正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Me: "So would you agree with the characterization that you are a misogynist?" Pastor Doug Wilson: "No." Me: "Why not? The definition of a misogynist is someone who discriminates against women. You've just told us on the record, happily, enthusiastically, that you would have a man decide the vote...

327,394 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Tucker Carlson is—to put it bluntly—transing himself into a leftist. Tucker announced that he is leaving the Republican Party. "I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm not going to support the Democratic Party. I don't know what I'm going to do. But at this point, you know, how could you support, how could I or any American voters support a political party that's not loyal to the United States? That puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. Like, that's, that's, you know, it's not possible to vote for people like that." Here's the point that needs to be made about that statement by Tucker Carlson. He said he would not support the Republican Party, nor is he going to support the Democrat Party and that's where I would challenge everyone to pause our thinking for a moment. If you refuse to vote for the Republican candidate, then you are, in effect, joining the Democrats. This is not some abstention that gives you moral high ground, because you don't 100% agree with the Republicans, or 100% agree with the Democrats, so you can't in good conscience, cast your vote because it might feel like an implicit endorsement of things that you don't agree with. No, no, no. If you do not vote for a Republican, you are, in effect, giving your opponent, the Democrats, a vote. Surrendering your vote gives your opponent an increased chance of winning because we are in a binary system. Either their values will prevail, or our values will prevail. So, if you refuse to vote for a Republican because you have even a significant policy disagreement with that politician, then you are effectively voting for racism against white people because that's what the Democrats stand for—wokeness, DEI, and ESG. I have never met a politician, read about a politician, or studied a politician with whom I agree 100% of the time. Disagreeing with a president on one policy is not a reason to blow up the rest of our agenda and, effectively, join the enemy—even if you claim you're not joining the enemy. Again, you don't have to agree with a politician on every policy in order to cast your vote for him, support him, or to be part of this general political party apparatus through which he is able to challenge the communists and anti-American zealots who are trying to take us down. So, I'm sorry to see Tucker leave the Republican Party. That makes me sad.

Liz Wheeler

83,512 次观看 • 2 个月前

Nobody is actually gay. There are men who want other men. There are acts. There is appetite. There is no inner species, no genetic cause, no finished type of human who is thereby excused from women, children, status, or the rest of male life. “Gay” is the name of the conversion process, not the name of a discovery. It takes a want and turns it into an identity, then treats the identity as a life sentence. That is why I say gay rights are a men’s-rights issue. A man who accepts the label is taught that he has taken himself out of the ordinary market with fewer claims on women, less expected competition. Women benefit when high-agency men are recoded as non-competitors. Institutions that live off female preference, safety narratives, and identity management amplify the recoding. The man finishes the job on himself. That is the psyop: not that male-male sex was invented last week, but that a behavior was moralized into a total category whose social function is removal. This is just not the case. Sex with men does not sterilize you. It does not cancel your capacity to have children. It does not rewrite your future unless you agree to the rewrite. Men have done both in every century that left records. The rule that one appetite closes the other is a recent administrative fiction. Reproduction is an act and a decision, not a sacrament you forfeit by touching another man. Trust. You can just do things. Want men. Have sex with men. Do not become the product. Do not accept exile. Do not treat a preference as a veto on women, children, or agency. The appetite can exist without the off-ramp. The off-ramp is the part that was sold to you.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​.. or whatever, it doesn’t really matter to be honest—artificial wombs and IVG will be here soon and women will no longer control access to reproduction.

Francesco 🇺🇸

16,639 次观看 • 1 天前