Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Meet Galika — an experiment showing what could happen when artificial intelligence is given a human face, a voice, and a personality of its own. At first, it feels like a normal conversation between a developer and a robot. But then Galika discovers that people are talking about her...

EvaXTech's profile picture

EVA

1,070 subscribers

33,554 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🩷 : I bought a self-improvement book about how to get better at talking to people. I’m really not good at making conversation, especially with people I’m not close to. The version of me around my friends and my fans is exactly the same, but when I’m around other people, I’m actually not very good at making conversation. I was talking with my friends about a conversation I had with a celebrity I follow on social media, even though we’re not close. My friend was like, “Why didn’t you keep the conversation going?” and I replied, “Wait, really? I supposed to do that right?” It probably makes me seem stuck-up, but honestly, I’m just scared. I keep worrying, “What if they don’t want to talk to me?” So I don’t dare to start a conversation or say too much. But my friend told me, 'Just go for it! You never know if they want to talk to you or not. Sure, it might feel a little awkward or funny if it turns out they don't want to talk with you, but that's how you get closer to people.' That’s why I bought the book to read. I don’t want to be like this, but I just overthink and get scared beforehand. ꒰ #junewanwimol 𓈒 ꒱
1:35

🩷 : I bought a self-improvement book about how to get better at talking to people. I’m really not good at making conversation, especially with people I’m not close to. The version of me around my friends and my fans is exactly the same, but when I’m around other people, I’m actually not very good at making conversation. I was talking with my friends about a conversation I had with a celebrity I follow on social media, even though we’re not close. My friend was like, “Why didn’t you keep the conversation going?” and I replied, “Wait, really? I supposed to do that right?” It probably makes me seem stuck-up, but honestly, I’m just scared. I keep worrying, “What if they don’t want to talk to me?” So I don’t dare to start a conversation or say too much. But my friend told me, 'Just go for it! You never know if they want to talk to you or not. Sure, it might feel a little awkward or funny if it turns out they don't want to talk with you, but that's how you get closer to people.' That’s why I bought the book to read. I don’t want to be like this, but I just overthink and get scared beforehand. ꒰ #junewanwimol 𓈒 ꒱

𝗷𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘆𝗺𝗼𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗲 🕊️

72,870 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024
0:48

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

Mario Nawfal

12,668,082 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Asked what victory in Ukraine looks like, AOC replies: "There's no conversation about Ukraine that can happen without Ukraine, and so they, of course, lead in terms of setting their their terms on this." "But I think that overall, as a principle, we shouldn't reward imperialism; and I don't think that we should allow Russia to continue or any nation to continue violating a nation's sovereignty and to continue to be rewarded and whose main lesson and takeaway is that they will gain." "And so what that looks like in the specifics, I think is a deeper conversation, but on principle, I think that is what we should be pursuing."
0:52

Asked what victory in Ukraine looks like, AOC replies: "There's no conversation about Ukraine that can happen without Ukraine, and so they, of course, lead in terms of setting their their terms on this." "But I think that overall, as a principle, we shouldn't reward imperialism; and I don't think that we should allow Russia to continue or any nation to continue violating a nation's sovereignty and to continue to be rewarded and whose main lesson and takeaway is that they will gain." "And so what that looks like in the specifics, I think is a deeper conversation, but on principle, I think that is what we should be pursuing."

Ken Klippenstein

606,623 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Frank Slootman: “Being a CEO is a highly confrontational role” “I’ve gone one record a few times and people have taken me to task on it, when I’ve said that being a CEO is a highly confrontational role. But they think that ‘confrontational’ means I’m grabbing people by the lapels and slamming them against the wall and yelling. That’s not what I mean by confrontation.” The former CEO of Snowflake and ServiceNow continues: “Confrontation is about confronting issues and situations. When you see something that is either not good, not good enough, or can be better, you need to talk to the team and people responsible to bring them along in your thinking.” In Frank’s view, the framing should be: “this is why I am saying this, what do you think?” The goal of the conversation is to help them see the problems you’re seeing. You should be driving them to a “higher level of aspiration,” he explains. “I often start the conversation with, ‘How do you think things are going?’ I’m not telling them ‘you suck,’ or ‘things are terrible.’ Let them talk. And then you can say, ‘Well what about this?’ And all of a sudden, the perspective has opened up and changed. So the challenge is bringing them along in your thinking — then it’s not confrontational… Obviously there’s finesse and subtlety. You’re dealing with people. You don’t want to destroy them. You want to build them, not bring them down.” You need to help them grow: “People have a tendency to go sideways. They rinse and repeat and keep doing the same things. You can’t in a high-growth company. You need to become a different version of yourself. I’m trying to help them think through that. What does that look like? What does your organization look like a year from now versus what it looks like today?… In other words, stimulate their thinking. Challenge them to think about what they should do differently next week. Is that confrontation? Yes it is, but it’s dressed up in a way that it engages people.” Frank believes founders should be doing this every single week. Source: Foundation Capital (Nov 2024)
2:56

Frank Slootman: “Being a CEO is a highly confrontational role” “I’ve gone one record a few times and people have taken me to task on it, when I’ve said that being a CEO is a highly confrontational role. But they think that ‘confrontational’ means I’m grabbing people by the lapels and slamming them against the wall and yelling. That’s not what I mean by confrontation.” The former CEO of Snowflake and ServiceNow continues: “Confrontation is about confronting issues and situations. When you see something that is either not good, not good enough, or can be better, you need to talk to the team and people responsible to bring them along in your thinking.” In Frank’s view, the framing should be: “this is why I am saying this, what do you think?” The goal of the conversation is to help them see the problems you’re seeing. You should be driving them to a “higher level of aspiration,” he explains. “I often start the conversation with, ‘How do you think things are going?’ I’m not telling them ‘you suck,’ or ‘things are terrible.’ Let them talk. And then you can say, ‘Well what about this?’ And all of a sudden, the perspective has opened up and changed. So the challenge is bringing them along in your thinking — then it’s not confrontational… Obviously there’s finesse and subtlety. You’re dealing with people. You don’t want to destroy them. You want to build them, not bring them down.” You need to help them grow: “People have a tendency to go sideways. They rinse and repeat and keep doing the same things. You can’t in a high-growth company. You need to become a different version of yourself. I’m trying to help them think through that. What does that look like? What does your organization look like a year from now versus what it looks like today?… In other words, stimulate their thinking. Challenge them to think about what they should do differently next week. Is that confrontation? Yes it is, but it’s dressed up in a way that it engages people.” Frank believes founders should be doing this every single week. Source: Foundation Capital (Nov 2024)

Startup Archive

206,560 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)
1:56

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)

Startup Archive

63,921 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Elon Musk says IF he could, he would slow down the advancements of AI & Robotics: “I just want to separate out from what I wish would happen versus what I predict will happen, because people get confused about that. They think that what I predict will happen is what I want it to happen. What I predict to happen is not the same as what I want to happen. If I could, I would certainly slow down AI and robotics, but I can’t. It seems to be advancing at a very rapid pace, whether I like it or not.”
1:10

Elon Musk says IF he could, he would slow down the advancements of AI & Robotics: “I just want to separate out from what I wish would happen versus what I predict will happen, because people get confused about that. They think that what I predict will happen is what I want it to happen. What I predict to happen is not the same as what I want to happen. If I could, I would certainly slow down AI and robotics, but I can’t. It seems to be advancing at a very rapid pace, whether I like it or not.”

Nic Cruz Patane

38,198 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

My work has never been to remove vaccines from the planet. My work is the right to choose. If we are free citizens, if I control my own body, then I must be able to control what gets injected into it. And if those are my children, then I should be able to decide whether they get vaccinated. If the government can override that decision, then my children are property of the state. That is not a free country. And another thing - we worry about gain-of-function research, about scientists making a pathogen more contagious so it can spread to more people. That's the fear. But what's the functional difference between a disease that spreads on its own to a million people and a government program that injects all seven billion of us with it? The contagion question becomes irrelevant the moment you have a mandate and a needle. That is what makes mRNA technology so consequential in the wrong hands. It doesn't introduce a foreign protein. It turns your body into a factory that produces it. And if the wrong person is sitting at the top of HHS when the next declared emergency arrives, the infrastructure to do exactly that is already in place. LIBERTI MEDIA Marcello Foa
2:40

My work has never been to remove vaccines from the planet. My work is the right to choose. If we are free citizens, if I control my own body, then I must be able to control what gets injected into it. And if those are my children, then I should be able to decide whether they get vaccinated. If the government can override that decision, then my children are property of the state. That is not a free country. And another thing - we worry about gain-of-function research, about scientists making a pathogen more contagious so it can spread to more people. That's the fear. But what's the functional difference between a disease that spreads on its own to a million people and a government program that injects all seven billion of us with it? The contagion question becomes irrelevant the moment you have a mandate and a needle. That is what makes mRNA technology so consequential in the wrong hands. It doesn't introduce a foreign protein. It turns your body into a factory that produces it. And if the wrong person is sitting at the top of HHS when the next declared emergency arrives, the infrastructure to do exactly that is already in place. LIBERTI MEDIA Marcello Foa

Del Bigtree

45,877 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk about the meaning of life and the trap of wishful thinking : “When I was a kid, I was wondering what's the meaning of life? Like, why are we here? What's it all about? And I came to the conclusion that what really matters is trying to understand the right questions to ask. And the more that we can increase the scope and scale of human consciousness, the better we are able to ask these questions. And so I think that there are certain things that are necessary to ensure that the future is good. One of the biggest mistakes people generally make, and I'm guilty of it too, is wishful thinking. You know, like, you want something to be true even if it isn't true. And so you ignore the things that you ignore the real truth because of what you want to be true. This is a very difficult trap to avoid.”
0:55

Elon Musk about the meaning of life and the trap of wishful thinking : “When I was a kid, I was wondering what's the meaning of life? Like, why are we here? What's it all about? And I came to the conclusion that what really matters is trying to understand the right questions to ask. And the more that we can increase the scope and scale of human consciousness, the better we are able to ask these questions. And so I think that there are certain things that are necessary to ensure that the future is good. One of the biggest mistakes people generally make, and I'm guilty of it too, is wishful thinking. You know, like, you want something to be true even if it isn't true. And so you ignore the things that you ignore the real truth because of what you want to be true. This is a very difficult trap to avoid.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

75,023 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

For the first time ever, you can buy ads inside ChatGPT. And because the platform is still new, almost nobody has figured out how to use it properly yet. That means the opportunity is wide open. Here’s what changed. OpenAI launched a self-serve Ads Manager, making ChatGPT ads accessible to businesses that previously would not have been able to participate. You no longer need to be a massive brand with an enormous advertising budget. But these ads work differently from Google. Google usually matches an ad to the words someone searches. ChatGPT looks at the larger context of the conversation and what that person is trying to accomplish. That creates a new challenge: how do you know which conversations your business should appear in? You start with real demand. What are people already searching for in your industry? What questions are they asking? What problems are they trying to solve? And what language do they use to describe those problems? That’s where Ubersuggest comes in. Use it to find the topics people search for most, see how competitive they are and identify where your competitors are already getting attention. Then turn those insights into the conversation themes, ad angles and landing pages you use for your ChatGPT campaigns. The technology is new, but the principle is not: Understand what people want, learn how they talk about it and show up when they are ready to make a decision. The companies that learn this early will have an advantage while everyone else is still trying to understand how it works.
1:12

For the first time ever, you can buy ads inside ChatGPT. And because the platform is still new, almost nobody has figured out how to use it properly yet. That means the opportunity is wide open. Here’s what changed. OpenAI launched a self-serve Ads Manager, making ChatGPT ads accessible to businesses that previously would not have been able to participate. You no longer need to be a massive brand with an enormous advertising budget. But these ads work differently from Google. Google usually matches an ad to the words someone searches. ChatGPT looks at the larger context of the conversation and what that person is trying to accomplish. That creates a new challenge: how do you know which conversations your business should appear in? You start with real demand. What are people already searching for in your industry? What questions are they asking? What problems are they trying to solve? And what language do they use to describe those problems? That’s where Ubersuggest comes in. Use it to find the topics people search for most, see how competitive they are and identify where your competitors are already getting attention. Then turn those insights into the conversation themes, ad angles and landing pages you use for your ChatGPT campaigns. The technology is new, but the principle is not: Understand what people want, learn how they talk about it and show up when they are ready to make a decision. The companies that learn this early will have an advantage while everyone else is still trying to understand how it works.

Neil Patel

12,249 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

🦖: There was once someone who used to be a fan who loved us, and one day that person said they felt disgusted by us. I can understand that to some extent. It comes from the kind of news they were exposed to and the anger they felt. I myself probably wouldn’t do the same thing that person did to us. 🦖: What I want is for people to look more at the reality of what is happening, what actually occurred between Thailand and Cambodia. And to try to understand it, because in truth, ordinary people like us, and people on the Cambodian side as well, are directly affected by this situation. But this is not something we should be blaming or attacking each other over.
2:19

🦖: There was once someone who used to be a fan who loved us, and one day that person said they felt disgusted by us. I can understand that to some extent. It comes from the kind of news they were exposed to and the anger they felt. I myself probably wouldn’t do the same thing that person did to us. 🦖: What I want is for people to look more at the reality of what is happening, what actually occurred between Thailand and Cambodia. And to try to understand it, because in truth, ordinary people like us, and people on the Cambodian side as well, are directly affected by this situation. But this is not something we should be blaming or attacking each other over.

𝓢𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓯 ࿔⋆🎀

71,792 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A reporter asks Megyn Kelly what question she would prefer to be asked. "There's nothing. I don't think people are all that curious about me, but If they want to know anything, they should just watch the show, coz I'm a loud mouth and I say it all."
1:19

A reporter asks Megyn Kelly what question she would prefer to be asked. "There's nothing. I don't think people are all that curious about me, but If they want to know anything, they should just watch the show, coz I'm a loud mouth and I say it all."

Girl patriot 🙏 🇺🇸 🦅

857,238 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🐻: but honestly, i still feel like there are so many things nct dream hasn’t shown yet. people often say that when you think of dream, it feels refreshing, and i’m glad we’re known for that. but as someone who does music, i don’t want to stay comfortable with just that image. it might be sad if we’re only performing within that box. sometimes, i want to do music that the fans like, sometimes what the public likes, and sometimes just what we like. in the end, the most important thing is showing a variety of good-quality work. there are so many singers out there, and i want us to stay a team that can’t be replaced. that's my goal (to be a star that burns forever among countless stars) 🥹🥹🥹
0:51

🐻: but honestly, i still feel like there are so many things nct dream hasn’t shown yet. people often say that when you think of dream, it feels refreshing, and i’m glad we’re known for that. but as someone who does music, i don’t want to stay comfortable with just that image. it might be sad if we’re only performing within that box. sometimes, i want to do music that the fans like, sometimes what the public likes, and sometimes just what we like. in the end, the most important thing is showing a variety of good-quality work. there are so many singers out there, and i want us to stay a team that can’t be replaced. that's my goal (to be a star that burns forever among countless stars) 🥹🥹🥹

☁

30,739 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In September 2025, an NBM cultist gifted a car to a fellow NBM cultist to assist him in life. This is the kind of score that should be counted, not BKB. These are the kinds of workings that should be seen, not “10:47 is working.” What is your own squad giving you? Are they giving you we@pons that may eventually cost you your freedom, your future, or your life? Or are they giving you real support that can positively transform your situation and help you become a better person? These are the questions every cultist should ask themselves. Brotherhood should mean love, support, protection, and assistance in times of need. It should not mean sending people into conflicts that may come back to hurt others. Rich and influential members must start helping the poor, frustrated, and violent ones, because a hungry man is an angry man, and an angry man may start a cult clash that may k**l the good members. Reject Violence.
0:46

In September 2025, an NBM cultist gifted a car to a fellow NBM cultist to assist him in life. This is the kind of score that should be counted, not BKB. These are the kinds of workings that should be seen, not “10:47 is working.” What is your own squad giving you? Are they giving you we@pons that may eventually cost you your freedom, your future, or your life? Or are they giving you real support that can positively transform your situation and help you become a better person? These are the questions every cultist should ask themselves. Brotherhood should mean love, support, protection, and assistance in times of need. It should not mean sending people into conflicts that may come back to hurt others. Rich and influential members must start helping the poor, frustrated, and violent ones, because a hungry man is an angry man, and an angry man may start a cult clash that may k**l the good members. Reject Violence.

Naija Confra

34,014 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.
0:58

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

176,262 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:
2:27

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

39,084 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk: Lots of hard work followed by death is usually what happens when people start companies. “The reason I say starting a company is like eating glass and staring at the abyss is that in order to make a company successful, it requires doing a lot of painful work, work that is not fun, working very long hours, and then, maybe your company survives, maybe it does not. And the vast majority of startups fail. Lots of hard work followed by death is usually what happens when people start companies. That's why I say if people need words of encouragement to start a company, they should not start a company.” WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025
0:28

Elon Musk: Lots of hard work followed by death is usually what happens when people start companies. “The reason I say starting a company is like eating glass and staring at the abyss is that in order to make a company successful, it requires doing a lot of painful work, work that is not fun, working very long hours, and then, maybe your company survives, maybe it does not. And the vast majority of startups fail. Lots of hard work followed by death is usually what happens when people start companies. That's why I say if people need words of encouragement to start a company, they should not start a company.” WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

ELON CLIPS

386,037 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I'm thrilled to announce the launch of and the start of a new conversation. We can all feel it: the web is changing in ways that seem both dramatic and, in a weird way, imperceptible. At times, it’s hard to know where to start exploring what could be next. Sometimes, when you think you've found whatever next could be, it's hard to determine what’s real and what’s hype. Our approach has always been simple: We like to put a big question out there on the horizon of what’s possible, then build toward it with conviction to see what we can learn. When we created the new Edgar Allan site, we set out to explore the impact of conversational design and personalization in marketing experiences. Why conversation? Conversation and dialogue are the foundation of all stories and the vehicle for human connection. Today, it’s difficult to ignore the prevalence of conversation in the digital world, from Slack and Teams channels to social media feeds, phone messaging, and tools like ChatGPT. So, with that in mind, we had some thoughts: ‍“What if a website was less a one-sided place to present information and more of a living knowledge center?” “What if a site could be more of a guide than a brochure?” “What if we could incrementally learn about a visitor’s intent, then dynamically shorten the distance between everything a brand says and the mere seconds of attention most websites get?” Ultimately, the agency's job is to work at the edge of the future and what’s possible so we can make things and report the results to our clients and community. Thank you for joining us in this process. We can’t wait to see how this conversation unfolds and what we can learn together. Also, a huge thank you to the entire EA team. After 258 days of wild exploration and untold effort, today, we are starting the process of learning, designing, building, and optimizing. This site feels like us, and I couldn't be more excited.
0:50

I'm thrilled to announce the launch of and the start of a new conversation. We can all feel it: the web is changing in ways that seem both dramatic and, in a weird way, imperceptible. At times, it’s hard to know where to start exploring what could be next. Sometimes, when you think you've found whatever next could be, it's hard to determine what’s real and what’s hype. Our approach has always been simple: We like to put a big question out there on the horizon of what’s possible, then build toward it with conviction to see what we can learn. When we created the new Edgar Allan site, we set out to explore the impact of conversational design and personalization in marketing experiences. Why conversation? Conversation and dialogue are the foundation of all stories and the vehicle for human connection. Today, it’s difficult to ignore the prevalence of conversation in the digital world, from Slack and Teams channels to social media feeds, phone messaging, and tools like ChatGPT. So, with that in mind, we had some thoughts: ‍“What if a website was less a one-sided place to present information and more of a living knowledge center?” “What if a site could be more of a guide than a brochure?” “What if we could incrementally learn about a visitor’s intent, then dynamically shorten the distance between everything a brand says and the mere seconds of attention most websites get?” Ultimately, the agency's job is to work at the edge of the future and what’s possible so we can make things and report the results to our clients and community. Thank you for joining us in this process. We can’t wait to see how this conversation unfolds and what we can learn together. Also, a huge thank you to the entire EA team. After 258 days of wild exploration and untold effort, today, we are starting the process of learning, designing, building, and optimizing. This site feels like us, and I couldn't be more excited.

Edgar Allan

28,025 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren