Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Meghan Markle seems to think that if she says “authenticity” and “authentic” often enough, people will stop noticing she’s one of the most manufactured people we’ve ever seen. As if repeating the words enough somehow makes them true. Sorry, Meghan, but you can’t manifest a personality by repeating adjectives... show more

Queen Esther

22,689 subscribers

70,141 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Komedi Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Lily Phillips says she f66ked 23 men majorly for the fun of it and also for business reasons. She says most people especially men don’t see as her as a business woman but she really is one and wants to be seen as one because she’s intelligent enough to be a business woman 👀👀💔 ‘I f66kd 23 men for the fun of it but also for business reasons. Most people especially men never acknowledge me as a business woman but i really am one because i’m intellectually superior enough to be’ 👀👀💔

Sensitive content

Lily Phillips says she f66ked 23 men majorly for the fun of it and also for business reasons. She says most people especially men don’t see as her as a business woman but she really is one and wants to be seen as one because she’s intelligent enough to be a business woman 👀👀💔 ‘I f66kd 23 men for the fun of it but also for business reasons. Most people especially men never acknowledge me as a business woman but i really am one because i’m intellectually superior enough to be’ 👀👀💔

hyz

91,060 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

If ego alone could make someone a billionaire, Rachel Meghan Markle would top the list. She seems utterly convinced that she is that girl. By merely looking at her actions, I can imagine she constantly reminds Prince Harry how fortunate he is to be with her and that she did him a favour by lowering her standards when she decided to trap him. Thomas Markle Sr. certainly created a monster. Rarely have I encountered someone whose narcissism radiates even through photographs. All of this is to say: Meghan acts as if she’s the world’s most beautiful and powerful woman. But perhaps someone should remind her to be humble.

If ego alone could make someone a billionaire, Rachel Meghan Markle would top the list. She seems utterly convinced that she is that girl. By merely looking at her actions, I can imagine she constantly reminds Prince Harry how fortunate he is to be with her and that she did him a favour by lowering her standards when she decided to trap him. Thomas Markle Sr. certainly created a monster. Rarely have I encountered someone whose narcissism radiates even through photographs. All of this is to say: Meghan acts as if she’s the world’s most beautiful and powerful woman. But perhaps someone should remind her to be humble.

Julia Unleashed

280,301 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Meghan Markle says she never corrected Mindy Kaling, and in her words: "I think people right now need to take a closer look at what I said about I'm Sussex now, because it's not really what it sounds like or what it means. Of course I am Meghan Markle. That clip of ours went viral but for all the wrong reasons." Here is the clip. What do you think?

Meghan Markle says she never corrected Mindy Kaling, and in her words: "I think people right now need to take a closer look at what I said about I'm Sussex now, because it's not really what it sounds like or what it means. Of course I am Meghan Markle. That clip of ours went viral but for all the wrong reasons." Here is the clip. What do you think?

Foster

449,561 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

She pulled the wick out of the candle, filmed a dramatic reveal, then blamed “crazy Meghan fans” when people clocked it. Meghan is one of the most bullied women online. Of course her supporters are protective. That is loyalty, not insanity. If you have to stage the moment, the story was never there.

She pulled the wick out of the candle, filmed a dramatic reveal, then blamed “crazy Meghan fans” when people clocked it. Meghan is one of the most bullied women online. Of course her supporters are protective. That is loyalty, not insanity. If you have to stage the moment, the story was never there.

The Notorious JTB

40,861 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This is what Meghan Markle and Prince Harry thought it would be like when they left the royal family and moved to California… motorcades, crowds lining the streets, people cheering and waving for them. Meghan Markle hugely miscalculated, thinking the crowds that turned out on royal tours were there for her. It’s a quiet but powerful lesson… don’t let your ego convince you the spotlight was ever yours alone. Some lights belong to something far bigger than one person. She learned that a little too late. And honestly? I’m not sorry she did. 😌

This is what Meghan Markle and Prince Harry thought it would be like when they left the royal family and moved to California… motorcades, crowds lining the streets, people cheering and waving for them. Meghan Markle hugely miscalculated, thinking the crowds that turned out on royal tours were there for her. It’s a quiet but powerful lesson… don’t let your ego convince you the spotlight was ever yours alone. Some lights belong to something far bigger than one person. She learned that a little too late. And honestly? I’m not sorry she did. 😌

Queen Esther

304,260 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Looking back, how do Meghan Markle and Harry can go on this humanitarian trip but she can’t even visit her own father? Add to that the silence on issues like Nigerian Christians being killed, despite loudly claiming that identity when it suits her. Will Meghan Markle and Harry be speaking out about Iranians as well, or does that not fit their narrative? How does someone live with themselves with this kind of fake humanitarianism just for optics and a few headlines? Every time you think Meghan Markle and Harry couldn’t sink lower, they prove you wrong by showing they are the worst kind of people.

Looking back, how do Meghan Markle and Harry can go on this humanitarian trip but she can’t even visit her own father? Add to that the silence on issues like Nigerian Christians being killed, despite loudly claiming that identity when it suits her. Will Meghan Markle and Harry be speaking out about Iranians as well, or does that not fit their narrative? How does someone live with themselves with this kind of fake humanitarianism just for optics and a few headlines? Every time you think Meghan Markle and Harry couldn’t sink lower, they prove you wrong by showing they are the worst kind of people.

Queen Esther

65,640 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

Queen Esther

100,702 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle

Glow Lee

92,179 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Marjorie Taylor Greene is calling out “QAnon” as a psychological operation that behaves like a cult, specifically targeting people who are already distrustful of the government and steering them in the wrong direction. She says it works by taking a small amount of truth, then twisting it into a false narrative that people get pulled into over and over again. According to her, Q is one of the most effective psychological operations she’s ever seen. “This is a bunch of bullsh*t.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene is calling out “QAnon” as a psychological operation that behaves like a cult, specifically targeting people who are already distrustful of the government and steering them in the wrong direction. She says it works by taking a small amount of truth, then twisting it into a false narrative that people get pulled into over and over again. According to her, Q is one of the most effective psychological operations she’s ever seen. “This is a bunch of bullsh*t.”

Shadow of Ezra

160,558 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

As if the people of California haven't been through enough, they have to deal with Harry and Meghan too! These hucksters ran their own lives into the ground, so I certainly wouldn't call them in a crisis.

As if the people of California haven't been through enough, they have to deal with Harry and Meghan too! These hucksters ran their own lives into the ground, so I certainly wouldn't call them in a crisis.

Link Lauren

230,878 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

She’s mad. Bethenny Frankel says she’s neither woke nor MAGA. Bethenny adds that if something she said bothered you, she’d rather hear it in a constructive way, but if people just want to “put [her] in the goddam ground,” they can wait, because she’s “not f—king going anywhere.” She also says she’s one of the only people who truly speaks her mind, while others just want to follow the crowd. At times, she sounds like she’s on the verge of tears and keeps repeating that she’s not going anywhere and won’t tolerate this anymore.

She’s mad. Bethenny Frankel says she’s neither woke nor MAGA. Bethenny adds that if something she said bothered you, she’d rather hear it in a constructive way, but if people just want to “put [her] in the goddam ground,” they can wait, because she’s “not f—king going anywhere.” She also says she’s one of the only people who truly speaks her mind, while others just want to follow the crowd. At times, she sounds like she’s on the verge of tears and keeps repeating that she’s not going anywhere and won’t tolerate this anymore.

Bye Wig Hello Drama

181,116 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Meghan Markle is a soulless parasite who knows exactly what she is doing here. Make no mistake, Meghan Markle has a lot of self awareness and is purposely gaslighting the public. She knows what she did to hurt the Late Queen to taint her legacy, and she doesn't care about the damage and harm she has caused. You want to talk about legacy Meghan? Who is going to cry when you die? At this rate, absolutely no one. Behind every successful woman is God and family. Get right with God and stop worshiping yourself as the most important. Being a female flounder is not it. #MeghanIsTheProblem #ConfessionsOfAFemaleFounder #meghanmarkleisanarcissist

Meghan Markle is a soulless parasite who knows exactly what she is doing here. Make no mistake, Meghan Markle has a lot of self awareness and is purposely gaslighting the public. She knows what she did to hurt the Late Queen to taint her legacy, and she doesn't care about the damage and harm she has caused. You want to talk about legacy Meghan? Who is going to cry when you die? At this rate, absolutely no one. Behind every successful woman is God and family. Get right with God and stop worshiping yourself as the most important. Being a female flounder is not it. #MeghanIsTheProblem #ConfessionsOfAFemaleFounder #meghanmarkleisanarcissist

TR G - The Royal Grift

52,208 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"Some of the words they still say with a British accent" Meghan Markle talking about Archie 5 and Little Betty 3. HUH?? How could these children still have a British accent if they never lived in the UK? 1. Likelihood of Meghan lying is high. 2. If the children STILL have a British accent, then that means the kids are isolated with only Harry & his body guard around them. 3. Maybe deflection because the children don't have biological traits due to being rented when needed or just non existent. Or 4. Or Meghan is so stupid that she does not know the difference between the meaning of "accent" and children having limited vocabulary as a result of one parent educating them. Whatever the case is, Meghan looks like an ignoring narcissist parent that does not pay attention the them. #WithLoveMeghan #WithLoveMeghanOnNetflix #meghanmarkleisaliar #MeghanMarkleIsAConArtist

"Some of the words they still say with a British accent" Meghan Markle talking about Archie 5 and Little Betty 3. HUH?? How could these children still have a British accent if they never lived in the UK? 1. Likelihood of Meghan lying is high. 2. If the children STILL have a British accent, then that means the kids are isolated with only Harry & his body guard around them. 3. Maybe deflection because the children don't have biological traits due to being rented when needed or just non existent. Or 4. Or Meghan is so stupid that she does not know the difference between the meaning of "accent" and children having limited vocabulary as a result of one parent educating them. Whatever the case is, Meghan looks like an ignoring narcissist parent that does not pay attention the them. #WithLoveMeghan #WithLoveMeghanOnNetflix #meghanmarkleisaliar #MeghanMarkleIsAConArtist

TR G - The Royal Grift

253,398 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Princess Catherine is everything Meghan Markle wanted people to see when she married into the Royal Family: the admiration, the respect, the influence and that effortless global profile. The difference is that Catherine actually earned it. She didn’t spend years telling everyone how misunderstood she was or how important her voice should be. She quietly got on with the job, turning up, carrying out her duties, and letting her actions speak louder than any interview or statement. Over time, people came to respect her because they saw real consistency, dignity, and commitment. Meghan seemed to believe the title alone would deliver the same level of admiration. It doesn’t work like that. Respect isn’t something you can demand, buy, marry into, or claim just because you think you deserve it. People decide for themselves whether you’ve earned it. That’s why Princess Catherine is respected, and Meghan Markle is still chasing the kind of respect she thought would come automatically. Respect isn’t a wedding present. It’s built brick by brick, year after year. Something Meghan Markle will never understand.

Queen Esther

132,004 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Rihanna has always said she wants to be a celebrity who bonds with people. If she ever pulled back from that it would be understandable, but it’s still been nice to see how much she’s connected with people over the years.

Rihanna has always said she wants to be a celebrity who bonds with people. If she ever pulled back from that it would be understandable, but it’s still been nice to see how much she’s connected with people over the years.

۟

70,492 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Emma Came To Talk Business. Meghan Came To Talk Meghan. After sitting through the full Emma Grede podcast with Meghan Markle, here’s my brief take. Emma asked good questions. Not gossip questions. Not royal questions. Business questions. Questions about pivots, imposter syndrome, criticism, building a brand, and what Meghan had learned from speaking to other female founders. Meghan had every opportunity to give people a real look at how she approaches business. Instead, we got the familiar stories. The childhood scrunchies. The jam. Faith over fear. The baby mama dance. The media. The noise. Time and again, questions that could have led somewhere interesting circled back to the same themes and the same carefully polished version of Meghan. Emma was trying to have a conversation about business. Meghan seemed far more interested in talking about Meghan. We learned a lot about the story she wants people to believe. We learned very little about the business itself. Most founders can talk for hours about the things that went wrong. Failed launches. Bad decisions. Partnerships that didn’t work out. Customer complaints. Unexpected problems. Expensive mistakes. The lessons that come from getting things wrong. Those are the stories that teach people something. Those are the stories that make people credible. Their absence here was noticeable. The contradictions didn’t help either. Meghan talks a lot about truth, authenticity and correcting false narratives, yet there seems to be very little reflection on her own changing stories over the years. She presents herself as a fearless risk-taker, but As Ever launched with advantages most entrepreneurs could only dream of: global name recognition, celebrity connections, media attention and a royal title. The humble beginnings narrative sits awkwardly beside all of that. The As Ever journey was also a missed opportunity. It could have been a chance to talk honestly about what didn’t work, what had to change, what she misjudged and what she learned along the way. Instead, obstacles mostly appeared as things that happened around her rather than things she might have contributed to or learned from. One answer summed up the entire interview for me. When Emma asked what Meghan had learned from the female founders she’d interviewed on her own podcast, I expected something specific. After all those conversations with successful women, surely there would be a lesson that changed her thinking, a mistake she saw repeated over and over, or advice she applied to her own business. Instead, the takeaway seemed to boil down to the idea that building a business is hard and people have regrets. Well… yes. That’s hardly a groundbreaking insight. After an entire season interviewing founders, entrepreneurs and business leaders, that’s the conclusion? Not a lesson that changed the way she operates. Not a mistake she was determined to avoid. Not a piece of advice she applied to As Ever. Just that building a business is difficult and people have regrets. By the end of the interview, the difference between Emma and Meghan couldn’t have been clearer. Emma was talking business. Meghan was talking narrative. The more the conversation went on, the more it felt like Meghan was sidestepping the substance of Emma’s questions and steering everything back to familiar talking points and personal stories. For someone positioning herself as a founder, she spent remarkably little time discussing the realities of building a business. Emma gave Meghan multiple opportunities to move beyond the carefully managed public image and show people how she thinks as a businesswoman. She never really did. What we got instead was another polished chapter in the ongoing Meghan Markle story.

Queen Esther

66,638 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce