Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Meghan Markle needs to stop mass ordering her pathetic candles from Temu!!! Another one shows up wickless? Girl, at this point it’s not a manufacturing error, it’s performance art. A $64 metaphor for “vibes only, no actual fire.” 🤣🤣 What a joke! Dan Wootton Royal News Network Link Lauren...

141,249 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 37

Фото профиля The Winking Minx
The Winking Minx8 месяцев назад

At this point, I’m starting to this was done deliberately, maybe to tank the business, declare insolvency/bankruptcy, and at least recoup some money? Or maybe to stop hemorrhaging money? If so many people with large SM platforms (3 come to mind, but I’m sure there are more) were dewicked, I wonder how many others were?

Фото профиля Harry, Meghan’s Spare
Harry, Meghan’s Spare8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews I wouldn’t doubt it. After all, the Netflix crew couldn’t stand her.

Фото профиля tot
tot8 месяцев назад

@TheWinkingMinx @danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews No one can.

Фото профиля The Winking Minx
The Winking Minx8 месяцев назад

@ViQueenie @danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews No….now that you mention it, Tot, no one really can We all smell the same sulfur and brimstone -especially animals and children - some things are universal

Фото профиля LostAddicted
LostAddicted8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Sure because wicks are so easily removed. They will never admit she’s a failure. I would never order from a site that doesn’t offer returns and you can only ask for a refund via email. Even then, refunds take months to get.

Фото профиля The High Priestess
The High Priestess8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews The odds were stacked against her selling them already, she’s got no chance now. Below Temu really, I bet their candles aren’t wickless. 😬😂

Фото профиля AMM Tuesday
AMM Tuesday8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews I used to make candles. I don’t understand how a wick came out of that AND I would think for that candle size, there’d be 2 wicks. I think she’s having some Temu mass production company make terrible products with her name on those candles. Wow. Just wow.

Фото профиля girlfromoz
girlfromoz8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews So on top of having vast amounts in her own stash, Netflix also has large amounts of stock as well.

Фото профиля Meredith Suzy Chapstick
Meredith Suzy Chapstick8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews But Harry got his wife from Temu… so?? Cmon man , that’s all he can afford these days. #MeghanMarkleAmericanPsycho #Call me McDonald’s because I’m lovin it!

Фото профиля Harry, Meghan’s Spare
Harry, Meghan’s Spare8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Excellent point!

Фото профиля FAFO Era 🤣
FAFO Era 🤣8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews The pretend candle is giving pretend car chase energy. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 #MeghanMarkleIsAConArtist #WWENXT

Фото профиля TM
TM8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews I'm genuinely confused how a wickless candle would have a whole in the center. Candles are poured over wick during production, aren't they? If there was no wick to make that indentation, candle would be smooth

Фото профиля MzG
MzG8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Wow, I've see 3 or 4 now that the candles didn't have wicks. How embarrassing for her. She's an utter failure. This needs to be reported because she's scamming people

Фото профиля Serret 🇬🇧 #ReformUK
Serret 🇬🇧 #ReformUK8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Safest candles ever, lol

Фото профиля Princess IamIamIam 🇺🇸
Princess IamIamIam 🇺🇸8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Box : $63 Candle: $1

Фото профиля Anna_Banana22
Anna_Banana228 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews I can’t believe it happened AGAIN! 😳

Фото профиля Lisa G.
Lisa G.8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews OMG Again? This is hilarious! 🤣😂🤣This is the third one publicly but you just know there’s more! As ‘ever, Was ‘never, Will ‘never be…Moron.

Фото профиля Melody Richards 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Melody Richards 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews This is shocking. I hope the customers will get a refund.

Фото профиля ❀ Colleen 🇺🇸
❀ Colleen 🇺🇸8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Why aren’t the ones purchasing this garbage, reporting it to the @bbb_us

Фото профиля Meredith Suzy Chapstick
Meredith Suzy Chapstick8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews There’s a clip from Suits days where she mocks gwneth Paltrow for expensive candle … I’m too dumb to find it. She calls gyneths candles stupid.

Фото профиля Mrs Ronald Raccoon
Mrs Ronald Raccoon8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews This is not the 1st to turn up defective & it's the evidence that costs in production have been cut and mass produced on the cheap. If not, every single production company will have a quality control dept checking each item as it rolls off the conveyor belt. She has no QC

Фото профиля grandma smoggy
grandma smoggy8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Come on they’re Forever candles they last for ever , can’t be used.🤣🤣🤣🤣

Фото профиля Politically Offside 🍁
Politically Offside 🍁8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Wow! A $64 candle with no wick isn’t a manufacturing error. It’s brand integrity. Looks the part, does absolutely nothing, and still expects applause. I agree that this company might be doing it deliberately to go bankrupt.

Фото профиля Sakura Musuku
Sakura Musuku8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Fake... same as @LinkLauren wickless candle where there's a dot hole. So, clickbait! Dan Wooton's candle has no wick hole in his as ever wickless candle. Be fair!

Фото профиля Harry, Meghan’s Spare
Harry, Meghan’s Spare8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews @LinkLauren Bull💩

Фото профиля Knotsure
Knotsure8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews A $65 candle at that! Please send a complaint email. Share the response with us? I wonder if it will have punctuation.

Фото профиля Lady Unicorn 🦄
Lady Unicorn 🦄8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Another hater without a wick. They all have one thing in common. They dont make an effort to hide where the wick was. They dont need to because that is literally the level of intelligence were dealing with here.

Фото профиля DryHumorBabe
DryHumorBabe8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews She’s sending out products that are not what AsEver says they are. The wickless candles are not mistakes. It’s a scam. She also has a history of taking payment from people, then said it was out of stock. If you don’t have the product you can’t complete the order. It’s fraud.

Фото профиля S. Picard, AMERICA FIRST; FAFO
S. Picard, AMERICA FIRST; FAFO8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews No offense, but who orders anything from a nit wit like Meeeghan?

Фото профиля Mark Woollard
Mark Woollard8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews There’s a saying in the UK ….’All fur coat and no knickers’ and the word TAT can both be used to summarise everything about these products

Фото профиля H
H8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Your followers must be mentally challenged There is a hole where the wick clearly was - before being removed Weird how it’s only the haters that end up with candles with the wick removed isn’t it? You’re all making up bullshit for clicks, sucked up by dicks #liar #desperate

Фото профиля Susan
Susan8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Wicks sold separately. (always check the fine print)

Фото профиля Donna Stelzer
Donna Stelzer8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Temu does a better job than that.

Фото профиля ConcreteLotus 🇬🇧🇸🇪🇫🇮👑🐶😉
ConcreteLotus 🇬🇧🇸🇪🇫🇮👑🐶😉8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews Maby someone at the factory ara not a Meghan fan?! 😂😂😂 Or they should pay the workers a deacent sallory. 🧐

Фото профиля Marie Allen
Marie Allen8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews The candle is like her empty ad useless

Фото профиля Donna
Donna8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews You are a Megan fan probably being paid to do this. Shame on you. You're doping the people.

Фото профиля Ifnotnow when
Ifnotnow when8 месяцев назад

@danwootton @RNN_RoyalNews But still you get fools buying her lowgrade stuff in expensive looking packaging. Boggles the mind...🥴

Похожие видео

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle

Glow Lee

92,179 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Meghan Markle may have overplayed her hand with people who do not need her. First the Kardashians. Meghan and Harry went to Kris Jenner’s 70th. Kim and Kris posted photos. The photos came down. The story from the Sussex side was that they had not consented. A source close to the Kardashians said there were no consent forms. Then Kim spoke for herself. They had been told it was fine to post. After the pictures went up, Meghan and Harry apparently remembered it was Remembrance Day and did not want to be seen partying and dancing. The photos came down. Kim called it “really innocent.” Now Martha Stewart. Martha, 85, said she was at a dinner with Meghan, that Meghan had just come back from the palace, and that Meghan was talking about it. Meghan’s side said Martha must have been “confused” because they were not seated near each other. Then the host of the dinner said Martha’s account was “simply untrue.” Do you see it? The Kardashians have to explain themselves. Martha Stewart is treated as though she somehow got the whole thing wrong. The Kardashians do not need lessons in publicity. Martha Stewart has spent decades building a name that does not depend on Meghan Markle. Neither of them needs her for attention. And still, whenever Meghan dislikes the way a night is being told, there is another source, another correction, another person who must have misunderstood. It is not one incident. It is the pile of them. Sooner or later, people start asking whether being near her is worth becoming the next story that has to be walked back. The Kardashians can absorb a deleted photo. Martha Stewart can absorb a briefing against her. What they will not absorb forever is being made the problem whenever the story does not land the way Meghan Markle wanted.

Queen Esther

272,923 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Remember when Meghan Markle said that on the “freedom flight” a crew member knelt next to her seat, took his hat off and told her, “We appreciate everything you did for our country.” 🤭 She later said it was the “first time” someone had recognised the “sacrifice” she had made 👀 I’m sorry but what sacrifice exactly? Apart from taxpayers ending up with a wedding estimated around £32 million that she later called a “spectacle”, I’m struggling to remember the contribution we’re all supposed to be grateful for 🙄 Meghan Markle always seems to have something extraordinary happening during flights, doesn’t she? It’s like all her biggest admirers are permanently somewhere in the skies 😌 And now we have not one but TWO Richie Richs signing her anniversary message… what are the odds 😂 But then it’s Meghan Markle’s world and stranger things have happened, so two crew members with the same name on one plane? Who knows 🤯 Maybe next we’ll hear about a crew member thanking her for her bravery in surviving hardships no ordinary person could possibly comprehend 😌 Or a pilot interrupting the flight to say, “Ladies and gentlemen, before landing we’d like to personally thank Meghan Markle for her extraordinary sacrifices and everything she has done for humanity.” 🤭 Or a cabin crew member wiping away tears whispering, “No one has ever suffered or sacrificed quite like you.” 😭 At this point, with Meghan Markle flight stories, I’m just wondering how long before we hear the next one 👀😭 On a serious note though, I’m embarrassed just listening to some of these stories 😭 The dramatic sobbing into a security guard’s arms… girl where was your husband that you had to collapse into the The “I tried so hard”, the kneeling crew member, the endless admiration, the extraordinary sacrifices… how do people listen to all this and not think, “this sounds less like real life and more like a Wattpad story where the heroine is worshipped by everyone she meets” 😭 Because the level of self importance in some of these stories is genuinely astonishing… and what surprises me even more is there are people listening thinking, “yes, this all sounds perfectly normal” 👀

Queen Esther

200,252 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад