The gator had human remains in its mouth. When officials tried to pull it from the waterway with a big truck, the gator started pulling the truck backwards. They are still trying to figure out who the human was. The massive gator was put down. Is this not terrifying? (video from FOX 13 Tampa Bay)

Ed Krassenstein

7,738,121 views • 2 years ago

No Republican should go to the mat for Google, Amazon, Facebook, or Apple. Republicans like Jim Jordan, who never tried to shut down any DOJ office that was persecuting January 6th defendants, now want to shutter the FTC over its lawsuit against Big Tech. Maybe if Trump grandmas who were thrown in the DC gulags were wearing Facebook hoodies, Jim Jordan would have saved them.

No Republican should go to the mat for Google, Amazon, Facebook, or Apple. Republicans like Jim Jordan, who never tried to shut down any DOJ office that was persecuting January 6th defendants, now want to shutter the FTC over its lawsuit against Big Tech. Maybe if Trump grandmas who were thrown in the DC gulags were wearing Facebook hoodies, Jim Jordan would have saved them.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

88,165 views • 1 year ago

This is another Justice (the fat communist) from Brazil's Supreme Court. He was the Minister of Justice when this meeting happened and was addressing all social media and other "big tech" executives. This is what the State does: threatening violence or directly using it. You will rarely see such an explicit threat like this, on camera, and without shame! This is fascism by definition: "You will change your terms of use to what I want them to be, or else you will be investigated by the Federal Police and/or prosecuted by us until bankruptcy."

This is another Justice (the fat communist) from Brazil's Supreme Court. He was the Minister of Justice when this meeting happened and was addressing all social media and other "big tech" executives. This is what the State does: threatening violence or directly using it. You will rarely see such an explicit threat like this, on camera, and without shame! This is fascism by definition: "You will change your terms of use to what I want them to be, or else you will be investigated by the Federal Police and/or prosecuted by us until bankruptcy."

Instituto Rothbard

194,253 views • 1 year ago

Lockdowns were used to push children towards screens for school activities. When two years later the children returned to school, their note books and paper diaries had been removed and learning was moved into gamefied screens and video game like learning. This was engineered by the tech elite (Bill Gates' Microsoft) in order to turn our kids into digital addicts first, and prescription drug addicts in future. We never had a debate about this. School teachers did not oppose any resistance, they did not defend our kids. They were complicit with Big Tech.

Lockdowns were used to push children towards screens for school activities. When two years later the children returned to school, their note books and paper diaries had been removed and learning was moved into gamefied screens and video game like learning. This was engineered by the tech elite (Bill Gates' Microsoft) in order to turn our kids into digital addicts first, and prescription drug addicts in future. We never had a debate about this. School teachers did not oppose any resistance, they did not defend our kids. They were complicit with Big Tech.

Robin Monotti

31,228 views • 1 year ago

Mike Rogers on privacy rights: “You can’t have your privacy violated, if you don’t know your privacy was violated.” This is Mike Rogers when he chaired the House committee on Intelligence. His failure to hold the NSA and Big Tech accountable paved the way for the dystopian surveillance state we live in now. Big Tech stole our data to not only violate our privacy, but also to sell our data to companies who now use it to charge us more for goods and services. They stole our data then weaponized it against us. It is called surveillance pricing and it happens to you every time you buy an item, book a flight, or reserve a hotel online. Mike Rogers is one of the architects of this predatory practice and does not belong anywhere near the United States senate.

Mike Rogers on privacy rights: “You can’t have your privacy violated, if you don’t know your privacy was violated.” This is Mike Rogers when he chaired the House committee on Intelligence. His failure to hold the NSA and Big Tech accountable paved the way for the dystopian surveillance state we live in now. Big Tech stole our data to not only violate our privacy, but also to sell our data to companies who now use it to charge us more for goods and services. They stole our data then weaponized it against us. It is called surveillance pricing and it happens to you every time you buy an item, book a flight, or reserve a hotel online. Mike Rogers is one of the architects of this predatory practice and does not belong anywhere near the United States senate.

Power to the People ☭🕊

23,050 views • 7 days ago

The penny is fast dropping that a Burnham gov won’t just be Starmer with better comms. Things are moving firmly leftwards. Yesterday, Andy had a big meeting with the unions just as his camp were sending a flurry of anti-tech briefings to the FT. It has immediately spooked the UK’s tech industry - one of the economy’s rare bright spots right now. Take this one on autonomous vehicles, where Team Burnham criticises the gov’s ‘headlong pursuit of driverless cars.’ We should be so proud that the UK has a dog in the fight when it comes to this field of tech, with British software company, Wayve, competing against the likes of Tesla, Waymo and Baidu. Wayve is developing a different proposition to its competitors, which map everything in a way that is time-intensive and costly. By safely testing its tech on London’s complex road network, a brilliant product is being developed and refined in the UK that could be exported or have application in other settings. Instead, all the focus is on the threat of robotaxis to jobs even though there remain substantial real-world hurdles to rolling them out at scale, not least their cost versus a driver. Do we want the UK to develop world-leading tech or just receive what everyone else is willing to give us? It looks like a Burnham gov may want to crush our chances, just as it wants to remove Palantir from the delivery of important gov projects even if its tech can deliver better NHS services or policing. I am on record as being sceptical of Labour’s unquestioning embrace of US big tech in its first two years because I worried that they were too dazzled to carry out due diligence on promised investments, draw up decent contracts which avoided vendor lock-in or to procure from a wider range of more innovative, often domestic, companies. But that’s not the critique the Left is making of this current gov’s tech policy thus far. Tech companies of all kinds are their new bogeymen, to be driven out the moment a union’s interests are threatened. After all, if Labour was truly concerned about tech’s impact on jobs, it would not have made it so much more eyewateringly expensive and difficult to employ people.

The penny is fast dropping that a Burnham gov won’t just be Starmer with better comms. Things are moving firmly leftwards. Yesterday, Andy had a big meeting with the unions just as his camp were sending a flurry of anti-tech briefings to the FT. It has immediately spooked the UK’s tech industry - one of the economy’s rare bright spots right now. Take this one on autonomous vehicles, where Team Burnham criticises the gov’s ‘headlong pursuit of driverless cars.’ We should be so proud that the UK has a dog in the fight when it comes to this field of tech, with British software company, Wayve, competing against the likes of Tesla, Waymo and Baidu. Wayve is developing a different proposition to its competitors, which map everything in a way that is time-intensive and costly. By safely testing its tech on London’s complex road network, a brilliant product is being developed and refined in the UK that could be exported or have application in other settings. Instead, all the focus is on the threat of robotaxis to jobs even though there remain substantial real-world hurdles to rolling them out at scale, not least their cost versus a driver. Do we want the UK to develop world-leading tech or just receive what everyone else is willing to give us? It looks like a Burnham gov may want to crush our chances, just as it wants to remove Palantir from the delivery of important gov projects even if its tech can deliver better NHS services or policing. I am on record as being sceptical of Labour’s unquestioning embrace of US big tech in its first two years because I worried that they were too dazzled to carry out due diligence on promised investments, draw up decent contracts which avoided vendor lock-in or to procure from a wider range of more innovative, often domestic, companies. But that’s not the critique the Left is making of this current gov’s tech policy thus far. Tech companies of all kinds are their new bogeymen, to be driven out the moment a union’s interests are threatened. After all, if Labour was truly concerned about tech’s impact on jobs, it would not have made it so much more eyewateringly expensive and difficult to employ people.

Julia Lopez MP

231,029 views • 1 month ago

[Excerpt from Premier Minns speech at the Evening of Light and Solidarity with Herzog] Premier Minns should reflect on his words when he points the finger at all Australians for failing “the test of human decency” when the country his guest presides over shows not a shred of human decency in its treatment of Palestinians. Hopefully it will occur to Minns that the Sydney demonstrators were rallying because their humanity forces them to rail against a genocide. The protesters have not failed any test of human decency: to the contrary they reflect its epitome. The most glaring failure of morality this century is the actions of the state of Israel in Gaza and the inaction of Western countries that support those actions contrary to the wishes of the majority of their population. Sheeting blame or responsibility for the Bondi shootings home to ordinary Australians is an intolerable insult. The Bondi murders were committed by very much atypical Australians motivated by an apparent extreme ideology. #nswpol

[Excerpt from Premier Minns speech at the Evening of Light and Solidarity with Herzog] Premier Minns should reflect on his words when he points the finger at all Australians for failing “the test of human decency” when the country his guest presides over shows not a shred of human decency in its treatment of Palestinians. Hopefully it will occur to Minns that the Sydney demonstrators were rallying because their humanity forces them to rail against a genocide. The protesters have not failed any test of human decency: to the contrary they reflect its epitome. The most glaring failure of morality this century is the actions of the state of Israel in Gaza and the inaction of Western countries that support those actions contrary to the wishes of the majority of their population. Sheeting blame or responsibility for the Bondi shootings home to ordinary Australians is an intolerable insult. The Bondi murders were committed by very much atypical Australians motivated by an apparent extreme ideology. #nswpol

KellieTranter

23,838 views • 6 months ago