正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Megan Fox didn’t raise three “trans kids” — she raised three boys and pushed gender-ideology books (including ones by trans children) on them from toddler age so they wouldn’t “feel weird.” Her oldest started dresses at two; her solution was ideology, not boundaries. That’s not support — that’s early...

22,528 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This woman is openly announcing that she’s actively sabotaging her own children’s futures and then daring the school to fail them for it. is proudly announcing her three kids (12, 10, and 6) have never done homework and never will. She skips every parent-teacher conference because she “doesn’t care.” Her exact words: “My job as a parent is to play with my kids. Your job as a teacher is to teach my kid.” She even admits she doesn’t know algebra and refuses to learn it. Homework isn’t busywork. It’s how kids reinforce what they learned, how parents stay aware of what’s actually being taught, and how children build the basic discipline of finishing something when they don’t feel like it. She has cut all three of those things out of their lives on purpose. She’s not protecting their childhood. She’s training them that effort is optional and someone else is always responsible for the outcome. That mindset does not produce adults who can hold a job, meet deadlines, or compete. It produces people who hit real expectations and fold. She is not raising free-spirited children. She is raising children who will hit the wall of real expectations — jobs, bills, deadlines, skill requirements — with no practice at meeting them. That is setting them up for failure. Not metaphorical failure. Actual, measurable underachievement and limited options. Her own admission that she can’t and won’t do algebra is the tell. She is modeling the exact attitude she is teaching her kids: if it’s hard or inconvenient, reject it and blame the institution. This is not bold parenting. It’s open neglect dressed up as boundaries. She is actively setting her own kids up for failure.

DocumentingLibs

103,569 次观看 • 2 个月前

Graham Linehan (Graham Linehan) was grossly misrepresented on Bill Maher this week. Glinner’s arrest was mentioned in the context of free speech - correct - but was used as a punchline more than a warning. His tweets were mentioned as “grossly offensive” without ever showing them. One of the three tweets he was arrested over said “a photo you can smell”. That’s not even offensive let alone grossly. This is just a bad cycle. Framing anything blatantly truthful about gender ideology as “grossly offensive” - especially when no evidence or context is given - literally repeats the dangerous pattern of arrest or worse. Trans activists thrive on this. They rely on it. Thousands of people - mainly women - have plainly stated the bullshit of gender ideology. Some people would say it’s grossly offensive to do so. Many have called us Nazis for it. Worse have sent threats because of it. All because we have said things like “there is no such this has trangender”, men who claim to be women are “con men”, and “all trans activism is trolling.” These are all true statements, ripe for healthy debate to anyone willing. None are. Once again, the sympathy is with the ideology taking away rights, not the poole it’s taking it away from. This is not progress. Graham deserves defending here not just because he didn’t say anything “grossly offensive” but because even if he did it doesn’t warrant being arrested or being a punchline.

Sall Grover

205,010 次观看 • 1 年前