Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Matt Tardio asks Comic Dave Smith how he would administer aid distribution sites in Gaza. Comic Dave refuses to answer. Later, Piers Morgan asks Comic Dave Smith what he would do to deal with Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, rocket attacks, and fighters living among civilians. Comic Dave refuses to answer.... show more

Max 📟

82,737 subscribers

30,579 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

13 Comments

Somewhere In The Middle5 days ago

He’s taken that one from the Glenn Greewald playbook. “Well what I wouldn’t have done…” and prattle more on what Israel did stated in the negative. Yeah, Dave we get what Israel did, what would Private First Class Comic Dave Smith do?

The‘kee5 days ago

how come noone ever asks about what HAMAS leadership says??? smith is such a scumbag grifter... just shouts stupidity. what a fucking douche

Redrick Samson4 days ago

D comic is a low grade grifter. The fact that he is still being invited places is quite pathetic.

RockTruth94 days ago

If you’re a comedian turned podcaster who wants your views taken seriously, at least do your homework and be ready to answer questions like these. Instead, he just rants and comes across like he missed his morning testosterone shot. All this guy is about is performative sound bites.

Ian Ruguaru4 days ago

@ComicDaveSmith has no answers.

Luke Skywalker SUCKS!5 days ago

Commie Dave Smith

Larry Bernard4 days ago

Dave just wants dead jews

Triggery5 days ago

@davidmdraiman Hes so retarded P.R. May be important but it’s not how you win wars.

Skyward Scribe4 days ago

In other words, you think that all the challenges Israel faces make it okay for Israel to engage in what amounts to ethnic cleansing, or genocide, or whatever you'd prefer to call the effectively almost indiscriminate killing of scores of thousands of Palestinian people.

Eric D 1 8 34 days ago

He sounded like as assclown calling him “comic” before using his name. What relevance does that have to his opinion (one which is held by the majority in the US right now)? It was an appeal to authority because Tardio didn’t have a better argument.

Andrew Meyer 🔥5 days ago

What a pathetic cuck!

Ken4 days ago

We can drop the “comic” moniker. My grandmother is funnier dead than he is alive

Hells Bells 🇦🇺5 days ago

The irony….he talks about people “talking about everything except that”….ummm….did he answer Pier’s question?

Related Videos

Dave Smith demolished Sam Harris' brain surgery argument Sam Harris: "If comic Dave Smith showed up to do your brain surgery, you wouldn't want that" Dave: "By this same logic, it would disqualify these two guys from talking about 90% of what they talk about" LINK IN BIO

Dave Smith demolished Sam Harris' brain surgery argument Sam Harris: "If comic Dave Smith showed up to do your brain surgery, you wouldn't want that" Dave: "By this same logic, it would disqualify these two guys from talking about 90% of what they talk about" LINK IN BIO

Rav Arora

355,812 views • 1 year ago

"How do I not call it a genocide? How do I look at that and defend it?!" Megyn Kelly, Dave Smith and Matt Tardio join the show to discuss the destruction of the Israel-Gaza war. Just dropped!👇 📺 Piers Morgan | @MegynKelly | Dave Smith | Matt Tardio

"How do I not call it a genocide? How do I look at that and defend it?!" Megyn Kelly, Dave Smith and Matt Tardio join the show to discuss the destruction of the Israel-Gaza war. Just dropped!👇 📺 Piers Morgan | @MegynKelly | Dave Smith | Matt Tardio

Piers Morgan Uncensored

394,552 views • 5 days ago

Douglas Murray appears to confirm what I suspected: He was trying to send a message to Joe Rogan — NOT win some debate with Comic Dave Smith

Douglas Murray appears to confirm what I suspected: He was trying to send a message to Joe Rogan — NOT win some debate with Comic Dave Smith

Eitan Fischberger

723,249 views • 1 year ago

“Dave Smith’s Morality Is Actually Evil” Dave Smith is evil. Or, if you prefer to be charitable, his morality is; and that makes his worldview, and how he acts in the world, evil in practice. Dave Smith would know that if he was actually Jewish. Judaism does not judge morality by thoughts or intentions but by actions… and by that standard, Dave Smith is evil. Dave Smith is one of the loudest online voices opposed to Israel. He uses social media—most notably Joe Rogan’s bullhorn—to spread that opposition. And not through facts, expertise, or serious moral reasoning: Dave Smith doesn’t debate with facts, as Coleman Hughes pointed out. Dave Smith doesn’t understand urban warfare, as John Spencer made obvious. And Dave Smith doesn’t have a clue how to actually combat terrorism or defeat genocidal enemies, as Dave Smith himself ineptly revealed on TRIGGERnometry elsewhere. But if Dave Smith were merely a liar, an ignoramus, or a clown, that would be fine. It’s 2026. Social media is full of clowns. What makes Dave Smith dangerous is something worse. Dave Smith is a coward. He claims to be “anti-war” as a philosophy. In reality, he’s anti-war because he lacks the moral courage to confront evil. His worldview is built on refusal: refusal of responsibility, refusal of force, refusal of hard moral choices. That cowardice becomes evil when applied to the real world. Dave Smith is so reflexively anti-war that he uses Israel as a cudgel against the Iranian people themselves; people actively risking their lives to overthrow one of the most brutal, murderous regimes on earth. Let’s be clear about that regime: •It murders its own Olympians •It murders women for dancing or showing their hair •It murders people for protesting those murders Even if Dave Smith were right about Israel—and he isn’t—it would still be a moral good to oppose the Iranian regime. But because his morality is not rooted in Western Enlightenment philosophy—responsibility, agency, just war, moral clarity—Dave Smith collapses everything into childish transitive logic: “Israel bad! Therefore anyone who supports Israel is immoral. And therefore anyone who supports the Iranian people is also immoral.” This isn’t moral seriousness. It’s intellectual sloth. Dave Smith lies about genocide in Israel. Then, because of his immoral framework, he turns 2+2 into BREAKFAST! His worldview doesn’t just misunderstand evil… it incentivizes it. He treats any military action against terrorists or murderous regimes as inherently immoral. He has no answer for how evil is defeated. No framework for stopping genocidal enemies. No solution beyond posturing. And that’s the point. A morality that refuses to confront evil is not neutral. A philosophy that allows evil to flourish is itself evil. If you allow evil to flourish—and do nothing to stop it—you are complicit. If this were merely cowardice, maybe Dave Smith wouldn’t be evil. But he goes further: he actively condemns those who take the fight to terrorists and tyrants. “I’m anti-war,” he says… while excusing those who start wars, butcher civilians, and rule through terror. That isn’t peace. That’s surrender dressed up as virtue. Dave Smith is an unserious thinker who relies on his audience being just as unserious: “Israel bad! Ergo people who support Israel and also support the Iranian people are bad!” Dave Smith thinks you are immoral for supporting Israel in its war to defeat genocidal terrorists. And he thinks you are immoral for supporting the Iranian people who are trying to defeat a murderous, oppressive theocratic regime. Dave Smith is a liar. Dave Smith is a coward. And Dave Smith believes that defeating evil—in the only way it has ever been defeated, through force when necessary—is itself evil. If you think defeating evil is wrong like Dave Smith, you’re evil. Welcome to the Dave Smith Comedy Tour: acting morally righteous while ensuring evil flourishes… and attacking those trying to stop it.

“Dave Smith’s Morality Is Actually Evil” Dave Smith is evil. Or, if you prefer to be charitable, his morality is; and that makes his worldview, and how he acts in the world, evil in practice. Dave Smith would know that if he was actually Jewish. Judaism does not judge morality by thoughts or intentions but by actions… and by that standard, Dave Smith is evil. Dave Smith is one of the loudest online voices opposed to Israel. He uses social media—most notably Joe Rogan’s bullhorn—to spread that opposition. And not through facts, expertise, or serious moral reasoning: Dave Smith doesn’t debate with facts, as Coleman Hughes pointed out. Dave Smith doesn’t understand urban warfare, as John Spencer made obvious. And Dave Smith doesn’t have a clue how to actually combat terrorism or defeat genocidal enemies, as Dave Smith himself ineptly revealed on TRIGGERnometry elsewhere. But if Dave Smith were merely a liar, an ignoramus, or a clown, that would be fine. It’s 2026. Social media is full of clowns. What makes Dave Smith dangerous is something worse. Dave Smith is a coward. He claims to be “anti-war” as a philosophy. In reality, he’s anti-war because he lacks the moral courage to confront evil. His worldview is built on refusal: refusal of responsibility, refusal of force, refusal of hard moral choices. That cowardice becomes evil when applied to the real world. Dave Smith is so reflexively anti-war that he uses Israel as a cudgel against the Iranian people themselves; people actively risking their lives to overthrow one of the most brutal, murderous regimes on earth. Let’s be clear about that regime: •It murders its own Olympians •It murders women for dancing or showing their hair •It murders people for protesting those murders Even if Dave Smith were right about Israel—and he isn’t—it would still be a moral good to oppose the Iranian regime. But because his morality is not rooted in Western Enlightenment philosophy—responsibility, agency, just war, moral clarity—Dave Smith collapses everything into childish transitive logic: “Israel bad! Therefore anyone who supports Israel is immoral. And therefore anyone who supports the Iranian people is also immoral.” This isn’t moral seriousness. It’s intellectual sloth. Dave Smith lies about genocide in Israel. Then, because of his immoral framework, he turns 2+2 into BREAKFAST! His worldview doesn’t just misunderstand evil… it incentivizes it. He treats any military action against terrorists or murderous regimes as inherently immoral. He has no answer for how evil is defeated. No framework for stopping genocidal enemies. No solution beyond posturing. And that’s the point. A morality that refuses to confront evil is not neutral. A philosophy that allows evil to flourish is itself evil. If you allow evil to flourish—and do nothing to stop it—you are complicit. If this were merely cowardice, maybe Dave Smith wouldn’t be evil. But he goes further: he actively condemns those who take the fight to terrorists and tyrants. “I’m anti-war,” he says… while excusing those who start wars, butcher civilians, and rule through terror. That isn’t peace. That’s surrender dressed up as virtue. Dave Smith is an unserious thinker who relies on his audience being just as unserious: “Israel bad! Ergo people who support Israel and also support the Iranian people are bad!” Dave Smith thinks you are immoral for supporting Israel in its war to defeat genocidal terrorists. And he thinks you are immoral for supporting the Iranian people who are trying to defeat a murderous, oppressive theocratic regime. Dave Smith is a liar. Dave Smith is a coward. And Dave Smith believes that defeating evil—in the only way it has ever been defeated, through force when necessary—is itself evil. If you think defeating evil is wrong like Dave Smith, you’re evil. Welcome to the Dave Smith Comedy Tour: acting morally righteous while ensuring evil flourishes… and attacking those trying to stop it.

Jake Donnelly

18,571 views • 8 months ago

“Dave Smith; the Pennywise of Pacifism” “Comic” Dave Smith is currently in an X spat with Dan Crenshaw over the perils of war. Yes, Dave Smith is staring at Crenshaw with two good eyes and telling Crenshaw’s eye patch about war. Hubris, thy name be “Comic” Dave Smith. Dave Smith presents himself as the anti-war guy despite LOVING and INCENTIVIZING all the worst actors in history: The terrorists who committed genocide against Israel and Israelis on October 7th? According to Dave Smith, “well, what do you think happens when you occupy somebody for 60 (sic) years?” Want to ensure more wars? Excuse the people who commit genocide and complain about the people who sacrifice their own soldiers so as to avoid as many civilian casualties as possible. EVERY war starting entity should be so lucky as to go to war against Israel. Don’t believe me? Ask the Ukrainians. Dave Smith’s current favorite current historian? Martyr Made, AKA “the Churchill was the main villain of World War II guy.” Boo the world savers? Yay the Hitler stans? What’s next, “why Mao was the greatest hop scotch player of all-time?” If you think that’s a leap, you don’t know what I’m talking about. And that’s Dave Smith. He’s loud. He’s confident. And he doesn’t have a fucking clue what he’s talking about. His morality doesn’t belong in the United States of American. Every debate with him should never move past this one issue: Why do you defend the war starters? Why do YOU—the anti-war guy—incentivize wars? Because you, Dave, are why many young men are dead in Israel AND Gaza. You, Dave, are why many young men and women in Israel don’t have limbs. Because you and your rhetoric incentivize wars. You incentivize death. Dave, you’re morally angry in the way a college freshman is morally angry after reading half a Chomsky essay. I’m morally angry because I’ve seen what your worldview does to actual families, actual children, and actual warriors. You get applause for your anger… I can’t get Arnon Zamora out of my head. I can’t get Sabine Taasa crumbling to the ground out of my head. Your rhetoric JUSTIFIES the terrorists to murder her husband. Your worldview made that possible. Your morality helped usher in the inevitable deaths of tens of thousands of Gazans… But you’re too much of an unserious, unfunny clown to see it. You’re not the Clown of Peace. You’re the Pennywise of Pacifism; waving people toward a moral sewer you’ll never have to drown in. And nobody who’s lived through real violence finds any of this funny. Nobody is laughing, Dave… Just like at your standup sets.

“Dave Smith; the Pennywise of Pacifism” “Comic” Dave Smith is currently in an X spat with Dan Crenshaw over the perils of war. Yes, Dave Smith is staring at Crenshaw with two good eyes and telling Crenshaw’s eye patch about war. Hubris, thy name be “Comic” Dave Smith. Dave Smith presents himself as the anti-war guy despite LOVING and INCENTIVIZING all the worst actors in history: The terrorists who committed genocide against Israel and Israelis on October 7th? According to Dave Smith, “well, what do you think happens when you occupy somebody for 60 (sic) years?” Want to ensure more wars? Excuse the people who commit genocide and complain about the people who sacrifice their own soldiers so as to avoid as many civilian casualties as possible. EVERY war starting entity should be so lucky as to go to war against Israel. Don’t believe me? Ask the Ukrainians. Dave Smith’s current favorite current historian? Martyr Made, AKA “the Churchill was the main villain of World War II guy.” Boo the world savers? Yay the Hitler stans? What’s next, “why Mao was the greatest hop scotch player of all-time?” If you think that’s a leap, you don’t know what I’m talking about. And that’s Dave Smith. He’s loud. He’s confident. And he doesn’t have a fucking clue what he’s talking about. His morality doesn’t belong in the United States of American. Every debate with him should never move past this one issue: Why do you defend the war starters? Why do YOU—the anti-war guy—incentivize wars? Because you, Dave, are why many young men are dead in Israel AND Gaza. You, Dave, are why many young men and women in Israel don’t have limbs. Because you and your rhetoric incentivize wars. You incentivize death. Dave, you’re morally angry in the way a college freshman is morally angry after reading half a Chomsky essay. I’m morally angry because I’ve seen what your worldview does to actual families, actual children, and actual warriors. You get applause for your anger… I can’t get Arnon Zamora out of my head. I can’t get Sabine Taasa crumbling to the ground out of my head. Your rhetoric JUSTIFIES the terrorists to murder her husband. Your worldview made that possible. Your morality helped usher in the inevitable deaths of tens of thousands of Gazans… But you’re too much of an unserious, unfunny clown to see it. You’re not the Clown of Peace. You’re the Pennywise of Pacifism; waving people toward a moral sewer you’ll never have to drown in. And nobody who’s lived through real violence finds any of this funny. Nobody is laughing, Dave… Just like at your standup sets.

Jake Donnelly

274,866 views • 10 months ago

.Blake Neff seems to forget this text — and the fact that just months before his death, Charlie Kirk hosted and moderated a debate featuring Dave Smith on Israel. In it, he asks Dave to make the case as to why Israel is not our ally, and the crowd sure seems to agree with him. This rhetoric is dangerous to a regime that wants to launch an illegitimate war... While these guys scream that “radical Islam is the greatest threat,” Charlie was consistently platforming people willing to criticize Israel and question the alliance, and it seemed he was beginning to do much of it himself. Full video linked below: 👇

.Blake Neff seems to forget this text — and the fact that just months before his death, Charlie Kirk hosted and moderated a debate featuring Dave Smith on Israel. In it, he asks Dave to make the case as to why Israel is not our ally, and the crowd sure seems to agree with him. This rhetoric is dangerous to a regime that wants to launch an illegitimate war... While these guys scream that “radical Islam is the greatest threat,” Charlie was consistently platforming people willing to criticize Israel and question the alliance, and it seemed he was beginning to do much of it himself. Full video linked below: 👇

Artifex Memoriarum

53,407 views • 2 months ago

My live stream with Michael Tracey today. We watch and react to his appearance on the Piers Morgan Show. It was an amazing performance. They looked like they had never been asked a difficult question before. And they had no responses. The whole Epstein thing is a fraud. We watch some Dave Smith comedy in order to find out if he's actually funny. We can report he is not. We also watch a video where Dave Smith says if anything the age of consent should be raised, and a healthy male reaction is to want to kill anyone who engages in what he calls "pedophilia" and also those who would "split hairs" about the topic. I always knew this Dave Smith guy was a moron, but hadn't ever looked into why he had an audience. It looks like what Low Human Capital wants is constant invective against real and imaginary "pedophiles" so they have someone to feel superior to and find an outlet for their feelings of inferiority. Thanks to all who joined. Subscribe here to get a notification for all our streams so you can join us next time:

My live stream with Michael Tracey today. We watch and react to his appearance on the Piers Morgan Show. It was an amazing performance. They looked like they had never been asked a difficult question before. And they had no responses. The whole Epstein thing is a fraud. We watch some Dave Smith comedy in order to find out if he's actually funny. We can report he is not. We also watch a video where Dave Smith says if anything the age of consent should be raised, and a healthy male reaction is to want to kill anyone who engages in what he calls "pedophilia" and also those who would "split hairs" about the topic. I always knew this Dave Smith guy was a moron, but hadn't ever looked into why he had an audience. It looks like what Low Human Capital wants is constant invective against real and imaginary "pedophiles" so they have someone to feel superior to and find an outlet for their feelings of inferiority. Thanks to all who joined. Subscribe here to get a notification for all our streams so you can join us next time:

Richard Hanania

44,032 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Brandon Tatum leaves Dave Smith and Piers Morgan SPEECHLESS: "Hamas wanted to kill everybody in Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu should have gone harder, and he should have eliminated Hamas immediately. In America, if we had faced such brutality, people's heads being cut off, rape, we would have been swift within 48 hours, and we would have caused the most damage that you have ever seen in world history. There's no genocide in Gaza. Hamas knew they can never beat the IDF. Why did they start the war?" Thank you for your voice of reason, Brandon Tatum 🙏

🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Brandon Tatum leaves Dave Smith and Piers Morgan SPEECHLESS: "Hamas wanted to kill everybody in Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu should have gone harder, and he should have eliminated Hamas immediately. In America, if we had faced such brutality, people's heads being cut off, rape, we would have been swift within 48 hours, and we would have caused the most damage that you have ever seen in world history. There's no genocide in Gaza. Hamas knew they can never beat the IDF. Why did they start the war?" Thank you for your voice of reason, Brandon Tatum 🙏

Vivid.🇮🇱

1,361,650 views • 1 year ago

Dave Smith just named the real reason why the Epstein class spent over $20 million against Thomas Massie. This isn’t about Trump. “Thomas Massie really angered the Israel lobby.” “He exposed that he’s the only one who doesn’t have an AIPAC handler.” “More money has been spent on this election than any other.” “He made his famous stand to get the Epstein files declassified.” “He really embarrassed the administration and through some political maneuvering, was actually able to get them to tap out and release it.” “Then, of course, he opposes both the 12-day war and this current war in Iran.” “The Israel lobby has poured at least $20 million into the race.” Dave Smith Nicholas J. Fuentes

Dave Smith just named the real reason why the Epstein class spent over $20 million against Thomas Massie. This isn’t about Trump. “Thomas Massie really angered the Israel lobby.” “He exposed that he’s the only one who doesn’t have an AIPAC handler.” “More money has been spent on this election than any other.” “He made his famous stand to get the Epstein files declassified.” “He really embarrassed the administration and through some political maneuvering, was actually able to get them to tap out and release it.” “Then, of course, he opposes both the 12-day war and this current war in Iran.” “The Israel lobby has poured at least $20 million into the race.” Dave Smith Nicholas J. Fuentes

Holden Culotta

61,800 views • 4 months ago

David Tynan O’Mahony (AKA Dave Allen) was born on this day in 1936. One of Ireland’s great comic voices and a brilliantly sharp satirist, his work made a lasting impression on British and Irish entertainment, not least because he had such an easy, distinctive way of drawing people in. Sitting on his stool, glass in hand, he made it feel as though he was simply talking to you, pointing out the absurdities of life, religion, authority, and human behaviour with a calm smile and a perfectly timed punchline. On what would have been his 90th birthday, Dave Allen is worth remembering not only as a very funny man, but as someone who encouraged people to think, question, and laugh at the strange business of being human x

David Tynan O’Mahony (AKA Dave Allen) was born on this day in 1936. One of Ireland’s great comic voices and a brilliantly sharp satirist, his work made a lasting impression on British and Irish entertainment, not least because he had such an easy, distinctive way of drawing people in. Sitting on his stool, glass in hand, he made it feel as though he was simply talking to you, pointing out the absurdities of life, religion, authority, and human behaviour with a calm smile and a perfectly timed punchline. On what would have been his 90th birthday, Dave Allen is worth remembering not only as a very funny man, but as someone who encouraged people to think, question, and laugh at the strange business of being human x

James Hogg

86,228 views • 2 months ago

There’s one moment in the debate between Dave Smith and Douglas Murray on Joe Rogan’s podcast that I just have to pause on—because it perfectly distills the heart of the matter. They’re discussing the so-called “blockade” on Gaza, which Dave claims has been in place since 2007. (Side note: Dave frames the disengagement as a move to kill the peace process. But what process was left to kill? The Palestinians had already walked away from it years before) Now, when someone whose entire understanding comes from Wikipedia and self-appointed expert podcasts— someone who’s never actually seen the region with their own eyes or even come close enough to talk to people who live there— hears the word “blockade,” they imagine some medieval-style siege. A small city, completely cut off, with people rotting in sewage, starving, and dying of disease. It’s the kind of imagery that gave rise to the entire mythology of Gaza as an “open-air prison,” and eventually even the obscene comparisons to a “concentration camp.” A modern-day blood libel. Of course, the side under this “blockade” actively promotes that view through its propaganda. They know that people like Dave Smith will keep repeating it, building entire narratives and views around it, because it drives traffic and earns them platforms. And so, the false narrative continues to echo. Then comes Douglas Murray, and he asks the two questions Dave can’t really answer: 1. Have you ever actually gone and seen the situation for yourself? Do you really understand what the word “blockade” means in this context? 2. Why is there a blockade in the first place? (Because while Dave talks about the result, Douglas focuses on the cause.) To both questions, Dave essentially has no real answer. Douglas, of course, does. That’s the difference between someone who knows something and someone who thinks they know enough to speak on it. Dave’s best comeback? “So we’re not allowed to talk about places we haven’t been to?” Of course you can talk. The question is: should anyone who talks automatically get a platform to broadcast their opinions—opinions based on cherry-picked quotes and zero formal education or firsthand experience—to millions around the world? So, for Dave Smith—the ultimate useful idiot, always ready to embrace narratives designed to manipulate and weaponize him—I’ll leave a thread in the comments. It’s one I wrote a while back, showing what Gaza could have been: the trade deals, the billions in international aid, the port and airport they could have had… and what Hamas ultimately chose to do instead. Maybe then Dave will stop just quoting other people (which, to be fair, he does impressively—his memory is sharp!) and start thinking for himself about what caused what. It’s easy to quote, harder to question. And almost impossible to admit you might have built your worldview on someone else’s script.

There’s one moment in the debate between Dave Smith and Douglas Murray on Joe Rogan’s podcast that I just have to pause on—because it perfectly distills the heart of the matter. They’re discussing the so-called “blockade” on Gaza, which Dave claims has been in place since 2007. (Side note: Dave frames the disengagement as a move to kill the peace process. But what process was left to kill? The Palestinians had already walked away from it years before) Now, when someone whose entire understanding comes from Wikipedia and self-appointed expert podcasts— someone who’s never actually seen the region with their own eyes or even come close enough to talk to people who live there— hears the word “blockade,” they imagine some medieval-style siege. A small city, completely cut off, with people rotting in sewage, starving, and dying of disease. It’s the kind of imagery that gave rise to the entire mythology of Gaza as an “open-air prison,” and eventually even the obscene comparisons to a “concentration camp.” A modern-day blood libel. Of course, the side under this “blockade” actively promotes that view through its propaganda. They know that people like Dave Smith will keep repeating it, building entire narratives and views around it, because it drives traffic and earns them platforms. And so, the false narrative continues to echo. Then comes Douglas Murray, and he asks the two questions Dave can’t really answer: 1. Have you ever actually gone and seen the situation for yourself? Do you really understand what the word “blockade” means in this context? 2. Why is there a blockade in the first place? (Because while Dave talks about the result, Douglas focuses on the cause.) To both questions, Dave essentially has no real answer. Douglas, of course, does. That’s the difference between someone who knows something and someone who thinks they know enough to speak on it. Dave’s best comeback? “So we’re not allowed to talk about places we haven’t been to?” Of course you can talk. The question is: should anyone who talks automatically get a platform to broadcast their opinions—opinions based on cherry-picked quotes and zero formal education or firsthand experience—to millions around the world? So, for Dave Smith—the ultimate useful idiot, always ready to embrace narratives designed to manipulate and weaponize him—I’ll leave a thread in the comments. It’s one I wrote a while back, showing what Gaza could have been: the trade deals, the billions in international aid, the port and airport they could have had… and what Hamas ultimately chose to do instead. Maybe then Dave will stop just quoting other people (which, to be fair, he does impressively—his memory is sharp!) and start thinking for himself about what caused what. It’s easy to quote, harder to question. And almost impossible to admit you might have built your worldview on someone else’s script.

Oren Barsky

384,370 views • 1 year ago

Caller: I have a gambling addiction. I haven’t filed taxes in five years. About five years ago, I had $200,000 in gambling winnings. After that, I haven’t filed anything. Dave Ramsey: Do you still have a career? Caller: I'm retired. Dave Ramsey: Okay. Do you have any money? Anything? Caller: I've got almost $10,000 in my savings account. Dave Ramsey: But you don't have a nest egg other than your pension. Caller: No. Dave Ramsey: Do you own a home? Caller: Yes. About $13,000 is remaining on the mortgage. Dave Ramsey: What is it worth? Caller: About $300,000. Dave Ramsey: And how much is your pension income? Caller: $95,000 a year. Dave Ramsey: That's good. Are you married? Caller: No. Dave Ramsey: Have you done something about the gambling addiction itself? Have you quit gambling? Caller: I have not. Dave Ramsey: Okay. So whatever we do is going to be a temporary fix because that is going to cause further problems. Agreed? Caller: Yes, absolutely. Dave Ramsey: What kind of gambling are you doing? Caller: Slot machines. Dave Ramsey: Are you lonely? Caller: Yeah. I've been single for quite a while. Dave Ramsey: How old are you? Caller: 61. Dave Ramsey: From working with people addicted to anything, I know that 100% of addicts eventually have financial problems. The addiction consumes every department of your life, including your financials. I can help you with the money parts of it, but it is a temporary fix until you deal with this. It's not bringing you joy. If you were my buddy sitting down over a cup of coffee, here is what I would tell you to do: Step 1: Get in touch with the Gamblers Anonymous folks in your area. Step 2: Find a good local church and start developing a personal relationship with a pastor who can walk with you. Step 3: Find a one-on-one professional counselor to help dig into what is really going on so you can get to the other side of this.

Caller: I have a gambling addiction. I haven’t filed taxes in five years. About five years ago, I had $200,000 in gambling winnings. After that, I haven’t filed anything. Dave Ramsey: Do you still have a career? Caller: I'm retired. Dave Ramsey: Okay. Do you have any money? Anything? Caller: I've got almost $10,000 in my savings account. Dave Ramsey: But you don't have a nest egg other than your pension. Caller: No. Dave Ramsey: Do you own a home? Caller: Yes. About $13,000 is remaining on the mortgage. Dave Ramsey: What is it worth? Caller: About $300,000. Dave Ramsey: And how much is your pension income? Caller: $95,000 a year. Dave Ramsey: That's good. Are you married? Caller: No. Dave Ramsey: Have you done something about the gambling addiction itself? Have you quit gambling? Caller: I have not. Dave Ramsey: Okay. So whatever we do is going to be a temporary fix because that is going to cause further problems. Agreed? Caller: Yes, absolutely. Dave Ramsey: What kind of gambling are you doing? Caller: Slot machines. Dave Ramsey: Are you lonely? Caller: Yeah. I've been single for quite a while. Dave Ramsey: How old are you? Caller: 61. Dave Ramsey: From working with people addicted to anything, I know that 100% of addicts eventually have financial problems. The addiction consumes every department of your life, including your financials. I can help you with the money parts of it, but it is a temporary fix until you deal with this. It's not bringing you joy. If you were my buddy sitting down over a cup of coffee, here is what I would tell you to do: Step 1: Get in touch with the Gamblers Anonymous folks in your area. Step 2: Find a good local church and start developing a personal relationship with a pastor who can walk with you. Step 3: Find a one-on-one professional counselor to help dig into what is really going on so you can get to the other side of this.

Traeyz ♠️

1,051,880 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Dave Smith calls Bessent’s economic D-Day a CRIMINAL act of war aimed at Iranian civilians Asked whether he opposes the sanctions campaign as well as the strikes, his answer is that the whole design is to impoverish people already living under a brutal government until they overthrow it, and that Washington never checks whether it works: "You just sit there impoverishing people for no reason. It's criminal." His evidence is the record. Cuba, North Korea, Iraq, Venezuela, all sanctioned for decades, and every time it ended in a military intervention or in quietly giving up. Iran's currency just hit a record low. So what happens if the pressure lands exactly as designed and the regime still doesn't fall? Dave Smith Alan Dershowitz

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Dave Smith calls Bessent’s economic D-Day a CRIMINAL act of war aimed at Iranian civilians Asked whether he opposes the sanctions campaign as well as the strikes, his answer is that the whole design is to impoverish people already living under a brutal government until they overthrow it, and that Washington never checks whether it works: "You just sit there impoverishing people for no reason. It's criminal." His evidence is the record. Cuba, North Korea, Iraq, Venezuela, all sanctioned for decades, and every time it ended in a military intervention or in quietly giving up. Iran's currency just hit a record low. So what happens if the pressure lands exactly as designed and the regime still doesn't fall? Dave Smith Alan Dershowitz

Mario Nawfal

47,077 views • 1 month ago

"Nobody" Supports Dave Smith Another day, another Adam 🆘 Sosnick self-own. After the supposed "debate" with Dave Smith Adam goes on PBD Podcast and tells the audience how he thinks he did fine, he doesn't read the comments and it doesn't even matter because nobody supports Dave. The laughable lack of self-awareness is so perplexing I can't wrap my head around it. I watched this supposed 'debate' and it was anything but a debate. No positions, no meaningful argument, no points whatsoever. Your debate position can't be "you lost in a debate to this other man" and then spend the rest of the conversation talking over him and squealing your talking points without any meaningful defense or discussion. It's OK to disagree with Dave, but to pretend that nobody cares about his opinion or supports him when he objectively destroys you in every objective measurement is just beyond reality. This seems to be the go-to retort these days and it's as weak as it is nonsensical. Disagree, debate the points and the audience response is the temperature check. It's so simple.

"Nobody" Supports Dave Smith Another day, another Adam 🆘 Sosnick self-own. After the supposed "debate" with Dave Smith Adam goes on PBD Podcast and tells the audience how he thinks he did fine, he doesn't read the comments and it doesn't even matter because nobody supports Dave. The laughable lack of self-awareness is so perplexing I can't wrap my head around it. I watched this supposed 'debate' and it was anything but a debate. No positions, no meaningful argument, no points whatsoever. Your debate position can't be "you lost in a debate to this other man" and then spend the rest of the conversation talking over him and squealing your talking points without any meaningful defense or discussion. It's OK to disagree with Dave, but to pretend that nobody cares about his opinion or supports him when he objectively destroys you in every objective measurement is just beyond reality. This seems to be the go-to retort these days and it's as weak as it is nonsensical. Disagree, debate the points and the audience response is the temperature check. It's so simple.

Bobby Sauce

162,429 views • 6 months ago