Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 Matthew Brown: “AARO is a catch and kill operation - It's not safe for UFO Whistleblowers.” 😱 The man who revealed Immaculate Constellation just warned that the official UAP whistleblower channels the White House is promoting are still not safe. Brown says the recent NDA waiver directive issued...

InterstellarUAP's profile picture

Interstellar

143,202 subscribers

26,306 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Dylan Borland is the DEAD MAN Switch and could bring catastrophic UFO disclosure 🛸 Sol Foundation Conference in Italy: Congressional UAP whistleblower Jeff Nuccetelli just revealed the TRUTH about fellow whistleblower Dylan Borland... “Dylan was what you call the dead man’s switch. He volunteered that if the situation got to the point where they felt their lives were in danger, that Dylan would be the one to come forward and disclose. And this would be the equivalent of catastrophic disclosure from these unknown whistleblowers. So Dylan did that.” Multiple high-level UFO whistleblowers trusted Dylan Borland with their lives — literally. If they were silenced, HE was the backup plan to drop everything. These are the same guys who testified to Congress about non-human craft, retaliation, and government cover-ups. Lives on the line for the truth. Dylan Borland is a national hero 🫡 Is this the beginning of the end for the biggest secret in history? 👽🔥 #UFO #UAP #Disclosure #UFOTwitter #Aliens
3:09

🚨 Dylan Borland is the DEAD MAN Switch and could bring catastrophic UFO disclosure 🛸 Sol Foundation Conference in Italy: Congressional UAP whistleblower Jeff Nuccetelli just revealed the TRUTH about fellow whistleblower Dylan Borland... “Dylan was what you call the dead man’s switch. He volunteered that if the situation got to the point where they felt their lives were in danger, that Dylan would be the one to come forward and disclose. And this would be the equivalent of catastrophic disclosure from these unknown whistleblowers. So Dylan did that.” Multiple high-level UFO whistleblowers trusted Dylan Borland with their lives — literally. If they were silenced, HE was the backup plan to drop everything. These are the same guys who testified to Congress about non-human craft, retaliation, and government cover-ups. Lives on the line for the truth. Dylan Borland is a national hero 🫡 Is this the beginning of the end for the biggest secret in history? 👽🔥 #UFO #UAP #Disclosure #UFOTwitter #Aliens

Interstellar

63,246 views • 7 months ago

Phillip: When you talk about divisiveness, Obama was smeared as not being a legitimate president because Trump was lying that he was not a native born American citizen, and then he welcomed that same man into the white house. Their wives sat down and had tea. Why is he considered to so divisive? Is it because he told people he was black? Moynihan: When he was in office, he would go on these sort of tours essentially apologizing for America. Phillip: Last year, Donald Trump went to the Middle East, and he said that America's past policies of regime change in that region had been a failure and that we were trying to basically overtake these great societies. He said that last year!
2:39

Phillip: When you talk about divisiveness, Obama was smeared as not being a legitimate president because Trump was lying that he was not a native born American citizen, and then he welcomed that same man into the white house. Their wives sat down and had tea. Why is he considered to so divisive? Is it because he told people he was black? Moynihan: When he was in office, he would go on these sort of tours essentially apologizing for America. Phillip: Last year, Donald Trump went to the Middle East, and he said that America's past policies of regime change in that region had been a failure and that we were trying to basically overtake these great societies. He said that last year!

Acyn

209,797 views • 1 month ago

Immaculate Constellation. It is time. UFO whistleblower goes public. HIGH-NOON PST on WEAPONIZED. Launching here : ••• In 2024, an enigmatic term began to percolate among a small group of UAP investigators. The name was "Immaculate Constellation." Anyone who dared to even utter that term would put their own lives at risk, according to persons familiar with the program. "ImCon”, the abbreviated version of the term, was brought to the attention of Congress. Members were told it was a cover term for an Unacknowledged Special Access Program housed within the executive branch, specifically under the control of the White House. ImCon was supposedly a highly secretive program that relied on artificial intelligence to secretly scour classified servers used by the U.S. military and its intelligence agencies to search for and snatch images of UAP encounters. A report about ImCon, written by an unknown policy advisor, was provided to Congress by Jeremy Corbell months prior to the start of a 2024 public hearing before a House subcommittee. The anonymous author of the report, who had been surreptitiously introduced to key House members by Corbell, had indicated he was willing to testify if requested to do so. A very curious series of events unfolded at the hearing, but in the end, the source of the Immaculate Constellation report was largely ignored, and the origin of the report itself was grossly distorted by members. A spokesperson for the Pentagon denied that any program by that name had ever existed within the Department of Defense. After many months of excruciating discussion and debate, the author of the ImCon report is now ready to reveal what he knows, how he knows it, and who he is. In this episode of WEAPONIZED (Part 1 of 3), Jeremy and George speak face-to-face with the previously anonymous source of the ImCon report. The person who wrote the report explains where he worked and in what capacities, how he was first exposed to the term Immaculate Constellation, and why he made the decision to come forward, in spite of what could be very serious repercussions.
1:21

Immaculate Constellation. It is time. UFO whistleblower goes public. HIGH-NOON PST on WEAPONIZED. Launching here : ••• In 2024, an enigmatic term began to percolate among a small group of UAP investigators. The name was "Immaculate Constellation." Anyone who dared to even utter that term would put their own lives at risk, according to persons familiar with the program. "ImCon”, the abbreviated version of the term, was brought to the attention of Congress. Members were told it was a cover term for an Unacknowledged Special Access Program housed within the executive branch, specifically under the control of the White House. ImCon was supposedly a highly secretive program that relied on artificial intelligence to secretly scour classified servers used by the U.S. military and its intelligence agencies to search for and snatch images of UAP encounters. A report about ImCon, written by an unknown policy advisor, was provided to Congress by Jeremy Corbell months prior to the start of a 2024 public hearing before a House subcommittee. The anonymous author of the report, who had been surreptitiously introduced to key House members by Corbell, had indicated he was willing to testify if requested to do so. A very curious series of events unfolded at the hearing, but in the end, the source of the Immaculate Constellation report was largely ignored, and the origin of the report itself was grossly distorted by members. A spokesperson for the Pentagon denied that any program by that name had ever existed within the Department of Defense. After many months of excruciating discussion and debate, the author of the ImCon report is now ready to reveal what he knows, how he knows it, and who he is. In this episode of WEAPONIZED (Part 1 of 3), Jeremy and George speak face-to-face with the previously anonymous source of the ImCon report. The person who wrote the report explains where he worked and in what capacities, how he was first exposed to the term Immaculate Constellation, and why he made the decision to come forward, in spite of what could be very serious repercussions.

Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell

264,923 views • 1 year ago

EXCELLENT Questions: “Someone wanna explain to me about how the testimony of the former Chief of the Border Patrol isn't causing people to be impeached immediately? He directly testified that he was told to lie to congress and to lie to the American people - Not only was he told to cover up the amount of illegal border crossings we were seeing every day - Not only was he told to cover up the amount of people we saw crossing that were on the terrorist watch list - He was told that when he was questioned by any member of congress to lie about it - He was told that when he was questioned by any member of the media that might get information to the American people to lie about that - He was also told that he wasn't allowed to speak on the flights being charted in from South America to bring illegals into the center of America. The program to release them all over the country without any warning to the American people nor to congress How the f*ck is he able to testify to all that and people aren't being impeached and people aren't being brought up on charges? His testimony shows that the executive branch lied to congress. That the executive branch told the border patrol to lie to congress. That they told the border patrol to hide the truth from the American people. How the f*ck are these people not being brought up on charges immediately?”
1:10

EXCELLENT Questions: “Someone wanna explain to me about how the testimony of the former Chief of the Border Patrol isn't causing people to be impeached immediately? He directly testified that he was told to lie to congress and to lie to the American people - Not only was he told to cover up the amount of illegal border crossings we were seeing every day - Not only was he told to cover up the amount of people we saw crossing that were on the terrorist watch list - He was told that when he was questioned by any member of congress to lie about it - He was told that when he was questioned by any member of the media that might get information to the American people to lie about that - He was also told that he wasn't allowed to speak on the flights being charted in from South America to bring illegals into the center of America. The program to release them all over the country without any warning to the American people nor to congress How the f*ck is he able to testify to all that and people aren't being impeached and people aren't being brought up on charges? His testimony shows that the executive branch lied to congress. That the executive branch told the border patrol to lie to congress. That they told the border patrol to hide the truth from the American people. How the f*ck are these people not being brought up on charges immediately?”

Wall Street Apes

814,127 views • 1 year ago

Whoa. Jim Breuer says that his old friend Dave Chapelle went to him in private and told him about how an elite group of people came to him and sat him down to "correct him" and that was right before he suddenly vanished and went to Africa. He says he no longer communicated with him say in the same way after he came back and wonders what really happened... Who visited him? I'd be curious to hear the names. "He came there and he was freaked out. He was visited. And when he told me who visited him. My heart stopped for a second. I'll never forget. He went, you believe me right? They came to me..He said the names.. I said what happened? And then all of a sudden he went to Africa... But I know for a fact that he was corrected. Hey, we need to have a conversation. When I saw him come back... It was a lot less communication. And maybe he just grows, whatever. Maybe I'm crazy for saying this. When I saw him completely come back I really questioned if that was him. I know that's crazy..." Jim Breuer Roseanne Barr
3:00

Whoa. Jim Breuer says that his old friend Dave Chapelle went to him in private and told him about how an elite group of people came to him and sat him down to "correct him" and that was right before he suddenly vanished and went to Africa. He says he no longer communicated with him say in the same way after he came back and wonders what really happened... Who visited him? I'd be curious to hear the names. "He came there and he was freaked out. He was visited. And when he told me who visited him. My heart stopped for a second. I'll never forget. He went, you believe me right? They came to me..He said the names.. I said what happened? And then all of a sudden he went to Africa... But I know for a fact that he was corrected. Hey, we need to have a conversation. When I saw him come back... It was a lot less communication. And maybe he just grows, whatever. Maybe I'm crazy for saying this. When I saw him completely come back I really questioned if that was him. I know that's crazy..." Jim Breuer Roseanne Barr

Green Lives Matter

4,485,142 views • 2 years ago

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.
0:30

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

ابن البخاري

245,087 views • 1 year ago

🚨 UAP Whistleblower Matthew Brown exposes the terrifying intimidation tactics used to silence him: They broke into his home while he and his wife slept, laid out his personal identification documents, and moved his own grandfather’s remains next to the garbage... “It was a very clear message.” 🛸👽 “Personal identification documents were left out in a way to indicate that not only were they in the house long enough... clearly this isn’t a robbery.” “It was not a robbery. It was a message.” This happened as he tried to expose secret programs. Whistleblowers are being terrorized. How far will the gatekeepers go to hide the truth? Would threats like this stop you from speaking out? What does this prove about the UAP cover-up? Drop your thoughts below 👇 #UAP #Disclosure
1:58

🚨 UAP Whistleblower Matthew Brown exposes the terrifying intimidation tactics used to silence him: They broke into his home while he and his wife slept, laid out his personal identification documents, and moved his own grandfather’s remains next to the garbage... “It was a very clear message.” 🛸👽 “Personal identification documents were left out in a way to indicate that not only were they in the house long enough... clearly this isn’t a robbery.” “It was not a robbery. It was a message.” This happened as he tried to expose secret programs. Whistleblowers are being terrorized. How far will the gatekeepers go to hide the truth? Would threats like this stop you from speaking out? What does this prove about the UAP cover-up? Drop your thoughts below 👇 #UAP #Disclosure

Interstellar

26,004 views • 4 months ago

Remember the Palestinian who was used as a HUMAN SHIELD by israel? His name is Mujahed Abadi and he provided his testimony regarding what happened, the video you all saw is nothing compared to what he actually went through. His testimony reported by Journalist Nida’ to AlJazeera: “He was shot and left to bleed for around 2 hours .. when the Israeli soldiers came his way, they shoved him on the hood of the jeep for 20 minutes. They interrogated him AFTER he was on the jeep then they shoved him back to the ground..”
2:15

Remember the Palestinian who was used as a HUMAN SHIELD by israel? His name is Mujahed Abadi and he provided his testimony regarding what happened, the video you all saw is nothing compared to what he actually went through. His testimony reported by Journalist Nida’ to AlJazeera: “He was shot and left to bleed for around 2 hours .. when the Israeli soldiers came his way, they shoved him on the hood of the jeep for 20 minutes. They interrogated him AFTER he was on the jeep then they shoved him back to the ground..”

Suppressed News.

1,042,896 views • 2 years ago

🚨#BREAKING: Tyjuan Crenshaw, a man who works with special needs children, saw a young man being BEATEN IN THE STREET. He stepped in and saved the man and chased the attacker off... ...AND THE POLICE ARRESTED HIM FOR IT He was charged with assault. Tyjuan is a MANDATORY REPORTER because he works with special needs kids. He is LEGALLY REQUIRED to step in when he sees a vulnerable person being abused. Crenshaw says he saw a man beating a vulnerable young man on Baylor's Lane in Petersburg, Virginia. In his words: "He was beating the hell out of him. After he dropped, he hit him across his head five more times." So Crenshaw stepped in. He says the man told him to mind his own business... then went and got a dog to sic on him. He stood his ground and protected the man until the police got there. When the police showed up, they arrested CRENSHAW. Charged him with assault and listed the man he was trying to stop as the VICTIM!!! But here's the kicker. TWO DAYS LATER, police arrested that same man, Harold Parker, and charged him with ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF AN INCAPACITATED ADULT. The exact thing Crenshaw said he was trying to stop! So the man who stepped in to protect the vulnerable is facing charges. When asked if he would do anything different, Crenshaw said: "If I had to do it all over, I'd do it again!"
1:17

🚨#BREAKING: Tyjuan Crenshaw, a man who works with special needs children, saw a young man being BEATEN IN THE STREET. He stepped in and saved the man and chased the attacker off... ...AND THE POLICE ARRESTED HIM FOR IT He was charged with assault. Tyjuan is a MANDATORY REPORTER because he works with special needs kids. He is LEGALLY REQUIRED to step in when he sees a vulnerable person being abused. Crenshaw says he saw a man beating a vulnerable young man on Baylor's Lane in Petersburg, Virginia. In his words: "He was beating the hell out of him. After he dropped, he hit him across his head five more times." So Crenshaw stepped in. He says the man told him to mind his own business... then went and got a dog to sic on him. He stood his ground and protected the man until the police got there. When the police showed up, they arrested CRENSHAW. Charged him with assault and listed the man he was trying to stop as the VICTIM!!! But here's the kicker. TWO DAYS LATER, police arrested that same man, Harold Parker, and charged him with ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF AN INCAPACITATED ADULT. The exact thing Crenshaw said he was trying to stop! So the man who stepped in to protect the vulnerable is facing charges. When asked if he would do anything different, Crenshaw said: "If I had to do it all over, I'd do it again!"

Matt Van Swol

116,863 views • 1 month ago

The US is not a DEMOCRACY. Europe is not DEMOCRACY The military-industrial state is who runs the United States. In 2017, Putin said something very, very interesting, which was, by then, he had dealt with Clinton, he had dealt with Obama, and he had dealt with Trump. And he said in this famous interview in, Le Figaro, that he's now dealt with three American presidents. He said they come into office with interesting ideas, but then the men in the dark suits and the suitcases and the blue ties come to visit them, and they explain to these presidents how are, and then the presidents, you never hear of those ideas again. And of course, what he was talking about is the military-industrial state. That's who runs the United States. - Jeffrey Sachs
8:06

The US is not a DEMOCRACY. Europe is not DEMOCRACY The military-industrial state is who runs the United States. In 2017, Putin said something very, very interesting, which was, by then, he had dealt with Clinton, he had dealt with Obama, and he had dealt with Trump. And he said in this famous interview in, Le Figaro, that he's now dealt with three American presidents. He said they come into office with interesting ideas, but then the men in the dark suits and the suitcases and the blue ties come to visit them, and they explain to these presidents how are, and then the presidents, you never hear of those ideas again. And of course, what he was talking about is the military-industrial state. That's who runs the United States. - Jeffrey Sachs

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

46,568 views • 9 months ago

🚨IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION MAY NOT BE A PENTAGON PROGRAM AT ALL Ross Coulthart says Matthew Brown has now clarified something that could explain one of the biggest contradictions surrounding Immaculate Constellation. According to Brown, the alleged UAP special access program is administered through the White House National Security Council rather than the Pentagon. That could explain how Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough was able to deny that Immaculate Constellation was a Department of Defense special access program without necessarily disproving Brown's account. If Brown's description is accurate, the program may run inside executive government rather than under the department being asked to confirm it. Coulthart suggests that the legacy UAP program may be managed at presidential level while individual presidents are not always fully briefed on what is being conducted in these programs. #UAP #UFO #ImmaculateConstellation #MatthewBrown #RossCoulthart #Disclosure
6:27

🚨IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION MAY NOT BE A PENTAGON PROGRAM AT ALL Ross Coulthart says Matthew Brown has now clarified something that could explain one of the biggest contradictions surrounding Immaculate Constellation. According to Brown, the alleged UAP special access program is administered through the White House National Security Council rather than the Pentagon. That could explain how Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough was able to deny that Immaculate Constellation was a Department of Defense special access program without necessarily disproving Brown's account. If Brown's description is accurate, the program may run inside executive government rather than under the department being asked to confirm it. Coulthart suggests that the legacy UAP program may be managed at presidential level while individual presidents are not always fully briefed on what is being conducted in these programs. #UAP #UFO #ImmaculateConstellation #MatthewBrown #RossCoulthart #Disclosure

Skywatch Signal

37,528 views • 4 days ago

"What impressed you most about Kyle McCord and getting to work with him this season?" Mike Golic Jr "His leadership. His ability to understand what it is to be a coach and a player. It was Fran Brown, Kyle McCord, and then the Coordinators. Because both sides of the ball have to love the quarterback, it's who he was off the field, not just what he did on the field." Fran Brown
2:07

"What impressed you most about Kyle McCord and getting to work with him this season?" Mike Golic Jr "His leadership. His ability to understand what it is to be a coach and a player. It was Fran Brown, Kyle McCord, and then the Coordinators. Because both sides of the ball have to love the quarterback, it's who he was off the field, not just what he did on the field." Fran Brown

GoJo and Golic

16,229 views • 1 year ago

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US
0:52

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 views • 5 months ago

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 views • 2 months ago

RFK Jr. on psychedelics and how his son’s ayahuasca experience opened his mind to legalization “My inclination would be to make them available, at least in therapeutic settings and maybe more generally, but in ways that would discourage the corporate control and exploitation of it. My wife in 2012 took her own life… and one of [my kids] was worrying to me because he never processed his mom’s death in a way that I could observe. About five years ago… he went to Patagonia to kayak a white water river that I kayaked for many, many years… The night my son arrived there, the guy [he stayed with] said to him ‘I’m doing an ayahuasca trip tonight’… so my kid ended up doing this. After he drank the ayahuasca… he felt himself sinking through all the geological strata of the Earth, and he told me… he had a total understanding of all of the processes that had laid them out through the eons. He ended up being propelled out the other side of the Earth and then floating through space for what he experienced as hundreds of years. He would focus on a distant planet and be transported there, and on each planet he would have an adventure and at the end there would be a lesson that he was supposed to remember. The last planet he visited, his mother was there. And she started passing through him, in and out of him again and again and every time she did that, he felt all these experiences of forgiveness, of love, of understanding, of comprehension, of empathy and compassion. When he came back from that trip, he was completely changed. He was very open about talking about his feelings, [but] the reason I really know that it changed him is he started taking out the garbage and doing the dishes. I have a friend who’s a Navy SEAL who had severe PTSD and he went to Costa Rica and had the same kind of experience. I have a couple of other friends who are in the NFL and they also had severe brain injuries and depression, and the same thing happened. So, my mind is open to the idea that there may be things that I don’t know about and that people ought to have the freedom and liberty to experiment with these things.”
8:05

RFK Jr. on psychedelics and how his son’s ayahuasca experience opened his mind to legalization “My inclination would be to make them available, at least in therapeutic settings and maybe more generally, but in ways that would discourage the corporate control and exploitation of it. My wife in 2012 took her own life… and one of [my kids] was worrying to me because he never processed his mom’s death in a way that I could observe. About five years ago… he went to Patagonia to kayak a white water river that I kayaked for many, many years… The night my son arrived there, the guy [he stayed with] said to him ‘I’m doing an ayahuasca trip tonight’… so my kid ended up doing this. After he drank the ayahuasca… he felt himself sinking through all the geological strata of the Earth, and he told me… he had a total understanding of all of the processes that had laid them out through the eons. He ended up being propelled out the other side of the Earth and then floating through space for what he experienced as hundreds of years. He would focus on a distant planet and be transported there, and on each planet he would have an adventure and at the end there would be a lesson that he was supposed to remember. The last planet he visited, his mother was there. And she started passing through him, in and out of him again and again and every time she did that, he felt all these experiences of forgiveness, of love, of understanding, of comprehension, of empathy and compassion. When he came back from that trip, he was completely changed. He was very open about talking about his feelings, [but] the reason I really know that it changed him is he started taking out the garbage and doing the dishes. I have a friend who’s a Navy SEAL who had severe PTSD and he went to Costa Rica and had the same kind of experience. I have a couple of other friends who are in the NFL and they also had severe brain injuries and depression, and the same thing happened. So, my mind is open to the idea that there may be things that I don’t know about and that people ought to have the freedom and liberty to experiment with these things.”

Holden Culotta

345,980 views • 2 years ago

👽🔥🔥Four Takeaways 🔥🔥👽 "This is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if [the folks keeping it secret] are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." "I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Brake lines were cut. "Not only do I have (direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin), I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." I testified to the, "Senate staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG. Under oath. FBI was there. The DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence..." ~~~ George Knapp: "There's a line you don't want to cross because of legal ramifications? Or because you promised you wouldn't? Dylan Borland: "Both, and I still believe in national security, which is why I'm here. It's why I went through the whistleblower process. It's why I'm so upset that so many whistleblowers have been let down. It's why I'm upset that laws are not being followed. It's why I'm upset that SEC whistleblower payments, which is 10% to anybody who comes forward with any information of financial abuse and wrong ship, should receive that. There's a number of reasons. But ultimately, I believe in the Constitution of the United States." (NOTE: "The SEC's whistleblower program was established by Congress to incentivize whistleblowers to report specific, timely and credible information about possible federal securities laws violations. "The Commission is authorized to provide monetary awards to eligible individuals who come forward with high-quality original information that leads to an SEC enforcement action in which over $1 million in sanctions is ordered. The range for awards is between 10% and 30% of the money collected." Source: Has anybody been sanctioned or money collected as it related to this? If not, how can a whistleblower receive an award?) ~~ Knapp: "Yeah, in a sense, you are a patriot. Of course, you love your country. But you are a patriot in a sense that there's a limit to it, and when people violate the Constitution or go against the law or treat people who are living up to their oaths, poorly, threatening them, intimidating, then it has to come out." Borland: "Yeah, it's infuriating. There's a difference between being disgruntled and me being disgruntled and maybe releasing everything: names, locations, places, crimes that were committed, sexual assaults I'm aware of, stalking I'm aware of, brake lines being cut. It would be me releasing all of that, and I'm not doing that." (Is all of that related to UAP programs? I hope all of that is being investigated, based on the information Borland shared and other information the investigatory bodies have collected.) Borland: "I am doing that because this needs to be told. The people that are in these programs and the decision makers at Congress and the executive branch owe it to the American people, to the whistleblowers, to the veterans, to the service members, to tell the truth in the capacity they can, because this is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if they are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "So you have direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin, from your official capacity of work? You have some direct knowledge of that?" Borland: "100%. Not only do I have it, I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." Corbell: "Who did you testify to? List them out." Borland: "Senate, staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG." Knapp: "Under oath." Borland: "Under oath. FBI was there, the ICIG was there, the DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence. Basically, I went through the whole kit and caboodle to tell the truth and get this on record, because I have grave concerns for what is happening to people." Knapp: "Is there something else in between that thing that you saw, that went (makes a noise with his mouth), other experiences, things that you saw, either as a citizen or while working for the government, that you want to share with us?" Borland: "There are many. I think, as of this time, what I will say is this: I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Corbell: "It would be the power source . Borland: "You can make that assessment yourself." Corbell: "I just did."
3:05

👽🔥🔥Four Takeaways 🔥🔥👽 "This is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if [the folks keeping it secret] are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." "I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Brake lines were cut. "Not only do I have (direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin), I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." I testified to the, "Senate staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG. Under oath. FBI was there. The DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence..." ~~~ George Knapp: "There's a line you don't want to cross because of legal ramifications? Or because you promised you wouldn't? Dylan Borland: "Both, and I still believe in national security, which is why I'm here. It's why I went through the whistleblower process. It's why I'm so upset that so many whistleblowers have been let down. It's why I'm upset that laws are not being followed. It's why I'm upset that SEC whistleblower payments, which is 10% to anybody who comes forward with any information of financial abuse and wrong ship, should receive that. There's a number of reasons. But ultimately, I believe in the Constitution of the United States." (NOTE: "The SEC's whistleblower program was established by Congress to incentivize whistleblowers to report specific, timely and credible information about possible federal securities laws violations. "The Commission is authorized to provide monetary awards to eligible individuals who come forward with high-quality original information that leads to an SEC enforcement action in which over $1 million in sanctions is ordered. The range for awards is between 10% and 30% of the money collected." Source: Has anybody been sanctioned or money collected as it related to this? If not, how can a whistleblower receive an award?) ~~ Knapp: "Yeah, in a sense, you are a patriot. Of course, you love your country. But you are a patriot in a sense that there's a limit to it, and when people violate the Constitution or go against the law or treat people who are living up to their oaths, poorly, threatening them, intimidating, then it has to come out." Borland: "Yeah, it's infuriating. There's a difference between being disgruntled and me being disgruntled and maybe releasing everything: names, locations, places, crimes that were committed, sexual assaults I'm aware of, stalking I'm aware of, brake lines being cut. It would be me releasing all of that, and I'm not doing that." (Is all of that related to UAP programs? I hope all of that is being investigated, based on the information Borland shared and other information the investigatory bodies have collected.) Borland: "I am doing that because this needs to be told. The people that are in these programs and the decision makers at Congress and the executive branch owe it to the American people, to the whistleblowers, to the veterans, to the service members, to tell the truth in the capacity they can, because this is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if they are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "So you have direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin, from your official capacity of work? You have some direct knowledge of that?" Borland: "100%. Not only do I have it, I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." Corbell: "Who did you testify to? List them out." Borland: "Senate, staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG." Knapp: "Under oath." Borland: "Under oath. FBI was there, the ICIG was there, the DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence. Basically, I went through the whole kit and caboodle to tell the truth and get this on record, because I have grave concerns for what is happening to people." Knapp: "Is there something else in between that thing that you saw, that went (makes a noise with his mouth), other experiences, things that you saw, either as a citizen or while working for the government, that you want to share with us?" Borland: "There are many. I think, as of this time, what I will say is this: I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Corbell: "It would be the power source . Borland: "You can make that assessment yourself." Corbell: "I just did."

Joe Murgia

54,064 views • 10 months ago

VIDEO | On ex-R&AW chief AS Dulat's book 'The Chief Minister and the Spy', PDP leader Iltija Mufti (Iltija Mufti) says, "It is very sad that somebody who is treated as a family members by the Abdullahs is now being disowned by them because he exposed the truth which he didn't want to come out in the public domain. And I am of the opinion that Dulat saheb is somebody who is extremely close to Farooq saheb and he knows him inside-out. Whatever he said, he was correct that the NC privately supported the abrogation of Article 370, and that is why perhaps Farooq saheb did not want to go to the Parliament. Because he knew in 2019, that if goes to the Parliament, he would have to talk against abrogation of Article 370, which he was not comfortable with." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
0:52

VIDEO | On ex-R&AW chief AS Dulat's book 'The Chief Minister and the Spy', PDP leader Iltija Mufti (Iltija Mufti) says, "It is very sad that somebody who is treated as a family members by the Abdullahs is now being disowned by them because he exposed the truth which he didn't want to come out in the public domain. And I am of the opinion that Dulat saheb is somebody who is extremely close to Farooq saheb and he knows him inside-out. Whatever he said, he was correct that the NC privately supported the abrogation of Article 370, and that is why perhaps Farooq saheb did not want to go to the Parliament. Because he knew in 2019, that if goes to the Parliament, he would have to talk against abrogation of Article 370, which he was not comfortable with." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

19,994 views • 1 year ago

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."
4:27

Tucker Carlson: Remembering Charlie Kirk - A Life of Faith and Courage "Quickly about Charlie, I've known him since he was a teenager, and just an amazing person, but the two things that stick out, he's a Christian man. We talked about that a lot, including, you know, just the other day. There's a lot of pressure on public people, people who run huge, you know, hundred million dollar a year non-profits, and there are a lot of pitfalls and traps." "That's why so many of them are destroyed, and Charlie really did, without, you know, betraying details, like he walked the line for real. It was the topic of many conversations between us, because I've seen so many people destroyed. You know, most people are destroyed by power, and he wasn't, and I just really admire that." "I mean, to his last moments, you know, in order, he cared about God, his wife, and his children, and then his country. So, and that was totally real, completely real. I can affirm that, because I just talked to him about it so much, and I admire that, and he's a model, really." "I mean, he didn't have hate in his heart, and it was funny, and again, it's one of the reasons I couldn't stop looking at these videos last night. People were describing the opposite of what he was. He was filled with hate." "No, and if you talked to him about people who had attacked him, or who were truly his enemies, up to, and I think including the people who assassinated him yesterday, he would never, ever express hate, ever. He would always turn to, no, this person has been led astray. This person is clearly possessed by dark forces." "This person is a perpetrator, but also a victim of evil. I mean, that really was his worldview. That's the Christian worldview, and he expressed that in public, and especially in private, and I think that faith, which was completely real, not the fake faith that you see on display so often, but a real one, that was the root of his courage, and he had real courage." "He loved being with people who disagreed with him, not theoretically with them, but physically with them, you know, like close enough to smell. He would wait right in the middle of everything. I mean, I could tell you a million stories that I saw, but that was absolutely real." "Like, he loved people, even people who hated him, and people he loved, he was the rare person who was willing to tell them what he thought was true. I mean, he really believed, as a political matter, by the way, that, you know, I don't think he had animus toward anybody in no other country, but he really believed in his own country, and the obligation of his government to stand behind his country. He was truly America first in the nicest, most decent, non-ideological, but sincere way." "He was one of the only people, I mean, truly one of the only people to go to the president, whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like, personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way, but he was one of the only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand, and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, boy, that was an unpopular position." "He didn't need to express it. Oh, of course, and he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing, and he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that." "He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see. He was one of the very few people, very few people I have met who combined a, like, a love for everyone involved with strong views. So, again, he was not animated by anything creepy or weird." "I mean, you knew him intimately, so you know this is true. If you talked to him off camera, he would say, you know, I really, like, I love whoever I'm talking about, but I think this is wrong. It's immoral." "It's bad for everybody involved, both sides, and he would say that, and he could say that because it was sincere. It was completely sincere, but I cannot overstate the amount of attacks he took privately over this, like, absolutely for real, and having lived in Washington most of my life and seen people run non-profits, I've never met one who was willing, stand up is too strong. He wasn't confrontational, but he would just say, no, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but I think this is the right thing." "The people we represent, which is mostly young people, they believe this, and I believe it also. It was brave, but loving at the same time, and I'm not sure he made a lot of headway, by the way. I mean, I think he made real enemies in doing that, but his view didn't change." "Anyway, he's just a wonderfully decent, loving man. That is true."

Camus

41,966 views • 10 months ago

The country was told Peter Lynch was a violent right wing extremist thug. Watch this video. Listen to what he says and how he says it and you will see that he was in fact just a softly spoken grandfather with concerns about the governance and future of his country that are shared by millions. He was put in prison and now he is dead. Shame on the state and the media that is supposed to protect people from tyranny, not facilitate it. RIP Peter.
1:27

Sensitive content

The country was told Peter Lynch was a violent right wing extremist thug. Watch this video. Listen to what he says and how he says it and you will see that he was in fact just a softly spoken grandfather with concerns about the governance and future of his country that are shared by millions. He was put in prison and now he is dead. Shame on the state and the media that is supposed to protect people from tyranny, not facilitate it. RIP Peter.

Andrew Bridgen

771,908 views • 1 year ago