Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Matthew McConaughey explaining his samurai beetle acting technique to Al Pacino and Robert De Niro is exactly the kind of unhinged energy I live for. Watching two acting titans try to process this is just hilarious. McConaughey: I look at myself and I go I'm a samurai beetle. Pacino:...

466,586 просмотров • 14 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Matthew McConaughey says his parents were wild, lustful and complete outlaws. Howard Stern: “It seemed like a wild family. Your mom was a kindergarten teacher?” Matthew McConaughey: “Right. A teacher.” Howard Stern: “And she lived to what?” Matthew McConaughey: “She’s still alive. She just celebrated her 85th birthday.” Howard Stern: Yeah. “And your parents lived this lustful life” Matthew McConaughey: “They divorced twice, married three times, and were together for 39 years. Unbelievable. They were wild.” Howard Stern: “Even your dad always said, ‘I’m going to go out probably banging your mom.’” Matthew McConaughey: “He said, ‘Boys, when I go, I’m going to be making love to your mother.’ And he did. Called his shot. It happened at 6:30 a.m. on a Monday morning.” Howard Stern: “Then your mom said, “I want my man to be carried out of here nude because I want them to see the gift that was Jim McConaughey.” I mean… he must’ve had a big cock, right?” Matthew McConaughey: “Yeah. The paramedics are covering him up, all the neighbors are out in the street, and they’re taking him out through the garage. You know, the sensible thing to do at 7 a.m. is cover him. My mom’s out there, half-naked, ripping the sheet off him, yelling, ‘Get that sheet off of him! You’re going to see how big Jim went out!’ “They were badasses and complete outlaws.”
1:21

Sensitive content

Matthew McConaughey says his parents were wild, lustful and complete outlaws. Howard Stern: “It seemed like a wild family. Your mom was a kindergarten teacher?” Matthew McConaughey: “Right. A teacher.” Howard Stern: “And she lived to what?” Matthew McConaughey: “She’s still alive. She just celebrated her 85th birthday.” Howard Stern: Yeah. “And your parents lived this lustful life” Matthew McConaughey: “They divorced twice, married three times, and were together for 39 years. Unbelievable. They were wild.” Howard Stern: “Even your dad always said, ‘I’m going to go out probably banging your mom.’” Matthew McConaughey: “He said, ‘Boys, when I go, I’m going to be making love to your mother.’ And he did. Called his shot. It happened at 6:30 a.m. on a Monday morning.” Howard Stern: “Then your mom said, “I want my man to be carried out of here nude because I want them to see the gift that was Jim McConaughey.” I mean… he must’ve had a big cock, right?” Matthew McConaughey: “Yeah. The paramedics are covering him up, all the neighbors are out in the street, and they’re taking him out through the garage. You know, the sensible thing to do at 7 a.m. is cover him. My mom’s out there, half-naked, ripping the sheet off him, yelling, ‘Get that sheet off of him! You’re going to see how big Jim went out!’ “They were badasses and complete outlaws.”

𝓢𝓵𝓪𝓶 👁️⃤

2,821,013 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Robert De Niro originally wanted to play Max Cherry in Jackie Brown, the role that eventually went to Robert Forster. However, Quentin Tarantino had written the role with Forster in mind and had already promised him the part. Tarantino explains… “I wrote Jackie Brown, and I decided at some point in writing the script that Robert Forster would be terrific as Max Cherry. So, while I’m still writing the script, I bump into Robert Forster - we go to the same coffee shop. ….so I decided I’m gonna give him the part, because I figure, look, this would be a big, big deal part. So if I don’t give him the part, then once I’m done with it and it gets out in the town, then it’s gonna be Gene Hackman and Paul Newman and people like that, and it would be pretty hard to say no to. But if I just give him the part right now, I’ve got the juice to get it through, and now I can’t take it back because I wouldn’t be a man of my word. So to lock myself into that decision, I give it to him before I finish writing it. And then now comes the time to do it. Robert De Niro reads it, and he wants to be in it, but he wants to play Max. And I go, “Well, look, you would be a fantastic Max, but I’ve already given that to Robert Forster, and I’m a man of my word. I can’t take it back.” Now, De Niro is very much a man of his word, so he understands that. He gets that. And he’s just like, “Yeah, yeah. That’s just disappointing. It’s just regretful.” I go, “What?” “Well, just because, you know, you were thinking about him, so you wrote it for him. But if we had had more dinners and hung out a little bit more, then you would have been thinking about me and you would have written it for me. And I understand what happened, but that could have been changed if we had spent more time with each other before this.” And so he kind of gives me the – “just think about it for a couple of days, all right? - and then let’s talk again. Maybe Bob (Robert Foster) could play Louis, the other guy.” So then I actually have Bob read Louis with me, and then read Max. And if that could work, maybe that could work. But no, everything that made him perfect for Max made him wrong for Louis. And so I get on the phone with De Niro — and I go, “Yeah, you know, I explored that. But no, everything about him that makes him perfect for Max makes him wrong to play this ex-convict guy.” And he goes, “Yeah, yeah, I get that. I get that, I get that, I get that. Okay, so tell me about this Louis character.” And I go, “You would consider playing Louis?” “Yeah, it’s a good character. It’s a good movie. I wanna be part of it. It’s a good character. I wanted the other character, but yeah, this is a good character. I’d be happy to play it.” I go, “Well, you didn’t let me know that before.” He goes, “Well, I didn’t wanna let you off the hook. I wanted you on the hook. But now if that ship has sailed, then let’s talk about Louis.” And then it was a done deal.”

Gangster Cinema Central

89,214 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Michelle Pfeiffer was relatively an unknown in 1983 when "Scarface" (1983) was made. Both Al Pacino & Brian De Palma were against casting her. De Palma wasn't convinced that she had the chops to pull off a part that was initially earmarked for Glenn Close. But Producer Martin Bregman fought for Pfeiffer to be cast & managed to achieve it. Here is Al Pacino and Bregman talking about it: While discussing the film's female casting, Bregman said, "Michelle Pfeiffer... That was a battle because of everybody in town was going out for that. In spite of what [Al] said before, [he was] a star at the time. Michelle wasn't known at the time." "And you had that sense about her," Pacino said "Because I probably would have said no." "You did say no!" replied Bregman, inciting laughter from Pacino and the entire theater. Michelle Pfeiffer explaining about it: "Al was probably more intense back then, or I think it was maybe the nature of the project, and he didn’t particularly want me for the part, It was a very long and drawn-out audition process. I don’t know it seemed like forever but I think it was about two or three months. And I was terrified and I was really young, and I knew he didn’t want me, and as it went on, the worse I got because I just got so afraid.” ("Why Al Pacino “didn’t want” Michelle Pfeiffer in ‘Scarface’", Scott Campbell, Farout Magazine, 2024 "Al Pacino Did Not Want Michelle Pfeiffer For Scarface and 8 Other Revelations About the Gangster Classic", Movieline, 2011) P.S: Happy 68th birthday, Michelle Pfeiffer!

DepressedBergman

54,057 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jason Day was asked ahead of The Masters whether he has any empathy for what Tiger Woods is going through and he gave a brilliant answer that a lot of people can probably agree with: “So yeah, in regards to Tiger, it just shows the human element and the human side of someone that is struggling with some sort of an addiction. He's not immune to it just because he can hit a golf ball really well. He's had 25 to 30 something surgeries, and when you're going through that many procedures, it's painful coming out of those procedures. I've had procedures done and I typically try and stay away from all that stuff because I just know that -- painkillers, there can potentially be a downfall to it. “Granted, when I look at that, I look at it and go, he's just a human being like everyone else and we have struggles. It's unfortunate, the only thing that I don't understand is that it's a little bit selfish of him to drive and put other people in harm's way, as well. “But when you're the player that he was and how strong-willed he is, he thinks he can do almost anything, and that's probably why he's probably driving and a little bit under the influence. “He was my hero -- he's my hero. He was my hero growing up. The reason why I play golf is because of this tournament and Tiger. It's hard to see him go through what he's going through, and especially under the microscope that -- it must be hard to be who he is and have everything, everyone look on, kind of down on him. “Some people want him to fail. Some people obviously want him to succeed. It's really difficult for me to go through that and watch him, and I know that he's getting the help now, which is good. I'm just hoping he comes out on the other side and is better.” Well said. Jason Day The Masters

Flushing It

502,885 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Christopher Nolan interviewing Michael Mann, Al Pacino and Robert De Niro on the iconic coffee shop meeting in Heat... Nolan: So for all three of you, I mean, one of the great and memorable scenes in the film - there are many - but the iconic coffee shop meeting that people were so struck by when the film came out, seeing two such great actors who had not acted in the same scene together before, together. There was such mythology around it at the time. I remember several friends of mine being convinced that you'd shot it on different days because there was no two-shot… (Michael Mann laughs) Nolan: Was it single camera? Was it two cameras? Did you have two cameras so you could shoot both close-ups at the same time? How did you approach that momentous event? Mann: It started with this consummate respect for the great artists that these two guys are. We talked about the scene and we analysed the scene… We didn't want to do the scene until we were at Cape Mandelini's. And then it was so ingrained that I knew that in all the little tiny organic details it would be different from take to take. So what I wanted to do was shoot with two cameras, two over the shoulders – I knew that there would be an organic unity to one take, and it would be a slightly different organic unity to another; because if you look at it very carefully, if Bob shifts his hand like this a little bit, right in the middle of dialogue, Al is doing something to counter it - because maybe he's shifting his positions so he can get closer to a weapon… Nolan: What do you remember about that shoot? Pacino: I do remember that Bob said – at first I wondered about it and then I thought how right he is – he said, “let’s not rehearse it.” Nolan: Because you love to rehearse. Pacino: Oh yeah. And Bob does too. De Niro: No, I do too at times, but this kind of scene we didn't have to. Pacino: But the thing is, what Bob said is so true about rehearsal – and that is that there is no sense in rehearsing if the people around you don't know how to rehearse. That is an important factor. Might as well not rehearse or rehearse very little. But it's true because it's a certain kind of thing and people either respond to it or they don't. And so, they could be great actors, of course, but they don't want to rehearse. I've had experiences like that… De Niro: Well, it was also that we were stationary. So, it wasn't we had to sort of rehearse blocking or anything and discover how our physical moves would be. We were kind of, there, though there were subtle moves in the scene itself, obviously. But anyway, and we started late and.... we didn't start till after lunch or dinner, which was really like one o'clock in the morning...I loved the scene and I wanted, you know, really wanted it to be as best as it could be. So I was a little unhappy that we started so late in the middle of the night... Mann: It was actually intentional... De Niro: I know, he wanted to tire us out. Nolan: But getting into a scene like that, that you know is going to be such a significant part of the film, huge expectation from both of you as you sit down to perform it. At the end of that night, did you know you had it? Did you feel it? Pacino: I never knew that. De Niro: You never know that. Mann: I knew we had it. Nolan: You knew. That's your job. Pacino: I'd like to do it again actually. Mann: (laughs) We’ll re-shoot it… We normally would rehearse scenes. That scene we talked about, we all as a group decided, you know, we wanted to just talk it through and save it for the event of shooting it, which was the only scene we probably did that with. But I tend to not want to rehearse things to the point where I feel like I wish I'd shot it. That's a disaster – I think things will be perfect once, and they'll never be perfect. They'll never be 100% twice. They'll only be 100% once. You want that happening in front of the camera. From a panel discussion following a special screening of Heat at the Samuel Goldwyn Theater on September 7, 2016.

Gangster Cinema Central

36,682 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Qullamaggie on Minervini Promoting Services “Minervini yeah. He’s promoting his services really hard. His books and services now. I think his books are decent. But when he starts tweeting about these thin stocks on Twitter, it kind of makes you think: is he even trading or is he just promoting? Selling books and making, you know, conferences. Making money that way. Because some of - a lot of the stocks he mentions are not even tradeable. And he’s tweeting them out to his tens of thousands of followers. I don’t know how many followers he has. I haven’t followed him for a while. I used to follow him. Uh Mark Minervini. He has 128 thousand followers. Yeah, that’s disgusting. And so he tweets out this. Let’s look at his tweets. If he has pumped any microcaps lately, hmm, CLGN. What’s this, yeah? So this one he, uh, tweeted about 2 days ago. You can’t even trade this shit. Like, what the f*ck is he doing? Is he trading a 10,000 dollar account? What the f*ck? I don’t know. He’s a sketchy dude. I think his book is great, but man, he should have no business tweeting about these thin stocks. Yeah, CLGN, exactly disgusting. Fucking disgusting, what is this TELA? Look at this thing it’s traded 3.9 thousand shares so far today. And he’s tweeting out these things. How do you even trade this thing? He was tweeting about stuff like AMD on a day like here, on oh, look at AMD’s breaking out. This is like an ultra liquid stock. But you know, when you tweet out something like this, I mean, I could make this thing double in five minutes if I wanted to. I could literally make this thing double if I use my intra-day margin. And he’s tweeting this thing out to his hundreds of thousands of followers. Really disgusting, Yeah. I was in his room. I took the trial, yeah. They’re super expensive. I guess that’s what happens if you don’t make money from trading. You know, you gotta sell. You gotta promote yourself. Exactly the same thing Tim Sykes is doing. They make no money from trading. But you know, it’s risk-free, right? You don’t have to take any trading risk. Just have to promote your stuff and you know, it’s kind of predictable income, I guess.”

Lone

56,088 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад