Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Meghan and Harry see themselves as private citizens using their global platform to continue the humanitarian work they have always done. Meghan was an established humanitarian long before she met Prince Harry. Prince William, king or not, CANNOT stop them from service to humanity. Here is #MeghanMarkIe before #PrinceHarry...

32,264 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

STEALING THE SPOTLIGHT????? NORMALISE THE ROYAL FAMILY NOT HAVING A CLAIM ON EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK AGAINST PRINCE HARRY AND DUCHESS MEGHAN. What the Royal PR machine seeks to do is to put some kind of claim on any day of the week so that any time Harry and Meghan do something they can be accused of being demonic or manipulative because it was on a certain day or just before or after a certain day. PLEASE DO NOT LET ROYAL REPORTERS CHANGE YOUR SENSE OF MORALITY OR THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE ROYAL FAMILY GETTING FIRST & ONLY RIGHTS TO A DAY. ♦️Day claiming shows the continued ARROGANCE OF THE ROYAL INSTITUTION and what a toxic entitlement it has. ♦️Meghan Markle launched her new business #AmericanRivieraOrchard on instagram on her and Harry’s SUSSEX FREEDOM DAY (14th March) - 4 year anniversary. This day is important to them. (See video👇). The day is not owned by anyone. ♦️PRINCESS DIANA would probably love this launch release day choice as she sought to be free too. Obviously the Royal would not love it as they do not support or celebrate the idea of the Sussexes being free and happy and neither do their reporters. ♦️There is nothing wrong with more than one event or occurrence happening on one day. It will happen many more times. Each can be covered by the press. It happens all the time with celebrities. The same applies to royals. But it’s ONLY A PROBLEM WHEN IT’S HARRY & MEGHAN because of the hate incitement campaign of the royals and their reporters. ♦️Harry and Meghan were held back from doing things they wanted while in the team of working royals. Now THEY ARE INDEPENDENT FROM THE ROYAL INSTITUTION’S programme. The whole point of this is freedom of planning and choices. Yet it seems they are still expected to hold themselves back and be at the beckon call, demands of the institution. ♦️The royals and their team have an ongoing desire to control and restrict Harry and Meghan even though they are now independent. But sorry because THEY CAN NOW DEVISE THEIR SCHEDULE ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN DESIRED TIMETABLE and should not have to change it if they become aware of a clash with another royal. ♦️The royals do not need to and do not change their schedule because of Harry and Meghan. So ditto! ♦️Often Prince William and Kate Middleton have heard announcements of the Sussexes fewer and far between events well in advance and (I believe) purposefully scheduled an event to clash as they benefit from being tagged on to the disproportionately higher global reporting on H&Ms event compared. THIS IS PR HIJACKING and their royal rota really take up that opportunity to tag them in. ♦️Why do people not accuse the Royals of being manipulative or demonic when they clash with a Sussex event announced ages ago? It’s because the reporters try to programme us to think they have a right to dominate and override. The institution’s sheep. 🐑🐏 ♦️WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Why should it be a concern that Harry and Meghan do something on the same day as the royals who are a powerful institution and ‘apparently’ have more backing, support and clout anyway. Apparently!!! ♦️THE ROYALS & THEIR TEAM ARE LACKING IN SELF ESTEEM if they’re worried, bothered and complaining about schedule clashes with Harry and Meghan in another country and appealing to a different audience. Saturday morning comment piece over. 🙂

Glow Lee

147,431 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

PLEASE WATCH THIS CLIP FOR INSIGHT ON THE ROYAL FAMILY’S SOPHISTICATED DISCREET INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE & UNFAIRNESS!!!! I also encourage you to rewatch the whole Oprah interview with Prince Harry and Meghan. There’s so much that is forgotten and so much that makes so much more sense now. ♦️Although this section of the interview exposed and therefore probably scuppered the Royal Family’s plan to change the convention so as to not have the Sussex’s children be titled Prince/Princesses when Charles their grandfather ascended to the throne after all, Meghan gives a vivid picture of what she and Harry faced behind palace doors that royal reporters have tried to distract us from by pretending they lied or focusing on the racism stuff. ♦️It shows how the Royal Family uses character assassination campaigns by their media pals, threats to deny titles and therefore security in order to dehumanise the un-favoured members of the family behind the scenes whilst still using them to promote the monarchy. ♦️Of course Harry and Meghan would not want to hard launch Archie’s life as if he would be a public high profile royal by parading him to the public at birth outside the hospital if behind the scenes the discussion by the family was to delegitimise him, ensure he gets no security and possibly subject him to the character assassination H&M realised the Royal family were allowing to happen against them, meaning that if this happened to Archie he would be more vulnerable without security. They let Meghan (and Harry)be criticised to high heaven for treating & protecting Archie from a public glare that should not come without security and was reasonable if he was not to be a titled royal. ♦️It’s also highly manipulative that in laying the groundwork, royal reporters told us that Harry and Meghan did not want their children to be titled, and they silenced them from correcting that so that if they did indeed change the convention and Archie was not titled, the public would be led to believe it was H&M that wanted this and not the royal family/the firm. The institution would feign innocence. ♦️It’s only since leaving that Harry and Meghan have been able to say their truth against strong calls from royal family proxies for them to be ‘private’ =be silent =hide the institutional abuse which would eventually be directed at Archie and Lilibet.

Glow Lee

10,976 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

Queen Esther

100,702 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Talking about Prince Harry’s jokes about Trump with a deranger. THANK GOODNESS Marvyn Harrison and the spite-less balance he offered in this discussion. …..but why does he always gets paired with derangers on this show. Despite her likely restraint it’s obvious that Lowri Turner is so deep in the murky hateful deranger world just from her petulant language and references like; ♦️ the fake ‘privacy tour’ narrative (she knows H&M never said they wanted to be anymore private than any other public figure and actually wanted to continue serving hence being bashed for saying “service is universal”.) ♦️Claim that Harry is a nobody (🙄 but she very het up over a nobody 🙂) ♦️Annoyance H&M are making money (against all expectations) and undermining this by suggesting this is due to the titles rather than merit, character and talent ♦️Dismissal that Meghan had serious earning power well before pre royal life and undermining her previous career when other royals have done far less or nothing at all. ♦️Pretends to think that Prince Harry is unemployed with no jobs when it’s the anti Sussex commentators that have researched this the most and choose not to highlight his other jobs & projects where they can and where they rely on public ignorance. ♦️No problem dehumanising Meghan by being fine with her fave fascist Trump and Royal Family personally attacking Meghan even while she worked her butt off for the Royal Family promoting them to the Commonwealth but outrage at Prince Harry and Meghan responding with their own defence /challenge to their families attacks ♦️Singling Meghan out as wrong for making interesting and unique crafts on a lifestyle show-as if you don’t just watch for entertainment mainly. (Watching how a Christmas cracker is made was cool.) ♦️ super opinionated about a show she apparently hasn’t watched a slates it based on clips. She definitely looks like the typical demographics for a deep deranger 😉

Glow Lee

10,132 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce