Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Meanwhile, the "bunker grandpa", also known as Putin, has once again started threatening to use the "Oreshnik" missile with a nuclear warhead.

wartranslated's profile picture

WarTranslated

731,608 subscribers

41,080 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Kremlin chief has arrived in Krasnoyarsk "Putin! Putin! Putin!" the children chanted as they greeted the bunker grandpa. Or maybe this isn't the bunker one after all? A touring version? Share your suggestions in the comments.
0:15

The Kremlin chief has arrived in Krasnoyarsk "Putin! Putin! Putin!" the children chanted as they greeted the bunker grandpa. Or maybe this isn't the bunker one after all? A touring version? Share your suggestions in the comments.

NEXTA

50,022 views • 19 days ago

🇷🇺 Putin says Russia's nuclear and missile programs are advancing on every front, with no Western equivalent in sight. - The first Sarmat missile regiment, which Putin calls the most powerful missile system in the world, will be deployed by end of year - The Oreshnik system can be equipped with nuclear warheads - Work on the Poseidon underwater nuclear drone and the Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missile is in its final stages - Putin says Russia was forced into this path after the U.S. withdrew from the ABM Treaty - Work to improve the Kinzhal hypersonic missile continues Poseidon, Burevestnik, Sarmat, Oreshnik, Kinzhal. Russia named its weapons better than anyone else in the business. Source: RIA
0:00

🇷🇺 Putin says Russia's nuclear and missile programs are advancing on every front, with no Western equivalent in sight. - The first Sarmat missile regiment, which Putin calls the most powerful missile system in the world, will be deployed by end of year - The Oreshnik system can be equipped with nuclear warheads - Work on the Poseidon underwater nuclear drone and the Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missile is in its final stages - Putin says Russia was forced into this path after the U.S. withdrew from the ABM Treaty - Work to improve the Kinzhal hypersonic missile continues Poseidon, Burevestnik, Sarmat, Oreshnik, Kinzhal. Russia named its weapons better than anyone else in the business. Source: RIA

Mario Nawfal

1,494,359 views • 3 months ago

Russians published what appears to be the first photo of Ruta Block 1 missile debris, showing the tail section of a Destinus missile. Range 300 km, warhead up to 150 kg.
0:11

Russians published what appears to be the first photo of Ruta Block 1 missile debris, showing the tail section of a Destinus missile. Range 300 km, warhead up to 150 kg.

WarTranslated

50,094 views • 29 days ago

Well it's Groundhog Day, again, and that must mean that Russia is threatening to use nukes. This time, it's the chairman of the Duma demanding the use of "weapons of retribution" for a war THEY started. And if Putin sees his shadow, that means 6 more weeks of nuclear winter.🌨️
0:12

Well it's Groundhog Day, again, and that must mean that Russia is threatening to use nukes. This time, it's the chairman of the Duma demanding the use of "weapons of retribution" for a war THEY started. And if Putin sees his shadow, that means 6 more weeks of nuclear winter.🌨️

Maria Drutska 🇺🇦

10,607 views • 6 months ago

Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko announced that a new Russian ballistic missile system, known as “Oreshnik,” has been placed on combat duty in Belarus as of yesterday.
0:10

Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko announced that a new Russian ballistic missile system, known as “Oreshnik,” has been placed on combat duty in Belarus as of yesterday.

Visegrád 24

52,401 views • 8 months ago

US Army Nike Hercules surface to air missile fitted with a conventional warhead blows a QF-80 target drone out of the sky during trials in the late 1950s The primary payload for this munition was a 20 kiloton nuclear warhead
0:15

US Army Nike Hercules surface to air missile fitted with a conventional warhead blows a QF-80 target drone out of the sky during trials in the late 1950s The primary payload for this munition was a 20 kiloton nuclear warhead

hw97karbine

26,345 views • 2 months ago

The use of the hypersonic non-nuclear Oreshnik missile provides Russia with a useable card that NATO lacks in an escalation game. The message would have been received by all military planners in NATO and in the US. The missile was reportedly used last night to destroy a major gas storage facility in Lviv in western Ukraine. The real value of the missile is its ability to destroy well protected command & control facilities and other critical infrastructure without resorting to the use of nuclear weapons.
0:15

The use of the hypersonic non-nuclear Oreshnik missile provides Russia with a useable card that NATO lacks in an escalation game. The message would have been received by all military planners in NATO and in the US. The missile was reportedly used last night to destroy a major gas storage facility in Lviv in western Ukraine. The real value of the missile is its ability to destroy well protected command & control facilities and other critical infrastructure without resorting to the use of nuclear weapons.

Zorawar Daulet Singh

99,055 views • 7 months ago

The IRGC also targeted Tel Aviv with a ballistic missile carrying a cluster warhead, with submunitions seen dispersing and descending through the sky.
0:09

The IRGC also targeted Tel Aviv with a ballistic missile carrying a cluster warhead, with submunitions seen dispersing and descending through the sky.

OSINTWarfare

18,396 views • 4 months ago

As the conflict between Europe and Russia escalates, Putin announced the deployment of a new powerful deterrent - the Oreshnik missile system will enter combat duty within the next two weeks
0:19

As the conflict between Europe and Russia escalates, Putin announced the deployment of a new powerful deterrent - the Oreshnik missile system will enter combat duty within the next two weeks

Glenn Diesen

26,004 views • 8 months ago

On the Oreshnik and the eternal question about the warhead There is a particular type of commentator who, after every Oreshnik strike, routinely asks the same question. Was there even a warhead in it this time? The question is meant to suggest that the weapon, without a classical explosive payload, is somehow fake or less dangerous. What it really reveals is that the person asking does not understand how the system works. A conventional ballistic missile carries explosives or a nuclear warhead. The destruction comes from the detonation at the target. The missile is essentially the delivery service. The Oreshnik works differently. It is an intermediate-range missile (range around 5000 kilometers) carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). These reentry vehicles enter the atmosphere at roughly Mach 10 to Mach 12, with Russian sources claiming higher in some cases. That works out to 3 to 3.5 kilometers per second on terminal approach. This is where the physics comes in. Kinetic energy is calculated as E = 0.5 times mass times velocity squared. Velocity enters the equation as a square. A reentry vehicle of a few hundred kilograms, on impact alone, releases energy in the range of several tons of TNT equivalent. With multiple submunitions per missile, that adds up. A tungsten or steel core entering the ground at this speed produces temperatures of several thousand degrees through friction and compression shock. Bunkers and hardened installations are not destroyed by an explosion, they are destroyed by the sheer force and heat of the impact itself. The technical term is kinetic penetration. Now to the actual answer for the warhead-askers. Yes, the Oreshnik is nuclear-capable. This was part of the design from the start, not a retrofit, but a built-in configuration option. Russian officials have stated this openly. The carrier is there. The only question is what it carries. But that is exactly the point the warhead-asker skips over. The whole point of the Oreshnik is that even in its conventional configuration it achieves an effect that previously required nuclear weapons against hardened targets. To destroy an underground command bunker, historically you needed a small tactical nuclear weapon. Today a reentry vehicle at Mach 10 with a few hundred kilograms of mass is enough. No radioactive fallout, no crossing of the nuclear threshold, no political price attached to a nuclear use. In a strike on a major city, the nuclear configuration would, in this conflict, almost certainly not be deployed. Not because it does not exist, but because it is neither necessary nor politically tenable for that purpose. The conventional version is sufficient to send a message without crossing the threshold above which entirely different chains of escalation are set in motion. In short. The question "was there a warhead in it?" misses the point. The Oreshnik does not need a large warhead, because its velocity is the weapon. It can carry a nuclear warhead, at any time. It just does not do so in the current conflict, because it does not have to.
0:10

On the Oreshnik and the eternal question about the warhead There is a particular type of commentator who, after every Oreshnik strike, routinely asks the same question. Was there even a warhead in it this time? The question is meant to suggest that the weapon, without a classical explosive payload, is somehow fake or less dangerous. What it really reveals is that the person asking does not understand how the system works. A conventional ballistic missile carries explosives or a nuclear warhead. The destruction comes from the detonation at the target. The missile is essentially the delivery service. The Oreshnik works differently. It is an intermediate-range missile (range around 5000 kilometers) carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV). These reentry vehicles enter the atmosphere at roughly Mach 10 to Mach 12, with Russian sources claiming higher in some cases. That works out to 3 to 3.5 kilometers per second on terminal approach. This is where the physics comes in. Kinetic energy is calculated as E = 0.5 times mass times velocity squared. Velocity enters the equation as a square. A reentry vehicle of a few hundred kilograms, on impact alone, releases energy in the range of several tons of TNT equivalent. With multiple submunitions per missile, that adds up. A tungsten or steel core entering the ground at this speed produces temperatures of several thousand degrees through friction and compression shock. Bunkers and hardened installations are not destroyed by an explosion, they are destroyed by the sheer force and heat of the impact itself. The technical term is kinetic penetration. Now to the actual answer for the warhead-askers. Yes, the Oreshnik is nuclear-capable. This was part of the design from the start, not a retrofit, but a built-in configuration option. Russian officials have stated this openly. The carrier is there. The only question is what it carries. But that is exactly the point the warhead-asker skips over. The whole point of the Oreshnik is that even in its conventional configuration it achieves an effect that previously required nuclear weapons against hardened targets. To destroy an underground command bunker, historically you needed a small tactical nuclear weapon. Today a reentry vehicle at Mach 10 with a few hundred kilograms of mass is enough. No radioactive fallout, no crossing of the nuclear threshold, no political price attached to a nuclear use. In a strike on a major city, the nuclear configuration would, in this conflict, almost certainly not be deployed. Not because it does not exist, but because it is neither necessary nor politically tenable for that purpose. The conventional version is sufficient to send a message without crossing the threshold above which entirely different chains of escalation are set in motion. In short. The question "was there a warhead in it?" misses the point. The Oreshnik does not need a large warhead, because its velocity is the weapon. It can carry a nuclear warhead, at any time. It just does not do so in the current conflict, because it does not have to.

Zlatti71

36,837 views • 3 months ago

Putin put a nuclear-capable Oreshnik into Russia’s overnight strike on Kyiv region. The hypersonic missile hit Bila Tserkva as Moscow launched around 90 cruise and ballistic missiles plus hundreds of drones. 4 people died, at least 80 were injured — Telegraph. 1/
0:19

Putin put a nuclear-capable Oreshnik into Russia’s overnight strike on Kyiv region. The hypersonic missile hit Bila Tserkva as Moscow launched around 90 cruise and ballistic missiles plus hundreds of drones. 4 people died, at least 80 were injured — Telegraph. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

45,348 views • 3 months ago

Recently, the IAEA Director General took part in the World Nuclear Energy Week in Moscow, discussed issues of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant with the head of Rosatom, and also met with Putin. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine condemned Grossi’s visit, stating that Russia used it in its propaganda and called such contacts of international institutions with Russia unacceptable.
0:14

Recently, the IAEA Director General took part in the World Nuclear Energy Week in Moscow, discussed issues of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant with the head of Rosatom, and also met with Putin. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine condemned Grossi’s visit, stating that Russia used it in its propaganda and called such contacts of international institutions with Russia unacceptable.

WarTranslated

46,889 views • 11 months ago

"Russia will undoubtedly bring the special military operation to its logical conclusion." — Putin. Meanwhile, the U.S. administration is convinced that Putin wants peace.
0:12

"Russia will undoubtedly bring the special military operation to its logical conclusion." — Putin. Meanwhile, the U.S. administration is convinced that Putin wants peace.

WarTranslated

54,290 views • 8 months ago

Footage captures the moment an Iranian ballistic missile struck the southern Israeli city of Dimona on Saturday evening. The city is known to be home to Israel’s main nuclear facility. Sirens have since sounded again across Dimona and nearby towns, as Iran launches another missile towards the area
0:15

Footage captures the moment an Iranian ballistic missile struck the southern Israeli city of Dimona on Saturday evening. The city is known to be home to Israel’s main nuclear facility. Sirens have since sounded again across Dimona and nearby towns, as Iran launches another missile towards the area

TRT World

40,065 views • 5 months ago

The first footage of the UMPB-5 — Russia’s new "KAB" bomb with a range of up to 200 km — likely the one that hit Poltava region today. It has a shape resembling a cruise missile: a flight range of up to 200 km and a warhead of about 100 kg. Such bombs are difficult to shoot down — they fly very high and fast, essentially like mini cruise missiles.
0:14

The first footage of the UMPB-5 — Russia’s new "KAB" bomb with a range of up to 200 km — likely the one that hit Poltava region today. It has a shape resembling a cruise missile: a flight range of up to 200 km and a warhead of about 100 kg. Such bombs are difficult to shoot down — they fly very high and fast, essentially like mini cruise missiles.

WarTranslated

28,598 views • 10 months ago

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons ONCE AGAIN – Mrs. Leyen Strictly speaking, she is right. The US had used nuclear bombs in Japan, and Russia said they would respond with nuclear weapons if the US used them first. As such, Russia would use nuclear weapons for the first time, but the word “again” is correct, for mankind, if you count Hiroshima. In summary, she is playing with words, insinuating that Russia had used the bombs before. A thoroughly unpleasant and devious person.
0:13

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons ONCE AGAIN – Mrs. Leyen Strictly speaking, she is right. The US had used nuclear bombs in Japan, and Russia said they would respond with nuclear weapons if the US used them first. As such, Russia would use nuclear weapons for the first time, but the word “again” is correct, for mankind, if you count Hiroshima. In summary, she is playing with words, insinuating that Russia had used the bombs before. A thoroughly unpleasant and devious person.

Alternative News

25,948 views • 8 days ago

During the mass missile attack on the night of May 24, Russia launched two Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missiles. Footage circulating online appears to show the deployment of warhead elements from the first missile over occupied Donetsk Oblast, north of Donetsk city. Landmarks visible in the video include the unfinished Rose Park shopping center, with the camera facing north/northwest. A second Oreshnik launch followed later, striking an area in Bila Tserkva, Kyiv region
0:10

During the mass missile attack on the night of May 24, Russia launched two Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missiles. Footage circulating online appears to show the deployment of warhead elements from the first missile over occupied Donetsk Oblast, north of Donetsk city. Landmarks visible in the video include the unfinished Rose Park shopping center, with the camera facing north/northwest. A second Oreshnik launch followed later, striking an area in Bila Tserkva, Kyiv region

Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦

59,047 views • 2 months ago