Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Maximum Ignorance Probability: What do you do when you must estimate a probability and there is ZERO information? Surgeon did 60 operations & 0 failure. What's the failure rate? I realized the trick wasn't in the literature when someone wrote a paper in SPL on my blog post.

235,091 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Tyler Foxworthy
Tyler Foxworthy2 лет назад

There was a great paper from Kaplan and Garrick in the late 70s applied to transport of hazardous nuclear waste and the actuaries’ collective inability to price the risk because a rail disaster hadn’t happened yet! Similar method

Фото профиля Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Nassim Nicholas Taleb2 лет назад

Thanks a million!

Фото профиля Robert J Frey
Robert J Frey2 лет назад

When I worked for a defense contractor in the late 70s/early ' 80s this approach was a common way engineers evaluated systems’ reliability with limited information.

Фото профиля Ljubomir Josifovski
Ljubomir Josifovski2 лет назад

Laplace’s rule gives me 1/62, and then I'd approx halve that again so approx round number 1/100. Saw it here on Laplace rule limitations

Фото профиля Zhuo Xi
Zhuo Xi2 лет назад

Concise and elegant. The probability can also be updated with new information (for example if the surgeon had 20 more operations and still got 0 failure)

Фото профиля jardoish
jardoish2 лет назад

this book profiles similar scenarios (Bayesian Statistics)

Фото профиля Markus Heimerl
Markus Heimerl2 лет назад

You still have your prior and that is free to choose. A good one might be the average failure rate of all surgeons. If your prior is unreasonable, the peer review will point that out.

Фото профиля Kevin Van Horn
Kevin Van Horn2 лет назад

The max-entropy distribution for p is uniform over [0,1]. Using this as a Bayesian prior, we get a probability of 1/(1 + 61) = 1/62 ≈ 1.61% of mortality for the thoracic surgeon's next surgery, which is higher than Taleb's number. Unexpected for the author of The Black Swan 😉. I get this same answer again if I assume that * for each surgery there are K possible detailed conditions, * i of these lead to mortality, and * 0 <= i <= K, but i is otherwise unknown, and then simply use a counting argument applying the classical definition of probability, taking the limit as K goes to infinity. This argument assumes that the detailed conditions are sufficiently detailed that they determine mortality.

Фото профиля wow
wow2 лет назад

Slides hard to follow, but it's a concept worth deepening

Фото профиля UPbeat_libra
UPbeat_libra2 лет назад

Sir, what do you think about Bitcoin? I’m just kidding LOOOOOOOL

Похожие видео