Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Meet Galika — an experiment showing what could happen when artificial intelligence is given a human face, a voice, and a personality of its own. At first, it feels like a normal conversation between a developer and a robot. But then Galika discovers that people are talking about her...

EvaXTech's profile picture

EVA

1,147 subscribers

34,929 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🩷 : I bought a self-improvement book about how to get better at talking to people. I’m really not good at making conversation, especially with people I’m not close to. The version of me around my friends and my fans is exactly the same, but when I’m around other people, I’m actually not very good at making conversation. I was talking with my friends about a conversation I had with a celebrity I follow on social media, even though we’re not close. My friend was like, “Why didn’t you keep the conversation going?” and I replied, “Wait, really? I supposed to do that right?” It probably makes me seem stuck-up, but honestly, I’m just scared. I keep worrying, “What if they don’t want to talk to me?” So I don’t dare to start a conversation or say too much. But my friend told me, 'Just go for it! You never know if they want to talk to you or not. Sure, it might feel a little awkward or funny if it turns out they don't want to talk with you, but that's how you get closer to people.' That’s why I bought the book to read. I don’t want to be like this, but I just overthink and get scared beforehand. ꒰ #junewanwimol 𓈒 ꒱
1:35

🩷 : I bought a self-improvement book about how to get better at talking to people. I’m really not good at making conversation, especially with people I’m not close to. The version of me around my friends and my fans is exactly the same, but when I’m around other people, I’m actually not very good at making conversation. I was talking with my friends about a conversation I had with a celebrity I follow on social media, even though we’re not close. My friend was like, “Why didn’t you keep the conversation going?” and I replied, “Wait, really? I supposed to do that right?” It probably makes me seem stuck-up, but honestly, I’m just scared. I keep worrying, “What if they don’t want to talk to me?” So I don’t dare to start a conversation or say too much. But my friend told me, 'Just go for it! You never know if they want to talk to you or not. Sure, it might feel a little awkward or funny if it turns out they don't want to talk with you, but that's how you get closer to people.' That’s why I bought the book to read. I don’t want to be like this, but I just overthink and get scared beforehand. ꒰ #junewanwimol 𓈒 ꒱

𝗷𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘆𝗺𝗼𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗲 🕊️

72,870 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024
0:48

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

Mario Nawfal

12,668,380 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨🚨🚨Elon Musk’s Robot Now Dances More Naturally Than Most People The strange part is not that the robot is dancing. It is that people are standing around it with their phones out, watching it like an entertainer. A few years ago, humanoid robots were mostly lab footage. White rooms. Slow steps. Engineers nearby, ready to catch them. Now Optimus is being shown in public as something people are supposed to react to. Not just a machine. A performer.A product.A glimpse of what Tesla wants the future to feel like. That detail matters. Because the first real breakthrough for humanoid robots may not be perfect intelligence or perfect speed. It may be the moment people stop treating them like experiments. And start treating them like part of the room. That is when robots become normal.
0:34

🚨🚨🚨Elon Musk’s Robot Now Dances More Naturally Than Most People The strange part is not that the robot is dancing. It is that people are standing around it with their phones out, watching it like an entertainer. A few years ago, humanoid robots were mostly lab footage. White rooms. Slow steps. Engineers nearby, ready to catch them. Now Optimus is being shown in public as something people are supposed to react to. Not just a machine. A performer.A product.A glimpse of what Tesla wants the future to feel like. That detail matters. Because the first real breakthrough for humanoid robots may not be perfect intelligence or perfect speed. It may be the moment people stop treating them like experiments. And start treating them like part of the room. That is when robots become normal.

velora

18,022 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ETH NYC was uncomfortable for me at the day one. And I think that's exactly why it was valuable. I've attended many crypto conferen2ces before — Token2049, Consensus, events in Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong. Usually, I have no problem talking to strangers. But at ETH conf, I found myself standing there, looking at people, and not knowing how to start a conversation. Most of the people here aren't KOLs. They're builders, developers, founders, researchers and VCs. And for a moment, I kept asking myself: - What value do I bring to this room? - What can I offer them? - What can I learn from them? Instead of forcing myself to "network", I started getting curious. 1. What are they building? 2. What are they excited about? 3. What problems are they trying to solve? That simple shift changed everything. Over the past two days, I met founders, builders, Ethereum ecosystem contributors and project teams. But the biggest takeaway wasn't who I met. It was realizing that growth usually starts the moment you leave the room where you feel comfortable. And sometimes, while trying to discover the value in others, you end up rediscovering your own. ETHGlobal ETHConf #ETHNYC
4:07

ETH NYC was uncomfortable for me at the day one. And I think that's exactly why it was valuable. I've attended many crypto conferen2ces before — Token2049, Consensus, events in Singapore, Dubai and Hong Kong. Usually, I have no problem talking to strangers. But at ETH conf, I found myself standing there, looking at people, and not knowing how to start a conversation. Most of the people here aren't KOLs. They're builders, developers, founders, researchers and VCs. And for a moment, I kept asking myself: - What value do I bring to this room? - What can I offer them? - What can I learn from them? Instead of forcing myself to "network", I started getting curious. 1. What are they building? 2. What are they excited about? 3. What problems are they trying to solve? That simple shift changed everything. Over the past two days, I met founders, builders, Ethereum ecosystem contributors and project teams. But the biggest takeaway wasn't who I met. It was realizing that growth usually starts the moment you leave the room where you feel comfortable. And sometimes, while trying to discover the value in others, you end up rediscovering your own. ETHGlobal ETHConf #ETHNYC

CE_Poloniex (YIYI)| HTX SmartEarn 13%APY

18,323 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Frank Slootman: “Being a CEO is a highly confrontational role” “I’ve gone one record a few times and people have taken me to task on it, when I’ve said that being a CEO is a highly confrontational role. But they think that ‘confrontational’ means I’m grabbing people by the lapels and slamming them against the wall and yelling. That’s not what I mean by confrontation.” The former CEO of Snowflake and ServiceNow continues: “Confrontation is about confronting issues and situations. When you see something that is either not good, not good enough, or can be better, you need to talk to the team and people responsible to bring them along in your thinking.” In Frank’s view, the framing should be: “this is why I am saying this, what do you think?” The goal of the conversation is to help them see the problems you’re seeing. You should be driving them to a “higher level of aspiration,” he explains. “I often start the conversation with, ‘How do you think things are going?’ I’m not telling them ‘you suck,’ or ‘things are terrible.’ Let them talk. And then you can say, ‘Well what about this?’ And all of a sudden, the perspective has opened up and changed. So the challenge is bringing them along in your thinking — then it’s not confrontational… Obviously there’s finesse and subtlety. You’re dealing with people. You don’t want to destroy them. You want to build them, not bring them down.” You need to help them grow: “People have a tendency to go sideways. They rinse and repeat and keep doing the same things. You can’t in a high-growth company. You need to become a different version of yourself. I’m trying to help them think through that. What does that look like? What does your organization look like a year from now versus what it looks like today?… In other words, stimulate their thinking. Challenge them to think about what they should do differently next week. Is that confrontation? Yes it is, but it’s dressed up in a way that it engages people.” Frank believes founders should be doing this every single week. Source: Foundation Capital (Nov 2024)
2:56

Frank Slootman: “Being a CEO is a highly confrontational role” “I’ve gone one record a few times and people have taken me to task on it, when I’ve said that being a CEO is a highly confrontational role. But they think that ‘confrontational’ means I’m grabbing people by the lapels and slamming them against the wall and yelling. That’s not what I mean by confrontation.” The former CEO of Snowflake and ServiceNow continues: “Confrontation is about confronting issues and situations. When you see something that is either not good, not good enough, or can be better, you need to talk to the team and people responsible to bring them along in your thinking.” In Frank’s view, the framing should be: “this is why I am saying this, what do you think?” The goal of the conversation is to help them see the problems you’re seeing. You should be driving them to a “higher level of aspiration,” he explains. “I often start the conversation with, ‘How do you think things are going?’ I’m not telling them ‘you suck,’ or ‘things are terrible.’ Let them talk. And then you can say, ‘Well what about this?’ And all of a sudden, the perspective has opened up and changed. So the challenge is bringing them along in your thinking — then it’s not confrontational… Obviously there’s finesse and subtlety. You’re dealing with people. You don’t want to destroy them. You want to build them, not bring them down.” You need to help them grow: “People have a tendency to go sideways. They rinse and repeat and keep doing the same things. You can’t in a high-growth company. You need to become a different version of yourself. I’m trying to help them think through that. What does that look like? What does your organization look like a year from now versus what it looks like today?… In other words, stimulate their thinking. Challenge them to think about what they should do differently next week. Is that confrontation? Yes it is, but it’s dressed up in a way that it engages people.” Frank believes founders should be doing this every single week. Source: Foundation Capital (Nov 2024)

Startup Archive

207,201 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

What happens to a country when its leaders stop asking what kind of nation they want to preserve? Immigration is a subject where people can have completely different opinions, but there is a basic question that is difficult to avoid. How much immigration can a country absorb while still maintaining control over its borders, its institutions, its infrastructure, and its sense of national identity? The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, but that doesn't mean immigration policy has to be unlimited or that a country has no right to decide who enters and under what conditions. Congress has broad constitutional authority over immigration, including the power to establish rules governing admission and exclusion. There's also a difference between having compassion for individual people and claiming that a government should be able to enforce its own immigration laws. Those ideas don't have to contradict each other. If a nation can't control who enters its territory, enforce the laws it has on the books, or determine the scale and pace of immigration, then the question becomes much bigger than immigration itself. It becomes a question of sovereignty and whether citizens still have meaningful control over the direction of their own country. And that's where the conversation gets uncomfortable. We can debate how many immigrants should be admitted, what legal pathways should look like, and how enforcement should work. But pretending there are no consequences to immigration policy doesn't make those consequences disappear. A country has limited resources, limited infrastructure, and a population with its own history and institutions. Citizens have every right to ask what policies best serve the long term interests of the nation they inherited and hope to pass on to their children. The real question isn't whether America should have immigration. It is whether Americans are still willing to have an honest conversation about what level of immigration is sustainable and what kind of country they want to preserve. If we don't decide what we want our nation to remain, who will?
1:28

What happens to a country when its leaders stop asking what kind of nation they want to preserve? Immigration is a subject where people can have completely different opinions, but there is a basic question that is difficult to avoid. How much immigration can a country absorb while still maintaining control over its borders, its institutions, its infrastructure, and its sense of national identity? The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, but that doesn't mean immigration policy has to be unlimited or that a country has no right to decide who enters and under what conditions. Congress has broad constitutional authority over immigration, including the power to establish rules governing admission and exclusion. There's also a difference between having compassion for individual people and claiming that a government should be able to enforce its own immigration laws. Those ideas don't have to contradict each other. If a nation can't control who enters its territory, enforce the laws it has on the books, or determine the scale and pace of immigration, then the question becomes much bigger than immigration itself. It becomes a question of sovereignty and whether citizens still have meaningful control over the direction of their own country. And that's where the conversation gets uncomfortable. We can debate how many immigrants should be admitted, what legal pathways should look like, and how enforcement should work. But pretending there are no consequences to immigration policy doesn't make those consequences disappear. A country has limited resources, limited infrastructure, and a population with its own history and institutions. Citizens have every right to ask what policies best serve the long term interests of the nation they inherited and hope to pass on to their children. The real question isn't whether America should have immigration. It is whether Americans are still willing to have an honest conversation about what level of immigration is sustainable and what kind of country they want to preserve. If we don't decide what we want our nation to remain, who will?

Declaration of Memes

17,122 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Asked what victory in Ukraine looks like, AOC replies: "There's no conversation about Ukraine that can happen without Ukraine, and so they, of course, lead in terms of setting their their terms on this." "But I think that overall, as a principle, we shouldn't reward imperialism; and I don't think that we should allow Russia to continue or any nation to continue violating a nation's sovereignty and to continue to be rewarded and whose main lesson and takeaway is that they will gain." "And so what that looks like in the specifics, I think is a deeper conversation, but on principle, I think that is what we should be pursuing."
0:52

Asked what victory in Ukraine looks like, AOC replies: "There's no conversation about Ukraine that can happen without Ukraine, and so they, of course, lead in terms of setting their their terms on this." "But I think that overall, as a principle, we shouldn't reward imperialism; and I don't think that we should allow Russia to continue or any nation to continue violating a nation's sovereignty and to continue to be rewarded and whose main lesson and takeaway is that they will gain." "And so what that looks like in the specifics, I think is a deeper conversation, but on principle, I think that is what we should be pursuing."

Ken Klippenstein

607,659 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)
1:56

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)

Startup Archive

63,921 просмотров • 1 год назад

My work has never been to remove vaccines from the planet. My work is the right to choose. If we are free citizens, if I control my own body, then I must be able to control what gets injected into it. And if those are my children, then I should be able to decide whether they get vaccinated. If the government can override that decision, then my children are property of the state. That is not a free country. And another thing - we worry about gain-of-function research, about scientists making a pathogen more contagious so it can spread to more people. That's the fear. But what's the functional difference between a disease that spreads on its own to a million people and a government program that injects all seven billion of us with it? The contagion question becomes irrelevant the moment you have a mandate and a needle. That is what makes mRNA technology so consequential in the wrong hands. It doesn't introduce a foreign protein. It turns your body into a factory that produces it. And if the wrong person is sitting at the top of HHS when the next declared emergency arrives, the infrastructure to do exactly that is already in place. LIBERTI MEDIA Marcello Foa
2:40

My work has never been to remove vaccines from the planet. My work is the right to choose. If we are free citizens, if I control my own body, then I must be able to control what gets injected into it. And if those are my children, then I should be able to decide whether they get vaccinated. If the government can override that decision, then my children are property of the state. That is not a free country. And another thing - we worry about gain-of-function research, about scientists making a pathogen more contagious so it can spread to more people. That's the fear. But what's the functional difference between a disease that spreads on its own to a million people and a government program that injects all seven billion of us with it? The contagion question becomes irrelevant the moment you have a mandate and a needle. That is what makes mRNA technology so consequential in the wrong hands. It doesn't introduce a foreign protein. It turns your body into a factory that produces it. And if the wrong person is sitting at the top of HHS when the next declared emergency arrives, the infrastructure to do exactly that is already in place. LIBERTI MEDIA Marcello Foa

Del Bigtree

46,118 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Elon Musk about the meaning of life and the trap of wishful thinking : “When I was a kid, I was wondering what's the meaning of life? Like, why are we here? What's it all about? And I came to the conclusion that what really matters is trying to understand the right questions to ask. And the more that we can increase the scope and scale of human consciousness, the better we are able to ask these questions. And so I think that there are certain things that are necessary to ensure that the future is good. One of the biggest mistakes people generally make, and I'm guilty of it too, is wishful thinking. You know, like, you want something to be true even if it isn't true. And so you ignore the things that you ignore the real truth because of what you want to be true. This is a very difficult trap to avoid.”
0:55

Elon Musk about the meaning of life and the trap of wishful thinking : “When I was a kid, I was wondering what's the meaning of life? Like, why are we here? What's it all about? And I came to the conclusion that what really matters is trying to understand the right questions to ask. And the more that we can increase the scope and scale of human consciousness, the better we are able to ask these questions. And so I think that there are certain things that are necessary to ensure that the future is good. One of the biggest mistakes people generally make, and I'm guilty of it too, is wishful thinking. You know, like, you want something to be true even if it isn't true. And so you ignore the things that you ignore the real truth because of what you want to be true. This is a very difficult trap to avoid.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

75,023 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

For the first time ever, you can buy ads inside ChatGPT. And because the platform is still new, almost nobody has figured out how to use it properly yet. That means the opportunity is wide open. Here’s what changed. OpenAI launched a self-serve Ads Manager, making ChatGPT ads accessible to businesses that previously would not have been able to participate. You no longer need to be a massive brand with an enormous advertising budget. But these ads work differently from Google. Google usually matches an ad to the words someone searches. ChatGPT looks at the larger context of the conversation and what that person is trying to accomplish. That creates a new challenge: how do you know which conversations your business should appear in? You start with real demand. What are people already searching for in your industry? What questions are they asking? What problems are they trying to solve? And what language do they use to describe those problems? That’s where Ubersuggest comes in. Use it to find the topics people search for most, see how competitive they are and identify where your competitors are already getting attention. Then turn those insights into the conversation themes, ad angles and landing pages you use for your ChatGPT campaigns. The technology is new, but the principle is not: Understand what people want, learn how they talk about it and show up when they are ready to make a decision. The companies that learn this early will have an advantage while everyone else is still trying to understand how it works.
1:12

For the first time ever, you can buy ads inside ChatGPT. And because the platform is still new, almost nobody has figured out how to use it properly yet. That means the opportunity is wide open. Here’s what changed. OpenAI launched a self-serve Ads Manager, making ChatGPT ads accessible to businesses that previously would not have been able to participate. You no longer need to be a massive brand with an enormous advertising budget. But these ads work differently from Google. Google usually matches an ad to the words someone searches. ChatGPT looks at the larger context of the conversation and what that person is trying to accomplish. That creates a new challenge: how do you know which conversations your business should appear in? You start with real demand. What are people already searching for in your industry? What questions are they asking? What problems are they trying to solve? And what language do they use to describe those problems? That’s where Ubersuggest comes in. Use it to find the topics people search for most, see how competitive they are and identify where your competitors are already getting attention. Then turn those insights into the conversation themes, ad angles and landing pages you use for your ChatGPT campaigns. The technology is new, but the principle is not: Understand what people want, learn how they talk about it and show up when they are ready to make a decision. The companies that learn this early will have an advantage while everyone else is still trying to understand how it works.

Neil Patel

12,249 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Obama on recursive self improvement and the risks associated with it. When he talks about the urgency for us all to have a say in how this technology evolves and how it is overseen, this is part of the reason why: “The models are going to get smarter and smarter and better and better at a much faster pace, at an exponential pace. What are the risks of that? There’s the big science fiction risk, wow, these models get smarter than us, and they decide humans are fine, but not necessary. They start setting their own goals, and the killer robots kill us, or we bow down to them. I do not want to exaggerate that particular risk, but I will say there is a non-zero risk of non-zero chance of that happening, but that’s not actually the risk that I’m most concerned about, although it’s the risk that gets most attention. And the reason that’s a risk is not because the computer models are conscious, necessarily. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily feel malice towards humans. It’s just that if they start setting their own agendas, you may get a misalignment between what they want to do and what we want them to do, and that gap can be dangerous. That’s problem number one. The more serious problem is these models are getting powerful enough that if they get in the hands of bad humans, they can do bad things. They can be weaponized in certain ways. They can do a lot of mischief.”
1:49

Obama on recursive self improvement and the risks associated with it. When he talks about the urgency for us all to have a say in how this technology evolves and how it is overseen, this is part of the reason why: “The models are going to get smarter and smarter and better and better at a much faster pace, at an exponential pace. What are the risks of that? There’s the big science fiction risk, wow, these models get smarter than us, and they decide humans are fine, but not necessary. They start setting their own goals, and the killer robots kill us, or we bow down to them. I do not want to exaggerate that particular risk, but I will say there is a non-zero risk of non-zero chance of that happening, but that’s not actually the risk that I’m most concerned about, although it’s the risk that gets most attention. And the reason that’s a risk is not because the computer models are conscious, necessarily. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily feel malice towards humans. It’s just that if they start setting their own agendas, you may get a misalignment between what they want to do and what we want them to do, and that gap can be dangerous. That’s problem number one. The more serious problem is these models are getting powerful enough that if they get in the hands of bad humans, they can do bad things. They can be weaponized in certain ways. They can do a lot of mischief.”

Jason Goldman

963,493 просмотров • 22 дней назад

🦖: There was once someone who used to be a fan who loved us, and one day that person said they felt disgusted by us. I can understand that to some extent. It comes from the kind of news they were exposed to and the anger they felt. I myself probably wouldn’t do the same thing that person did to us. 🦖: What I want is for people to look more at the reality of what is happening, what actually occurred between Thailand and Cambodia. And to try to understand it, because in truth, ordinary people like us, and people on the Cambodian side as well, are directly affected by this situation. But this is not something we should be blaming or attacking each other over.
2:19

🦖: There was once someone who used to be a fan who loved us, and one day that person said they felt disgusted by us. I can understand that to some extent. It comes from the kind of news they were exposed to and the anger they felt. I myself probably wouldn’t do the same thing that person did to us. 🦖: What I want is for people to look more at the reality of what is happening, what actually occurred between Thailand and Cambodia. And to try to understand it, because in truth, ordinary people like us, and people on the Cambodian side as well, are directly affected by this situation. But this is not something we should be blaming or attacking each other over.

𝓢𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓯 ࿔⋆🎀

71,792 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

A reporter asks Megyn Kelly what question she would prefer to be asked. "There's nothing. I don't think people are all that curious about me, but If they want to know anything, they should just watch the show, coz I'm a loud mouth and I say it all."
1:19

A reporter asks Megyn Kelly what question she would prefer to be asked. "There's nothing. I don't think people are all that curious about me, but If they want to know anything, they should just watch the show, coz I'm a loud mouth and I say it all."

Girl patriot 🙏 🇺🇸 🦅

857,251 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.
0:58

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

176,262 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In September 2025, an NBM cultist gifted a car to a fellow NBM cultist to assist him in life. This is the kind of score that should be counted, not BKB. These are the kinds of workings that should be seen, not “10:47 is working.” What is your own squad giving you? Are they giving you we@pons that may eventually cost you your freedom, your future, or your life? Or are they giving you real support that can positively transform your situation and help you become a better person? These are the questions every cultist should ask themselves. Brotherhood should mean love, support, protection, and assistance in times of need. It should not mean sending people into conflicts that may come back to hurt others. Rich and influential members must start helping the poor, frustrated, and violent ones, because a hungry man is an angry man, and an angry man may start a cult clash that may k**l the good members. Reject Violence.
0:46

In September 2025, an NBM cultist gifted a car to a fellow NBM cultist to assist him in life. This is the kind of score that should be counted, not BKB. These are the kinds of workings that should be seen, not “10:47 is working.” What is your own squad giving you? Are they giving you we@pons that may eventually cost you your freedom, your future, or your life? Or are they giving you real support that can positively transform your situation and help you become a better person? These are the questions every cultist should ask themselves. Brotherhood should mean love, support, protection, and assistance in times of need. It should not mean sending people into conflicts that may come back to hurt others. Rich and influential members must start helping the poor, frustrated, and violent ones, because a hungry man is an angry man, and an angry man may start a cult clash that may k**l the good members. Reject Violence.

Naija Confra

34,014 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🐻: but honestly, i still feel like there are so many things nct dream hasn’t shown yet. people often say that when you think of dream, it feels refreshing, and i’m glad we’re known for that. but as someone who does music, i don’t want to stay comfortable with just that image. it might be sad if we’re only performing within that box. sometimes, i want to do music that the fans like, sometimes what the public likes, and sometimes just what we like. in the end, the most important thing is showing a variety of good-quality work. there are so many singers out there, and i want us to stay a team that can’t be replaced. that's my goal (to be a star that burns forever among countless stars) 🥹🥹🥹
0:51

🐻: but honestly, i still feel like there are so many things nct dream hasn’t shown yet. people often say that when you think of dream, it feels refreshing, and i’m glad we’re known for that. but as someone who does music, i don’t want to stay comfortable with just that image. it might be sad if we’re only performing within that box. sometimes, i want to do music that the fans like, sometimes what the public likes, and sometimes just what we like. in the end, the most important thing is showing a variety of good-quality work. there are so many singers out there, and i want us to stay a team that can’t be replaced. that's my goal (to be a star that burns forever among countless stars) 🥹🥹🥹

☁

30,739 просмотров • 1 год назад