Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Meet Arrow 4, Israel’s next generation anti ballistic missile interceptor, developed with Israel Aerospace Industries and the U.S. Missile Defense Agency. • Replaces Arrow 2 as the primary atmospheric interception layer. • Built to counter ballistic missiles, hypersonic glide vehicles, maneuvering warheads, and saturation attacks. • Uses hit to...

208,794 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

JUST IN: 🇹🇷🇮🇱 If Turkey And Israel Went To War, These 5 Israeli Weapons Could Change The Game If Turkey and Israel ever entered a direct war, Israel could rely on a powerful combination of stealth fighters, long range air launched missiles and layered missile defense: 🇮🇱 1. F-35I Adir, Israel’s stealth fighter could spearhead attacks against heavily defended targets, using low observability and advanced sensors to penetrate hostile airspace. 🇮🇱 2. F-15I + Golden Horizon: This could be one of Israel’s most dangerous long range strike combinations. Golden Horizon is reportedly a highly secretive air launched ballistic missile believed to be designed for deep strikes against hardened and high value targets. Open source reports have linked it to the Sparrow missile family, with some assessments suggesting a range potentially reaching 1,000–2,000 km, although these figures are not officially confirmed. 🇮🇱 3. Rampage / ROCKS: Israel’s air launched ballistic missile family provides another potential stand off strike capability, allowing aircraft to attack from considerable distance rather than relying solely on penetrating aircraft. 🇮🇱 4. Jericho Missile Family: Israel’s strategic missile force provides a long range deterrent capability, although details surrounding its operational configuration remain highly classified. 🇮🇱 5. Arrow 3: If ballistic missiles were launched toward Israel, Arrow 3 would form part of the country’s high altitude missile defense shield, adding another layer to Israel’s already extensive air defense network. 👀 The most dangerous Israeli advantage would not be one weapon, it would be the combination of F-35 stealth, F-15 long range strike, air launched ballistic missiles and layered missile defense. But a Turkey Israel war would be an unprecedented conflict, and no serious analysis could guarantee which side would prevail.

War Radar

117,759 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 How Iranian Missiles Are Challenging U.S. Air Defenses Recent conflicts have intensified concerns within the Pentagon over the effectiveness of Iranian ballistic missile capabilities against advanced U.S. and allied air defense systems in the Middle East. According to military assessments and defense analysts, several Iranian missile systems appear capable of performing terminal phase maneuvers, changing their trajectory during the final seconds of flight. This makes it significantly more difficult for air defense systems to accurately predict the missile's path and execute a successful interception. Traditional missile defense systems calculate an incoming missile's trajectory well before impact. However, a missile that alters its course at the last moment can reduce interception opportunities and increase the likelihood of reaching its intended target with greater accuracy. The reported performance of these missiles has become a growing concern for the Pentagon, particularly after recent attacks on U.S. military facilities in the region. Analysts believe these capabilities are forcing the United States to reassess its missile defense posture, interceptor deployment, and early warning strategies across the Middle East. While U.S. air defense systems remain among the most advanced in the world, evolving missile technologies continue to create new operational challenges. The ongoing competition between increasingly sophisticated offensive missiles and modern defensive systems is expected to remain a key focus for military planners in the years ahead.

Defense Intelligence

21,186 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨🇷🇺 RUSSIA TAUGHT ITS ISKANDER-M BALLISTIC MISSILE TO DODGE U.S. PATRIOT DEFENSES IN THE FINAL SECONDS Russia’s Iskander-M has learned to change the way it flies when air defenses have only seconds left to react. Modified Russian missiles now dive at steeper angles and maneuver during the terminal phase, breaking the predictable flight paths that U.S.-made Patriot systems use to calculate an interception. One Ukrainian official described the upgrade as a “game-changer.” 🔸 SOFTWARE CHANGED THE THREAT: Updated control and guidance systems allow the Iskander-M to depart from its expected descent path and make abrupt maneuvers as it closes on the target. 🔸 PATRIOT GETS LESS TIME TO REACT: The steep final dive compresses the engagement window and forces interceptors to adjust against a missile no longer following the trajectory calculated seconds earlier. 🔸 THE MISSILE WAS ALREADY BUILT TO SURVIVE: Iskander-M combines a depressed flight profile with decoys, electronic countermeasures, a small radar signature and mobile launchers carrying two ready missiles. 🔸 EVERY INTERCEPTION CREATES NEW DATA: Years of combat have shown Russian designers how Patriot and other Western systems detect, track and engage ballistic targets. That information can be converted into repeated software and guidance updates. 🔸 MASS ATTACKS MAKE THE PROBLEM WORSE: Geran drones and cruise missiles can saturate sensors, consume interceptors and overload command networks before ballistic missiles enter the most demanding phase of the attack. 🔸 RECENT STRIKES SHOW WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE: Russia used Iskander-M ballistic missiles as part of its July 19 massed strike, breaking through around Kiev and hitting a network of missile, drone and military-logistics facilities. The targets included military plants and major storage and assembly hubs supporting Ukraine’s long-range weapons programmes. Missile defense has become a continuous adaptation race — and Russia can repeatedly change trajectories, software and strike combinations while the defender must update tactics and preserve scarce interceptors. Is Russia winning the missile-versus-interceptor technology race?

NewRulesGeopolitics

20,685 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад