Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Megyn Kelly’s Antithetical Turn on Islam: 8-Year Reversal Exposed! "Six months earlier she had delivered “a very good incisive critique” that focused not so much on “Israel versus Islam” but on Islam itself as “rightly suspicious..." Victor Davis Hanson highlighted a dramatic shift in the views of several prominent... conservative voices on Jews and Israel. “If you took tapes of all these people,” he said, “and you look what Candace Owens was saying about Jews in Israel 8 years ago and now or Steve Bannon 8 years ago and now or Tucker Carlson 8 years ago and now,” their positions have changed radically. Hanson singled out Megyn Kelly, whom he likes “a lot,” noting that roughly six months earlier she had delivered “a very good incisive critique” that focused not so much on “Israel versus Islam” but on Islam itself as “rightly suspicious,” spotlighting “the seclusion of women and they couldn’t express themselves and the lack of free expression and rigidity.” Hanson observed that her current remarks stand “almost antithetical” to those earlier statements. He questioned what has driven “this radical change” and why there is “no push back.” Recalling the Iraq War era, Hanson remembered accusations that “the neocons planned it,” pointing to figures like Bill Kristol “in his glory days” and Richard Perle. While at the Naval Academy when the war broke out and supporting it, he was frequently asked if he was Jewish. “I said, ‘No, why?’” he recounted. “‘Well, the Jews support this.’ And I said, ‘Actually, Israel doesn’t.’” Hanson added that Israel had wanted the U.S. to stay out of Iraq and focus on Iran instead, “which might have been wiser, by the way.” Hanson warned that such sentiments have now become mainstreamed and are gaining momentum. Criticism has evolved into a “continuum” where it is acceptable to “damn” not only Israel but Jews, often masked by qualifiers such as “Well, I’m not against Jews. I’m just against Israel. I’m not against Israel. I’m just against Netanyahu.” Hanson found the surge in antisemitism on the left especially strange in the age of DEI. Hanson attributed it to “a combination of three factors that have coalesced in a synergy,” with DEI; Obama’s creation, serving as a key driver. It moved beyond the traditional Black-white historical problem of slavery and Jim Crow to a broader framework requiring, in his words, “a DNA test to verify this crackpot theory.” Under DEI logic, “67% of the country is white. Therefore they’re oppressors and they’re victimizers and the others are victims,” regardless of wealth, class, or actual circumstances. “It doesn’t matter,” he said. “You’re they are victims by the color of their skin… even if they’re whiter than the people on the other side by their ethnicity or the religion.”show more

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

38,767 subscribers

82,954 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

VDH Pointing At Megyn Kelly Morphing Into A Zombie: “They’ve Lost Their Minds” “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead... you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn." Victor Davis Hanson, the historian and national speaker, addressed the evolving landscape of American attitudes toward Israel and antisemitism in a recent in today's episode of the Victor Davis Hanson In His Own Words, highlighting what he described as a troubling shift across the political spectrum. Hanson argued that while the Democratic Party and elements of the cultural left had long embraced antisemitic tendencies, certain voices on the right were now joining in, leaving staunch support for Israel primarily in the hands of former President Donald Trump and the MAGA base. Hanson traced the roots of the problem to the political left, noting that during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and further intensified by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, “they became anti-semitic.” In contrast, he emphasized, “It was the Republican party that stood up for Israel.”He expressed particular disappointment with figures once aligned with conservative or Republican circles who have recently voiced skepticism toward Israel. Citing Megyn Kelly as an example, Hanson recounted her public reflection: “I think I’ve been mistaken. And I might have been affected too much by people who were pro-Israel. And now I think we’ve been a little bit too hard on Islam and Netanyahu did this and Netanyahu did this.” Hanson grouped her alongside others including Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson. Of Carlson, Hanson observed that the podcaster is “very informed” and “very bright,” yet still questions strong support for Israel despite knowing key historical threats. “He knows that Roth and Johnny said that Israel was a one bomb state. One bomb could kill all the Jews. He knows what Akmanagen Akminad [Ahmadinejad] said he wanted to wipe,” Hanson stated, adding pointedly, “Why would he say it would be helpful if Iran had a bomb?” Hanson noted the absence of forceful pushback within conservative circles. “There’s no party that says, ‘How dare you?’ They’re both in on it, their bases,” he said, referring to growing tolerance for anti-Israel rhetoric on both sides. Hanson contrasted this with the unexpected defenders of Jewish communities amid rising campus harassment and demonization: “The only people now in the United States who will stand up and say, ‘No more. We’re not going to let you demonize a whole people and push them around and rough them up on campus and call them all these names’ is who? It’s Donald Trump and the MAGA base, the irredeemables, the clingers. They’re the people who are still supporting Israel. They still support Jews and evangelicals.” Hanson explicitly rejected other factions as reliable allies. “It is not the Democratic Party. It is not the podcaster right base. It is not the DEI people. It is not the bicoastal leftwing elite teachers unions,” Hanson declared. To illustrate the sudden, widespread nature of the shift, he invoked pop-culture metaphors of infection and transformation. “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead that certain people, you know, get infected and now they’re lost and they’re zombies and the other people, you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn,” he said. “Well, now they’re all turning and they’ve lost their minds.”

VDH Pointing At Megyn Kelly Morphing Into A Zombie: “They’ve Lost Their Minds” “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead... you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn." Victor Davis Hanson, the historian and national speaker, addressed the evolving landscape of American attitudes toward Israel and antisemitism in a recent in today's episode of the Victor Davis Hanson In His Own Words, highlighting what he described as a troubling shift across the political spectrum. Hanson argued that while the Democratic Party and elements of the cultural left had long embraced antisemitic tendencies, certain voices on the right were now joining in, leaving staunch support for Israel primarily in the hands of former President Donald Trump and the MAGA base. Hanson traced the roots of the problem to the political left, noting that during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and further intensified by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, “they became anti-semitic.” In contrast, he emphasized, “It was the Republican party that stood up for Israel.”He expressed particular disappointment with figures once aligned with conservative or Republican circles who have recently voiced skepticism toward Israel. Citing Megyn Kelly as an example, Hanson recounted her public reflection: “I think I’ve been mistaken. And I might have been affected too much by people who were pro-Israel. And now I think we’ve been a little bit too hard on Islam and Netanyahu did this and Netanyahu did this.” Hanson grouped her alongside others including Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson. Of Carlson, Hanson observed that the podcaster is “very informed” and “very bright,” yet still questions strong support for Israel despite knowing key historical threats. “He knows that Roth and Johnny said that Israel was a one bomb state. One bomb could kill all the Jews. He knows what Akmanagen Akminad [Ahmadinejad] said he wanted to wipe,” Hanson stated, adding pointedly, “Why would he say it would be helpful if Iran had a bomb?” Hanson noted the absence of forceful pushback within conservative circles. “There’s no party that says, ‘How dare you?’ They’re both in on it, their bases,” he said, referring to growing tolerance for anti-Israel rhetoric on both sides. Hanson contrasted this with the unexpected defenders of Jewish communities amid rising campus harassment and demonization: “The only people now in the United States who will stand up and say, ‘No more. We’re not going to let you demonize a whole people and push them around and rough them up on campus and call them all these names’ is who? It’s Donald Trump and the MAGA base, the irredeemables, the clingers. They’re the people who are still supporting Israel. They still support Jews and evangelicals.” Hanson explicitly rejected other factions as reliable allies. “It is not the Democratic Party. It is not the podcaster right base. It is not the DEI people. It is not the bicoastal leftwing elite teachers unions,” Hanson declared. To illustrate the sudden, widespread nature of the shift, he invoked pop-culture metaphors of infection and transformation. “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead that certain people, you know, get infected and now they’re lost and they’re zombies and the other people, you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn,” he said. “Well, now they’re all turning and they’ve lost their minds.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

89,759 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Victor Davis Hanson on Megyn Kelly’s Sudden Anti-Israel Transformation! The audacity of Kelly to pretend she is the protector of Erka Kirk is just farcical on its face. Kelly does not have "the human inside" she claims to posses. Megyn Kelly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language Pastor Holthaus noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler." Pastor Brandon Holthaus, who leads a prophetic teaching ministry focused on exposing the truth of Bible prophecy, recently interviewed historian and commentator Victor Davis Hanson. Holthaus opened the conversation by expressing his belief that God has raised Hanson up as a voice of reason during these times, noting that Hanson is one of the few prominent figures who has not “went crazy.” Hanson shared his personal knowledge of several well-known conservative voices and his shock at their apparent transformation. He stated that he knew Tucker Carlson very well, having appeared on his show every Monday night and known him for 20 years. He expressed disbelief at what Carlson has become. Hanson also recounted meeting Megyn Kelly in Bakersfield after she called and asked him to appear on her show for no compensation. He described her at the time as “normal.” He further noted having dinner with Candace Owens and her husband, meeting Steve Bannon for dinner at LAX, and encountering Marjorie Taylor Greene when she was a “fanatic Trump supporter.” Holthaus voiced his bewilderment at the antisemitism and hostility toward Israel now displayed by these figures, saying he was “dumbfounded by it.” Victor Davis Hanson agreed and offered an explanation for the changes. He stated, “I think part of the problem was they all got very close to Trump. Very close. They were riding on Air Force One. They were in Mar-a-Lago every weekend. They had they called him up all the time and they felt they were important people. And so when he went in to get rid of the Iranian nuclear thing, they didn’t like it.” Hanson continued: “So they said, ‘How dare you do this? You got to listen to me.’ And he said, ‘I’m not going to listen to you.’ And they got very angry. They said, ‘We’re important people. We have the president’s ear. We tell them what to do.’ And they never realized that a thousand people say that and they’re not that important. And they got very, very angry. It was all about their ego and now it’s about clicks and things that the more outrageous they sound most of them have huge audiences from the Middle East and from Europe because of the antisemitism and pro-Muslim stuff.” Hanson then focused specifically on Megyn Kelly. He recalled appearing on her show regularly, including after the June bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. At that time, he said, Kelly gave “a very eloquent explanation of why this was not contrary to MAGA doctrine, why you had to stop these lunatics from getting the bomb and why we had to protect our allies like Israel.” Holthaus contrasted that earlier stance with Kelly’s later appearance on the Shawn Ryan show, where she reportedly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language he noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler. He observed that such tropes about Israel being “a cancer” are being repeated. While taking the matter very seriously, Hanson said he does not view the radical shift as fully authentic. He pointed out that he had been on her show every three weeks and found the change “too quick, it’s too quick and too sudden.” Hanson further highlighted the contrast by referencing one of Kelly’s earlier speeches, which he described as “one of the most vivid candid criticisms of Islam I’ve ever heard,” and juxtaposed it against her more recent comments.

Victor Davis Hanson on Megyn Kelly’s Sudden Anti-Israel Transformation! The audacity of Kelly to pretend she is the protector of Erka Kirk is just farcical on its face. Kelly does not have "the human inside" she claims to posses. Megyn Kelly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language Pastor Holthaus noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler." Pastor Brandon Holthaus, who leads a prophetic teaching ministry focused on exposing the truth of Bible prophecy, recently interviewed historian and commentator Victor Davis Hanson. Holthaus opened the conversation by expressing his belief that God has raised Hanson up as a voice of reason during these times, noting that Hanson is one of the few prominent figures who has not “went crazy.” Hanson shared his personal knowledge of several well-known conservative voices and his shock at their apparent transformation. He stated that he knew Tucker Carlson very well, having appeared on his show every Monday night and known him for 20 years. He expressed disbelief at what Carlson has become. Hanson also recounted meeting Megyn Kelly in Bakersfield after she called and asked him to appear on her show for no compensation. He described her at the time as “normal.” He further noted having dinner with Candace Owens and her husband, meeting Steve Bannon for dinner at LAX, and encountering Marjorie Taylor Greene when she was a “fanatic Trump supporter.” Holthaus voiced his bewilderment at the antisemitism and hostility toward Israel now displayed by these figures, saying he was “dumbfounded by it.” Victor Davis Hanson agreed and offered an explanation for the changes. He stated, “I think part of the problem was they all got very close to Trump. Very close. They were riding on Air Force One. They were in Mar-a-Lago every weekend. They had they called him up all the time and they felt they were important people. And so when he went in to get rid of the Iranian nuclear thing, they didn’t like it.” Hanson continued: “So they said, ‘How dare you do this? You got to listen to me.’ And he said, ‘I’m not going to listen to you.’ And they got very angry. They said, ‘We’re important people. We have the president’s ear. We tell them what to do.’ And they never realized that a thousand people say that and they’re not that important. And they got very, very angry. It was all about their ego and now it’s about clicks and things that the more outrageous they sound most of them have huge audiences from the Middle East and from Europe because of the antisemitism and pro-Muslim stuff.” Hanson then focused specifically on Megyn Kelly. He recalled appearing on her show regularly, including after the June bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. At that time, he said, Kelly gave “a very eloquent explanation of why this was not contrary to MAGA doctrine, why you had to stop these lunatics from getting the bomb and why we had to protect our allies like Israel.” Holthaus contrasted that earlier stance with Kelly’s later appearance on the Shawn Ryan show, where she reportedly said “Israel’s a cancer”—language he noted is exactly the same verbiage used by Hitler. He observed that such tropes about Israel being “a cancer” are being repeated. While taking the matter very seriously, Hanson said he does not view the radical shift as fully authentic. He pointed out that he had been on her show every three weeks and found the change “too quick, it’s too quick and too sudden.” Hanson further highlighted the contrast by referencing one of Kelly’s earlier speeches, which he described as “one of the most vivid candid criticisms of Islam I’ve ever heard,” and juxtaposed it against her more recent comments.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

39,185 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Calibrating Antisemitism: Victor Davis Hanson on Tucker Carlson and the New Right! “That’s how I calibrate antisemitism, not by criticism per se of Israel, but criticism ad nauseam of Israel when the same supposed sin applies to other states and they don’t say a word.” ~ Victor Davis Hanson In a recent appearance on The Sean Spicer Show, historian Victor Davis Hanson expressed deep unease about the rising tolerance for overt antisemitism within certain conservative circles, reserving his sharpest criticism for commentator Tucker Carlson and white nationalist Nick Fuentes. Hanson recounted being “horrified” by Fuentes’s unfiltered remarks, particularly on Carlson’s program, where Fuentes attacked JD Vance’s Indian-American wife, claimed Jews “like violence” and that “as long as they think when you rape them you’re not completely serious,” and issued veiled threats that Jews must “stop this or we’re going to get you… you got to get out of this country.” Hanson described the monologue as unlike anything he had ever heard in mainstream conservative discourse. Hanson, who appeared every Monday night on Carlson’s Fox show for seven years and says he owes Carlson “a great debt of gratitude,” nevertheless asked aloud what has changed. He pointed to a pattern: Carlson aggressively ambushed pro-Israel guests such as Senator Ted Cruz in what Hanson called an unfair “ambush” interview, yet gave entirely uncritical platforms to Fuentes, Candace Owens, and Darryl Cooper, all of whom have trafficked in anti-Jewish tropes. “He tried to destroy Ted Cruz,” Hanson noted, “in a way that he tried to empower Nick Fuentes by not using any cross-examination at all,” Hanson stated. The historian argued that Carlson appears sincerely convinced that “the Jewish community has inordinate influence over U.S. foreign policy” and that Israel is “not really an ally,” a fixation that stands in stark contrast to Carlson’s relative silence on American troop commitments in Europe, South Korea, and Japan. Hanson offered a broader metric for identifying antisemitism on the right: “That’s how I calibrate antisemitism, not by criticism per se of Israel, but criticism ad nauseam of Israel when the same supposed sin applies to other states and they don’t say a word.” He cited Turkey’s decades-long occupation of northern Cyprus, Azerbaijan’s recent ethnic cleansing of 100,000 Armenians, and the expulsion of millions of Christians from Middle Eastern countries as examples that provoke no comparable outrage from the same voices. For Hanson, the selective, obsessive focus on Israel and Jews, combined with the mainstreaming of figures like Nick Fuentes, marks a troubling new tolerance for antisemitic rhetoric on the American right.

Calibrating Antisemitism: Victor Davis Hanson on Tucker Carlson and the New Right! “That’s how I calibrate antisemitism, not by criticism per se of Israel, but criticism ad nauseam of Israel when the same supposed sin applies to other states and they don’t say a word.” ~ Victor Davis Hanson In a recent appearance on The Sean Spicer Show, historian Victor Davis Hanson expressed deep unease about the rising tolerance for overt antisemitism within certain conservative circles, reserving his sharpest criticism for commentator Tucker Carlson and white nationalist Nick Fuentes. Hanson recounted being “horrified” by Fuentes’s unfiltered remarks, particularly on Carlson’s program, where Fuentes attacked JD Vance’s Indian-American wife, claimed Jews “like violence” and that “as long as they think when you rape them you’re not completely serious,” and issued veiled threats that Jews must “stop this or we’re going to get you… you got to get out of this country.” Hanson described the monologue as unlike anything he had ever heard in mainstream conservative discourse. Hanson, who appeared every Monday night on Carlson’s Fox show for seven years and says he owes Carlson “a great debt of gratitude,” nevertheless asked aloud what has changed. He pointed to a pattern: Carlson aggressively ambushed pro-Israel guests such as Senator Ted Cruz in what Hanson called an unfair “ambush” interview, yet gave entirely uncritical platforms to Fuentes, Candace Owens, and Darryl Cooper, all of whom have trafficked in anti-Jewish tropes. “He tried to destroy Ted Cruz,” Hanson noted, “in a way that he tried to empower Nick Fuentes by not using any cross-examination at all,” Hanson stated. The historian argued that Carlson appears sincerely convinced that “the Jewish community has inordinate influence over U.S. foreign policy” and that Israel is “not really an ally,” a fixation that stands in stark contrast to Carlson’s relative silence on American troop commitments in Europe, South Korea, and Japan. Hanson offered a broader metric for identifying antisemitism on the right: “That’s how I calibrate antisemitism, not by criticism per se of Israel, but criticism ad nauseam of Israel when the same supposed sin applies to other states and they don’t say a word.” He cited Turkey’s decades-long occupation of northern Cyprus, Azerbaijan’s recent ethnic cleansing of 100,000 Armenians, and the expulsion of millions of Christians from Middle Eastern countries as examples that provoke no comparable outrage from the same voices. For Hanson, the selective, obsessive focus on Israel and Jews, combined with the mainstreaming of figures like Nick Fuentes, marks a troubling new tolerance for antisemitic rhetoric on the American right.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

44,845 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.Victor Davis Hanson says that Megyn Kelly was very supportive of Israel when he was on her show after October 7th and the first Iran strike. He attributes her flip on Israel not to a material change in the conflict but to a shift in world opinion. “What changed was not the actual realities but world opinion and the propaganda of all the rubble in Gaza…and none of the reasons of the causation for it…” He went on to say that it became “cool” for the left and center to blame Netanyahu & paint Trump as a stooge. Megyn appears to be following the crowd.

.Victor Davis Hanson says that Megyn Kelly was very supportive of Israel when he was on her show after October 7th and the first Iran strike. He attributes her flip on Israel not to a material change in the conflict but to a shift in world opinion. “What changed was not the actual realities but world opinion and the propaganda of all the rubble in Gaza…and none of the reasons of the causation for it…” He went on to say that it became “cool” for the left and center to blame Netanyahu & paint Trump as a stooge. Megyn appears to be following the crowd.

Jackie Chea ⚖️

98,707 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

381,726 просмотров • 1 год назад

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

38,263 просмотров • 1 год назад

VDH Stunned: "Never Seen Anything Like This” Megyn Kelly Claims Manipulated! "Her first {Kelly}… excursus on it was very empirical. She said it right last summer... She was confident when she said that because she was looking at the evidence.” ~ Victor Davis Hanson Victor Davis Hanson observed that public figures such as Pete Buttigieg, Megyn Kelly, and others like them had dismissed Israel in ways he had never seen before. Hanson declared that he had never witnessed anything quite like the current discourse surrounding the issue. Hanson pointed to his friend Megyn Kelly’s recent passionate interview, which had gone viral after viewers juxtaposed clips of it with her appearance on his program the previous summer. At that time, Kelly had been adamant about the necessity of military action to neutralize the nuclear threat and had offered strong arguments about Islam. Hanson reviewed the long history of attacks on American targets across five or six presidential administrations, citing the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the Beirut embassy and Marine barracks assaults, the deployment of shape charges against U.S. forces, the underwear (or “panty”) bomber attempt, the Fort Hood shooting, the San Bernardino attack, the Orlando nightclub massacre, the September 11 attacks, and the bombing of the USS Cole. In every case, Hanson emphasized, the perpetrators were not Jewish terrorists but Islamic extremists. He rejected as “crazy” the suggestion, attributed to Tucker Carlson, that Israel posed a greater threat to the United States than either China or the Islamic world. Hanson expressed sharp disappointment in Kelly’s later claim that she had been manipulated by pro-Israel voices in the United States, calling the assertion pathetic for someone as intelligent as she is. The evidence, Hanson argued, had always been clear and publicly available. Her original position the previous summer had been confident and firmly empirical; she had not been misled but had drawn conclusions based squarely on the facts.

VDH Stunned: "Never Seen Anything Like This” Megyn Kelly Claims Manipulated! "Her first {Kelly}… excursus on it was very empirical. She said it right last summer... She was confident when she said that because she was looking at the evidence.” ~ Victor Davis Hanson Victor Davis Hanson observed that public figures such as Pete Buttigieg, Megyn Kelly, and others like them had dismissed Israel in ways he had never seen before. Hanson declared that he had never witnessed anything quite like the current discourse surrounding the issue. Hanson pointed to his friend Megyn Kelly’s recent passionate interview, which had gone viral after viewers juxtaposed clips of it with her appearance on his program the previous summer. At that time, Kelly had been adamant about the necessity of military action to neutralize the nuclear threat and had offered strong arguments about Islam. Hanson reviewed the long history of attacks on American targets across five or six presidential administrations, citing the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the Beirut embassy and Marine barracks assaults, the deployment of shape charges against U.S. forces, the underwear (or “panty”) bomber attempt, the Fort Hood shooting, the San Bernardino attack, the Orlando nightclub massacre, the September 11 attacks, and the bombing of the USS Cole. In every case, Hanson emphasized, the perpetrators were not Jewish terrorists but Islamic extremists. He rejected as “crazy” the suggestion, attributed to Tucker Carlson, that Israel posed a greater threat to the United States than either China or the Islamic world. Hanson expressed sharp disappointment in Kelly’s later claim that she had been manipulated by pro-Israel voices in the United States, calling the assertion pathetic for someone as intelligent as she is. The evidence, Hanson argued, had always been clear and publicly available. Her original position the previous summer had been confident and firmly empirical; she had not been misled but had drawn conclusions based squarely on the facts.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

177,095 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Then came a move that few presidents would touch. This was a mini revolution. Instead of dancing around the DEI issue, Trump simply walked in and ended it. Hanson called it “the third rail”—the issue no one dares confront. But Trump didn’t hesitate. He pointed to a Supreme Court ruling that declared race-based admissions at Harvard and UNC unconstitutional and used that momentum to wipe DEI from federal agencies and push back against its corporate grip. “The law is on Donald Trump's side,” Hanson said. “The court decisions are on Donald Trump's side.” And the cultural shift has been fast and dramatic. For years, Americans were told to judge people by the color of their skin. Now, Hanson said, “We’re doing exactly the opposite of what Martin Luther King taught us.”

Then came a move that few presidents would touch. This was a mini revolution. Instead of dancing around the DEI issue, Trump simply walked in and ended it. Hanson called it “the third rail”—the issue no one dares confront. But Trump didn’t hesitate. He pointed to a Supreme Court ruling that declared race-based admissions at Harvard and UNC unconstitutional and used that momentum to wipe DEI from federal agencies and push back against its corporate grip. “The law is on Donald Trump's side,” Hanson said. “The court decisions are on Donald Trump's side.” And the cultural shift has been fast and dramatic. For years, Americans were told to judge people by the color of their skin. Now, Hanson said, “We’re doing exactly the opposite of what Martin Luther King taught us.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

407,898 просмотров • 1 год назад

Victor Davis Hanson: I Hate to Say It, but If You’re Jewish, Mamdani Hates You “I hate to say this, but all people who are Jewish American in New York City, if you're on the Left, [Mamdani] hates you because he is an anti-Semitic racist. “And he hates you if you're not Jewish and you're in favor of Israel as a traditional home for the Jewish people. And he doesn't care anymore,” Victor Davis Hanson argues on this week’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words,” following recent comments from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani where he called AIPAC “ monsters.” Full episode: Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson: I Hate to Say It, but If You’re Jewish, Mamdani Hates You “I hate to say this, but all people who are Jewish American in New York City, if you're on the Left, [Mamdani] hates you because he is an anti-Semitic racist. “And he hates you if you're not Jewish and you're in favor of Israel as a traditional home for the Jewish people. And he doesn't care anymore,” Victor Davis Hanson argues on this week’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words,” following recent comments from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani where he called AIPAC “ monsters.” Full episode: Victor Davis Hanson

The Daily Signal

46,689 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Victor Davis Hanson: Stop Trying to Get Around Graham Platner’s Totenkopf Tattoo “Rather than respond to what the guy's positions are, they've just called him a Nazi for the last month because he had a tattoo that was not a swastika, but apparently was connected to the German military at some point. It's not even clear he knew that. But they've attacked the guy in his personal life. It's like they don't like him because he's not sufficiently supportive of Israel,” Tucker Carlson said of Democrat Maine Senate Candidate Graham Platner on a recent podcast interview. When Tucker says “allegedly,” that's simply not true, Tucker. It's not allegedly. It was tied directly. That particular version of a death's head is tied particularly with SS groups that slaughtered people both in the Holocaust and prisoners of war. And Graham Platner knew that, and he put it on there for a reason, Victor Davis Hanson argues on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson: Stop Trying to Get Around Graham Platner’s Totenkopf Tattoo “Rather than respond to what the guy's positions are, they've just called him a Nazi for the last month because he had a tattoo that was not a swastika, but apparently was connected to the German military at some point. It's not even clear he knew that. But they've attacked the guy in his personal life. It's like they don't like him because he's not sufficiently supportive of Israel,” Tucker Carlson said of Democrat Maine Senate Candidate Graham Platner on a recent podcast interview. When Tucker says “allegedly,” that's simply not true, Tucker. It's not allegedly. It was tied directly. That particular version of a death's head is tied particularly with SS groups that slaughtered people both in the Holocaust and prisoners of war. And Graham Platner knew that, and he put it on there for a reason, Victor Davis Hanson argues on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” Victor Davis Hanson

The Daily Signal

46,071 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Let’s just get this straight. Anti-Zionism is antisemitism. Antisemitism is not just racism or hatred. It’s a shape-shifting conspiracy theory. And every few generations it changes into something different. Now people are literally saying, oh, we’ll just get rid of Israel and everything will be fine. It shifts into something different, in which takes everything bad that was said about the Jews, everything that you attributed to the Jews as the worst thing in history, instead of on the Jews, onto Israel. And they attribute the same bloodthirstiness, the same untrustworthiness, the same desire to control and power. Literally take the word Jew and swap it with IDF. They’re standing on the footsteps of colleges in America and they are rehashing. They think they have this new, they found this new cause and unbeknown to them, first of all, they’re rehashing antisemitic tropes from like the 1500s, right? And that obsession that they aren’t even aware of is what allowed for October 7th and October 8th to happen. And that is something that we need to be very careful about, because they’re after taking Israel down. And that would be if they will succeed, and they won’t. But they’re after that. And that is the possible new Holocaust. That would be the calamity of the Jewish people of our generation. And it’s masked as this like, I’m not antisemitic, I’m just an anti-Zionist. No. Antisemitism in a new face. We have to be very careful of it.

Let’s just get this straight. Anti-Zionism is antisemitism. Antisemitism is not just racism or hatred. It’s a shape-shifting conspiracy theory. And every few generations it changes into something different. Now people are literally saying, oh, we’ll just get rid of Israel and everything will be fine. It shifts into something different, in which takes everything bad that was said about the Jews, everything that you attributed to the Jews as the worst thing in history, instead of on the Jews, onto Israel. And they attribute the same bloodthirstiness, the same untrustworthiness, the same desire to control and power. Literally take the word Jew and swap it with IDF. They’re standing on the footsteps of colleges in America and they are rehashing. They think they have this new, they found this new cause and unbeknown to them, first of all, they’re rehashing antisemitic tropes from like the 1500s, right? And that obsession that they aren’t even aware of is what allowed for October 7th and October 8th to happen. And that is something that we need to be very careful about, because they’re after taking Israel down. And that would be if they will succeed, and they won’t. But they’re after that. And that is the possible new Holocaust. That would be the calamity of the Jewish people of our generation. And it’s masked as this like, I’m not antisemitic, I’m just an anti-Zionist. No. Antisemitism in a new face. We have to be very careful of it.

Noa Tishby

309,614 просмотров • 1 год назад

Disastrous JD Vance Israel Press Conference – VDH Breaks It Down! The more Vance criticized Israel during the conference, the more animated he became saying "I want to warn you… I’m sending a message.” Historian Victor Davis Hanson sharply critiqued Vice President JD Vance’s recent press conference remarks on Israel, suggesting Vance may have exceeded his mandate. “I don’t think that he was authorized to say the things he did to such an extent,” Hanson stated. He observed that the more Vance criticized Israel during the conference, the more animated he became, warning, “there are people there and I want to warn you that two-thirds of your defense comes from us and I want to warn you… I’m sending a message.” Hanson added that he was unsure whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had made similar comments and urged caution, noting one must “be very careful.”Hanson described Vance’s approach as the typical vice-presidential role of “punching back at the president’s critics” and acting as a “non-supplicant,” contrasting it with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy’s direct criticism during his White House visit. While puzzled by the tone, Hanson stressed the broader strategic stakes: “It’s in our interest to get rid of the bomb. Because once they destroy Israel, they’re going to try to threaten us and Europe with nuclear weapons.” Hanson credited Israel with making the U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities last June possible by destroying air-defense systems, stating, “We would have never been able to bomb last June the nuclear facilities had there been air defenses.” Hanson contrasted this with European allies who offered no help and instead blocked access, noting that leaders including Meloni, Macron, Starmer, and “the nut in Spain” told the U.S., “You can’t use our bases.”

Disastrous JD Vance Israel Press Conference – VDH Breaks It Down! The more Vance criticized Israel during the conference, the more animated he became saying "I want to warn you… I’m sending a message.” Historian Victor Davis Hanson sharply critiqued Vice President JD Vance’s recent press conference remarks on Israel, suggesting Vance may have exceeded his mandate. “I don’t think that he was authorized to say the things he did to such an extent,” Hanson stated. He observed that the more Vance criticized Israel during the conference, the more animated he became, warning, “there are people there and I want to warn you that two-thirds of your defense comes from us and I want to warn you… I’m sending a message.” Hanson added that he was unsure whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had made similar comments and urged caution, noting one must “be very careful.”Hanson described Vance’s approach as the typical vice-presidential role of “punching back at the president’s critics” and acting as a “non-supplicant,” contrasting it with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy’s direct criticism during his White House visit. While puzzled by the tone, Hanson stressed the broader strategic stakes: “It’s in our interest to get rid of the bomb. Because once they destroy Israel, they’re going to try to threaten us and Europe with nuclear weapons.” Hanson credited Israel with making the U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities last June possible by destroying air-defense systems, stating, “We would have never been able to bomb last June the nuclear facilities had there been air defenses.” Hanson contrasted this with European allies who offered no help and instead blocked access, noting that leaders including Meloni, Macron, Starmer, and “the nut in Spain” told the U.S., “You can’t use our bases.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

104,600 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I have a story to tell you about how one person altered the course of history without even knowing it. Stay with me for a minute. In 1977, when Menachem Begin was elected Prime Minister of Israel, John Hagee was a young man in Texas. His pastor said, “We’ve got five tickets to go to Israel. Who wants to go?” He raised his hand and he went to Israel. He was there for a week, had an amazing time. The last day, they go to the Kotel, and he’s praying at the Kotel, and something told him to turn to the right, and there was a very elderly gentleman, Jewish, with a kippah, in a wheelchair, eyes closed, crying and praying fervently. And he said that something told him to speak to this man. Now, the man spoke halting English. Hagee spoke no Hebrew. Somehow they spoke for 5-10 minutes. I said, “Pastor, what did you talk about?” He said, “I have no idea. But based on those five or 10 minutes, I knew that I had to change the entire trajectory of my life and devote it entirely to saving and protecting the Jewish state and the Jewish people.” And that's what he has done every single day since. This elderly man, of course, would never know the impact that his decision to go to the Kotel that day would have on the future trajectory of the Jewish people or the Jewish state. But that man he was speaking to—Pastor John Hagee—now sits in the Oval Office and meets one-on-one about Israel with the President of the United States. Pastor Hagee recently announced that Christians United for Israel has surpassed 10 million members. For those of you keeping score at home, that’s more people than there are in the entire state of Israel—Muslim, Christian, and Jew. That’s almost twice as many Jews as there are in the entire United States. That's more Jews than exist in the entire diaspora in the world outside of Israel. Any person has it within his or her grasp to change the world. You need only believe it and speak up everywhere and anywhere that you can.

I have a story to tell you about how one person altered the course of history without even knowing it. Stay with me for a minute. In 1977, when Menachem Begin was elected Prime Minister of Israel, John Hagee was a young man in Texas. His pastor said, “We’ve got five tickets to go to Israel. Who wants to go?” He raised his hand and he went to Israel. He was there for a week, had an amazing time. The last day, they go to the Kotel, and he’s praying at the Kotel, and something told him to turn to the right, and there was a very elderly gentleman, Jewish, with a kippah, in a wheelchair, eyes closed, crying and praying fervently. And he said that something told him to speak to this man. Now, the man spoke halting English. Hagee spoke no Hebrew. Somehow they spoke for 5-10 minutes. I said, “Pastor, what did you talk about?” He said, “I have no idea. But based on those five or 10 minutes, I knew that I had to change the entire trajectory of my life and devote it entirely to saving and protecting the Jewish state and the Jewish people.” And that's what he has done every single day since. This elderly man, of course, would never know the impact that his decision to go to the Kotel that day would have on the future trajectory of the Jewish people or the Jewish state. But that man he was speaking to—Pastor John Hagee—now sits in the Oval Office and meets one-on-one about Israel with the President of the United States. Pastor Hagee recently announced that Christians United for Israel has surpassed 10 million members. For those of you keeping score at home, that’s more people than there are in the entire state of Israel—Muslim, Christian, and Jew. That’s almost twice as many Jews as there are in the entire United States. That's more Jews than exist in the entire diaspora in the world outside of Israel. Any person has it within his or her grasp to change the world. You need only believe it and speak up everywhere and anywhere that you can.

Roy K. Altman

20,526 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Jonny Ardavanis on Isaiah 53 and what it has to do with God’s preservation of the Jewish people: “But I want you to notice as we turn to Isaiah 53 that all of these verbs are in the past tense. It does not say He will be pierced through for our transgressions. He will be crushed. It says what? ‘He was.’ Every verb starting in verse 1 all the way through verse 11 in the past tense, meaning that this is prophetic, and yet, it is written in such a way as if it had already happened. Why? Well, because this is the mournful confession of the Jews in the future. I’ve been getting asked a lot about Israel and the Jews lately, and I’ll discuss this more in the future, maybe do a little series, but there is a reason why you’ve never met a Jebusite, an Edomite, an Amorite, a Hittite, a Perizzite, or a Philistine. They are not and were not preserved by God, but one day, Zechariah 12:10 says that they will look on Me whom they have pierced, and they will mourn as for an only son. There isn’t a singular personal pronoun in the chapter. It’s all a collective statement. It’s in the future. The Jews are going to recognize their hard heart, their rebellion, and their rejection of their Messiah. But this text not only applies to the Jews. It applies to all of us as well.”

Jonny Ardavanis on Isaiah 53 and what it has to do with God’s preservation of the Jewish people: “But I want you to notice as we turn to Isaiah 53 that all of these verbs are in the past tense. It does not say He will be pierced through for our transgressions. He will be crushed. It says what? ‘He was.’ Every verb starting in verse 1 all the way through verse 11 in the past tense, meaning that this is prophetic, and yet, it is written in such a way as if it had already happened. Why? Well, because this is the mournful confession of the Jews in the future. I’ve been getting asked a lot about Israel and the Jews lately, and I’ll discuss this more in the future, maybe do a little series, but there is a reason why you’ve never met a Jebusite, an Edomite, an Amorite, a Hittite, a Perizzite, or a Philistine. They are not and were not preserved by God, but one day, Zechariah 12:10 says that they will look on Me whom they have pierced, and they will mourn as for an only son. There isn’t a singular personal pronoun in the chapter. It’s all a collective statement. It’s in the future. The Jews are going to recognize their hard heart, their rebellion, and their rejection of their Messiah. But this text not only applies to the Jews. It applies to all of us as well.”

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

40,260 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Dick Carlson, Tucker's dad, loved Israel. I should know. I was with him in Israel for 10 straight days. Every bus ride, every tour, every meal. At Yad Vashem, I'll never forget what he said: "Thank God the Jews have Israel." Dick Carlson knew that Jews have faced unique threats throughout history, and that Israel was necessary to protect Jews everywhere. I know that because he told me that. Not long after we returned from Israel, I started working for FDD, where he was already. We would have lunch every month or two for years. I can say without reservation that when it comes to Israel and the Jews, Tucker Carlson is no Dick Carlson. Dick Carlson supported Israel. Dick Carlson hated Hamas. Dick Carlson called "Radical Islam" an "enemy of the United States and of the West." Dick Carlson didn't question the patriotism of Jews who supported Israel. Dick Carlson didn't hate Christians who supported Israel, not least because he was one of them. Dick Carlson didn't insist that Jews needed to take DNA tests to prove that they're actually Jews. Dick Carlson never slandered "Zionists" by saying that they "don't care about America" or accused them of having "not much of a soul." Dick Carlson, in fact, rarely used the word "Zionist," even though he worked with many of them. And, of course, he was a Zionist himself. How did Dick Carlson describe the Jewish state? "Israel is a country under siege. And it's a democracy in a part of the world where there are no democracies." If you're looking for a north star to help you understand Israel and the Muslim world, you could do a lot worse than the late, great Dick Carlson. Like, for instance, his son Tucker.

Dick Carlson, Tucker's dad, loved Israel. I should know. I was with him in Israel for 10 straight days. Every bus ride, every tour, every meal. At Yad Vashem, I'll never forget what he said: "Thank God the Jews have Israel." Dick Carlson knew that Jews have faced unique threats throughout history, and that Israel was necessary to protect Jews everywhere. I know that because he told me that. Not long after we returned from Israel, I started working for FDD, where he was already. We would have lunch every month or two for years. I can say without reservation that when it comes to Israel and the Jews, Tucker Carlson is no Dick Carlson. Dick Carlson supported Israel. Dick Carlson hated Hamas. Dick Carlson called "Radical Islam" an "enemy of the United States and of the West." Dick Carlson didn't question the patriotism of Jews who supported Israel. Dick Carlson didn't hate Christians who supported Israel, not least because he was one of them. Dick Carlson didn't insist that Jews needed to take DNA tests to prove that they're actually Jews. Dick Carlson never slandered "Zionists" by saying that they "don't care about America" or accused them of having "not much of a soul." Dick Carlson, in fact, rarely used the word "Zionist," even though he worked with many of them. And, of course, he was a Zionist himself. How did Dick Carlson describe the Jewish state? "Israel is a country under siege. And it's a democracy in a part of the world where there are no democracies." If you're looking for a north star to help you understand Israel and the Muslim world, you could do a lot worse than the late, great Dick Carlson. Like, for instance, his son Tucker.

Joel Mowbray

2,218,544 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

You may have seen recently an interview by Tucker Carlson of Mike Huckabee, the ambassador to Israel, where Carlson suggested that all Jews who want to live in Israel should have to take a DNA test in order to be able to live in their ancestral homeland. Even on its own terms, his argument fails, because those tests have actually been conducted on every major Jewish population in the world, and they've compared the Syrian Jews to the Iraqi and Iranian Jews and the Italian and Moroccan Jews and even Ashkenazi Jews from Europe like me. And guess what they have found? Dozens of genetic tests over 30 or 40 years have shown that we Jews are intimately connected with one another genetically, and that all the major Jewish populations of the world descend from one place 2000 years ago, and that place is the Levant, where Israel is today, in the heart of the Middle East.

You may have seen recently an interview by Tucker Carlson of Mike Huckabee, the ambassador to Israel, where Carlson suggested that all Jews who want to live in Israel should have to take a DNA test in order to be able to live in their ancestral homeland. Even on its own terms, his argument fails, because those tests have actually been conducted on every major Jewish population in the world, and they've compared the Syrian Jews to the Iraqi and Iranian Jews and the Italian and Moroccan Jews and even Ashkenazi Jews from Europe like me. And guess what they have found? Dozens of genetic tests over 30 or 40 years have shown that we Jews are intimately connected with one another genetically, and that all the major Jewish populations of the world descend from one place 2000 years ago, and that place is the Levant, where Israel is today, in the heart of the Middle East.

Roy K. Altman

18,785 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

'Larijani was killed after he lost his status as the main candidate for the leadership of the transition period,' — CNN host Amanpour. 'What's even worse for the US and Israel, even analysts on their side are now actually saying that it is Iran that is currently driving the situation. And we don't see any end to it. At least from the American side, it is believed that there is no way out of this situation, because everything is in the hands of the IRGC. Larijani was the Speaker of Parliament for many years, he is very close to the IRGC, was close to the former Supreme Leader. He was considered a preferred figure for the transition period. If they were looking for someone with whom they could agree, then in September last year, that is, about six months ago, he was the main candidate. But then in February this year, that is, about a month ago, he lost this status and became a target, as he took, as expected, a tough stance in response to the actions of the US and Israel after the start of the war. And this again raises the question: what is the plan of Israel and Trump, except to continue the bombings and, as the targets are exhausted, to increasingly approach strikes on civilian objects? And the number of civilian victims continues to grow.' - SK

'Larijani was killed after he lost his status as the main candidate for the leadership of the transition period,' — CNN host Amanpour. 'What's even worse for the US and Israel, even analysts on their side are now actually saying that it is Iran that is currently driving the situation. And we don't see any end to it. At least from the American side, it is believed that there is no way out of this situation, because everything is in the hands of the IRGC. Larijani was the Speaker of Parliament for many years, he is very close to the IRGC, was close to the former Supreme Leader. He was considered a preferred figure for the transition period. If they were looking for someone with whom they could agree, then in September last year, that is, about six months ago, he was the main candidate. But then in February this year, that is, about a month ago, he lost this status and became a target, as he took, as expected, a tough stance in response to the actions of the US and Israel after the start of the war. And this again raises the question: what is the plan of Israel and Trump, except to continue the bombings and, as the targets are exhausted, to increasingly approach strikes on civilian objects? And the number of civilian victims continues to grow.' - SK

Zlatti71

15,270 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

An excellent point by Peter Beinart, especially in light of the despicable attacks on synagogues: "The problem that we have in fighting against people who conflate Israel & Jews & therefore take out there anger against Israel on Jews... is that we are asking them to make a distinction b/w Israel as a state & Jews as a people... but the organized American Jewish community is not making that distinction ourselves ... instead they are saying, 'being a Zionist is inherent in being Jewish' ... ...and so when the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom said a few years ago, 'Zionism leaps from every day of the Siddur,' the Jewish prayer book, again, very strange statement given that we've had prayer books since long before Herzl & Pinsker came around in the late 19th century, then why shouldn't someone write 'Free Palestine' on a Jewish prayer book? ... since you've just said the prayer book is a political pamphlet for the State of Israel." Full interview:

An excellent point by Peter Beinart, especially in light of the despicable attacks on synagogues: "The problem that we have in fighting against people who conflate Israel & Jews & therefore take out there anger against Israel on Jews... is that we are asking them to make a distinction b/w Israel as a state & Jews as a people... but the organized American Jewish community is not making that distinction ourselves ... instead they are saying, 'being a Zionist is inherent in being Jewish' ... ...and so when the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom said a few years ago, 'Zionism leaps from every day of the Siddur,' the Jewish prayer book, again, very strange statement given that we've had prayer books since long before Herzl & Pinsker came around in the late 19th century, then why shouldn't someone write 'Free Palestine' on a Jewish prayer book? ... since you've just said the prayer book is a political pamphlet for the State of Israel." Full interview:

Zachary Foster

86,430 просмотров • 1 год назад

Victor Davis Hanson on Vance, Rubio, and 2028 Ambitions! "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort... around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically." ~ VDH Victor Davis Hanson offered a candid assessment of the future political trajectories of JD Vance and Marco Rubio within the Republican Party. He asserted that it is an "ironclad reality" that JD Vance will not serve as vice president under Donald Trump for four years and then simply pivot to serve another four years under Marco Rubio. "JD Vance is not going to be vice president for four years under Donald Trump and then turn around and say I have four more years under Marco Rubio. It's just not going to happen. I'm sorry," Hanson stated. Instead, he predicted that Vance is positioned to run for president himself, and if he fails to secure the nomination, he would not accept a vice-presidential slot under Rubio. Hanson flipped the scenario, noting that "Rubio can be picked by Vance and he can say you can serve for eight years like George HW Bush and then you can come in." He pointed out that Rubio remains young enough, in his late 50s, to potentially run in his early 60s. Hanson praised both figures highly, describing them as "very good" and effective communicators. "They're both very good with the media. They're both very good on the issues," he said. Hanson then turned to a specific critique of Vance, highlighting what he sees as a shortcoming in how the vice president addressed Holocaust Remembrance Day. Hanson noted that Vance spoke "quite movingly about the tragedy of the Holocaust but he didn't mention the Jewish people." While acknowledging that around a million and a half non-Jews were also killed, Hanson emphasized the unique nature of the Holocaust. He explained that the systematic, ideological effort targeted non-combatant civilians; pulled from every country, ally or enemy of the Third Reich. Creating an industrialized extermination through death camps, German engineering, crematoria, and methods like Zyklon B gas. "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort to take citizens that were not combatants and pull them out of every different country... and then find an industrial way of killing them," Hanson said. Hanson contrasted this with other World War II deaths, such as those among Russians or Chinese, which occurred mostly in combat or as collateral damage from bombing. "Yes, but these were mostly in combat situations or collateral damage through bombing etc.," he noted. In the Holocaust, the majority of the civilian victims, around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically because of their ethnic background, religion, and perceived success in European society. "The majority of them were Jewish people who were selected because of their ethnic background and religion and traditional role in European society as being very successful, competent, good citizens," Hanson concluded. "And that has to be the lesson of the Holocaust."

Victor Davis Hanson on Vance, Rubio, and 2028 Ambitions! "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort... around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically." ~ VDH Victor Davis Hanson offered a candid assessment of the future political trajectories of JD Vance and Marco Rubio within the Republican Party. He asserted that it is an "ironclad reality" that JD Vance will not serve as vice president under Donald Trump for four years and then simply pivot to serve another four years under Marco Rubio. "JD Vance is not going to be vice president for four years under Donald Trump and then turn around and say I have four more years under Marco Rubio. It's just not going to happen. I'm sorry," Hanson stated. Instead, he predicted that Vance is positioned to run for president himself, and if he fails to secure the nomination, he would not accept a vice-presidential slot under Rubio. Hanson flipped the scenario, noting that "Rubio can be picked by Vance and he can say you can serve for eight years like George HW Bush and then you can come in." He pointed out that Rubio remains young enough, in his late 50s, to potentially run in his early 60s. Hanson praised both figures highly, describing them as "very good" and effective communicators. "They're both very good with the media. They're both very good on the issues," he said. Hanson then turned to a specific critique of Vance, highlighting what he sees as a shortcoming in how the vice president addressed Holocaust Remembrance Day. Hanson noted that Vance spoke "quite movingly about the tragedy of the Holocaust but he didn't mention the Jewish people." While acknowledging that around a million and a half non-Jews were also killed, Hanson emphasized the unique nature of the Holocaust. He explained that the systematic, ideological effort targeted non-combatant civilians; pulled from every country, ally or enemy of the Third Reich. Creating an industrialized extermination through death camps, German engineering, crematoria, and methods like Zyklon B gas. "What was unique about the Holocaust was there was a systematic ideological effort to take citizens that were not combatants and pull them out of every different country... and then find an industrial way of killing them," Hanson said. Hanson contrasted this with other World War II deaths, such as those among Russians or Chinese, which occurred mostly in combat or as collateral damage from bombing. "Yes, but these were mostly in combat situations or collateral damage through bombing etc.," he noted. In the Holocaust, the majority of the civilian victims, around 6 million out of roughly 8 million total, were Jewish people, targeted specifically because of their ethnic background, religion, and perceived success in European society. "The majority of them were Jewish people who were selected because of their ethnic background and religion and traditional role in European society as being very successful, competent, good citizens," Hanson concluded. "And that has to be the lesson of the Holocaust."

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

13,844 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Victor Davis Hanson: Iran Tried to Run Out the Clock—Trump Shut It Down Iran’s strategy against Trump was probably trying to “ride it out” and bet on a new presidency such as “AOC,” “Newsom or Harris.” President Trump, on the other hand, had a different strategy: By any means necessary, don’t allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. ”You can't negotiate with them because their whole currency is lying and their fanatic ideologues, and they believe that they have a supernatural view of what's going to happen, and they're on the right side of Cosmic Divinity,” Victor Davis Hanson said on the newest episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.”

Victor Davis Hanson: Iran Tried to Run Out the Clock—Trump Shut It Down Iran’s strategy against Trump was probably trying to “ride it out” and bet on a new presidency such as “AOC,” “Newsom or Harris.” President Trump, on the other hand, had a different strategy: By any means necessary, don’t allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. ”You can't negotiate with them because their whole currency is lying and their fanatic ideologues, and they believe that they have a supernatural view of what's going to happen, and they're on the right side of Cosmic Divinity,” Victor Davis Hanson said on the newest episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.”

A Man Of Memes

42,894 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад